We thank Bijlmakers et al. for their interest in our article, “A never-before opportunity to strengthen investment and action on adolescent contraception, and what we must do to make full use of it”, and are grateful for the opportunity to respond to their four key assertions.
First, we fully agree that sexual rights are controversial, which we discussed in depth in our original article. However, we reaffirm that there is global consensus on adolescent contraception as evidenced in part by recent data emerging from FP2020 on 38.8 million additional modern contraceptive users, the Global Goods and commitments emanating from the 2017 FP2020 summit, and their translated actions at the country level. Additionally, we clarify WHO’s working definitions of sex, sexual health, and sexuality, and introduce WHO’s newly released Operational Framework on Sexual Health and its Linkages to Reproductive Health. We welcome and agree with Bijlmakers et al.’s second point, which elaborates on the barrier of restrictive laws and policies. To address this barrier, we describe examples of resources that can help programmes understand the political/social context that drives these laws and policies at national and subnational levels, and identify programmatic gaps and best practices to address them within specific political/social contexts. We also welcome and agree with Bijlmakers et al.’s third point, which reiterates that discomfort around adolescent sexuality is a major barrier for sexuality education. In response, we point to four relevant reviews of CSE policies and their implementation, our original article’s description of three programmes that have successfully addressed inadequate teacher skills, and our ongoing work on documenting strategies to build an enabling environment for CSE and deal with resistance. Lastly, we wholeheartedly agree that the harmful policies noted by Bijlmakers et al. are damaging to international efforts to improve adolescent SRH and rights. We argue, though, that these policies alone will not undermine efforts by countless other stakeholders around the world who are working in defence and promotion of adolescents’ SRH and rights.
Despite the many valid obstacles noted by Bijlmakers et al., we truly believe that this is “a never-before opportunity to strengthen investment and action on adolescent contraception”.
Bijlmakers et al. The political dimension of sexual rights. Commentary on the paper by Chandra-Mouli et al: “A never-before opportunity to strengthen investment and action on adolescent contraception, and what we must do to make full use of it”. Reproductive Health [in press].
FP2020. FP2020 the way ahead: 2016–2017. London: FP2020; 2017.
FP2020. The family planning summit for safer, healthier, and empowered futures: overview. London: FP2020; 2017.
FP2020. Family planning 2020 commitment: government of Mozambique. London: FP2020; 2017.
FP2020. Family planning 2020 commitment: government of Liberia. London: FP2020; 2017.
Ministry of Health, Republic of Liberia. Investment case for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health 2016–2020. Monrovia: Ministry of Health; 2016.
WHO. Defining sexual health: report of a technical consultation on sexual health, 28–31 January, 20020. Geneva: WHO; 2006.
WHO. Developing sexual health programmes; a framework for action. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
WHO. Sexual health and its linkages to reproductive health: an operational approach. Geneva: WHO; 2017.
WHO. Ensuring health and human rights in the provision of contraceptive information and services: guidance and recommendations. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
Population and Reference Bureau. Youth family planning: policy score card. New York: Population Reference Bureau; 2017.
Evidence Project. Adolescents in Bangladesh: a situation analysis of programmatic approaches to sexual and reproductive health education and services. Washington: Population Council; 2017.
Guttmacher Institute. De la Normativa a la Práctica: la Política y el Currículo de Educación en Sexualidad y su Implementación en Guatemala. New York: Guttmacher; 2017.
Guttmacher Institute. De la Normativa a la Práctica: la Política y el Currículo de Educación en Sexualidad y su Implementación en Peru. New York: Guttmacher; 2017.
Guttmacher Institute. From paper to practice: sexuality education policies and their implementation in Ghana. New York: Guttmacher; 2017.
Guttmacher Institute. From paper to practice: sexuality education policies and their implementation in Kenya. New York: Guttmacher; 2017.
Chandra-Mouli V, Plesons M, Hadi S, et al. Building support for adolescent sexuality and reproductive health education and responding to resistance in conservative contexts: Cases from Pakistan. Global Health Science and Practice. [Accepted].
Chandra-Mouli V, Gómez Garbero L, Plesons M, et al. Phases of Evolution and Resistance to Sexuality Education in Mexico. Global Health Science and Practice. [Accepted].
Scientific and Technical Advisory Group and Gender and Rights Advisory Panel. Statement on the promotion, protection and fulfilment of sexual and reproductive health and rights. Geneva: UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/WORLD BANK Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction; 2017.
WHO. WHO guidelines on preventing early pregnancy and poor reproductive outcomes in adolescents in developing countries. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
UNESCO. Revised Edition: International Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education: An Evidence-Informed Approach. Paris: UNESCO. 2018.
Government of Canada. Canada’s feminist international assistance policy. 2017.
- 38.8 million additional modern contraceptive users: this, in fact, is “a never-before opportunity to strengthen investment and action on adolescent contraception”
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet
e.Med Kampagnen-Visual, Mail Icon II