Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Rechtsmedizin 2/2015

01.04.2015 | Originalien

Communication skills of doctors in German forensic medicine institutes

Self-assessment concerning contact to next of kin of the deceased and to living victims of violence in clinical forensic medicine

verfasst von: M. Aboutara, K. Püschel, B. Wulff

Erschienen in: Rechtsmedizin | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this questionnaire-based study was to assess the communication skills of German forensic pathologists in respect to talks with the next of kin of the deceased and victims of violence (clinical forensic medicine). The study investigated self-confidence in these challenging situations.

Methods

All 28 German forensic medicine institutes were asked to participate. After consent had been granted a local investigator was appointed who contributed information about the organizational structure and delivered the local questionnaires to the colleagues.

Results

A total of 25 German forensic institutes participated and146 out of 192 questionnaires were retrieved (response rate 76 %: 72 female, 70 male and 4 unknown). The results of the whole sample are shown and the distribution of female/male doctors in respect to the professional status, the amount and topics of next of kin contact and contact to victims of violence and the estimated need for further training. Of the responders 52 % have on average 1–5 contacts with the next of kin of the deceased per month and12 % have more contact. Of the whole sample 30 % but nearly half of the female responders have experienced themselves as not being well-prepared in the past and 38 % reported these conversations to be more challenging than those with victims of violence. Further communication training for the next of kin contact was judged as necessary to very necessary by 64 % of the participating doctors, especially highlighted by those in leading positions. Of the participants 57 % conduct 1–5 examinations per month, 32 % carry out more, 80 % assessed these contacts as difficult and for 7 % even more than next of kin contacts. Further education for the care of victims of violence was evaluated as necessary to very necessary by 74 %, mainly by interns. Both kinds of contact are equally difficult for 36 %.

Conclusion

Many forensic pathologists, especially the younger ones, do not feel adequately prepared for the communication challenges in legal medicine by their specialty training although these skills are required for forensic specialists in Germany. Therefore, the German Association of Forensic Pathologists is called upon to put the further education rules (Weiterbildungsordnung) into practice and enable the requested achievement of competences. According to the data obtained in this survey even a voluntary offer for communication training would be attended by more than 70 % of the responders.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E et al (1995) Posttraumatic stress disorder in the national comorbidity survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry (52):1048–1060CrossRefPubMed Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E et al (1995) Posttraumatic stress disorder in the national comorbidity survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry (52):1048–1060CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hauswirth V, Bartsch Ch (2011) Angehörigenkontakt in der Rechtsmedizin. Eine Schweizer Untersuchung. Rechtsmedizin 21(4):291–297CrossRef Hauswirth V, Bartsch Ch (2011) Angehörigenkontakt in der Rechtsmedizin. Eine Schweizer Untersuchung. Rechtsmedizin 21(4):291–297CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Coburn MU, Borges MC, Knake E, Harper M (2000) The multidisciplinary approach to dealing with families: a model for medical examiners. J Forensic Sci 45(6):1278–1279PubMed Coburn MU, Borges MC, Knake E, Harper M (2000) The multidisciplinary approach to dealing with families: a model for medical examiners. J Forensic Sci 45(6):1278–1279PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sperhake J, Püschel K (2003) Das Hamburger Sektionsgesetz vom 9. Februar 2000 – Entwicklung der Sektionszahlen in Hamburgs Prosekturen. Pathologe 24:204–206PubMed Sperhake J, Püschel K (2003) Das Hamburger Sektionsgesetz vom 9. Februar 2000 – Entwicklung der Sektionszahlen in Hamburgs Prosekturen. Pathologe 24:204–206PubMed
7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Banaschak S, Gerlach K, Seifert D, Bockholdt B, Graß H (2011) Forensisch-medizinische Untersuchung von Gewaltopfern. Empfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rechtsmedizin auf der Grundlage der Empfehlungen der Schweizer Gesellschaft. Rechtsmedizin 21:483–488CrossRef Banaschak S, Gerlach K, Seifert D, Bockholdt B, Graß H (2011) Forensisch-medizinische Untersuchung von Gewaltopfern. Empfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rechtsmedizin auf der Grundlage der Empfehlungen der Schweizer Gesellschaft. Rechtsmedizin 21:483–488CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Brinkmann B, DuChesne A, Vennemann B (2002) Aktuelle Daten zur Obduktionsfrequenz in Deutschland. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 127:791–795CrossRefPubMed Brinkmann B, DuChesne A, Vennemann B (2002) Aktuelle Daten zur Obduktionsfrequenz in Deutschland. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 127:791–795CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Riepert T (2010) Zur Rechtsmedizin und ihren Berührungspunkten mit der Pathologie. Pathologe 31:248–255CrossRefPubMed Riepert T (2010) Zur Rechtsmedizin und ihren Berührungspunkten mit der Pathologie. Pathologe 31:248–255CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Communication skills of doctors in German forensic medicine institutes
Self-assessment concerning contact to next of kin of the deceased and to living victims of violence in clinical forensic medicine
verfasst von
M. Aboutara
K. Püschel
B. Wulff
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Rechtsmedizin / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-9819
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-5196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-015-0013-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Rechtsmedizin 2/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Mittelungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rechtsmedizin

Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rechtsmedizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Rechtsmedizin