Ganganalyse bei neurologischen Erkrankungen

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Gangunsicherheit und Mobilitätseinschränkungen sind bei neurologischen Patienten ein häufiges Leitsymptom. Gerade bei älteren Patienten wird oft nicht gut differenziert, welche Funktionsstörungen im Einzelnen vorliegen. Qualitative und quantitative Analysen helfen, Teilursachen des Defizits zu differenzieren und den Verlauf nachvollziehbar zu dokumentieren. Die Messung kann die Therapie steuern, deren Erfolg dann erneut aufgezeichnet werden kann.

Abstract

Walking requires the interaction of the muscles, joints and supporting tissues (bones, ligaments, etc.) with the sensory systems and the central nervous system in the brain and spinal cord. Due to this full-body performance, the gait pattern is a mirror of the general state of health and state of mind. Further, unsteady gait and restricted mobility are common key symptoms in neurological patients. In older patients, it is often not easy to differentiate which functional deficits are present. Qualitative and quantitative analyzes help to differentiate partial causes of the deficit and to document the course in a comprehensible manner. The measurement can control the therapy, the success of which can then be recorded again. Here we describe the methods currently in use in clinical and scientific environments.

Publication History

Article published online:
29 November 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

• Literatur

• 1 Jahn K, Zwergal A, Schniepp R. Gait disturbances in old age: classification, diagnosis, and treatment from a neurological perspective. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 2010; 107: 306-315
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Agrawal Y, Carey JP, Della Santina CC. et al. Disorders of balance and vestibular function in US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001–2004. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 938-944 DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.66.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Masud T, Morris RO. Epidemiology of falls. Age Ageing 2001; 30: 3-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Jahn K, Kressig RW, Bridenbaugh SA. et al. Dizziness and Unstable Gait in Old Age: Etiology, Diagnosis and Treatment. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 2015; 112: 387-393 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0387.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Ambrose AF, Paul G, Hausdorff JM. Risk factors for falls among older adults: a review of the literature. Maturitas 2013; 75: 51-61 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.02.009.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Grillner S, Wallen P. Central pattern generators for locomotion, with special reference to vertebrates. Annu Rev Neurosci 1985; 8: 233-261
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Dietz V. Spinal cord pattern generators for locomotion. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114: 1379-1389
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Jahn K, Deutschlander A, Stephan T. et al. Imaging human supraspinal locomotor centers in brainstem and cerebellum. Neuroimage 2008; 39: 786-792
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Jahn K, Deutschlander A, Stephan T. et al. Supraspinal locomotor control in quadrupeds and humans. Prog Brain Res 2008; 171: 353-362
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Pradhan C, Wuehr M, Akrami F. et al. Automated classification of neurological disorders of gait using spatio-temporal gait parameters. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2015; 25: 413-422 DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.01.004.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Jahn K, Kressig RW, Bridenbaugh SA. et al. Dizziness and Unstable Gait in Old Age. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 2015; 112: 387-393 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0387.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Kluge F, Del Din S, Cereatti A. et al. Consensus based framework for digital mobility monitoring. PloS One 2021; 16: e0256541 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256541.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Wuehr M, Jooshani N, Schniepp R. Concepts for diagnosis, course and fall risk assessment in neurological gait disorders. Fortschr Neurol Psychiat 2021; 89: 233-242 DOI: 10.1055/a-1418-8476.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Wuehr M, Pradhan C, Novozhilov S. et al. Inadequate interaction between open- and closed-loop postural control in phobic postural vertigo. J Neurol 2013; 260: 1314-1323 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-012-6797-7.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Schniepp R, Wuehr M, Pradhan C. et al. Nonlinear variability of body sway in patients with phobic postural vertigo. Front Neurol 2013; 4: 115 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00115.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K. et al. Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA 2011; 305: 50-58 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1923.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Schniepp R, Huppert A, Decker J. et al. Fall prediction in neurological gait disorders: differential contributions from clinical assessment, gait analysis, and daily-life mobility monitoring. J Neurol 2021; 268: 3421-3434 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10504-x.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Schniepp R, Wuehr M, Huth S. et al. Gait characteristics of patients with phobic postural vertigo: effects of fear of falling, attention, and visual input. J Neurol 2014; 261: 738-746 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-014-7259-1.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Kressig RW, Herrmann FR, Grandjean R. et al. Gait variability while dual-tasking: fall predictor in older inpatients?. Aging Clin Exp Res 2008; 20: 123-130
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Lord S, Galna B, Verghese J. et al. Independent domains of gait in older adults and associated motor and nonmotor attributes: validation of a factor analysis approach. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2013; 68: 820-827 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/gls255.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar