nach oben

Current Osteoporosis Reports

Erschienen in:

03.08.2020 | Regenerative Biology and Medicine in Osteoporosis (S Bryant and M Krebs, Section Editors)

3D Printing for Bone Regeneration

verfasst von: Amit Bandyopadhyay, Indranath Mitra, Susmita Bose

Erschienen in: Current Osteoporosis Reports | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to illustrate the current state of 3D printing (3DP) technology used in biomedical industry towards bone regeneration. We have focused our efforts towards correlating materials and structural design aspects of 3DP with biological response from host tissue upon implantation. The primary question that we have tried to address is—can 3DP be a viable technology platform for bone regeneration devices?

Recent Findings

Recent findings show that 3DP is a versatile technology platform for numerous materials for mass customizable bone regeneration devices that are also getting approval from different regulatory bodies worldwide.

Summary

After a brief introduction of different 3DP technologies, this review elaborates 3DP of different materials and devices for bone regeneration. From cell-based bioprinting to acellular patient-matched metallic or ceramic devices, 3DP has tremendous potential to improve the quality of human life through bone regeneration among patients of all ages.

Bandyopadhyay A, Bose S. Additive Manufacturing, Second Edition [Internet]. 2nd ed. CRC Press; 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 14]. Available from: https://www.crcpress.com/Additive-Manufacturing-Second-Edition/Bandyopadhyay-Bose/p/book/9781138609259

•• Bose S, Ke D, Sahasrabudhe H, Bandyopadhyay A. Additive manufacturing of biomaterials. Progress in Materials Science. 2018;93:45–111. This recent review provides a thorough understanding of different AM technologies, their compatibility with manufacturing biomaterials for clinical applications, and subsequent challenges that need to be addressed in the coming days. It covers a broad area of biomedical industry concerned with 3DP of biomedical electronic devices to pharmaceutical drug delivery vehicles to bone regenerative implants.

Billiet T, Vandenhaute M, Schelfhout J, Van Vlierberghe S, Dubruel P. A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2012;33:6020–41.CrossRef

Peng F, Vogt BD, Cakmak M. Complex flow and temperature history during melt extrusion in material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2018;22:197–206.

Gonzalez JA, Mireles J, Lin Y, Wicker RB. Characterization of ceramic components fabricated using binder jetting additive manufacturing technology. Ceram Int. 2016;42:10559–64.CrossRef

Hossain MS, Gonzalez JA, Hernandez RM, Shuvo MAI, Mireles J, Choudhuri A, et al. Fabrication of smart parts using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing technology. Addit Manuf. 2016;10:58–66.

Bandyopadhyay A, Traxel KD. Invited review article: metal-additive manufacturing—modeling strategies for application-optimized designs. Addit Manuf. 2018;22:758–74.PubMedPubMedCentral

Bose S, Traxel KD, Vu AA, Bandyopadhyay A. Clinical significance of three-dimensional printed biomaterials and biomedical devices. MRS Bull. 2019;44:494–504.CrossRef

Kolesky DB, Truby RL, Gladman AS, Busbee TA, Homan KA, Lewis JA. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, Heterogeneous Cell-Laden Tissue Constructs. Adv Mater. 2014;26:3124–30.CrossRef

10.

Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:773–85.CrossRef

11.

Doberenz F, Zeng K, Willems C, Zhang K, Groth T. Thermoresponsive polymers and their biomedical application in tissue engineering. J Mater Chemist B [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jan 11]; Available from: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2020/tb/c9tb02052g

12.

Sultan S, Siqueira G, Zimmermann T, Mathew AP. 3D printing of nano-cellulosic biomaterials for medical applications. Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2017;2:29–34.CrossRef

13.

•• Daly AC, Cunniffe GM, Sathy BN, Jeon O, Alsberg E, Kelly DJ. 3D Bioprinting of Developmentally Inspired Templates for Whole Bone Organ Engineering. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2016;5:2353–62. Bioprinting is still in its infancy but recent developments have been made to successfully implement this technology in bone regeneration. This article illustrates inspired cartilage printing using alternative novel system comprised of stem cells-alginate bioink and PCL crosslinking towards enhanced protein adhesion.

14.

Wen Y, Xun S, Haoye M, Baichuan S, Peng C, Xuejian L, et al. 3D printed porous ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a review. Biomater Sci. 2017;5:1690–8.CrossRef

15.

Trombetta R, Inzana JA, Schwarz EM, Kates SL, Awad HA. 3D printing of calcium phosphate ceramics for bone tissue engineering and drug delivery. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45:23–44.CrossRef

16.

Comesaña R, Lusquiños F, Del Val J, Quintero F, Riveiro A, Boutinguiza M, et al. Toward smart implant synthesis: bonding bioceramics of different resorbability to match bone growth rates.

17.

Bergemann C, Cornelsen M, Quade A, Laube T, Schnabelrauch M, Rebl H, et al. Continuous cellularization of calcium phosphate hybrid scaffolds induced by plasma polymer activation. Mater Sci Eng C Biomimet Mater Sens Syst. 2016;59:514–23.CrossRef

18.

Zhang Y, Xia L, Zhai D, Shi M, Luo Y, Feng C, et al. Mesoporous bioactive glass nanolayer-functionalized 3D-printed scaffolds for accelerating osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Nanoscale. 2015;7:19207–21.CrossRef

19.

Sweet L, Kang Y, Czisch C, Witek L, Shi Y, Smay J, et al. Geometrical versus random beta-TCP scaffolds: exploring the effects on Schwann cell growth and behavior. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0139820.CrossRef

20.

Bose S, Tarafder S, Bandyopadhyay A. Effect of chemistry on Osteogenesis and angiogenesis towards bone tissue engineering using 3D printed scaffolds. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45:261–72.CrossRef

21.

Bose S, Banerjee D, Robertson S, Vahabzadeh S. Enhanced in vivo bone and blood vessel formation by Iron oxide and silica doped 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds. Ann Biomed Eng. 2018;46:1241–53.CrossRef

22.

•• Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A. Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Materials today. 2013;16:496–504. This review brings 3D printed ceramic scaffolds to the forefront of bone tissue engineering devices. It illustrates how porous ceramic structures can be designed using 3DP technology and hence can be beneficial in securing successful tissue ingrowth and subsequent bone regeneration.

23.

Baino F, Minguella-Canela J, Korkusuz F, Korkusuz P, Kankılıç B, Montealegre MÁ, et al. In vitro assessment of bioactive glass coatings on alumina/zirconia composite implants for potential use in prosthetic applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:722.CrossRef

24.

Baino F, Montealegre MA, Minguella-Canela J, Vitale-Brovarone C. Laser surface texturing of alumina/zirconia composite ceramics for potential use in hip joint prosthesis. Coatings. 2019;9:369.CrossRef

25.

Rodriguez CA, Lara-Padilla H, Dean D. Bioceramics for musculoskeletal regenerative medicine: materials and manufacturing process compatibility for synthetic bone grafts and medical devices. In: Ovsianikov a, Yoo J, Mironov V, editors. 3D printing and biofabrication [internet]. Cham: springer international publishing; 2018 [cited 2020 Jan 11]. p. 161–93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45444-3_22.

26.

Mussano F, Genova T, Serra FG, Carossa M, Munaron L, Carossa S. Nano-pore size of alumina affects Osteoblastic response. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:528.CrossRef

27.

Liu W, Wu H, Zhou M, He R, Jiang Q, Wu Z, et al. Fabrication of fine-grained alumina ceramics by a novel process integrating stereolithography and liquid precursor infiltration processing. Ceram Int. 2016;15:17736–41.CrossRef

28.

Dehurtevent M, Robberecht L, Hornez JC, Thuault A, Deveaux E, Béhin P. Stereolithography: a new method for processing dental ceramics by additive computer-aided manufacturing. Dental Mater. 2017;33:477–85.CrossRef

29.

Wu H, Cheng Y, Liu W, He R, Zhou M, Wu S, et al. Effect of the particle size and the debinding process on the density of alumina ceramics fabricated by 3D printing based on stereolithography. Ceram Int. 2016;15:17290–4.CrossRef

30.

Travitzky N, Bonet A, Dermeik B, Fey T, Filbert-Demut I, Schlier L, et al. Additive manufacturing of ceramic-based materials. Adv Eng Mater. 2014;16:729–54.CrossRef

31.

Placone JK, Engler AJ. Recent advances in extrusion-based 3D printing for biomedical applications. Adv Healthcare Mater 2019;1701161.

32.

Bose S, Sarkar N, Vahabzadeh S. Sustained release of vitamin C from PCL coated TCP induces proliferation and differentiation of osteoblast cells and suppresses osteosarcoma cell growth. Mater Sci Eng C. 2019;105:110096.CrossRef

33.

Hung BP, Naved BA, Nyberg EL, Dias M, Holmes CA, Elisseeff JH, et al. Three-Dimensional Printing of Bone Extracellular Matrix for Craniofacial Regeneration.

34.

Nyberg E, Rindone A, Dorafshar A, Grayson WL. Comparison of 3D-printed poly-ɛ-caprolactone scaffolds functionalized with tricalcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite, bio-Oss, or decellularized bone matrix. Tissue Eng A. 2017;23:503–14.CrossRef

35.

Koski C, Onuike B, Bandyopadhyay A, Bose S. Starch-hydroxyapatite composite bone scaffold fabrication utilizing a slurry extrusion-based solid freeform fabricator. Addit Manuf. 2018;24:47–59.PubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Sarkar N, Bose S. Liposome-encapsulated Curcumin-loaded 3D printed scaffold for bone tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:17184–92.CrossRef

37.

•• Bose S, Sarkar N. Natural medicinal compounds in bone tissue engineering. Trends in Biotechnology. This paper provides detailed insight on the beneficial role of combining 3DP ceramic scaffolds and natural medicinal compounds that have osteogenic effects. This kind of novel combinations can provide more efficient and faster bone healing due to augmented effects of porous ceramic scaffolding together with chemical/pharmacological contributions of the natural medicinal compounds.

38.

Dumas M, Terriault P, Brailovski V. Modelling and characterization of a porosity graded lattice structure for additively manufactured biomaterials. Mater Des. 2017;121:383–92.CrossRef

39.

Sheydaeian E, Fishman Z, Vlasea M, Toyserkani E. On the effect of throughout layer thickness variation on properties of additively manufactured cellular titanium structures. Addit Manuf. 2017;18:40–7.

40.

Kuo T-Y, Chin W-H, Chien C-S, Hsieh Y-H. Mechanical and biological properties of graded porous tantalum coatings deposited on titanium alloy implants by vacuum plasma spraying. Surf Coat Technol. 2019;372:399–409.CrossRef

41.

Hee AC. Wear and corrosion resistance of tantalum coating on titanium alloys for biomedical implant applications. 2017;

42.

Campanelli LC, Bortolan CC, da Silva PSCP, Bolfarini C, Oliveira NTC. Effect of an amorphous titania nanotubes coating on the fatigue and corrosion behaviors of the biomedical Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-6Al-7Nb alloys. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;100:542–51.CrossRef

43.

Balla VK, Bose S, Davies NM, Bandyopadhyay A. Tantalum—a bioactive metal for implants. Jom. 2010;62:61–4.CrossRef

44.

Bandyopadhyay A, Mitra I, Shivaram A, Dasgupta N, Bose S. Direct comparison of additively manufactured porous titanium and tantalum implants towards in vivo osseointegration. Addit Manuf. 2019;28:259–66.PubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Balla VK, Banerjee S, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A. Direct laser processing of a tantalum coating on titanium for bone replacement structures. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:2329–34.CrossRef

46.

Staiger MP, Pietak AM, Huadmai J, Dias G. Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: a review. Biomaterials. 2006;9:1728–34.CrossRef

47.

Li Y, Zhou J, Pavanram P, Leeflang MA, Fockaert LI, Pouran B, et al. Additively manufactured biodegradable porous magnesium. Acta Biomater. 2018;67:378–92.CrossRef

48.

Ibrahim H, Jahadakbar A, Dehghan A, Moghaddam NS, Amerinatanzi A, Elahinia M. In vitro corrosion assessment of additively manufactured porous NiTi structures for bone fixation applications. Metals. 2018;8:164.CrossRef

49.

Gorgin Karaji Z, Speirs M, Dadbakhsh S, Kruth J-P, Weinans H, Zadpoor AA, et al. Additively manufactured and surface biofunctionalized porous Nitinol. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:1293–304.CrossRef

Titel: 3D Printing for Bone Regeneration
verfasst von: Amit Bandyopadhyay
Indranath Mitra
Susmita Bose
Publikationsdatum: 03.08.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Osteoporosis Reports / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1544-1873
Elektronische ISSN: 1544-2241
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-020-00606-2

The Cannabinoids Effect on Bone Formation and Bone Healing

Bone and Joint Pain (P Mantyh and T Schnitzer, Section Editors)

Do Bisphosphonates Alleviate Pain in Children? A Systematic Review

Bone and Joint Pain (P Mantyh and T Schnitzer, Section Editors)

Osteocyte Cellular Senescence

Osteocytes (J Delgado-Calle and J Klein-Nulend, Section Editors)

Is There a Governing Role of Osteocytes in Bone Tissue Regeneration?

Open Access
Osteocytes (J Delgado-Calle and J Klein-Nulend, Section Editors)

How to Include Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials

Therapeutics and Medical Management (S Jan De Beur and B Clarke, Section Editors)

Gone Caving: Roles of the Transcriptional Regulators YAP and TAZ in Skeletal Development

Skeletal Development (R Marcucio and JQ Feng, Section Editors)

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. Zur Fortbildung und Wissenserweiterung, verfasst und geprüft von Expertinnen und Experten der Gesellschaft für Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie (AGA).

Jetzt entdecken!

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Was sich Patienten mit Frozen Shoulder wünschen

10.01.2025
Schultersteife
Nachrichten

Die Capsulitis adhaesiva des Glenohumeralgelenks, auch als Frozen Shoulder bezeichnet, belastet die Betroffenen weit über die körperlichen Beschwerden hinaus, wie eine italienische Studie ergeben hat.

Restriktive Sauerstoffgabe ohne Vorteil bei schwerem Trauma

09.01.2025
Traumatologische Notfallmedizin
Nachrichten

Ob schwer verletzte Personen besser restriktiv oder liberal mit Sauerstoff versorgt werden sollten, hat die Arbeitsgruppe der TRAUMOX2-Studie untersucht – mit klarem Ergebnis.

Hinweis auf Zusatznutzen der Anfallsprophylaxe mit Colchicin

08.01.2025
Hyperurikämie und Gicht
Nachrichten

Wenn Gichtkranke in den ersten Monaten einer harnsäuresenkenden Therapie eine Anfallsprophylaxe mit Colchicin erhalten, könnten sie davon doppelt profitieren: Ihr Risiko für kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen scheint ebenfalls gesenkt zu werden.

Wenn orthopädische Patienten psychiatrische Hilfe brauchen

20.12.2024
Behandlungsmethoden
Nachrichten

Auch in der orthopädischen Praxis ist man manchmal mit psychischen Problemen konfrontiert. Woran Sie erkennen können, ob Ihre Patientin oder Ihr Patient eigentlich die Hilfe einer anderen Fachdisziplin benötigt, hat ein Team aus Bologna zusammengefasst.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

3D Printing for Bone Regeneration