Introduction
Overweight and obesity are among the world’s largest health care problems, with more than 1.9 billion affected adults worldwide [
1]. In addition to functional and esthetic limitations, obesity is associated with a large number of concomitant diseases that significantly reduce life expectancy [
2].
Bariatric surgery can significantly reduce an individual’s weight. Within 6–12 months, an excess weight loss (%EWL) of 60–70% can be achieved [
3,
4]. In addition to %EWL and the reduction of metabolic diseases, this massive weight loss also results in an enormous change in body shape. This is currently measured primarily by hip and waist circumference measurements. These two parameters are also used for diagnosing metabolic syndrome [
5] or in various clinical scores such as the fatty liver index (FLI) for noninvasive diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [
6]. However, these two-dimensional measurement methods suffer from large measurement errors due to the lack of independent reproducibility and difficult anatomical conditions in obese patients with concealed anatomical landmarks and folds of sagging skin after bariatric surgery. Although the WHO has recommendations for measuring waist and hip circumference [
7], especially in super obese patients, it is technically difficult to measure hip and waist circumference with a measuring tape in a reliable manner.
Three-dimensional imaging techniques using modern bedside 3D scanners are becoming increasingly popular in medicine. First, these scanners work without harmful ionizing radiation and are easy to use with a modern laptop. Furthermore, detailed three-dimensional information allows postprocessing and objective and reproducible data collection. These data are already used for evaluating patient outcome or planning complex surgical procedures in plastic reconstructive surgery or facial surgery [
8‐
10].
The aim of the present study is to investigate three-dimensional measurements of the torsos of bariatric surgery patients with Artec EVA®, a state-of-the-art 3D scanner. Pre- and postoperative scans are matched and compared to visualize body shape changes. Postprocessed three-dimensional data are also compared and correlated with conventionally acquired data.
Discussion
As obesity has become a worldwide epidemic, body shape and body shape changes have become increasingly important for the monitoring of therapy options such as the therapeutic effects of bariatric surgery. Due to several shortcomings of clinical measurements made with measuring tapes, three-dimensional techniques are on the rise. Artec EVA® is an easy-to-use bedside tool. The device is connected to a conventional notebook and can be used after a short briefing without extra equipment. The Artec EVA® system is capable of performing 2D and 3D imaging of the torso in bariatric patients. It is particularly important to visualize and compare pre- and postoperative changes in the body shape of bariatric patients. Therefore, it is crucial to match pre- and postoperative scans. For clinical measurements, this is particularly difficult in obese patients due to hidden anatomic landmarks. Therefore, in our study, participants stood straight with their feet close together and arms crossed behind their back, exposing the claviculae, which could then be reliably identified in all patients. Consequently, the claviculae were used as consistent landmarks to match different scans in obese patients, especially following bariatric surgery.
For the first time, a three-dimensional, bedside measurement of body shape changes in bariatric patients, as it is common in maxillofacial or vascular surgery [
11‐
13] is possible. Mean volume loss of the torso was more than 10 l with 14.44 ± 6.658 %TVL 6 months after surgery. In particular, our three-dimensional method allows researchers to evaluate the entire torso independently of the rest of the body. Our data show that %TWL and % TVL (Fig.
3b) correlate. Nevertheless, we observed a difference between %TWL and %TVL, probably due to the fact that %TWL includes the weight loss of the entire body instead of only the torso. Therefore, focusing on the torso with a three-dimensional procedure may be of relevance for future studies addressing central obesity.
In addition to the better information provided by the third dimension, this system offers objective and reproducible measurements. The median interoperator variability of volume measurements of the torso was 0.03% in our study. This is an indicator for superior reliability and objectivity of our three-dimensional measurement technique. The reliability of manual measurement of waist circumference, which is widely used to describe central obesity, has been questioned in several studies [
14‐
16]. In our study, we could demonstrate that there is no relevant correlation between the manual measurement of waist circumference with a measuring tape and weight loss (Fig.
3d) or
cumb (Fig.
3e). Especially in obese patients, it is nearly impossible to measure waist circumference with a measuring tape. It is difficult for a nurse or technician to place a tape around an obese person in a reliable manner. In contrast, postprocessing of three-dimensional data allows the objective and reproducible measurement of circumference (i.e.,
cumb or
cmax) and any kind of distances (i.e.,
dumb or
dmax). Consequently,
cumb correlated strongly with weight loss (Fig.
3c). Furthermore, hanging fat pads are not detected by two-dimensional measurement methods. This can lead to underestimation of the waist circumference in obese patients [
17]. These shortcomings are overcome by volume measurements and the calculation of %TVL. Recent literature comparing three-dimensional techniques with anthropometric measurements of central obesity reports that three-dimensional scanners are a more reliable and reproducible method for detecting central obesity [
18]. So far, we do not have an algorithm that can automatically distinguish between central obesity and hanging aprons. But the combination of volume measurement and the exact calculation of circumference as well as the possibility of defining any kind of distances helps to distinguish between central obesity and hanging aprons.
The incidences of overweight and obesity increase globally, and bariatric surgery is still the most effective treatment option for obesity. Therefore, three-dimensional imaging should become a common tool to measure central obesity in bariatric patients.
This is particularly important as waist circumference is used in many scientific publications and scientifically applied scores [
19,
20]. The FLI score, for example, is widely used as a predictor for NAFLD and metabolic syndrome [
21,
22] and for evaluating the effect of different treatment methods [
23]. However, the FLI is still under investigation, and researchers continue to adjust how it is calculated to further improve the reliability [
24]. Since the FLI also contains waist circumference, it is at risk for the above-mentioned sources of error. Our three-dimensional method can overcome these shortcomings and might be useful for research issues, to minimize measurement errors in science.
The objective calculation of %TVL is not the only innovative application of three-dimensional measurements. Another interesting feature of three-dimensional imaging is depicting the exact area of body mass reduction. It is possible to visualize certain areas of the body, i.e., the breast or different parts of the abdomen, and compare them pre- and postoperatively. Heat maps created by matching different scans from the same patient can precisely capture the change in body shape (Fig.
1d). Different shades of color illustrate the extent of change in body shape in the respective areas. Comparing these changes in body shape with postoperative quality of life or metabolism after bariatric surgery might be future aspects of using three-dimensional imaging. Surprisingly,
Des and
Dumb decreased following weight loss (Table
2). Usually we expect the skin to sag following weight loss, but our data indicate that the skin does not sag, only the volume of the fat apron is reduced. The excess skin has a smaller volume and therefore seems to hang lower, whereas objective measurements prove the opposite. Correspondingly,
dumb did not correlate with weight loss (Fig.
3f). This finding shows that objective studies of body shape changes are missing in current literature.
Further fields of the application of three-dimensional scanners are reconstructive and plastic surgery after massive weight loss following bariatric interventions. Three-dimensional imaging has a long tradition in plastic surgery [
25], and a more precise planning of surgical procedures, as demonstrated by Liu et al. for breast asymmetry [
26], plays an important role in counseling postbariatric patients. Three-dimensional imaging can help to demonstrate the expected changes possible with a certain procedure. This is particularly important because a negative body image is associated with less weight loss and more depressive symptoms in postbariatric patients [
27]. Hence, body image should be taken seriously and be part of the outcome assessment in pre- and postbariatric patients.
A few limitations should be considered regarding this study. Firstly, the investment costs for Artec EVA® are expensive compared to a measuring tape. Furthermore, scanning with Artec EVA® (15–30 s) and postprocessing the data (10–15 min) take more time than measurements with a tape (AE comments, comment # 2). In this study, we only measured the volume of the torso. Weight and volume loss of the extremities and the gluteal area are not detected by this method. Future studies of our group will therefore include scans of the entire body.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.