Background
Melanoma, a type of cancer caused due to uncontrolled proliferation of melanocytes in epidermis of skin, is one of the most frequent cancers in fair skinned populations [
1,
2]. According to recently published statistics based on data from United States of America, it is the fifth most common cancer in men and seventh most common cancer in women [
3]. Melanoma is known for its rapid progression, metastasis, and poor prognosis, and is responsible for over 80% of deaths from skin cancer [
1]. Early diagnosis allows for surgical excision of the tumors and the patients can be managed with a relapse free interval of up to 10 years [
4,
5]. But, approximately 1 in 35 patients develop metastatic tumors, and metastatic melanoma has a very poor prognosis with an overall survival between 8 to 18 months. Only 15% of patients with metastatic melanoma survive for 5 years [
3,
6].
There has been limited progress in the treatment of melanoma; metastatic melanoma is notorious for its resistance to conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Until recently, dacarbazine, a DNA alkylating agent, was the only FDA approved drug available for the treatment of melanoma [
6]. In 2011, vemurafenib, a specific inhibitor of BrafV600E (BRAF harbouring a point mutation resulting from a substitution of valine at amino-acid 600 with glutamine), and ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), have been approved for the treatment of melanoma [
6]. However, the success of their use is limited by effectiveness only in a restricted population, potential development of lethal resistance with vemurafenib treatment, and only a small increase in median survival time in the case of ipilimumab [
6]. Our lab previously reported a significant association between increased Braf expression and melanoma progression, and an inverse relationship between Braf expression and patient prognosis [
7,
8]. Considering the significance of Braf inhibitors in melanoma treatment, several studies have attempted to decipher the mechanisms for resistance and suggested both mitogen activated protein kinase (MAP kinase) dependent and independent pathways as reasons for vemurafenib resistance [
6]. A number of strategies to overcome the resistance, including a combination therapy of Braf and MEK1/2 inhibitors, have been proposed and are in various stages of clinical studies [
6]. However, there are no results on the efficiency of the combination therapies in clinical settings and the search for alternative and additional drugs for the treatment of melanoma is ongoing.
We analyzed the expression of p300, a well studied histone acetyl transferase (HAT) [
9], in melanoma patient samples and found that loss of p300 expression in the nucleus was correlated with disease progression and worse survival in melanoma patients [
10]. Furthermore, we also found that nuclear p300 expression was an independent prognostic factor, suggesting the importance of targeting the functions of histone acetyltransferases (HAT) in melanoma therapy [
10]. Stability and activity of p300 protein have been shown to be regulated by phosphorylation, and phosphorylation of p300 by mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) has been reported to promote the degradation of p300 protein [
11,
12]. Since our previous studies in melanoma patients showed an increase in Braf expression, which is known to be upstream of MAPK in the signaling cascade, we hypothesized a potential for correlation between p300 and Braf [
8]. To test our hypothesis, and to explore the possible opportunity of targeting histone acetylation and Braf in melanoma treatment, we studied the association between p300 and Braf expression in patient samples.
Methods
Patient specimens and tissue microarray construction
The collection of patient specimens and the construction of the tissue microarray (TMA) have been previously described [
13]. Briefly, we used patient data collected from 1990 to 2009. Of 748 patients specimens collected, 369 biopsies including 327 melanoma cases (193 primary melanoma and 134 metastatic melanoma) and 42 cases of nevi (21 normal nevi and 21 dysplastic nevi) could be evaluated for comparing p300 and Braf staining in this study, due to loss of biopsy cores or insufficient tumor cells present in the cores. The demographic characteristics of melanoma patients are detailed in Table
1. All specimens were obtained from the archives of the Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital. The use of human skin tissues and the waiver of patient consent in this study were approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Board of the University of British Columbia [
14]. The study was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Table 1
Demographics and clinical characteristics of 327 melanoma patients
All melanoma | | |
Age | | |
≤ 62 | 166 | 50.8% |
> 62 | 161 | 49.2% |
Gender | | |
Male | 196 | 59.9% |
Female | 131 | 40.1% |
AJCC | | |
I | 80 | 24.5% |
II | 113 | 34.6% |
III | 55 | 16.8% |
IV | 79 | 24.2% |
Primary melanoma (n = 193) | | |
Age | | |
≤ 62 | 89 | 46.1% |
> 62 | 104 | 53.9% |
Gender | | |
Male | 109 | 56.5% |
Female | 84 | 43.5% |
Thickness | | |
≤ 2.0 mm | 91 | 47.2% |
> 2.0 mm | 102 | 52.8% |
Ulceration | | |
Absent | 144 | 74.6% |
Present | 49 | 25.4% |
Metastatic melanoma (n = 134) | | |
Age | | |
≤ 62 | 77 | 57.5% |
> 62 | 57 | 42.5% |
Gender | | |
Male | 87 | 64.9% |
Female | 47 | 35.1% |
From the original tissue biopsies, the most representative tumor area was carefully selected and marked on hematoxylin and eosin stained slides. Tissue cores of 0.6-mm thickness were taken in duplicate from each biopsy and the TMAs were assembled using a tissue-array instrument (Beecher Instruments, Silver Spring, MD). Using a Leica microtome, multiple 4 μM sections were cut and transferred to adhesive-coated slides using regular histological procedures. One section from each TMA was routinely stained with hematoxylin and eosin while the remaining sections were stored at room temperature for immunohistochemical staining.
Immunohistochemistry
Tissue microarray (TMA) slides were dewaxed at 55°C for 20 min followed by three 5 min washes with xylene. The tissues were then rehydrated by washing the slides for 5 min each with 100%, 95%, 80% ethanol and finally with distilled water. The slides were then heated to 95°C for 30 min in 10 mmol/L sodium citrate (pH 6.0) for antigen retrieval and then treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 1 hour to block the endogenous peroxidase activity. After blocking the slides with the universal blocking serum (Dako Diagnostics, Carpinteria, CA, USA), the sections were incubated overnight with monoclonal mouse anti-p300 antibody (1:50 dilution; Millipore, USA) or with mouse polyclonal anti-Braf antibody (1:100 dilution; Sigma, USA) at 4°C. The sections were then incubated for 30 min with a biotin-labeled secondary antibody and then with streptavidin-peroxidase (Dako Diagnostics). The samples were developed by treatment with 3,3′-diamino-benzidine substrate (Vector Laboratories, Burlington, Ontario, Canada) and with hematoxylin to counter-stain the nuclei. Negative controls were done by omitting the p300/Braf antibody during the primary antibody incubation.
Evaluation of immunostaining
The evaluation of p300 and Braf staining was done blindly by microscopic examination of the tissue sections by one dermatopathologist and two other observers simultaneously, using a multiple viewing microscope and a consensus was reached for the score of each core. p300/Braf staining intensity was scored as 0+, 1+, 2+, 3+ whereas the percentage of p300/Braf positive cells was scored as 1 (1-25%), 2 (26-50%), 3 (51-75%) and 4 (76-100%). In cases of discrepancy between duplicated cores, the higher score from the two tissue cores was taken as the final score. The product of intensity and percentage was taken as the immunoreactive score (IRS) [
15]. Based on IRS, p300 & Braf staining in the tissue sections was categorized as negative (IRS 0), weak (IRS 1–4), moderate (IRS 6–8), or strong (IRS 9–12). Since p300 was found to be expressed in both nucleus and cytoplasm [
10], the nuclear and cytoplasmic staining was evaluated in parallel at the same time. The choice of the optimum cut-off values for the IRS were derived based on the IRS pattern in nevi and melanoma cases and are described previously [
7,
10].
Statistical analysis
Correlation between p300 and Braf, and clinicopathologic parameters was evaluated by Chi-square test among the patient subgroups. Survival time was calculated from the date of melanoma diagnosis to the date of death or last follow-up. The effect of p300 and Braf on the overall and disease-specific survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. Additionally, multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were preformed to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidential intervals (CIs). Classification tree was constructed by the classification and regression tree (CRT) model as described previously to examine possibility of using a Braf and p300 combination to identify different stages of melanoma [
16]. The decision trees depicting the classification rules were generated through recursive partitioning. When growing each tree, equal prior probabilities to the normal and cancer cohorts, and equal misclassification costs were assigned. To assess the amount of over-fitting, 10-fold cross-validation experiments was performed using the SE rule as described previously [
16].
P-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) software.
Discussion
The key to successful management of melanoma includes both early and accurate diagnosis, followed by medical intervention in the form of surgery and chemotherapy. Accuracy of the diagnosis is particularly important as misdiagnosis of the melanoma patients might lead to inadequate treatment and allow spread of the disease. Melanoma is distinguished from dysplastic nevi with a fair degree of success using routine pathological examination, but ambiguous lesions could still pose problems due to the wide variation in morphologic features and because of the overlap in the clinical and histologic features between dysplastic nevi and melanoma [
16,
18‐
21]. Our results suggest that a combination of Braf and p300 expression can be used for differentiating melanoma from nevi. The protocol for immunohistochemical staining of the tissue samples is a simple technique to perform and can give results relatively fast [
22]. Since the expression of only two markers is needed to completely separate nevi from melanoma, the experimental costs are also relatively small. Our study could thus be used to develop a practical protocol, which would complement routine pathological examination and provide a clarification when tissue sections show overlapping morphologic and histologic features.
Despite significant progress in the identification of molecular pathways that drive tumorigenesis, melanoma still poses a challenge to the scientific community. Owing to its notorious resistance to chemotherapy, patients with malignant melanoma have limited treatment options and have a poor prognosis. Although, vemurafenib, a Braf
V600E specific inhibitor, showed impressive results in terms of response rate and progression free survival, the responses are mostly short-lived as seen by development of resistance in nearly every case [
23‐
25]. Several strategies to increase the effectiveness, like combining Braf inhibitors with MEK1/2 inhibitors or small molecule inhibitors of the PI-3 kinase pathway, are in various stages of clinical studies, but it is too early to predict their clinical efficacy [
6,
25].
Our results from patient survival show that patients with low Braf and high nuclear p300 expression have better survival, hinting at the benefits of simultaneously targeting Braf and nuclear p300 in treatment of melanoma. Data from our previous study showed that though cytoplasmic p300 expression was significantly associated with clinico-pathologic characteristics of melanoma, only nuclear p300 had prognostic significance [
10]. Even in the present study, cytoplasmic p300 expression was only informative during the diagnosis part of the analysis but was not a significant prognostic factor (Table
4). Besides, the major site of activity of p300 is in the nucleus where it regulates critically important processes like transcription and DNA repair [
26‐
28]. Interestingly, loss of another well known histone acetyltransferase, TIP60, was reported to be associated with worse prognosis in melanoma patients [
29]. We therefore think that combining Braf inhibitors with HDAC inhibitors might be beneficial in the chemotherapy of melanoma. Strikingly, two HDAC inhibitors, vorinostat (Merck) and romidepsin (Gloucester Pharmaceuticals), which reportedly showed inhibitory effects on melanoma growth, were approved by the US FDA for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma [
30‐
34]. A combination of tyrosine kinase & C-Raf inhibitor, Sorafenib and vorinostat is currently being studied in the treatment of advanced cancers [
35], but we could not find any studies performed using a combination of B-raf inhibitors and vorinostat or romidepsin. Our findings encourage further research on the potential improved efficacy of coadministration of Braf and HDAC inhibitors.
Another finding of our study is the inverse correlation between Braf and nuclear p300 and direct correlation between Braf and cytoplasmic p300 expression which suggests possible cross-talk between Braf and p300. Previous studies showed that phosphorylation of p300 could differentially regulate its activity and protein stability [
36,
37]. For example, while protein kinase C (PKC) and salt inducible kinase 2 mediated phosphorylation at serine-89 was reported to inhibit the HAT activity [
38,
39], Akt mediated phosphorylation at serine-1834, serine-2279, serine-2315, and serine-2366 was shown to enhance the HAT activity of p300 [
40‐
42]. Along those lines, Akt and ERK2 mediated phosphorylation was shown to stabilize p300 protein levels, but phosphorylation by mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) resulted in degradation of the p300 protein [
11,
12,
36,
40,
43]. However, none of the studies have so far focused on the effect of phosphorylation on intracellular distribution of p300. Our findings point to the possible phosphorylation and altered localization of p300 by Braf/MAPK signaling, which needs further investigation.
While our database was relatively large with details of several clinical characteristics, further studies are warranted before drawing firm conclusions on the benefits of combined Braf and HDAC inhibitors. Though the significance of finding a correlation in patient biopsies cannot be underestimated, evidence from studies at the cellular level is needed to convincingly establish the relationship between Braf and p300. Furthermore, we did not have enough cases with information on the status of Braf mutations, so we were unable to analyze the potential correlation between BrafV600E and p300.
Acknowledgements
MB, GA, GZ, GL were supported by funds from Canadian Institute of Health Research (CCI-117958, MOP-110974, MOP-93810), KM was supported by funds from Canadian Dermatology Foundation. The funding organizations had no role in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
Conceived and designed the project: AR, analyzed the data: MB, MM, GA, GL, GZ, AR, and KM, wrote the manuscript: AR, KM and MB. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.