Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Der Anaesthesist 7/2015

01.07.2015 | Originalien

Recovery from prolonged deep rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade

A randomized comparison of sugammadex reversal with spontaneous recovery

verfasst von: Prof. N. Rahe-Meyer, C. Berger, M. Wittmann, C. Solomon, E.A.M. Abels, H. Rietbergen, D.A. Reuter

Erschienen in: Die Anaesthesiologie | Ausgabe 7/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) may not always be maintained to the end of surgery and the depth of block may be allowed to gradually diminish over time, particularly if reversal of NMB is not routinely performed.

Aim

The current study aimed to assess recovery from deep rocuronium-induced NMB with sugammadex compared with placebo, provide data regarding the extent of residual blockade after deep rocuronium-induced NMB (placebo group), and to determine whether complete and reliable recovery could be provided by sugammadex (sugammadex group).

Materials and methods

This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, safety-assessor-blinded study in adult patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I to III. Patients with clinically relevant kidney or liver insufficiency were excluded. Anesthesia was administered as routinely practiced at each study site. Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was administered for intubation, with maintenance doses of 0.1–0.2 mg/kg as needed. After the last rocuronium dose, at deep NMB (target depth 1–2 post-tetanic counts), patients received a single dose of sugammadex 4.0 mg/kg or placebo as randomized. The primary endpoint was time from sugammadex or placebo administration to recovery of the train-of-four (TOF) ratio to 0.9. Safety was assessed through monitoring of adverse events, vital signs and physical examination. Patients were also assessed for evidence of residual or recurrence of NMB. With this design, the study will provide data regarding the extent of residual blockade under these conditions (placebo group), and determine whether complete and reliable recovery could be provided by sugammadex (sugammadex group).

Results

Recovery to a TOF ratio of ≥ 0.9 with sugammadex was significantly faster (~ 40 times) than spontaneous recovery: geometric mean (95 % confidence interval) times were 2.2 (1.9–2.5) and 89.8 (80.1–100.7) min, respectively (p < 0.0001, N = 134); maximum spontaneous recovery was 289.8 min. Safety was comparable between groups, with no recurrence of blockade.

Conclusions

This study confirms a prolonged residual blockade in patients who did not receive sugammadex, with median time to recovery > 1.5 h in the placebo group and one patient taking 4.8 h to achieve a safe level of neuromuscular function recovery following deep NMB. In contrast, sugammadex provided complete and reliable recovery of neuromuscular function (median time to recovery of 2.0 min). Thus, deep NMB with rocuronium until the end of the operation may be possible in combination with sugammadex reversal.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Baillard C, Gehan G, Reboul-Marty J et al (2000) Residual curarization in the recovery room after vecuronium. Br J Anaesth 84:394–395PubMedCrossRef Baillard C, Gehan G, Reboul-Marty J et al (2000) Residual curarization in the recovery room after vecuronium. Br J Anaesth 84:394–395PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg H, Roed J, Viby-Mogensen J et al (1997) Residual neuromuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications. A prospective, randomised, and blinded study of postoperative pulmonary complications after atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 41:1095–1103PubMedCrossRef Berg H, Roed J, Viby-Mogensen J et al (1997) Residual neuromuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications. A prospective, randomised, and blinded study of postoperative pulmonary complications after atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 41:1095–1103PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH et al (2008) Residual neuromuscular blockade and critical respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg 107:130–137PubMedCrossRef Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH et al (2008) Residual neuromuscular blockade and critical respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg 107:130–137PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones RK, Caldwell JE, Brull SJ, Soto RG (2008) Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine. Anesthesiology 109:816–824PubMedCrossRef Jones RK, Caldwell JE, Brull SJ, Soto RG (2008) Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine. Anesthesiology 109:816–824PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F, Marty J (2010) Residual paralysis after emergence from anesthesia. Anesthesiology 112:1013–1022PubMedCrossRef Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F, Marty J (2010) Residual paralysis after emergence from anesthesia. Anesthesiology 112:1013–1022PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Grayling M, Sweeney BP (2007) Recovery from neuromuscular blockade: a survey of practice. Anaesthesia 62:806–809PubMedCrossRef Grayling M, Sweeney BP (2007) Recovery from neuromuscular blockade: a survey of practice. Anaesthesia 62:806–809PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Blobner M, Eriksson LI, Scholz J et al (2010) Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex compared with neostigmine during sevoflurane anaesthesia: results of a randomised, controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 27:874–881PubMedCrossRef Blobner M, Eriksson LI, Scholz J et al (2010) Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex compared with neostigmine during sevoflurane anaesthesia: results of a randomised, controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 27:874–881PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemmens HJ, El-Orbany MI, Berry J et al (2010) Reversal of profound vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block under sevoflurane anesthesia: sugammadex versus neostigmine. BMC Anesthesiol 10:15PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lemmens HJ, El-Orbany MI, Berry J et al (2010) Reversal of profound vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block under sevoflurane anesthesia: sugammadex versus neostigmine. BMC Anesthesiol 10:15PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Khuenl-Brady KS, Wattwil M, Vanacker BF et al (2010) Sugammadex provides faster reversal of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade compared with neostigmine: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Anesth Analg 110:64–73PubMedCrossRef Khuenl-Brady KS, Wattwil M, Vanacker BF et al (2010) Sugammadex provides faster reversal of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade compared with neostigmine: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Anesth Analg 110:64–73PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT et al (2007) Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 51:789–808PubMedCrossRef Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT et al (2007) Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 51:789–808PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhananker SM, Posner KL, Cheney FW et al (2006) Injury and liability associated with monitored anesthesia care: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 104:228–234PubMedCrossRef Bhananker SM, Posner KL, Cheney FW et al (2006) Injury and liability associated with monitored anesthesia care: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 104:228–234PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Geldner G, Niskanen M, Laurila P et al (2012) A randomised controlled trial comparing sugammadex and neostigmine at different depths of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Anaesthesia 67:991–998PubMedCrossRef Geldner G, Niskanen M, Laurila P et al (2012) A randomised controlled trial comparing sugammadex and neostigmine at different depths of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Anaesthesia 67:991–998PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Duvaldestin P, Kuizenga K, Saldien V et al (2010) A randomized, dose-response study of sugammadex given for the reversal of deep rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade under sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg 110:74–82PubMedCrossRef Duvaldestin P, Kuizenga K, Saldien V et al (2010) A randomized, dose-response study of sugammadex given for the reversal of deep rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade under sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg 110:74–82PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Maybauer DM, Geldner G, Blobner M et al (2007) Incidence and duration of residual paralysis at the end of surgery after multiple administrations of cisatracurium and rocuronium. Anaesthesia 62:12–17PubMedCrossRef Maybauer DM, Geldner G, Blobner M et al (2007) Incidence and duration of residual paralysis at the end of surgery after multiple administrations of cisatracurium and rocuronium. Anaesthesia 62:12–17PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Naguib M, Kopman AF, Lien CA et al (2010) A survey of current management of neuromuscular block in the United States and Europe. Anesth Analg 111:110–119PubMed Naguib M, Kopman AF, Lien CA et al (2010) A survey of current management of neuromuscular block in the United States and Europe. Anesth Analg 111:110–119PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ledowski T, Falke L, Johnston F et al (2014) Retrospective investigation of postoperative outcome after reversal of residual neuromuscular blockade: sugammadex, neostigmine or no reversal. Eur J Anaesthesiol 31:423–429PubMedCrossRef Ledowski T, Falke L, Johnston F et al (2014) Retrospective investigation of postoperative outcome after reversal of residual neuromuscular blockade: sugammadex, neostigmine or no reversal. Eur J Anaesthesiol 31:423–429PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Recovery from prolonged deep rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade
A randomized comparison of sugammadex reversal with spontaneous recovery
verfasst von
Prof. N. Rahe-Meyer
C. Berger
M. Wittmann
C. Solomon
E.A.M. Abels
H. Rietbergen
D.A. Reuter
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Die Anaesthesiologie / Ausgabe 7/2015
Print ISSN: 2731-6858
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-6866
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-015-0048-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2015

Der Anaesthesist 7/2015 Zur Ausgabe

CME Zertifizierte Fortbildung

Postmortale Organspende

Leitlinien und Empfehlungen

S3-Leitlinie Volumentherapie

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.