Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2/2015

01.02.2015 | Original article

3’-Deoxy-3’-[18F]-fluorothymidine PET/CT in early determination of prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer

Comparison with [18F]-FDG PET/CT

verfasst von: Haojun Chen, M.D., Yimin Li, M.D., Hua Wu, M.D., Ph.D., Long Sun, M.D., Ph.D., Qin Lin, M.D., Ph.D., Long Zhao, M.D., Hanxiang An, M.D., Ph.D.

Erschienen in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this work was to investigate the prognostic value of response analysis using early 3’-deoxy-3’-[18F]-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) PET/CT in esophageal squamous cancer patients and make a comparison with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT.

Patients and materials

For 34 patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer, both 18F-FLT PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed at baseline (pre), 4 weeks after the start of radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (interim), and 2 weeks after therapy completion (final). SUVmax1, SUVmax2, and SUVmax3 represent SUVmax (SUV: standard uptake values) measured on the pre, interim, and final scans, respectively. GTVFLT-PET and GTVFDG-PET (GTV: gross tumor volume) were measured on the pre and interim scans. ΔSUV/ΔGTV represents the fractional changes of SUVmax/GTV between two different time points. PET parameters were evaluated for correlations with outcome.

Results

Regarding 18F-FLT PET/CT, according to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, parameters for predicting 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and locoregional control (LRC) showed the highest area under curve (AUC) on interim 18F-FLT PET/CT scans (ΔSUV12, AUC of 0.812 for PFS, 0.775 for LRC, with a cutoff of 60 %; P = 0.008), compared with the parameters on pre and final scans. Patients with a ΔSUV12 greater than 60 %, who were defined as interim PET-negative group, were associated with better 2-year PFS and LRC than the interim PET-positive group (PFS: 70.6 % vs. 35.2 %, P = 0.025; LRC: 84.2 % vs 52.9, P = 0.046). In terms of 18F-FDG PET/CT, ΔSUV13 on the final 18F-FDG PET/CT scan demonstrated better prediction (AUC of 0.812 for PFS, 0.807 for LRC, with a cutoff of 75 %; P = 0.016) than the parameters on pre and interim scans. An SUVmax decrease ≥ 75 % on the final 18F-FDG PET/CT scan was associated with better clinical outcome (PFS: 73.3 % vs. 36.8 %, P = 0.022; LRC: 86.7 % vs 52.6, P = 0.029). These correlations were most prominent in the subgroup of patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Conclusion

Early interim 18F-FLT PET/CT is a significant predictor of 2-year PFS and LRC, which is correlated better with early responses and late outcomes than interim 18F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal squamous cancer patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF (2006) Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol 24:2137–2150PubMedCrossRef Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF (2006) Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol 24:2137–2150PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Semrau R, Herzog SL, Vallbohmer D et al (2012) Radiotherapy in elderly patients with inoperable esophageal cancer. Is there a benefit? Strahlenther Onkol 188:226–232PubMedCrossRef Semrau R, Herzog SL, Vallbohmer D et al (2012) Radiotherapy in elderly patients with inoperable esophageal cancer. Is there a benefit? Strahlenther Onkol 188:226–232PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Westerterp M, van Westreenen HL, Reitsma JB et al (2005) Esophageal cancer: CT, endoscopic US, and FDG PET for assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy–systematic review. Radiology 236:841–851PubMedCrossRef Westerterp M, van Westreenen HL, Reitsma JB et al (2005) Esophageal cancer: CT, endoscopic US, and FDG PET for assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy–systematic review. Radiology 236:841–851PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tixier F, Le Rest CC, Hatt M et al (2011) Intratumor heterogeneity characterized by textural features on baseline 18F-FDG PET images predicts response to concomitant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Nucl Med 52:369–378PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Tixier F, Le Rest CC, Hatt M et al (2011) Intratumor heterogeneity characterized by textural features on baseline 18F-FDG PET images predicts response to concomitant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Nucl Med 52:369–378PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Essler M, Wantke J, Mayer B et al (2013) Positron-emission tomography CT to identify local recurrence in stage I lung cancer patients 1 year after stereotactic body radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 189:495–501PubMedCrossRef Essler M, Wantke J, Mayer B et al (2013) Positron-emission tomography CT to identify local recurrence in stage I lung cancer patients 1 year after stereotactic body radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 189:495–501PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Troost EG, Schinagl DA, Bussink J et al (2010) Innovations in radiotherapy planning of head and neck cancers: role of PET. J Nucl Med 51:66–76PubMedCrossRef Troost EG, Schinagl DA, Bussink J et al (2010) Innovations in radiotherapy planning of head and neck cancers: role of PET. J Nucl Med 51:66–76PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Arslan N, Miller TR, Dehdashti F et al (2002) Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant therapy by quantitative 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose with positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal cancer. Mol Imaging Biol 4:301–310PubMedCrossRef Arslan N, Miller TR, Dehdashti F et al (2002) Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant therapy by quantitative 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose with positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal cancer. Mol Imaging Biol 4:301–310PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Jadvar H (2013) Imaging evaluation of prostate cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT: utility and limitations. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40:5–10PubMedCentralCrossRef Jadvar H (2013) Imaging evaluation of prostate cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT: utility and limitations. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40:5–10PubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang YJ, Ryu JS, Kim SY et al (2006) Use of 3’-deoxy-3’-[18F]fluorothymidine PET to monitor early responses to radiation therapy in murine SCCVII tumors. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33:412–419PubMedCrossRef Yang YJ, Ryu JS, Kim SY et al (2006) Use of 3’-deoxy-3’-[18F]fluorothymidine PET to monitor early responses to radiation therapy in murine SCCVII tumors. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33:412–419PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Herrmann K, Buck AK, Schuster T et al (2011) Predictive value of initial 18F-FLT uptake in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving R-CHOP treatment. J Nucl Med 52:690–696PubMedCrossRef Herrmann K, Buck AK, Schuster T et al (2011) Predictive value of initial 18F-FLT uptake in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving R-CHOP treatment. J Nucl Med 52:690–696PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee H, Kim SK, Kim YI et al (2014) Early determination of prognosis by interim 3’-deoxy-3’-18F-fluorothymidine PET in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. J Nucl Med 55:216–222PubMedCrossRef Lee H, Kim SK, Kim YI et al (2014) Early determination of prognosis by interim 3’-deoxy-3’-18F-fluorothymidine PET in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. J Nucl Med 55:216–222PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Machulla H-J, Blocher A, Kuntzsch M et al (2000) Simplified labeling approach for synthesizing 3’-deoxy-3’-[18F] fluorothymidine ([18F] FLT). J Radioanal Nucl Chem 243:843–846CrossRef Machulla H-J, Blocher A, Kuntzsch M et al (2000) Simplified labeling approach for synthesizing 3’-deoxy-3’-[18F] fluorothymidine ([18F] FLT). J Radioanal Nucl Chem 243:843–846CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JJ, Tannock IF (2005) Repopulation of cancer cells during therapy: an important cause of treatment failure. Nat Rev Cancer 5:516–525PubMedCrossRef Kim JJ, Tannock IF (2005) Repopulation of cancer cells during therapy: an important cause of treatment failure. Nat Rev Cancer 5:516–525PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Withers HR, Taylor JM (1993) Critical volume model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 25:151–152PubMedCrossRef Withers HR, Taylor JM (1993) Critical volume model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 25:151–152PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cvek J, Kubes J, Skacelikova E et al (2012) Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant integrated boost of 70–75 Gy in 5 weeks for advanced head and neck cancer. A phase I dose escalation study. Strahlenther Onkol 188:666–670PubMedCrossRef Cvek J, Kubes J, Skacelikova E et al (2012) Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant integrated boost of 70–75 Gy in 5 weeks for advanced head and neck cancer. A phase I dose escalation study. Strahlenther Onkol 188:666–670PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Balermpas P, Bauer C, Fraunholz I et al (2014) Concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy as definitive, first line treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A retrospective single center analysis. Strahlenther Onkol 190:256–262PubMedCrossRef Balermpas P, Bauer C, Fraunholz I et al (2014) Concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy as definitive, first line treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A retrospective single center analysis. Strahlenther Onkol 190:256–262PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J et al (2010) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival. Lancet Oncol 11:21–28PubMedCrossRef Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J et al (2010) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival. Lancet Oncol 11:21–28PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy JD, La TH, Chu K et al (2011) Postradiation metabolic tumor volume predicts outcome in head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 80:514–521PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Murphy JD, La TH, Chu K et al (2011) Postradiation metabolic tumor volume predicts outcome in head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 80:514–521PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Castaldi P, Rufini V, Bussu F et al (2012) Can “early” and “late”18F-FDG PET-CT be used as prognostic factors for the clinical outcome of patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with radio-chemotherapy? Radiother Oncol 103:63–68PubMedCrossRef Castaldi P, Rufini V, Bussu F et al (2012) Can “early” and “late”18F-FDG PET-CT be used as prognostic factors for the clinical outcome of patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with radio-chemotherapy? Radiother Oncol 103:63–68PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lordick F, Ott K, Krause BJ et al (2007) PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial. Lancet Oncol 8:797–805PubMedCrossRef Lordick F, Ott K, Krause BJ et al (2007) PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial. Lancet Oncol 8:797–805PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat zum Buschenfelde CM, Herrmann, Schuster T et al (2011) (18)F-FDG PET-guided salvage neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: the MUNICON II trial. J Nucl Med 52:1189–1196PubMedCrossRef zum Buschenfelde CM, Herrmann, Schuster T et al (2011) (18)F-FDG PET-guided salvage neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: the MUNICON II trial. J Nucl Med 52:1189–1196PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ott K, Weber WA, Lordick F et al (2006) Metabolic imaging predicts response, survival, and recurrence in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol 24:4692–4698PubMedCrossRef Ott K, Weber WA, Lordick F et al (2006) Metabolic imaging predicts response, survival, and recurrence in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol 24:4692–4698PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin Q, Yang R, Sun L et al (2012) Biological response of nasopharyngeal carcinoma to radiation therapy: a pilot study using serial 18F-FDG PET/CT scans. Cancer Invest 30:528–536PubMedCrossRef Lin Q, Yang R, Sun L et al (2012) Biological response of nasopharyngeal carcinoma to radiation therapy: a pilot study using serial 18F-FDG PET/CT scans. Cancer Invest 30:528–536PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sohn HJ, Yang YJ, Ryu JS et al (2008) [18F]Fluorothymidine positron emission tomography before and 7 days after gefitinib treatment predicts response in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung. Clin Cancer Res 14:7423–7429PubMedCrossRef Sohn HJ, Yang YJ, Ryu JS et al (2008) [18F]Fluorothymidine positron emission tomography before and 7 days after gefitinib treatment predicts response in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung. Clin Cancer Res 14:7423–7429PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoeben BA, Troost EG, Span PN et al (2013) 18F-FLT PET during radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is an early predictor of outcome. J Nucl Med 54:532–540PubMedCrossRef Hoeben BA, Troost EG, Span PN et al (2013) 18F-FLT PET during radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is an early predictor of outcome. J Nucl Med 54:532–540PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Arens AI, Troost EG, Hoeben BA et al (2014) Semiautomatic methods for segmentation of the proliferative tumour volume on sequential FLT PET/CT images in head and neck carcinomas and their relation to clinical outcome. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41:915–924PubMedCrossRef Arens AI, Troost EG, Hoeben BA et al (2014) Semiautomatic methods for segmentation of the proliferative tumour volume on sequential FLT PET/CT images in head and neck carcinomas and their relation to clinical outcome. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41:915–924PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarzenberg J, Czernin J, Cloughesy TF et al (2012) 3’-deoxy-3’-18F-fluorothymidine PET and MRI for early survival predictions in patients with recurrent malignant glioma treated with bevacizumab. J Nucl Med 53:29–36PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schwarzenberg J, Czernin J, Cloughesy TF et al (2012) 3’-deoxy-3’-18F-fluorothymidine PET and MRI for early survival predictions in patients with recurrent malignant glioma treated with bevacizumab. J Nucl Med 53:29–36PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Yue J, Chen L, Cabrera AR et al (2010) Measuring tumor cell proliferation with 18F-FLT PET during radiotherapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot clinical study. J Nucl Med 51:528–534PubMedCrossRef Yue J, Chen L, Cabrera AR et al (2010) Measuring tumor cell proliferation with 18F-FLT PET during radiotherapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot clinical study. J Nucl Med 51:528–534PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Pastor C, Subtil JC, Sola J et al (2011) Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound to assess tumor response after neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: can we trust the findings? Dis Colon Rectum 54:1141–1146PubMedCrossRef Pastor C, Subtil JC, Sola J et al (2011) Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound to assess tumor response after neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: can we trust the findings? Dis Colon Rectum 54:1141–1146PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
3’-Deoxy-3’-[18F]-fluorothymidine PET/CT in early determination of prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer
Comparison with [18F]-FDG PET/CT
verfasst von
Haojun Chen, M.D.
Yimin Li, M.D.
Hua Wu, M.D., Ph.D.
Long Sun, M.D., Ph.D.
Qin Lin, M.D., Ph.D.
Long Zhao, M.D.
Hanxiang An, M.D., Ph.D.
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Elektronische ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-014-0744-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.