Anzeige
Erschienen in:
01.12.2014 | Original Article
A Comparison of the “Hands-Off” and “Hands-On” Methods to Reduce Perineal Lacerations: A Randomised Clinical Trial
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Ausgabe 6/2014
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Objective
The objective of the current study was to compare the “Hands-off” and “Hands-on” methods to reduce perineal lacerations.
Method
We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of two techniques for perineum protection during spontaneous delivery. Study participants included 600 nulliparous expectant mothers, who were divided equally between the “hands off” and “hands on” groups (n_300 per group).
Findings
A total of 147 (49 %) women in the “Hands-on” and 143 women (47.7 %) in the “Hand -off” groups encountered perineal trauma (p = 0.74). In the “Hands-on” group, 8 women (2.7 %) experienced a third degree trauma compared with (0.3 %) that in the “Hands-off” method (p = 0.1).
Episiotomy was performed on 38 women (12.7 %) from the “Hands-on” and 17 (5.7 %) women from the “Hands-off” (p = 0.003) groups. In addition, 28 women (9.3 %) from the “Hands-on” group and 47 women (15.7 %) from the “Hands-off” group experienced periurethral tears (p = 0.01) that did not need mending.
Conclusion
Application of the “Hands-off” method for vaginal delivery has a positive effect on the mother’s health because of the reduction of Episiotomy and third degree tearing. Therefore, we conclude that the “Hands-off” method offers a safer alternative for perineal control during labor.