Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 2/2016

01.04.2016 | Original Paper

A comparison of fasciotomy wound closure methods following extremity compartment syndrome at a regional trauma centre

verfasst von: Gareth Price, Nicholas Hodgins, Brendan Fogarty

Erschienen in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Extremity fasciotomy wound closure following acute compartment syndrome is often prohibited by residual swelling, producing wounds that significantly contribute to patient morbidity. The aim of this study was to assess patient and fasciotomy wound outcomes associated with dynamic closure (DYN), delayed primary closure (DPS) and split skin grafting (SSG) techniques.

Methods

A retrospective review of all trauma-related compartment syndrome patients managed between January 2000 and March 2010 was conducted, and a comprehensive patient and wound outcomes analysis was performed.

Results

DYN was employed in 109 wounds, DPS in 66 wounds and SSG in 7 wounds. DPS wounds achieved closure in a significantly shorter timescale than other methods (p = <0.05). DYN and SSG group wound closure times were comparable; however, SSG techniques were employed later post-fasciotomy. SSG patients had longer hospital stays (p = <0.05) and the lowest wound complication rate (0 %). Wound complication rates were significantly higher in the DYN (55 %) and DPS groups (15 %) (p = <0.05), and these wounds required a higher number of further surgical procedures. The need for repeated wound debridements was higher in the DYN group than any other (p = <0.05).

Conclusions

DPS provided the fastest method of fasciotomy wound closure and the shortest inpatient stay. DYN techniques were associated with higher wound complication rates and the need for further surgical procedures. SSG techniques were associated with low complication rates and fewer surgical procedures and, if applied earlier, could result in shorter inpatient stay.
Level of evidence IV, therapeutic study.
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Köstler W, Strohm PC, Südkamp NP (2004) Acute compartment syndrome of the limb. Injury 35:1221–1227CrossRefPubMed Köstler W, Strohm PC, Südkamp NP (2004) Acute compartment syndrome of the limb. Injury 35:1221–1227CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Shadgan B, Menon M, Sanders D et al (2010) Current thinking about acute compartment syndrome of the lower extremity. Can J Surg 53:329–334PubMedPubMedCentral Shadgan B, Menon M, Sanders D et al (2010) Current thinking about acute compartment syndrome of the lower extremity. Can J Surg 53:329–334PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat McQueen MM, Gaston P, Court-Brown CM (2000) Acute compartment syndrome. Who is at risk? Br J Bone Joint Surg 82:200–203CrossRef McQueen MM, Gaston P, Court-Brown CM (2000) Acute compartment syndrome. Who is at risk? Br J Bone Joint Surg 82:200–203CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakagia D, Karadimas EJ, Drosos G et al (2014) Wound closure of leg fasciotomy: comparison of vacuum-assisted closure versus shoelace technique. A randomised study. Injury 45:890–893CrossRefPubMed Kakagia D, Karadimas EJ, Drosos G et al (2014) Wound closure of leg fasciotomy: comparison of vacuum-assisted closure versus shoelace technique. A randomised study. Injury 45:890–893CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Scherer LA, Shiver S, Chang M et al (2002) The vacuum assisted closure device: a method of securing skin grafts and improving graft survival. Arch Surg 137:930–934CrossRefPubMed Scherer LA, Shiver S, Chang M et al (2002) The vacuum assisted closure device: a method of securing skin grafts and improving graft survival. Arch Surg 137:930–934CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers GF, Maclellan RA, Liu AS et al (2013) Extremity fasciotomy wound closure: comparison of skin grafting to staged linear closure. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66:90–91CrossRef Rogers GF, Maclellan RA, Liu AS et al (2013) Extremity fasciotomy wound closure: comparison of skin grafting to staged linear closure. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66:90–91CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiverton N, Redden JF (2000) A new technique for delayed primary closure of fasciotomy wounds. Injury 31:21–24CrossRefPubMed Chiverton N, Redden JF (2000) A new technique for delayed primary closure of fasciotomy wounds. Injury 31:21–24CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Berman SS, Schilling JD, McIntyre KE et al (1994) Shoelace technique for delayed primary closure of fasciotomies. Am J Surg 167:435–436CrossRefPubMed Berman SS, Schilling JD, McIntyre KE et al (1994) Shoelace technique for delayed primary closure of fasciotomies. Am J Surg 167:435–436CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Callanan I, Macey A (1997) Closure of fasciotomy wounds: a technical modification. Br J Hand Surg 22:264–265CrossRef Callanan I, Macey A (1997) Closure of fasciotomy wounds: a technical modification. Br J Hand Surg 22:264–265CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrah J, Gates R, Carl J et al (2000) A simpler, less expensive technique for delayed primary closure of fasciotomies. Am J Surg 180:55–57CrossRefPubMed Harrah J, Gates R, Carl J et al (2000) A simpler, less expensive technique for delayed primary closure of fasciotomies. Am J Surg 180:55–57CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Narayanan K, Latenser BA, Jones LM et al (1996) Simultaneous primary closure of four fasciotomy wounds in a single setting using the sure-closure device. Injury 27:449–451CrossRefPubMed Narayanan K, Latenser BA, Jones LM et al (1996) Simultaneous primary closure of four fasciotomy wounds in a single setting using the sure-closure device. Injury 27:449–451CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat McKenney MG, Nir I, Fee T et al (1996) A simple device for closure of fasciotomy wounds. Am J Surg 172:275–277CrossRefPubMed McKenney MG, Nir I, Fee T et al (1996) A simple device for closure of fasciotomy wounds. Am J Surg 172:275–277CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh N, Bluman E, Starnes B et al (2008) Dynamic wound closure for decompressive leg fasciotomy wounds. Am Surg 74:217–220PubMed Singh N, Bluman E, Starnes B et al (2008) Dynamic wound closure for decompressive leg fasciotomy wounds. Am Surg 74:217–220PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Barnea Y, Gur E, Amir A et al (2006) Delayed primary closure of fasciotomy wounds with Wisebands, a skin-and soft tissue-stretch device. Injury 37:561–566CrossRefPubMed Barnea Y, Gur E, Amir A et al (2006) Delayed primary closure of fasciotomy wounds with Wisebands, a skin-and soft tissue-stretch device. Injury 37:561–566CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Özyurtlu M, Altinkaya S, Baltu Y et al (2014) A new, simple technique for gradual primary closure of fasciotomy wounds. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 20:194–198CrossRefPubMed Özyurtlu M, Altinkaya S, Baltu Y et al (2014) A new, simple technique for gradual primary closure of fasciotomy wounds. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 20:194–198CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Park H, Copeland C, Henry S et al (2010) Complex wounds and their management. Surg Clin North Am 90:1181–1194CrossRefPubMed Park H, Copeland C, Henry S et al (2010) Complex wounds and their management. Surg Clin North Am 90:1181–1194CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Arnold M, Barbul A (2006) Nutrition and wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:42–58CrossRef Arnold M, Barbul A (2006) Nutrition and wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:42–58CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Elliott KG, Johnstone AJ (2003) Diagnosing acute compartment syndrome. Br J Bone Joint Surg 85:625–632 Elliott KG, Johnstone AJ (2003) Diagnosing acute compartment syndrome. Br J Bone Joint Surg 85:625–632
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Galois L, Pauchot J, Pfeffer F et al (2002) Modified shoelace technique for delayed primary closure of the thigh after acute compartment syndrome. Acta Orthop Belg 68:63–67PubMed Galois L, Pauchot J, Pfeffer F et al (2002) Modified shoelace technique for delayed primary closure of the thigh after acute compartment syndrome. Acta Orthop Belg 68:63–67PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor RC, Reitsma BJ, Sarazin S et al (2013) Early results using a dynamic method for delayed primary closure of fasciotomy wounds. J Am Coll Surg 197:872–878CrossRef Taylor RC, Reitsma BJ, Sarazin S et al (2013) Early results using a dynamic method for delayed primary closure of fasciotomy wounds. J Am Coll Surg 197:872–878CrossRef
24.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson SB, Weaver FA, Yellin AE et al (1992) Clinical results of decompressive dermotomy-fasciotomy. Am J Surg 164:286–290CrossRefPubMed Johnson SB, Weaver FA, Yellin AE et al (1992) Clinical results of decompressive dermotomy-fasciotomy. Am J Surg 164:286–290CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A comparison of fasciotomy wound closure methods following extremity compartment syndrome at a regional trauma centre
verfasst von
Gareth Price
Nicholas Hodgins
Brendan Fogarty
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-015-1156-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.