nach oben

Abdominal Radiology

Erschienen in:

06.01.2020 | Pancreas

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT feature of pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma with pathological correlation

verfasst von: Weiwei Su, Shuai Zhao, Ying Chen, Changjing Zuo, Bin Cui, Minjie Wang, Fangyuan Ren

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT feature of pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) in contrast with conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and its correlation with pathological findings.

Patients and methods

Patients with PASC or PDAC confirmed by surgical pathology, who underwent FDG PET/CT scanning before surgical resection, were retrospectively studied. PASC group and conventional PDAC group included 13 and 104 patients, respectively. Delayed phase of PET/CT scanning was performed in 12 patients with PASC and 99 with PDAC. Maximum standardized value (SUVmax) was measured, and the mean retention index (RI) was calculated by ([PET_120min SUVmax]–[PET _60min SUVmax]) ÷ PET _60min SUVmax × 100%.

Results

On PET/CT, all lesions of PASC group showed intense FDG uptake, and the SUVmax were significantly higher than the lesions of conventional PDAC group both on the early [10.43 ± 5.10 (4.37–24.00) vs. 7.31 ± 3.86 (1.93–21.08), P = 0.011] and delayed phase [13.29 ± 6.04 (5.72–28.16) vs. 8.84 ± 5.14 (1.92–27.58), P = 0.005]. On the delayed phase, all lesions of PASC group had increased SUVmax with positive RI value (27.04% ± 8.87%, 7.14–39.27%). For conventional PDAC group, 81 lesions had increased SUVmax with positive RI value (27.25% ± 19.10%, 1.09–104.49%), while eighteen (18.18%) lesions of PDAC group had slightly decreased SUVmax, and their RI value were negative (− 11.35% ± 13.50%, − 43.17 to − 0.14%). The proliferative index (Ki-67) of lesions of PASC group was positively correlated with both the early (P = 0.034, r = 0.671) and delayed SUVmax (P = 0.019, r = 0.721). The RI value of lesions with adjacent organ invasion in PASC group was significantly higher than those without invasion (33.25% ± 4.92% vs. 20.83% ± 7.49%, P = 0.007).

Conclusion

PASC has more intense FDG uptake than conventional PDAC both on early and delayed phase. RI value of PASC was positive. Negative RI value may be helpful for differentiating PDAC from PASC. SUVmax and RI value may be helpful for prediction of its malignancy and invasion.

Boyd CA, Benarroch-Gampel J, Sheffield KM, et al. (2012) 415 patients with adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas: a population-based analysis of prognosis and survival. J Surg Res 174(1):12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.06.015 CrossRefPubMed

Madura JA, Jarman BT, Doherty MG, et al. (1999) Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas. Arch Surg 134(6):599-603. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.134.6.599 CrossRefPubMed

Aranha GV, Yong S, Olson M. (1999) Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas. Int J Pancreatol. 26(2):85-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02781735 CrossRefPubMed

Imaoka H, Shimizu Y, Mizuno N, et al. (2014) Clinical characteristics of adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas: a matched case-control study. Pancreas. 43(2):287-290. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000000089 CrossRefPubMed

Okabayashi T, Hanazaki K. (2008) Surgical outcome of adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas. World J Gastroenterol. 14(44):6765-6770. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.6765 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Izuishi K, Takebayashi R, Suzuki Y. (2010) Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Pancreas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8(4):40-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2009.11.020 CrossRef

Jiang L, Nie H, Zhu L, et al. (2017) Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Pancreas Demonstrated on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT Imaging. Clin Nucl Med 42(3):206-208. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.000000000001535 CrossRefPubMed

Borazanci E, Millis S Z, Korn R, et al. (2015) Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas: Molecular characterization of 23 patients along with a literature review. World J Gastrointest Oncol 7(9):132-140. https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v7.i9.132 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hsu JT, Chen HM, Wu RC, et al. (2008) Clinicopathologic features and outcomes following surgery for pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 6(1):95-100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-6-95 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Smoot RL, Zhang L, Sebo TJ, Que FG. (2008) Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas: a single-institution experience comparing resection and palliative care. J Am Coll Surg 207 (3):368-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.03.027 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Toshima F, Inoue D, Yoshida K, et al. (2016) Adenosquamous carcinoma of pancreas: CT and MR imaging features in eight patients, with pathologic correlations and comparison with adenocarcinoma of pancreas. Abdominal Radiology, 41(3):508-520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0616-4 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Yin Q, Wang C, Wu Z, et al. (2013) Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Pancreas: Multidetector-Row Computed Tomographic Manifestations and Tumor Characteristics. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 37(2):125-133. https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0b013e31827bc452 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Ding Y, Zhou J, Sun H, et al. (2013) Contrast-enhanced multiphasic CT and MRI findings of adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas[J]. Clin Imaging, 37(6):1054-1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.08.002 CrossRef

14.

Yang F, Jin C, Long J, et al. (2009) Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: a case series of 26 consecutive patients. Am J Surg 198(2):210-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.062 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Tang LH, Aydin H, Brennan MF, et al. (2005) Clinically Aggressive Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors of the Pancreas:a report of two cases with components of undifferentiated carcinoma and a comparative clinicopathologic analysis of 34 conventional cases. Am J Surg Pathol 29(4):512-519. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000155159.28530.88 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Dong A, Wang Y, Dong H, et al. (2013) FDG PET/CT Findings of Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Pancreas With CT and MRI Correlation. Clin Nucl Med 38(3):118-124. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e318270868a CrossRef

17.

Nakagohri T, Kinoshita T, Konishi M, et al. (2008) Surgical outcome of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15(3):318-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-007-1264-z CrossRefPubMed

18.

Song JY, Lee YN, Kim YS, et al. (2015) Predictability of preoperative 18F-FDG PET for histopathological differentiation and early recurrence of primary malignant intrahepatic tumors. Nucl Med Commun 36(4):319-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000254 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Baek YH, Lee SW, Jeong YJ, et al. (2015) Tumor-to-muscle ratio of 8F-FDG PET for predicting histologic features and recurrence of HCC. Hepatogastroenterology 62(138):383-388. https://doi.org/10.5754/hge14873 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: 18F-FDG PET/CT feature of pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma with pathological correlation
verfasst von: Weiwei Su
Shuai Zhao
Ying Chen
Changjing Zuo
Bin Cui
Minjie Wang
Fangyuan Ren
Publikationsdatum: 06.01.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02393-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

18.04.2024 | Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT feature of pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma with pathological correlation

Abstract

Purpose

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Complementary role of computed tomography texture analysis for differentiation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the portal-venous enhancement phase

The utility of retrograde pyelography to follow up incompletely opacified ureters on CT urography

MRI findings of obstructive azoospermia: lesions in and out of pelvic cavity

Small (< 4 cm) Bosniak renal cysts: association of initial fluid percentage and enhancing solid volume thresholds with future lesion behavior

White paper on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from society of abdominal radiology’s disease-focused panel for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Part II, update on imaging techniques and screening of pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals

Radiomics performs comparable to morphologic assessment by expert radiologists for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on baseline staging MRI in rectal cancer

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie