Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Der Orthopäde 5/2015

01.05.2015 | Leitthema

Defektadaptierte Rekonstruktionsstrategien in der Hüftrevisionsendoprothetik

Welches Implantat in welcher Situation? Innovationen und Bewährtes

verfasst von: Dr. B. S. Craiovan, J. Grifka, A. Keshmiri, B. Moser, M. Wörner, T. Renkawitz

Erschienen in: Die Orthopädie | Ausgabe 5/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die Hüftrevisionsendoprothetik gewinnt in Deutschland mit etwa 35.000 Operationen jährlich zunehmend an Bedeutung.

Fragestellung

Im Vordergrund stehen eine dauerhaft stabile Verankerung des Pfannenimplantates und des Schaftes im azetabulären und femoralen Knochen, sowie die Wiederherstellung des anatomischen Drehzentrums und die Rekonstruktion des Knochenlagers.

Methoden

Aktuelle Literatur und eigene Erfahrungsbeispiele werden dargestellt.

Ergebnisse und Schlussfolgerung

Neue Entwicklungen aus Forschung und Industrie erweitern die Versorgungsmöglichkeiten. Für ein schlüssiges Therapiekonzept bei der Implantatauswahl sollten Kriterien wie Defektsituation, Defektaufbau, Kombinierbarkeit mit verbliebenen Implantaten, Lockerungs- und Versagensursachen, Implanatallergie und patientenspezifische Parameter berücksichtigt werden.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Franz D, Roeder N (2012) Mengendynamik in den Krankenhäusern: auch eine gesellschaftliche Frage. Dtsch Arztebl 109(51–52):12 Franz D, Roeder N (2012) Mengendynamik in den Krankenhäusern: auch eine gesellschaftliche Frage. Dtsch Arztebl 109(51–52):12
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Statistisches Bundesamt W (2013) DRG-Statistik. Destatis, 21-Dez-2014 Statistisches Bundesamt W (2013) DRG-Statistik. Destatis, 21-Dez-2014
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(1):128–133CrossRefPubMed Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(1):128–133CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber M, Woerner M, Springorum R, Sendtner E, Hapfelmeier A, Grifka J, Renkawitz T (2014) Fluoroscopy and imageless navigation enable an equivalent reconstruction of leg length and global and femoral offset in THA. Clin Orthop 472(10):3150–3158CrossRefPubMed Weber M, Woerner M, Springorum R, Sendtner E, Hapfelmeier A, Grifka J, Renkawitz T (2014) Fluoroscopy and imageless navigation enable an equivalent reconstruction of leg length and global and femoral offset in THA. Clin Orthop 472(10):3150–3158CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Renkawitz T, Haimerl M, Dohmen L, Gneiting S, Wegner M, Ehret N, Buchele C, Schubert M, Lechler P, Woerner M, Sendtner E, Schuster T, Ulm K, Springorum R, Grifka J (2011) Minimally invasive computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty, following the concept of femur first and combined anteversion: design of a blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:192CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Renkawitz T, Haimerl M, Dohmen L, Gneiting S, Wegner M, Ehret N, Buchele C, Schubert M, Lechler P, Woerner M, Sendtner E, Schuster T, Ulm K, Springorum R, Grifka J (2011) Minimally invasive computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty, following the concept of femur first and combined anteversion: design of a blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:192CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehner B, Witte D, Suda AJ, Weiss S (2009) Revision strategy for periprosthetic infection. Orthop 38(8):681–688CrossRef Lehner B, Witte D, Suda AJ, Weiss S (2009) Revision strategy for periprosthetic infection. Orthop 38(8):681–688CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris WH, Schiller AL, Scholler JM, Freiberg RA, Scott R (1976) Extensive localized bone resorption in the femur following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58(5):612–618PubMed Harris WH, Schiller AL, Scholler JM, Freiberg RA, Scott R (1976) Extensive localized bone resorption in the femur following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58(5):612–618PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Willert HG, Semlitsch M (1977) Reactions of the articular capsule to wear products of artificial joint prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 11(2):157–164CrossRefPubMed Willert HG, Semlitsch M (1977) Reactions of the articular capsule to wear products of artificial joint prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 11(2):157–164CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Krenn V, Morawietz L, Perino G, Kienapfel H, Ascherl R, Hassenpflug GJ, Thomsen M, Thomas P, Huber M, Kendoff D, Baumhoer D, Krukemeyer MG, Natu S, Boettner F, Zustin J, Kölbel B, Rüther W, Kretzer JP, Tiemann A, Trampuz A, Frommelt L, Tichilow R, Söder S, Müller S, Parvizi J, Illgner U, Gehrke T (2014) Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint implant related pathology. Pathol Res Pract 210(12):779–786CrossRefPubMed Krenn V, Morawietz L, Perino G, Kienapfel H, Ascherl R, Hassenpflug GJ, Thomsen M, Thomas P, Huber M, Kendoff D, Baumhoer D, Krukemeyer MG, Natu S, Boettner F, Zustin J, Kölbel B, Rüther W, Kretzer JP, Tiemann A, Trampuz A, Frommelt L, Tichilow R, Söder S, Müller S, Parvizi J, Illgner U, Gehrke T (2014) Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint implant related pathology. Pathol Res Pract 210(12):779–786CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Engh CA, Bobyn JD (1988) The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 231:7–28PubMed Engh CA, Bobyn JD (1988) The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 231:7–28PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryd L, Linder L (1989) On the correlation between micromotion and histology of the bone-cement interface. Report of three cases of knee arthroplasty followed by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Arthroplasty 4(4):303–309CrossRefPubMed Ryd L, Linder L (1989) On the correlation between micromotion and histology of the bone-cement interface. Report of three cases of knee arthroplasty followed by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Arthroplasty 4(4):303–309CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Schaumburger J, Winkler S, Handel M, Grifka J, Baier C (2012) Prosthesis loosening. Z Für Rheumatol 71(9):785–797CrossRef Schaumburger J, Winkler S, Handel M, Grifka J, Baier C (2012) Prosthesis loosening. Z Für Rheumatol 71(9):785–797CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Brade H, Brade L, Schade U, Zähringer U, Holst O, Kuhn HM, Rozalski A, Röhrscheidt E, Rietschel ET (1988) Structure, endotoxicity, immunogenicity and antigenicity of bacterial lipopolysaccharides (endotoxins, O-antigens). Prog Clin Biol Res 272:17–45PubMed Brade H, Brade L, Schade U, Zähringer U, Holst O, Kuhn HM, Rozalski A, Röhrscheidt E, Rietschel ET (1988) Structure, endotoxicity, immunogenicity and antigenicity of bacterial lipopolysaccharides (endotoxins, O-antigens). Prog Clin Biol Res 272:17–45PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gelb H, Schumacher HR, Cuckler J, Ducheyne P, Baker DG (1994) In vivo inflammatory response to polymethylmethacrylate particulate debris: effect of size, morphology, and surface area. J Orthop Res Off Publ Orthop Res Soc 12(1):83–92CrossRef Gelb H, Schumacher HR, Cuckler J, Ducheyne P, Baker DG (1994) In vivo inflammatory response to polymethylmethacrylate particulate debris: effect of size, morphology, and surface area. J Orthop Res Off Publ Orthop Res Soc 12(1):83–92CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Höhr D, Steinfartz Y, Schins RPF, Knaapen, G. Martra, B. Fubini, Borm PJA (2002) The surface area rather than the surface coating determines the acute inflammatory response after instillation of fine and ultrafine TiO2 in the rat. Int J Hyg Environ Health 205(3):239–244 Höhr D, Steinfartz Y, Schins RPF, Knaapen, G. Martra, B. Fubini, Borm PJA (2002) The surface area rather than the surface coating determines the acute inflammatory response after instillation of fine and ultrafine TiO2 in the rat. Int J Hyg Environ Health 205(3):239–244
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Shanbhag AS, Jacobs JJ, Black J, Galante JO, Glant TT (1994) Macrophage/particle interactions: effect of size, composition and surface area. J Biomed Mater Res 28(1):81–90CrossRefPubMed Shanbhag AS, Jacobs JJ, Black J, Galante JO, Glant TT (1994) Macrophage/particle interactions: effect of size, composition and surface area. J Biomed Mater Res 28(1):81–90CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumann B, Rolf O, Jakob F, Goebel S, Sterner T, Eulert J, Rader CP (2006) Synergistic effects of mixed TiAlV and polyethylene wear particles on TNFalpha response in THP-1 macrophages. Biomed Tech (Berl) 51(5–6):360–366CrossRef Baumann B, Rolf O, Jakob F, Goebel S, Sterner T, Eulert J, Rader CP (2006) Synergistic effects of mixed TiAlV and polyethylene wear particles on TNFalpha response in THP-1 macrophages. Biomed Tech (Berl) 51(5–6):360–366CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bettin D, Katthagen BD (1997) [The German Society of orthopedics and traumatology classification of bone defects in total hip endoprostheses revision operations]. Z Für Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 135(4):281–284CrossRef Bettin D, Katthagen BD (1997) [The German Society of orthopedics and traumatology classification of bone defects in total hip endoprostheses revision operations]. Z Für Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 135(4):281–284CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS, Bargar WL, Bierbaum BF, Boettcher WG, Steinberg ME, Stulberg SD, Wedge JH (1989) Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 243:126–137PubMed D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS, Bargar WL, Bierbaum BF, Boettcher WG, Steinberg ME, Stulberg SD, Wedge JH (1989) Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 243:126–137PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Antonio J, McCarthy JC, Bargar WL, Borden LS, Cappelo WN, Collis DK, Steinberg ME, Wedge JH (1993) Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 296:133–139PubMed D’Antonio J, McCarthy JC, Bargar WL, Borden LS, Cappelo WN, Collis DK, Steinberg ME, Wedge JH (1993) Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 296:133–139PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9(1):33–44CrossRefPubMed Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9(1):33–44CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG (2004) The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop 420:55–62CrossRefPubMed Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG (2004) The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop 420:55–62CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Gollwitzer H, Toepfer A, Pilge H, Holzapfel BM, Rechl H, Gradinger R (2010) Mega cups and partial pelvic replacement. Orthop 39(10):931–941CrossRef von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Gollwitzer H, Toepfer A, Pilge H, Holzapfel BM, Rechl H, Gradinger R (2010) Mega cups and partial pelvic replacement. Orthop 39(10):931–941CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Gruner A, Heller K-D (2009) Revision hip arthroplastiy of the hip joint. Revision of the femur: which implant is indicated when? Orthop 38(8):667–680CrossRef Gruner A, Heller K-D (2009) Revision hip arthroplastiy of the hip joint. Revision of the femur: which implant is indicated when? Orthop 38(8):667–680CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Gravius S, Randau T, Wirtz DC (2011) What can be done when hip prostheses fail?: new trends in revision endoprosthetics. Orthop 40(12):1084–1094CrossRef Gravius S, Randau T, Wirtz DC (2011) What can be done when hip prostheses fail?: new trends in revision endoprosthetics. Orthop 40(12):1084–1094CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Holzapfel BM, Greimel F, Prodinger PM, Pilge H, Nöth U, Gollwitzer H, Rudert M (2012) Total hip replacement in developmental dysplasia using an oval-shaped cementless press-fit cup. Int Orthop 36(7):1355–1361CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Holzapfel BM, Greimel F, Prodinger PM, Pilge H, Nöth U, Gollwitzer H, Rudert M (2012) Total hip replacement in developmental dysplasia using an oval-shaped cementless press-fit cup. Int Orthop 36(7):1355–1361CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Starker M, Kandziora F, Jäger A, Kerschbaumer F (1998) Acetabular reconstruction using acetabular reinforcement rings. Orthop 27(6):366–374 Starker M, Kandziora F, Jäger A, Kerschbaumer F (1998) Acetabular reconstruction using acetabular reinforcement rings. Orthop 27(6):366–374
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Mittelmeier W, Peters P, Ascherl R, Gradinger R (1997) Rapid prototyping. Construction of a model in the preoperative planning of reconstructive pelvic interventions. Orthop 26(3):273–279 Mittelmeier W, Peters P, Ascherl R, Gradinger R (1997) Rapid prototyping. Construction of a model in the preoperative planning of reconstructive pelvic interventions. Orthop 26(3):273–279
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Issack PS, Nousiainen M, Beksac B, Helfet DL, Sculco TP, Buly RL (2009) Acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. Part II: management of major bone loss and pelvic discontinuity. Am J Orthop Belle Mead NJ 38(11):550–556PubMed Issack PS, Nousiainen M, Beksac B, Helfet DL, Sculco TP, Buly RL (2009) Acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. Part II: management of major bone loss and pelvic discontinuity. Am J Orthop Belle Mead NJ 38(11):550–556PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Gollwitzer H, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Holzapfel BM, Gradinger R (2010) Revision arthroplasty of the hip: acetabular component. Chir Z Für Alle Geb Oper Med 81(4):284–292CrossRef Gollwitzer H, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Holzapfel BM, Gradinger R (2010) Revision arthroplasty of the hip: acetabular component. Chir Z Für Alle Geb Oper Med 81(4):284–292CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuh A, Werber S, Holzwarth U, Zeiler G (2004) Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP titan revision stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years’ follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124(5):306–309CrossRefPubMed Schuh A, Werber S, Holzwarth U, Zeiler G (2004) Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP titan revision stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years’ follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124(5):306–309CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Mumme T, Müller-Rath R, Andereya S, Wirtz DC (2007) Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem. Oper Orthop Traumatol 19(1):56–77CrossRefPubMed Mumme T, Müller-Rath R, Andereya S, Wirtz DC (2007) Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem. Oper Orthop Traumatol 19(1):56–77CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Steinbrink K, Engelbrecht E, Fenelon GC (1982) The total femoral prosthesis. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64(3):305–312PubMed Steinbrink K, Engelbrecht E, Fenelon GC (1982) The total femoral prosthesis. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64(3):305–312PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Charissoux J-L, Asloum Y, Marcheix P-S (2014) Surgical management of recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR 100(Suppl 1):25–34CrossRef Charissoux J-L, Asloum Y, Marcheix P-S (2014) Surgical management of recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR 100(Suppl 1):25–34CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, Chevillotte C, Béjui-Hugues J (2009) Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability. Clin Orthop 467(2):465–472CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, Chevillotte C, Béjui-Hugues J (2009) Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability. Clin Orthop 467(2):465–472CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Plummer DR, Haughom BD, Della Valle CJ (2014) Dual mobility in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 45(1):1–8CrossRefPubMed Plummer DR, Haughom BD, Della Valle CJ (2014) Dual mobility in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 45(1):1–8CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Wirtz DC, Niethard FU (1997) [Etiology, diagnosis and therapy of aseptic hip prosthesis loosening – a status assessment]. Z Für Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 135(4):270–280CrossRef Wirtz DC, Niethard FU (1997) [Etiology, diagnosis and therapy of aseptic hip prosthesis loosening – a status assessment]. Z Für Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 135(4):270–280CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmolders J, Friedrich MJ, Michel RD, Randau TM, Wimmer MD, Strauss AC, Kohlhof H, Wirtz DC, Gravius S (2015) Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation. Int Orthop 39(4):623–630 Schmolders J, Friedrich MJ, Michel RD, Randau TM, Wimmer MD, Strauss AC, Kohlhof H, Wirtz DC, Gravius S (2015) Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation. Int Orthop 39(4):623–630
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Garbuz DS, Penner MJ (1998) Role and results of segmental allografts for acetabular segmental bone deficiency. Orthop Clin North Am 29(2):263–275CrossRefPubMed Garbuz DS, Penner MJ (1998) Role and results of segmental allografts for acetabular segmental bone deficiency. Orthop Clin North Am 29(2):263–275CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoshino M, Namikawa T, Kato M, Terai H, Taguchi S, Takaoka K (2007) Repair of bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty by implantation of a new bone-inducing material comprised of recombinant human BMP-2, Beta-TCP powder, and a biodegradable polymer: an experimental study in dogs. J Orthop Res Off Publ Orthop Res Soc 25(8):1042–1051CrossRef Hoshino M, Namikawa T, Kato M, Terai H, Taguchi S, Takaoka K (2007) Repair of bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty by implantation of a new bone-inducing material comprised of recombinant human BMP-2, Beta-TCP powder, and a biodegradable polymer: an experimental study in dogs. J Orthop Res Off Publ Orthop Res Soc 25(8):1042–1051CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Swarts E, Bucher TA, Phillips M, Yap FHX (2014) Does the ingrowth surface make a difference? A retrieval study of 423 cementless acetabular components. J Arthroplasty. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.028 (Epub ahead of print) Swarts E, Bucher TA, Phillips M, Yap FHX (2014) Does the ingrowth surface make a difference? A retrieval study of 423 cementless acetabular components. J Arthroplasty. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.028 (Epub ahead of print)
Metadaten
Titel
Defektadaptierte Rekonstruktionsstrategien in der Hüftrevisionsendoprothetik
Welches Implantat in welcher Situation? Innovationen und Bewährtes
verfasst von
Dr. B. S. Craiovan
J. Grifka
A. Keshmiri
B. Moser
M. Wörner
T. Renkawitz
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Die Orthopädie / Ausgabe 5/2015
Print ISSN: 2731-7145
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-7153
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-015-3103-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2015

Der Orthopäde 5/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Orthopädie – Endoprothetik

Update Orthopädie – Endoprothetik

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.