Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 3/2018

03.01.2018 | Original Article

A comparison of the prognosis between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in stage IB–IIA cervical cancer

verfasst von: Xiuzhen Xie, Kun Song, Baoxia Cui, Jie Jiang, Xingsheng Yang, Beihua Kong

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To explore differences in prognosis between adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and to explore feasibility of ovarian preservation in stage IB–IIA cervical cancer (CC).

Materials and methods

Medical records of 810 patients (682 SCC + 128 AC) with stage IB–IIA CC were reviewed. Clinical and pathological characters of the two groups were compared using the chi-squared test. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used in univariate analysis of prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was conducted by the Cox hazards regression model.

Results

The incidence of LVSI (lymphovascular space invasion) and poor cell differentiation in SCC patients was higher than that in AC patients (23.90% vs. 8.59%, P < 0.05; and 54.25% vs. 28.91%, P < 0.05). Results of univariate analysis showed that cell differentiation, clinical stage, lymph node metastasis (LNM), ovarian metastasis (OM), parametrial involvement (PI), LVSI, depth of stromal invasion, and tumor size were related to the prognosis of patients with stage IB–IIA CC (P < 0.05). Results of multivariate analysis showed that cell differentiation, clinical stage, and LNM were independent prognostic factors for patients with stage IB–IIA CC. There was no difference in 5-year survival rate between SCC patients and AC patients (87.3% vs. 82.4%; P > 0.05). In AC patients, there was no difference in the 5-year survival rate between patients with ovarian retention and patients with bilateral ovariectomy (75% vs. 86.6%; P > 0.05).

Conclusions

In stage IB–IIA CC, there is no difference in prognosis between AC and SCC. The ovaries of stage IB–IIA1 AC patients under age 45 might be preserved.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Davy ML, Dodd TJ, Luke CG et al (2003) Cervical cancer: effect of glandular cell type on prognosis, treatment, and survival. Obstet Gynecol 101:38–45PubMed Davy ML, Dodd TJ, Luke CG et al (2003) Cervical cancer: effect of glandular cell type on prognosis, treatment, and survival. Obstet Gynecol 101:38–45PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Eifel PJ, Burke TW, Morris M et al (1995) Adenocarcinoma as an independent risk factor for disease recurrence in patients with stage IB cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 59:38–44CrossRefPubMed Eifel PJ, Burke TW, Morris M et al (1995) Adenocarcinoma as an independent risk factor for disease recurrence in patients with stage IB cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 59:38–44CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Irie T, Kigawa J, Minagawa Y et al (2000) Prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of IB–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in patients who have had radical hysterectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 26:464–467CrossRefPubMed Irie T, Kigawa J, Minagawa Y et al (2000) Prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of IB–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in patients who have had radical hysterectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 26:464–467CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimada M, Kigawa J, Nishimura R et al (2006) Ovarian metastasis in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 101:234–237CrossRefPubMed Shimada M, Kigawa J, Nishimura R et al (2006) Ovarian metastasis in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 101:234–237CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Noh JM, Park W, Kim YS et al (2014) Comparison of clinical outcomes of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in uterine cervical cancer patients receiving surgical resection followed by radiotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study (KROG 13–10). Gynecol Oncol 132:618–623CrossRefPubMed Noh JM, Park W, Kim YS et al (2014) Comparison of clinical outcomes of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in uterine cervical cancer patients receiving surgical resection followed by radiotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study (KROG 13–10). Gynecol Oncol 132:618–623CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee YY, Choi CH, Kim TJ et al (2011) A comparison of pure adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy in stage IB–IIA. Gynecol Oncol 120:439–443CrossRefPubMed Lee YY, Choi CH, Kim TJ et al (2011) A comparison of pure adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy in stage IB–IIA. Gynecol Oncol 120:439–443CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakanishi T, Ishikawa H, Suzuki Y et al (2000) A comparison of prognoses of pathologic stage IB adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 79:289–293CrossRefPubMed Nakanishi T, Ishikawa H, Suzuki Y et al (2000) A comparison of prognoses of pathologic stage IB adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 79:289–293CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fregnani JH, Soares FA, Novik PR et al (2008) Comparison of biological behavior between early-stage adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 136:215–223CrossRefPubMed Fregnani JH, Soares FA, Novik PR et al (2008) Comparison of biological behavior between early-stage adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 136:215–223CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ayhan A, Al RA, Baykal C et al (2004) A comparison of prognoses of FIGO stage IB adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 14:279–285CrossRefPubMed Ayhan A, Al RA, Baykal C et al (2004) A comparison of prognoses of FIGO stage IB adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 14:279–285CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A et al (1997) Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage IB–IIA cervical cancer. Lancet 350:535–540CrossRefPubMed Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A et al (1997) Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage IB–IIA cervical cancer. Lancet 350:535–540CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mabuchi S, Okazawa M, Matsuo K et al (2012) Impact of histological subtype on survival of patients with surgically treated stage IA2–IIB cervical cancer: adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 127:114–120CrossRefPubMed Mabuchi S, Okazawa M, Matsuo K et al (2012) Impact of histological subtype on survival of patients with surgically treated stage IA2–IIB cervical cancer: adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 127:114–120CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Look KY, Brunetto VL, Clarke-Pearson DL et al (1996) An analysis of cell type in patients with surgically staged stage IB carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 63:304–311CrossRefPubMed Look KY, Brunetto VL, Clarke-Pearson DL et al (1996) An analysis of cell type in patients with surgically staged stage IB carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 63:304–311CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Farley JH, Hickey KW, Carlson JW et al (2003) Adenosquamous histology predicts a poor outcome for patients with advanced-stage, but not early-stage, cervical carcinoma. Cancer (Phila) 97:2196–2202CrossRef Farley JH, Hickey KW, Carlson JW et al (2003) Adenosquamous histology predicts a poor outcome for patients with advanced-stage, but not early-stage, cervical carcinoma. Cancer (Phila) 97:2196–2202CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gien LT, Beauchemin MC, Thomas G (2010) Adenocarcinoma: a unique cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 116:140–146CrossRefPubMed Gien LT, Beauchemin MC, Thomas G (2010) Adenocarcinoma: a unique cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 116:140–146CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Grigsby PW, Perez CA, Kuske RR et al (1988) Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: lack of evidence for a poor prognosis. Radiother Oncol 12:289–296CrossRefPubMed Grigsby PW, Perez CA, Kuske RR et al (1988) Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: lack of evidence for a poor prognosis. Radiother Oncol 12:289–296CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Shingleton HM, Bell MC, Fremgen A et al (1995) Is there really a difference in survival of women with squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the cervix? Cancer (Phila) 76:1948–1955CrossRef Shingleton HM, Bell MC, Fremgen A et al (1995) Is there really a difference in survival of women with squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the cervix? Cancer (Phila) 76:1948–1955CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kilgore LC, Soong SJ, Gore H et al (1998) Analysis of prognostic features in adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 31:137–148CrossRef Kilgore LC, Soong SJ, Gore H et al (1998) Analysis of prognostic features in adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 31:137–148CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Alfsen GC, Kristensen GB, Skovlund E et al (2001) Histologic subtype has minor importance for overall survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a population-based study of prognostic factors in 505 patients with nonsquamous cell carcinomas of the cervix. Cancer (Phila) 92:2471–2483CrossRef Alfsen GC, Kristensen GB, Skovlund E et al (2001) Histologic subtype has minor importance for overall survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a population-based study of prognostic factors in 505 patients with nonsquamous cell carcinomas of the cervix. Cancer (Phila) 92:2471–2483CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee KBM, Lee JM, Park CY et al (2006) What is the difference between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix? A matched case–control study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16:1569–1573CrossRefPubMed Lee KBM, Lee JM, Park CY et al (2006) What is the difference between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix? A matched case–control study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16:1569–1573CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen RJ, Lin YH, Chen CA et al (1999) Influence of histologic type and age on survival rates for invasive cervical carcinoma in Taiwan. Gynecol Oncol 73:184–190CrossRefPubMed Chen RJ, Lin YH, Chen CA et al (1999) Influence of histologic type and age on survival rates for invasive cervical carcinoma in Taiwan. Gynecol Oncol 73:184–190CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hopkins MP, Morley GW (1991) A comparison of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 77:912–917PubMed Hopkins MP, Morley GW (1991) A comparison of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 77:912–917PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Vandenbroucke L, Robert AL, Lavoué V et al (2013) Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: particularities in diagnosis and treatment. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 42:207–216CrossRef Vandenbroucke L, Robert AL, Lavoué V et al (2013) Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: particularities in diagnosis and treatment. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 42:207–216CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Katanyoo K, Sanguanrungsirikul S, Manusirivithaya S (2012) Comparison of treatment outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 125:292CrossRefPubMed Katanyoo K, Sanguanrungsirikul S, Manusirivithaya S (2012) Comparison of treatment outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 125:292CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Galic V, Herzog TJ, Lewin SN et al (2012) Prognostic significance of adenocarcinoma histology in women with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 125:287–291CrossRefPubMed Galic V, Herzog TJ, Lewin SN et al (2012) Prognostic significance of adenocarcinoma histology in women with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 125:287–291CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Berek JS, Hacker NS, Fu YS et al (1985) Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: histologic variables associated with lymph node metastasis and survival. Obstet Gynecol 65:46–52PubMed Berek JS, Hacker NS, Fu YS et al (1985) Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: histologic variables associated with lymph node metastasis and survival. Obstet Gynecol 65:46–52PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kornovski Y, Ismail E (2015) Surgical staging and lymph node status in patients with invasive cervical cancer. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) 54:17–21 (in Bulgarian) Kornovski Y, Ismail E (2015) Surgical staging and lymph node status in patients with invasive cervical cancer. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) 54:17–21 (in Bulgarian)
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Odicino F et al (2006) Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. FIGO 26th annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer. Int J Gynecol Obstet 95:S43–S103CrossRef Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Odicino F et al (2006) Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. FIGO 26th annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer. Int J Gynecol Obstet 95:S43–S103CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Rocca WA, Grossardt BR, de Andrade M et al (2006) Survival patterns after oophorectomy in premenopausal women: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Oncol 7(10):821–828CrossRefPubMed Rocca WA, Grossardt BR, de Andrade M et al (2006) Survival patterns after oophorectomy in premenopausal women: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Oncol 7(10):821–828CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Parker WH, Broder MS, Chang E et al (2009) Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy and long-term health outcomes in the nurses’ health study. Obstet Gynecol 113(5):1027–1037CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Parker WH, Broder MS, Chang E et al (2009) Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy and long-term health outcomes in the nurses’ health study. Obstet Gynecol 113(5):1027–1037CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Orshan SA, Furniss KK, Forst C et al (2001) The lived experience of premature ovarian failure. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 30(2):202–208CrossRefPubMed Orshan SA, Furniss KK, Forst C et al (2001) The lived experience of premature ovarian failure. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 30(2):202–208CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakanishi T, Wakai K, Ishikawa H et al (2001) A comparison of ovarian metastasis between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 82(3):504–509CrossRefPubMed Nakanishi T, Wakai K, Ishikawa H et al (2001) A comparison of ovarian metastasis between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 82(3):504–509CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutton GP, Bundy BN, Delgado G et al (1992) Ovarian metastases in stage IB carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:50–53CrossRefPubMed Sutton GP, Bundy BN, Delgado G et al (1992) Ovarian metastases in stage IB carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:50–53CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Webb GA (1975) The role of ovarian conservation in the treatment of carcinoma of the cervix with radical surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 122(4):476–484CrossRefPubMed Webb GA (1975) The role of ovarian conservation in the treatment of carcinoma of the cervix with radical surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 122(4):476–484CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabata M, Ichinoe K, Sakuragi N et al (1987) Incidence of ovarian metastasis in patients with cancer of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 28(3):255–261CrossRefPubMed Tabata M, Ichinoe K, Sakuragi N et al (1987) Incidence of ovarian metastasis in patients with cancer of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 28(3):255–261CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiao XB, Hu J, Zhu LR (2016) The safety of ovarian preservation in early-stage adenocarcinoma compared with squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Gynecol Cancer 26:1510–1514CrossRefPubMed Jiao XB, Hu J, Zhu LR (2016) The safety of ovarian preservation in early-stage adenocarcinoma compared with squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Gynecol Cancer 26:1510–1514CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A comparison of the prognosis between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in stage IB–IIA cervical cancer
verfasst von
Xiuzhen Xie
Kun Song
Baoxia Cui
Jie Jiang
Xingsheng Yang
Beihua Kong
Publikationsdatum
03.01.2018
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1225-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.