Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2016

02.03.2016 | Original Article

Occlusal stability after Herbst treatment of patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types

A pilot study

verfasst von: Dr. Niko C. Bock, Dr. Erhard Gnandt, Prof. Dr. Sabine Ruf

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to assess and compare occlusal changes induced by Herbst treatment and the stability of these changes in patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types.

Patients and methods

The sample comprised 11 retrognathic (SNA ≤76°, SNB ≤72°, ML/NSL ≥36°) and 10 prognathic (SNA ≥83°, SNB ≥80°, ML/NSL ≤32°) patients with Class II molar relationships of ≥0.5 cusp widths bilaterally or ≥1.0 cusp width unilaterally. Both groups involved similar distributions of skeletal maturity before treatment. Study parameters were assessed on casts reflecting the situations before treatment (T0), after Herbst treatment (T1), after multibracket treatment immediately following Herbst treatment (T2), and after a mean of 31.1 months of retention (T3).

Results

Sagittal molar relationships improved by 0.8 cusp widths in the retrognathic and by 0.7 cusp widths in the prognathic group during active treatment (T0–T2). Insignificant changes of ≤0,2 cusp widths were seen in both groups during retention (T2–T3). Overjet decreased by 8.6 mm in the retrognathic and by 5.5 mm in the prognathic group during T0–T2, and both groups showed clinically irrelevant amounts of relapse by 0.7 mm during T2–T3. Overbite improved by 1.2 mm in the retrognathic and by 2.5 mm in the prognathic group during T0–T2, reaching mean values of 1.0 mm or 1.4 mm by T2, which was followed by 0.2 mm or 1.1 mm of relapse during T2–T3.

Conclusion

Treatment with a Herbst appliance seems to offer stable correction of the sagittal occlusal relationships in Class II patients with retrognathic or prognathic facial types, with the vertical changes being more pronounced in the prognathic cases.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Angle EH (1908) Behandlung der Okklusionsanomlien der Zähne. Meusser, Berlin, pp 114–120, 158–160 Angle EH (1908) Behandlung der Okklusionsanomlien der Zähne. Meusser, Berlin, pp 114–120, 158–160
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR (1985) Longitudinal changes in three normal facial types. Am J Orthod 88:466–502CrossRefPubMed Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR (1985) Longitudinal changes in three normal facial types. Am J Orthod 88:466–502CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Blanchette ME, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Ghosh J, Nanda SK (1996) A longitudinal cephalometric study of the soft tissue profile of short- and long-face syndromes from 7 to 17 years. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 109:116–131CrossRef Blanchette ME, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Ghosh J, Nanda SK (1996) A longitudinal cephalometric study of the soft tissue profile of short- and long-face syndromes from 7 to 17 years. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 109:116–131CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bock N, Pancherz H (2006) Herbst treatment of class II division 1 malocclusions in retrognathic and prognathic facial types. Angle Orthod 76:930–941CrossRefPubMed Bock N, Pancherz H (2006) Herbst treatment of class II division 1 malocclusions in retrognathic and prognathic facial types. Angle Orthod 76:930–941CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bock NC, Reiser B, Ruf S (2013) Class II subdivision treatment with the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod 83:327–333CrossRefPubMed Bock NC, Reiser B, Ruf S (2013) Class II subdivision treatment with the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod 83:327–333CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bock N, Ruf S (2008) Post-treatment occlusal changes in class II division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 30:606–613CrossRefPubMed Bock N, Ruf S (2008) Post-treatment occlusal changes in class II division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 30:606–613CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bock NC, Ruf S (2012) Dentoskeletal changes in adult class II division 1 Herbst treatment–how much is left after the retention period? Eur J Orthod 34:747–753CrossRefPubMed Bock NC, Ruf S (2012) Dentoskeletal changes in adult class II division 1 Herbst treatment–how much is left after the retention period? Eur J Orthod 34:747–753CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bock NC, von Bremen J, Ruf S (2010) Occlusal stability of adult class II Division 1 treatment with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 138:146–151CrossRef Bock NC, von Bremen J, Ruf S (2010) Occlusal stability of adult class II Division 1 treatment with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 138:146–151CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaiyongsirisern A, Rabie AB, Wong RWK (2009) Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance versus mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Treatment effects and long-term stability of adult class II patients. Angle Orthod 79:1084–1094CrossRefPubMed Chaiyongsirisern A, Rabie AB, Wong RWK (2009) Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance versus mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Treatment effects and long-term stability of adult class II patients. Angle Orthod 79:1084–1094CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Champagne M (1989) Herbst appliance therapy related to the mandibular plane angle. Funct Orthod 6:17–21PubMed Champagne M (1989) Herbst appliance therapy related to the mandibular plane angle. Funct Orthod 6:17–21PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. InterScience Publications, New York Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. InterScience Publications, New York
12.
Zurück zum Zitat DeBerardinis M, Stretesky T, Sinha P, Nanda RS (2000) Evaluation of the vertical holding appliance in treatment of high-angle patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 117:700–705CrossRef DeBerardinis M, Stretesky T, Sinha P, Nanda RS (2000) Evaluation of the vertical holding appliance in treatment of high-angle patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 117:700–705CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Drescher D (2000) Fernröntgenanalyse. In: Diedrich P, Kieferorthopädie I. Urban & Fischer, München, Jena, pp 281–283 Drescher D (2000) Fernröntgenanalyse. In: Diedrich P, Kieferorthopädie I. Urban & Fischer, München, Jena, pp 281–283
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fogle LL, Southard KA, Southard TE, Casko JS (2004) Treatment outcomes of growing class II Division 1 patients with varying degrees of anteroposterior and vertical dysplasias, Part 1. Cephalometrics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 125:450–456CrossRef Fogle LL, Southard KA, Southard TE, Casko JS (2004) Treatment outcomes of growing class II Division 1 patients with varying degrees of anteroposterior and vertical dysplasias, Part 1. Cephalometrics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 125:450–456CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gkantidis N, Halazonetis DJ, Alexandropoulos E, Haralabakis NB (2011) Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent class II Division 1 malocclusion: Is vertical dimension affected? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140:346–355CrossRef Gkantidis N, Halazonetis DJ, Alexandropoulos E, Haralabakis NB (2011) Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent class II Division 1 malocclusion: Is vertical dimension affected? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140:346–355CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Godt A, Kalwitzki M, Göz G (2007) Effects of cervical headgear on overbite against the background of existing growth patterns. Angle Orthod 77:42–46CrossRefPubMed Godt A, Kalwitzki M, Göz G (2007) Effects of cervical headgear on overbite against the background of existing growth patterns. Angle Orthod 77:42–46CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Grobéty D, Pfeiffer JP, Joho JP (1978) La Classe II—dimension sagittale. SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd 88:890–905PubMed Grobéty D, Pfeiffer JP, Joho JP (1978) La Classe II—dimension sagittale. SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd 88:890–905PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hägg U, Taranger J (1980) Skeletal stages of the hand wrist as indicators of the pubertal growth spurt. Acta Odontol Scand 38:187–200CrossRefPubMed Hägg U, Taranger J (1980) Skeletal stages of the hand wrist as indicators of the pubertal growth spurt. Acta Odontol Scand 38:187–200CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Haralabakis NB, Sifakakis IB (2004) The effect of cervical headgear on patients with high or low mandibular plane angles and the “myth” of posterior mandibular rotation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 126:310–317CrossRef Haralabakis NB, Sifakakis IB (2004) The effect of cervical headgear on patients with high or low mandibular plane angles and the “myth” of posterior mandibular rotation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 126:310–317CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassel B, Farman AG (1995) Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 107:58–66CrossRef Hassel B, Farman AG (1995) Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 107:58–66CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasund A (1973) Klinische Kephalometrie für die Bergen-Technik. Kieferorthopädische Abteilung des zahnärztlichen Instituts der Universität Bergen, Norwegen, pp 51–58, 63–67 Hasund A (1973) Klinische Kephalometrie für die Bergen-Technik. Kieferorthopädische Abteilung des zahnärztlichen Instituts der Universität Bergen, Norwegen, pp 51–58, 63–67
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Herbst E (1910) Atlas und Grundriss der Zahnärztlichen Orthopädie. J. F. Lehmann’s Verlag, München, pp 311–315 Herbst E (1910) Atlas und Grundriss der Zahnärztlichen Orthopädie. J. F. Lehmann’s Verlag, München, pp 311–315
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hering K, Ruf S, Pancherz H (1999) Orthodontic treatment of openbite and deepbite high-angle malocclusions. Angle Orthod 69:470–477PubMed Hering K, Ruf S, Pancherz H (1999) Orthodontic treatment of openbite and deepbite high-angle malocclusions. Angle Orthod 69:470–477PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Janson I (1987) Bionator-Modifikationen in der kieferorthopädischen Therapie. Hanser Verlag, München, pp 23–56 Janson I (1987) Bionator-Modifikationen in der kieferorthopädischen Therapie. Hanser Verlag, München, pp 23–56
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai J, Ghosh J, Nanda RS (2000) Effects of orthodontic therapy on the facial profile in long and short vertical facial patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 118:505–513CrossRef Lai J, Ghosh J, Nanda RS (2000) Effects of orthodontic therapy on the facial profile in long and short vertical facial patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 118:505–513CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin CH, Short LL, Banting DW (2012) The effects of non-extraction orthodontic treatment on the vertical dimension: a comparison of a dolichofacial and a mesofacial group. Aust Orthod J 28:37–43PubMed Lin CH, Short LL, Banting DW (2012) The effects of non-extraction orthodontic treatment on the vertical dimension: a comparison of a dolichofacial and a mesofacial group. Aust Orthod J 28:37–43PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mobarak KA, Espeland L, Krogstad O, Lyberg T (2001) Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle class II patients: different long-term skeletal responses. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 119:368–381CrossRef Mobarak KA, Espeland L, Krogstad O, Lyberg T (2001) Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle class II patients: different long-term skeletal responses. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 119:368–381CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Nanda RS, Ghosh J (1995) Longitudinal growth changes in the sagittal relationship of maxilla and mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 107:79–90CrossRef Nanda RS, Ghosh J (1995) Longitudinal growth changes in the sagittal relationship of maxilla and mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 107:79–90CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Pancherz H (1991) The nature of class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric long-term investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 100:220–233CrossRef Pancherz H (1991) The nature of class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric long-term investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 100:220–233CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Pancherz H, Fackel U (1990) The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post- dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 12:209–218CrossRefPubMed Pancherz H, Fackel U (1990) The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post- dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 12:209–218CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Pancherz H, Hansen K (1986) Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod 8:215–228CrossRefPubMed Pancherz H, Hansen K (1986) Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod 8:215–228CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Pancherz H, Michailidou C (2004) Temporomandibular joint growth changes in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent Herbst subjects. A long-term roentgenographic cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 126:153–161CrossRef Pancherz H, Michailidou C (2004) Temporomandibular joint growth changes in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent Herbst subjects. A long-term roentgenographic cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 126:153–161CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Phan KL, Bendeus M, Hägg U, Hansen K, Rabie AB (2006) Comparison of the headgear activator and Herbst appliance- effects and post-treatment changes. Eur J Orthod 28:594–604CrossRefPubMed Phan KL, Bendeus M, Hägg U, Hansen K, Rabie AB (2006) Comparison of the headgear activator and Herbst appliance- effects and post-treatment changes. Eur J Orthod 28:594–604CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Pike JB (1975) A cephalometric investigation of facial profile changes in high angle nongrowing cases. Angle Orthod 45:115–124PubMed Pike JB (1975) A cephalometric investigation of facial profile changes in high angle nongrowing cases. Angle Orthod 45:115–124PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Prittinen JR (1997) Orthodontic management of long face syndrome. Gen Dent 45:568–572PubMed Prittinen JR (1997) Orthodontic management of long face syndrome. Gen Dent 45:568–572PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruf S, Pancherz H (1997) The mechanism of class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Angle Orthod 67:271–276PubMed Ruf S, Pancherz H (1997) The mechanism of class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Angle Orthod 67:271–276PubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Schopf P (2000) Bewertung und klinische Bedeutung der kephalometrischen Messwerte. In: Schopf P, Curriculum Kieferorthopädie. Quintessenz, Berlin, pp 225–232 Schopf P (2000) Bewertung und klinische Bedeutung der kephalometrischen Messwerte. In: Schopf P, Curriculum Kieferorthopädie. Quintessenz, Berlin, pp 225–232
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Schudy FF (1964) Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as related to function and treatment. Angle Orthod 34:75–93 Schudy FF (1964) Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as related to function and treatment. Angle Orthod 34:75–93
39.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Linden FGPM (1999) The development of long and short faces, and their limitations in treatment. In: Van Beek H, Grobéty D, Kirveskari P, Van der Linden F, Nielsen IL, Pancherz H, Weijs H, Wilhelmus A, Zachrisson BU. Orthodontic management of facial height. Verlag Neuer Merkur GmbH, München, pp 39–43 van der Linden FGPM (1999) The development of long and short faces, and their limitations in treatment. In: Van Beek H, Grobéty D, Kirveskari P, Van der Linden F, Nielsen IL, Pancherz H, Weijs H, Wilhelmus A, Zachrisson BU. Orthodontic management of facial height. Verlag Neuer Merkur GmbH, München, pp 39–43
Metadaten
Titel
Occlusal stability after Herbst treatment of patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types
A pilot study
verfasst von
Dr. Niko C. Bock
Dr. Erhard Gnandt
Prof. Dr. Sabine Ruf
Publikationsdatum
02.03.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0020-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.