Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2/2020

10.08.2019 | Original Article

A community hospital’s experience with robotic thoracic surgery

verfasst von: Nihaal Karnik, Xihua Yang, Naeem Goussous, Lindsay Howe, Riny Karras

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The emergence of minimally invasive thoracic surgery has positively impacted postoperative recovery. Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) has been shown to have equivalent short- and long-term outcomes as compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The introduction of RATS offers a three-dimensional high-definition image, improved ergonomics, and wristed movement. The purpose of this paper was to define the learning curve of RATS.

Methods

This study is a retrospective review of a single surgeon’s RATS experience in a community hospital. All patients who underwent RATS between December 2011 and April 2014 were included. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: “early” and “late.” These groups were created based on the date before or after February 2013, respectively. Data is presented as means and percentages. Significance was defined as a P value < 0.05. All categorical variables were evaluated with Fisher’s exact t test and all continuous variables were compared via a paired t test.

Results

Seventy-nine patients were identified with a mean age of 59. There were 39 patients in the early group and 40 in the late. Rates of conversion to open thoracotomy (13% vs 10%, P = 0.74) and operative time (180 vs 204 min, P = 0.34) did not demonstrate any statistical significance between the two cohorts. Postoperative morbidity (21% vs 28%, P = 0.60) and mortality (3% vs 0%, P = 1.00) were equivalent between both groups. There was a higher percentage of lobectomies performed during the late group (38% vs 65%, P = 0.02). Furthermore, these lobectomies were performed at a faster rate in the late group.

Conclusion

Based on our experience, the complexity of the operations that can be performed robotically increased with the number of operations performed without an impact on postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Roviaro G, Rebuffat C, Varoli F, Vergani C, Mariani C, Maciocco M. Videoendoscopic pulmonary lobectomy for cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1992;2:244–7.PubMed Roviaro G, Rebuffat C, Varoli F, Vergani C, Mariani C, Maciocco M. Videoendoscopic pulmonary lobectomy for cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1992;2:244–7.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirby TJ, Mack MJ, Landreneau RJ, Rice TW. Initial experience with video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:1248–52.CrossRef Kirby TJ, Mack MJ, Landreneau RJ, Rice TW. Initial experience with video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:1248–52.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat McKenna RJ. Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery with mediastinal node sampling for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:879–81.CrossRef McKenna RJ. Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery with mediastinal node sampling for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:879–81.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat McKenna RJ, Wolf RK, Brenner M, Fischel RJ, Wurnig P. Is lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate cancer operation? Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:1903–8.CrossRef McKenna RJ, Wolf RK, Brenner M, Fischel RJ, Wurnig P. Is lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate cancer operation? Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:1903–8.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Swanson S, Miller DL, McKenna RJ, et al. Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: results from multihospital database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:929–37.CrossRef Swanson S, Miller DL, McKenna RJ, et al. Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: results from multihospital database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:929–37.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Louie B, Farivar AS, Aye RW, Vallieres E. Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:1598–604.CrossRef Louie B, Farivar AS, Aye RW, Vallieres E. Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:1598–604.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kent M, Wang T, Whyte R, Curran T, Flores R, Gangadharan S. Open, video -assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:236–42.CrossRef Kent M, Wang T, Whyte R, Curran T, Flores R, Gangadharan S. Open, video -assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:236–42.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rocco G, Internullo E, Cassivi SD, Van Raemdonck D, Ferfuson MK. The variability of practice in minimally invasive thoracic surgery for pulmonary resections. Thorac Surg Clin. 2008;18:235–47.CrossRef Rocco G, Internullo E, Cassivi SD, Van Raemdonck D, Ferfuson MK. The variability of practice in minimally invasive thoracic surgery for pulmonary resections. Thorac Surg Clin. 2008;18:235–47.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Veronesi J. Robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy for lung cancer: results and operating technique. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:S122–30.PubMedPubMedCentral Veronesi J. Robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy for lung cancer: results and operating technique. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:S122–30.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Skylizard L, Minnich DJ. Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:740–6.CrossRef Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Skylizard L, Minnich DJ. Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:740–6.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Park BJ, Melfi F, Mussi A, et al. Robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): long-term oncologic results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:383–9.CrossRef Park BJ, Melfi F, Mussi A, et al. Robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): long-term oncologic results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:383–9.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Veronesi G, Galetta D, Maisonnueve P, et al. Four-arm robotic lobectomy for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:19–25.CrossRef Veronesi G, Galetta D, Maisonnueve P, et al. Four-arm robotic lobectomy for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:19–25.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bapoje SR, Whitaker JF, Schulz T, Chu ES, Albert RK. Preoperative evaluation of the patient with pulmonary disease. Chest. 2007;132:1637–45.CrossRef Bapoje SR, Whitaker JF, Schulz T, Chu ES, Albert RK. Preoperative evaluation of the patient with pulmonary disease. Chest. 2007;132:1637–45.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Emmert A, Straube C, Buentzel J, Roever C. Robotic versus thoracoscopic lung resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e7633.CrossRef Emmert A, Straube C, Buentzel J, Roever C. Robotic versus thoracoscopic lung resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e7633.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Arnold BN, Thomas DC, Bhatnagar V,et al. Defining the learning curve in robot-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Surgery. 2019;165:450–454.CrossRef Arnold BN, Thomas DC, Bhatnagar V,et al. Defining the learning curve in robot-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Surgery. 2019;165:450–454.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A community hospital’s experience with robotic thoracic surgery
verfasst von
Nihaal Karnik
Xihua Yang
Naeem Goussous
Lindsay Howe
Riny Karras
Publikationsdatum
10.08.2019
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0970-9134
Elektronische ISSN: 0973-7723
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-019-00848-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.