Appendectomy is one of the most common operations. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is considered first-line treatment, but the use of LA for treatment of complicated appendicitis remains controversial. Here, we performed a retrospective analysis to compare clinical outcomes between patients treated with LA and those who underwent open appendectomy (OA).
Data for 179 patients who underwent an operation for the treatment of complicated appendicitis at our hospital between 2011 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The selection included 89 patients who underwent a conventional appendectomy and 90 patients who were treated laparoscopically. Outcome measures such as mean operative time, blood loss, time until oral intake duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the concurrent effects of the examined factors on the rate of postoperative complications.
The mean ages of patients in the OA and LA groups were 50.17 ± 22.77 and 50.13 ± 25.84 year. Mean operative times were longer in the LA group than OA (10.2.56 ± 44.4 versus 85.4 ± 43.11 min; p = 0.009). The duration of hospital stay was shorter for the LA group (9.61 ± 5.57 versus 12.19 ± 8.4; p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in return to consumption of oral intake between the LA and OA groups (2.03 ± 1.66 versus 2.48 ± 2.17; p = 0.123). Multivariable analysis found that the rate of postoperative complications was significantly reduced for the LA group, in comparison with the postoperative-complication rate of the OA group (16.7% versus 27%; odds ratio 0.376; 95% CI 0.153–0.923; p = 0.0327).
These results suggest that LA is a safe and efficient operative procedure that provides clinically beneficial advantages in comparison with OA. Thus, when possible, appendectomy for complicated appendicitis should be attempted using a laparoscopic approach.
Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:910–25. CrossRef
Seem K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy. 1983;15:59–64. CrossRef
McBurney C.The incision made in the abdominal wall in case of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg. 1894;20:38–43. CrossRef
Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:545–53. CrossRef
Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg. 1999;177:250–6. CrossRef
Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1999;9:17–26. CrossRef
Lin HF, Lai HS, Lai IR. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:14338–47. CrossRef
Thereaux J, Veyrie N, Corigliano N, Servajean S, Czernichow S, Bouillot J. Is laparoscopy a safe approach for diffuse appendicular peritonitis? Feasibility and determination of risk factors for postoperative intra-abdominal abscess. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1908–13. CrossRef
Yeom S, Kim MS, Park S, Son T, Jung YY, Lee SA et al. Comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic and open approaches in the treatment of periapendiceal abscess diagnosed by radiologic investigation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24:762–9. CrossRef
Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8. CrossRef
Kehagias I, Karamanakos SN, Panagiotopoulos S, Panagopoulos K, Kalfarentzos F. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go? World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:4909–14. CrossRef
Fritts LL, Orlando R. Laparoscopic appendectomy. A safety and cost analysis. Arch Surg. 1993;128:521–5. CrossRef
Nowzaradan Y, Westmoreland J, McCarver CT, Harris RJ. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: indication and current use. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991;1:247–57. CrossRef
Taguchi Y, Komatsu S, Sakamoto E, Norimizu S, Shingu Y, Hasegawa H. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis in adults: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2016;5:1705–12. CrossRef
Li P, Han Y, Yang Y, Guo H, Hao F, Tang Y,et al.Retrospective review of laparscopic versus open surgery in the treatment of appendiceal abscess in pediatric patients:Laparoscopic versus open surgey for appendiceal abscess. Medicine. 2017;96(30):e7514. CrossRef
Athanasiou C, Lockwood S, Markides GA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: an update of the literature. World J Surg. 2017;41(12):3083–99. CrossRef
Zhang S, Du T, Jiang X, Song C. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children with perforated appendicitis: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017;27(4):262–6. CrossRef
Johnson A. Laparoscopic surgery. Lancet. 1997;349:631–5. CrossRef
Bonanni F, Reed J, Hartzell G, Trostle D, Boorse R, Gittleman M, et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;179:273–8.
Frazee RC, Bohannon WT. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Arch Surg. 1996;131:509–11. CrossRef
Dai L, Shuai J.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. UEG J. 2017;5(4):542–553.
Kim SY, Hong SG, Roh HR, Park SB, Kim YH, Chae GB. Learning curve for a laparoscopic appendectomy by a surgical trainee. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26:324–8. CrossRef
So JB, Chiong EC, Chiong E, Cheah WK, Lomanto D, Goh P, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. World J Surg. 2002;26:1485–8. CrossRef
Shimoda M, Maruyama T, Nishida K, Suzuki K, Tago T, Shimazaki J, et al. Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy, single center experience.2018;4(5):e00635.
Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier LH, Peterson ED, Eubanks S,et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg. 2004;239:43–52. CrossRef
Minutolo V, Licciardello A, Di Stefano B, Arena M, Arena G, Antonacci V. Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital. BMC Surg. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-14.
Lim SG, Ahn EJ, Kim SY, Chung IY, Park JM, Park SH,et al. A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27:293–7. CrossRef
Biondi A, Di Stefano C, Ferrara F, Bellia A, Vacante M, Piazza L. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness. World J Emerg Surg. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0102-5.
Markides G, Subar D, Riyad K. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2010;34:2026–40. CrossRef
Ball CG, Kortbeek JB, Kirkpatrick AW. Mitchell P.Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:969–73. CrossRef
Kazemier G, in’t Hof KH, Saad S, Bonjer HJ, Sauerland S. Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling? Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1473–6. CrossRef
Sahm M, Kube R, Schmidt S, Ritter C, Pross M, Lippert H. Current analysis of endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:124–9. CrossRef
Piskun G, Kozik D, Rajpal S, Shaftan G, Fogler R. Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:660–2. CrossRef
Katkhouda N, Friedlander MH, Grant SW, Achanta KK, Essani R, Paik P,et al. Intraabdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg. 2000;180:456–9. CrossRef
- A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis: historical cohort study
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Official Publication of the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-9941
Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
e.Med Kampagnen-Visual, Mail Icon II