nach oben

Clinical Oral Investigations

Erschienen in:

16.07.2018 | Original Article

A comparison of orofacial profiles in 5- and 10-year-old Swedish children with and without cleft lip and/or palate

verfasst von: Anna Lena Sundell, Agneta Marcusson

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to assess orofacial profiles in 5- and 10-year-old children with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) compared to controls and to estimate a possible association between orofacial dysfunction and caries frequency.

Materials and methods

A total of 133 children with CL/P (77 5-year-olds and 56 10-year-olds) and 308 controls (142 5-year-olds and 166 10-year-olds) were included in the study. Orofacial function was evaluated with Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening (NOT-S), and caries were scored according to the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS).

Results

The total NOT-S score was higher in children with CL/P compared to controls (mean 3.2 vs 0.9, p < 0.001). The domains frequently scored in CL/P children were speech (82%), face at rest (72%), and facial expression (58%). There was a significantly positive correlation between NOT-S scores and caries frequency.

Conclusions

Children with CL/P have impaired orofacial function compared to controls. There seems to be a correlation between orofacial function and caries.

Clinical relevance

Impaired orofacial function seen in children with CL/P can be one of many risk factors for caries development, and it is suggested to be a part of caries risk assessment.

Barlow SM, Trotman CA, Chu SY, Lee J (2012) Modification of perioral stiffness in patients with repaired cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 49:524–529. https://doi.org/10.1597/10-092 CrossRefPubMed

Trotman CA, Barlow SM, Faraway JJ (2007) Functional outcomes of cleft lip surgery. Part III: measurement of lip forces. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 44:617–623. https://doi.org/10.1597/06-138.1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Trotman CA, Phillips C, Essick GK, Faraway JJ, Barlow SM, Losken HW, van Aalst J, Rogers L (2007) Functional outcomes of cleft lip surgery. Part I: study design and surgeon ratings of lip disability and need for lip revision. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 44:598–606. https://doi.org/10.1597/06-124.1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Essick GK, Dorion C, Rumley S, Rogers L, Young M, Trotman CA (2005) Report of altered sensation in patients with cleft lip. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 42:178–184. https://doi.org/10.1597/03-124.1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Trotman CA, Faraway J, Soltmann R, Hartman T, van Aalst J (2013) Facial soft tissue dynamics before and after primary lip repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 50:315–322. https://doi.org/10.1597/12-080 CrossRefPubMed

Rutjens CA, Spauwen PH, van Lieshout PH (2001) Lip movement in patients with a history of unilateral cleft lip. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 38:468–475. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(2001)038<0468:LMIPWA>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefPubMed

Flynn T, Lohmander A (2014) A longitudinal study of hearing and middle ear status in individuals with UCLP. Otol Neurotol 35:989–996. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000429 CrossRefPubMed

Hasslöf P, Twetman S (2007) Caries prevalence in children with cleft lip and palate--a systematic review of case-control studies. Int J Paediatr Dent 17:313–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00847.x CrossRefPubMed

Antonarakis GS, Palaska PK, Herzog G (2013) Caries prevalence in non-syndromic patients with cleft lip and/or palate: a meta-analysis. Caries Res 47:406–413. https://doi.org/10.1159/000349911 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Sundell AL, Nilsson AK, Ullbro C, Twetman S, Marcusson A (2016) Caries prevalence and enamel defects in 5- and 10-year-old children with cleft lip and/or palate: a case-control study. Acta Odontol Scand 74:90–95. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2015.1044562 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Dahllöf G, Ussisoo-Joandi R, Ideberg M, Modéer T (1989) Caries, gingivitis, and dental abnormalities in preschool children with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate J 26:233–237PubMed

12.

Ahluwalia M, Brailsford SR, Tarelli E, Gilbert SC, Clark DT, Barnard K, Beighton D (2004) Dental caries, oral hygiene, and oral clearance in children with craniofacial disorders. J Dent Res 83:175–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300218 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Sundell AL, Ullbro C, Marcusson A, Twetman S (2015) Comparing caries risk profiles between 5- and 10- year-old children with cleft lip and/or palate and non-cleft controls. BMC Oral Health 15:85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0067-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Chopra A, Lakhanpal M, Rao NC, Gupta N, Vashisth S (2014) Oral health in 4-6 years children with cleft lip/palate: a case control study. N Am J Med Sci 6:266–269. https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.134371 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Hairfield WM, Warren DW, Seaton DL (1988) Prevalence of mouthbreathing in cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 25:135–138PubMed

16.

Montes ABM, de Oliveira TM, Gaviao MBD, de Souza Barbosa T (2018) Occlusal, chewing, and tasting characteristics associated with orofacial dysfunctions in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a case-control study. Clin Oral Investig 22:941–950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2173-4 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Bakke M, Bergendal B, McAllister A, Sjögreen L, Asten P (2007) Development and evaluation of a comprehensive screening for orofacial dysfunction. Swed Dent J 31:75–84PubMed

18.

Millard DR Jr (1964) Rotation-advancement principle in cleft lip closure. Cleft Palate J 12:246–252PubMed

19.

Mulliken JB (2001) Primary repair of bilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 1(181–194):195–186CrossRef

20.

Sommerlad BC (2003) A technique for cleft palate repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 6:1542–1548. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000085599.84458.D2 CrossRef

21.

Lilja J, Friede H, Johanson J (1996) Changing philosophy of surgery of the cleft lip and palate in Göteborg, Sweden. In: Berkowitz S (ed) Cleft lip and palate perspectives on management, vol 2. Singular Publishing, San Diego, pp 155–170

22.

Pitts NB, Ekstrand KR, ICDAS Foundation (2013) International caries detection and assessment system (ICDAS) and its international caries classification and management system (ICCMS)—methods for staging of the caries process and enabling dentists to manage caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 41:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12025 CrossRef

23.

Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, Pitts NB (2007) The international caries detection and assessment system (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 35:170–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00347.x CrossRefPubMed

24.

McAllister A, Hammarström Lundeborg I (2014) Oral sensorimotor functions in typically developing children 3 to 8 years old, assessed by the Nordic Orofacial test, NOT_S. J Med Speech Lang Pathol 21(1):51–59

25.

Strini PJ, Strini PJ, De Souza Barbosa T, Duarte Gaviao MB (2011) Assessment of orofacial dysfunctions, salivary cortisol levels and oral health related quality of life (ORHQoL) in young adults. Arch Oral Biol 56:1521–1527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.06.009 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Cheng HY, Murdoch BE, Goozee JV, Scott D (2007) Physiologic development of tongue-jaw coordination from childhood to adulthood. J Speech Lang Hear Res 50:352–360. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Smith A, Zelaznik HN (2004) Development of functional synergies for speech motor coordination in childhood and adolescence. Dev Psychobiol 45:22–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20009 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Trotman CA, Faraway JJ, Losken HW, van Aalst JA (2007) Functional outcomes of cleft lip surgery. Part II: quantification of nasolabial movement. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 44:607–616. https://doi.org/10.1597/06-125.1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Nyberg J, Peterson P, Lohmander A (2014) Speech outcomes at age 5 and 10 years in unilateral cleft lip and palate after one-stage palatal repair with minimal incision technique - a longitudinal perspective. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 78:1662–1670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.07.016 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Klintö K, Falk E, Wilhelmsson S, Schonmeyr B, Becker M (2018) Speech in 5-year-olds with cleft palate with or without cleft lip treated with primary palatal surgery with muscle reconstruction according to Sommerlad. Cleft Palate Craniofac. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665618768541

31.

Bosnjak A, Vucicevic-Boras V, Miletic I, Bozic D, Vukelja M (2002) Incidence of oral habits in children with mixed dentition. J Oral Rehabil 29:902–905CrossRefPubMed

32.

Barsi PC, Ribeiro da Silva T, Costa B, da Silva Dalben G (2013) Prevalence of oral habits in children with cleft lip and palate. Plast Surg Int 2013:247908–247904. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/247908 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Gabre P, Norrman C, Birkhed D (2005) Oral sugar clearance in individuals with oral motor dysfunctions. Caries Res 39:357–362. https://doi.org/10.1159/000086841 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Dawes C (2008) Salivary flow patterns and the health of hard and soft oral tissues. J Am Dent Assoc 139:18–24CrossRef

Titel: A comparison of orofacial profiles in 5- and 10-year-old Swedish children with and without cleft lip and/or palate
verfasst von: Anna Lena Sundell
Agneta Marcusson
Publikationsdatum: 16.07.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2562-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

A comparison of orofacial profiles in 5- and 10-year-old Swedish children with and without cleft lip and/or palate

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

The antimicrobial properties, cytotoxicity, and differentiation potential of double antibiotic intracanal medicaments loaded into hydrogel system

Injectable platelet rich fibrin: cell content, morphological, and protein characterization

Influence of involuntary facial expressions on reproducibility of 3D stereophotogrammetry in children with and without complete unilateral cleft lip and palate from 3 to 18 months of age

Effects of non-thermal atmospheric plasma treatment on dentin wetting and surface free energy for application of universal adhesives

Diagnosis of vertical root fracture in teeth close and distant to implant: an in vitro study to assess the influence of artifacts produced in cone beam computed tomography

What kind of third molars are disease-free in a population aged 30 to 93 years?

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter