Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Advances in Therapy 9/2020

31.07.2020 | Original Research

A Comparison of Analgesia After a Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Operation with a Sustained Epidural Block and a Sustained Paravertebral Block: A Randomized Controlled Study

verfasst von: Qiao-Wen Huang, Jia-Bin Li, Ye Huang, Wen-Qing Zhang, Zhi-Wei Lu

Erschienen in: Advances in Therapy | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to compare the challenge of puncture and catheterization and the effect of postoperative analgesia of ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral block and the continuous epidural analgesia in patients receiving thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.

Methods

One-hundred and fifty patients received elective unilateral thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer and were randomized into three groups; test group 1 (T group), test group 2 (P group), and the control group (E group). Both of the test groups received ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) while the control group received continuous epidural analgesia. After the operation, all the patients in the test groups received the same postoperative analgesia; loading dose 0.5 mg kg−1, background dose 0.25 mg kg−1 h−1, patient controlled analgesia (PCA) 0.25 mg kg−1, and a locking time of 60 min, while the patients in the control group received a loading dose of 5 ml, a background dose of 5 ml h−1, and a locking time of 20 min. The outcomes of this study were the success rate of the puncture and catheter placement, the blocked segments, numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at rest and during coughing, and the segments with reduced or lost cold and pinpricking sensation.

Results

The success rates of the puncture and catheterization in group T were the highest. Compared with group P, the failure rate of the puncture in group E was lower (p < 0.05), but the success rate of catheterization was higher (p < 0.05). The puncture time in group T was the shortest; there was no difference between group E and group T. The time of catheterization in group P was the longest, this was followed by group T, and was the fastest in group E. The stable time of the block level in group E was shorter than that in groups P and T, but was similar between groups P and T. The block level of all three groups in the 4 h postoperative period was similar (p > 0.05), while the 4 h postoperative levels of groups P and T were reduced significantly (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The continuous analgesia technique of paravertebral space catheterization cannot replace the continuous epidural analgesia in thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery as the latter technique is still considered to be the gold standard.

Trial Registration

China Clinical Trial Registration Center identifier ChiCTR1900020973.
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott WJ, Allen MS, Darling G, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:976–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.059. Scott WJ, Allen MS, Darling G, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:976–81. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jtcvs.​2009.​11.​059.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bimston DN, McGee JP, Liptay MJ, Fry WA. Continuous paravertebral extrapleural infusion for post-thoracotomy pain management. Surgery. 1999;126(4):650–7.CrossRef Bimston DN, McGee JP, Liptay MJ, Fry WA. Continuous paravertebral extrapleural infusion for post-thoracotomy pain management. Surgery. 1999;126(4):650–7.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Casati A, Alessandrini P, Nuzzi M, et al. A prospective, randomized, blinded comparison between continuous thoracic paravertebral and epidural infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine after lung resection surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006;23:999–1004. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265021506001104. Casati A, Alessandrini P, Nuzzi M, et al. A prospective, randomized, blinded comparison between continuous thoracic paravertebral and epidural infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine after lung resection surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006;23:999–1004. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1017/​S026502150600110​4.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurford WE, Bailin MT, Davison JK, Haspel K, Rosow C. Intravenous and inhalation anesthetics. Clinical anesthesia procedures of the Massachusetts General Hospital, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997. pp. 162–80. Hurford WE, Bailin MT, Davison JK, Haspel K, Rosow C. Intravenous and inhalation anesthetics. Clinical anesthesia procedures of the Massachusetts General Hospital, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997. pp. 162–80.
24.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshida T, Watanabe Y, Hashimoto T, Ohta A, Nakamoto T. Effects of catheter tip location on the spread of sensory block caused by a continuous thoracic paravertebral block: a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:1051629. . Yoshida T, Watanabe Y, Hashimoto T, Ohta A, Nakamoto T. Effects of catheter tip location on the spread of sensory block caused by a continuous thoracic paravertebral block: a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:1051629. .
Metadaten
Titel
A Comparison of Analgesia After a Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Operation with a Sustained Epidural Block and a Sustained Paravertebral Block: A Randomized Controlled Study
verfasst von
Qiao-Wen Huang
Jia-Bin Li
Ye Huang
Wen-Qing Zhang
Zhi-Wei Lu
Publikationsdatum
31.07.2020
Verlag
Springer Healthcare
Erschienen in
Advances in Therapy / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01446-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

Advances in Therapy 9/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.