Skip to main content
main-content

28.07.2017 | Original Article | Ausgabe 5/2017 Open Access

Insights into Imaging 5/2017

A critical appraisal of the quality of adult musculoskeletal ultrasound guidelines using the AGREE II tool: an EuroAIM initiative

Zeitschrift:
Insights into Imaging > Ausgabe 5/2017
Autoren:
Carmelo Messina, Bianca Bignotti, Alberto Tagliafico, Davide Orlandi, Angelo Corazza, Francesco Sardanelli, Luca Maria Sconfienza
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1007/​s13244-017-0563-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.

Abstract

Objectives

Our aim was to evaluate the quality of published guidelines on musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US) for adults.

Methods

Between June and July 2016, we conducted an online search for MSK-US guidelines, which were evaluated by four independent readers blinded to each other using the AGREE II tool. A fifth independent reviewer calculated scores per each domain and agreement between reviewers’ scores using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

Five guidelines were included in this appraisal. They were published between 2001 and 2014. Our appraisal showed intermediate results, with four out of five guidelines scoring “average” as overall quality. Domain 1 (scope and purpose) achieved the highest result (total score = 71.1% ± 18.7%). Domain 6 (editorial independence) had the lowest score (total score = 26.3% ± 19.3%). Interobserver agreement was very good for all the evaluated guidelines (ICC ranged between 0.932 and 0.956).

Conclusions

Overall, quality of MSK-US guidelines ranges from low to average when evaluated using the AGREE II tool. The editorial independence domain was the most critical, thus deserving more attention when developing future guidelines.

Main messages

• Four of five guidelines on MSK-US had an average quality level.
• Scope/purpose had the highest score (71.1% ± 18.7%).
• Editorial independence had the lowest score (26.3% ± 19.3%).
• Interobserver agreement was very good (ranges: 0.932–0.956).
Zusatzmaterial
ESM 1 (DOCX 20 kb)
13244_2017_563_MOESM1_ESM.docx
ESM 2 (DOCX 20 kb)
13244_2017_563_MOESM2_ESM.docx
ESM 3 (DOCX 20 kb)
13244_2017_563_MOESM3_ESM.docx
ESM 4 (DOCX 20 kb)
13244_2017_563_MOESM4_ESM.docx
ESM 5 (DOCX 20 kb)
13244_2017_563_MOESM5_ESM.docx
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Insights into Imaging 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Meistgelesene Bücher aus der Radiologie

2016 | Buch

Medizinische Fremdkörper in der Bildgebung

Thorax, Abdomen, Gefäße und Kinder

Dieses einzigartige Buch enthält ca. 1.600 hochwertige radiologische Abbildungen und Fotos iatrogen eingebrachter Fremdmaterialien im Röntgenbild und CT.

Herausgeber:
Dr. med. Daniela Kildal

2011 | Buch

Atlas Klinische Neuroradiologie des Gehirns

Radiologie lebt von Bildern! Der vorliegende Atlas trägt dieser Tatsache Rechnung. Sie finden zu jedem Krankheitsbild des Gehirns Referenzbilder zum Abgleichen mit eigenen Befunden.

Autoren:
Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Jennifer Linn, Prof. Dr. med. Martin Wiesmann, Prof. Dr. med. Hartmut Brückmann

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Radiologie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise