Computers in the Treatment of Chronic Aphasia

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Computers and related technology can increase the amount of treatment received by adults with chronic aphasia. Computers used in treatment, however, are only valuable to the patient if the intervention is efficacious. Real and potential applications of computer technology are discussed in the context of three roles of computerized aphasia treatment for adults with chronic aphasia. Pertinent studies regarding Phases 1 and 2 are briefly described. The only Phase 3 study of efficacy of computerized aphasia treatment is more fully described and its implications discussed.

REFERENCES

• 1 Seron X, Deloche G, Moulard G, Rousselle M. A computer-based therapy for the treatment of aphasic subjects with writing disorders.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1980;  45(1) 45-58
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Katz R C, Nagy V T. A computerized treatment system for chronic aphasic adults. In: Brookshire RH Clinical Aphasiology: Conference Proceedings. Minneapolis, MN; BRK Publishers 1982: 153-160
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Mills R H. Microcomputerized auditory comprehension training. In: Brookshire RH Clinical Aphasiology: Conference Proceedings. Minneapolis, MN; BRK Publishers 1982: 147-152
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Robertson I. Does computerized cognitive rehabilitation work? A review.  Aphasiology. 1990;  4 381-405
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Robey R R. The efficacy of treatment for aphasic persons: a meta-analysis.  Brain Lang. 1994;  47(4) 582-608
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Robey R R. A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;  41(1) 172-187
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Code C. Multifactorial processes in recovery from aphasia: developing the foundations for a multileveled framework.  Brain Lang. 2001;  77(1) 25-44
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Kertesz A. Recovery of language disorders: homologous contralateral or connected ipsilateral compensation?. In: Finger S, LeVere TE, Almli CR, Stein DG Brain Recovery: Theoretical and Controversial Issues. New York, NY; Plenum 1988: 307-321
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Mimura M, Kato M, Kato M et al.. Prospective and retrospective studies of recovery in aphasia. Changes in cerebral blood flow and language functions.  Brain. 1998;  121(Pt 11) 2083-2094
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Basso A. Prognostic factors in aphasia.  Aphasiology. 1992;  6 337-348
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Culton G L. Spontaneous recovery from aphasia.  J Speech Hear Res. 1969;  12(4) 825-832
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Hanson W R, Metter E J, Riege W H. The course of chronic aphasia.  Aphasiology. 1989;  3 19-29
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Katz R C, Hallowell B, Code C et al.. A multinational comparison of aphasia management practices.  Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2000;  35(2) 303-314
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Wertz R T, Katz R C. Outcomes for computer-provided treatment for aphasia.  Aphasiology. 2004;  18 229-244
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Colby K M, Christinaz D, Parkison R C, Graham S, Karpf C. A word-finding computer program with a dynamic lexical-semantic memory for patients with anomia using an intelligent speech prosthesis.  Brain Lang. 1981;  14(2) 272-281
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Steele R D, Weinrich M, Kleczewska M K, Wertz R T, Carlson G S. Evaluating performance of severely aphasic patients on a computer-aided visual communication system. In: Brookshire RH Clinical Aphasiology: Conference Proceedings. Minneapolis, MN; BRK Publishers 1987: 46-54
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Steele R D, Weinrich M, Wertz R T, Kleczewska M K, Carlson G S. Computer-based visual communication in aphasia.  Neuropsychologia. 1989;  27(4) 409-426
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 van de Sandt-Koenderman W ME, Wiegers J, Wielaert S M, Duivenvoorden H J, Ribbers G M. High-tech AAC and severe aphasia: candidacy for TouchSpeak (TS).  Aphasiology. 2007;  21 459-474
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Bartlett M R, Fink R B, Schwartz M F, Linebarger M. Informativeness ratings of messages created on an AAC processing prosthesis.  Aphasiology. 2007;  21(5) 475-498
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Aftonomos L B, Steele R D, Wertz R T. Promoting recovery in chronic aphasia with an interactive technology.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;  78(8) 841-846
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Fink R B, Bartlett M R, Lowery J S, Linebarger M C, Schwartz M F. Aphasic speech with and without SentenceShaper: two methods for assessing informativeness.  Aphasiology. 2008;  22(7-8) 679-690
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Mortley J, Enderby P, Petheram B. Using a computer to improve functional writing in a patient with severe dysgraphia.  Aphasiology. 2001;  15 443-461
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 van de Sandt-Koenderman W ME. Multicue, a computer program for word finding in aphasia. 1994 1. International Congress Language-Therapy-Computers; Graz, Austria, University of Graz
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Loverso F L, Prescott T E, Selinger M. Microcomputer treatment applications in aphasiology.  Aphasiology. 1992;  6 155-163
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Katz R C, Nagy V T. An intelligent computer-based task for chronic aphasic patients. In: Brookshire RH Clinical Aphasiology: Conference Proceedings. Minneapolis, MN; BRK Publishers 1994: 159-165
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Katz R C, Nagy V T. A self-modifying computerized reading program for severely impaired aphasic adults. In: Brookshire RH Clinical Aphasiology: Conference Proceedings. Minneapolis, MN; BRK Publishers 1985: 184-188
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Mortley J, Wade J, Enderby P, Hughes A. Effectiveness of computerised rehabilitation for long-term aphasia: a case series study.  Br J Gen Pract. 2004;  54(508) 856-857
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Cherney L R, Halper A S, Holland A L, Cole R. Computerized script training for aphasia: preliminary results.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;  17(1) 19-34
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Mortley J, Enderby P, Petheram B. Using a computer to improve functional writing in a patient with severe dysgraphia.  Aphasiology. 2001;  15 443-461
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Crerar M A, Ellis A W. Computer-based therapy for aphasia: towards second generation clinical tools. In: Code C, Müller D Treatment of Aphasia: From Theory to Practice. London, United Kingdom; Whurr 1995: 223-250
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Crerar M A, Ellis A W, Dean E C. Remediation of sentence processing deficits in aphasia using a computer-based microworld.  Brain Lang. 1996;  52(1) 229-275
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Katz R C, Nagy V T. A computerized approach for improving word recognition in chronic aphasic patients. In: Brookshire RH Clinical Aphasiology: Conference Proceedings. Minneapolis, MN; BRK Publishers 1983: 65-72
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Ross K B, Wertz R T. Quality of life with and without aphasia.  Aphasiology. 2003;  17 355-364
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Code C, Herrmann M. The relevance of emotional and psychosocial factors in aphasia to rehabilitation.  Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2003;  13 109-132
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Seligman M. Helplessness: On Depression, Development and Death. San Francisco, CA; Freeman 1975
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Coelho G V, Hamburg D A, Adams J E. Coping and Adaptation. New York, NY; Basic Books 1974
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Bengston V L. Self-determination: A social psychologic perspective on helping the aged.  Geriatrics. 1973;  28 118-130
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Langer E J, Rodin J. The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: a field experiment in an institutional setting.  J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976;  34(2) 191-198
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Schulz R. Effects of control and predictability on the physical and psychological well-being of the institutionalized aged.  J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976;  33(5) 563-573
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Renwick R, Brown I. The Centre for Health Promotion's approach to quality of life: being, belonging, and becoming. In: Renwick R, Brown I, Nagler M Quality of Life in Health Promotion and Rehabilitation: Conceptual Approaches, Issues, and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage 1996: 65-86
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Ross K B, Wertz R T. Relationships between language-based disability and quality of life in chronically aphasic adults.  Aphasiology. 2002;  16 791-800
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Wertz R T. Aphasia management: the speech pathologist's role.  Semin Speech Lang. 1981;  2 315-331
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Wertz R T, Irwin W H. Darley and the efficacy of language rehabilitation in aphasia.  Aphasiology. 2001;  15 231-247
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Robey R R, Schultz M C. A model for conducting clinical-outcome research: adaptation of the standard protocol for use in aphasiology.  Aphasiology. 1998;  12 787-810
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology . Assessment: melodic intonation therapy.  Neurology. 1994;  44(3 Pt 1) 566-568
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Cicerone K D, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K et al.. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;  81(12) 1596-1615
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Cicerone K D, Dahlberg C, Malec J F et al.. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;  86(8) 1681-1692
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Katz R C, Wertz R T. The efficacy of computer-provided reading treatment for chronic aphasic adults.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;  40(3) 493-507
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Schuell H. Aphasia Theory and Therapy: Selected Lectures and Papers of Hildred Schuell. Baltimore, MD; Park Press 1974
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Coelho C A, Sinotte M P, Duffy J R. Schuell's stimulation approach to rehabilitation. In: Chapey, R Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders. 5th ed. New York, NY; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2008: 403-449
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Porch B E. The Porch Index of Communicative Ability: administration, scoring and interpretation. 3rd ed. Palo Alto, CA; Consulting Psychologists Press 1981
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery. New York, NY; Grune & Stratton 1982
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Hinckley J, Carr T. Comparing the outcomes of intensive and nonintensive aphasia treatment.  Aphasiology. 2005;  19 965-974
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Maher L M, Kendall D, Swearengin J A et al.. A pilot study of use-dependent learning in the context of Constraint Induced Language Therapy.  J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006;  12(6) 843-852
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Gonzalez Rothi L J, Musson N, Rosenbek J C, Sapienza C M. Neuroplasticity and rehabilitation research for speech, language, and swallowing disorders.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;  51(1) S222-S224
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Mortley J, Wade J, Enderby P. Superhighway to promoting a client-therapist partnership? Using the Internet to deliver word-retrieval computer therapy, monitored remotely with minimal speech and language therapy input.  Aphasiology. 2004;  18 193-211
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Katz R C, Ross K B. An Internet-based automated auditory stimulation treatment for aphasic adults.  Acta Neuropsychologica. 2004;  2 25-34
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

Richard C KatzPh.D. 

Chief, Audiology and Speech Pathology Service, Phoenix VA Health Care System

650 E Indian School Rd, Phoenix, AZ 85012-1839

Email: richard.katz@va.gov