Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2016

19.05.2016 | Original Research

A Cross-Sectional Assessment of the Quality of Physician Quality Reporting System Measures

verfasst von: Brittney A. Frankel, BA, Tara F. Bishop, MD, MPH

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Starting in 2015, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) requires all Medicare providers to report quality measures through Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) or incur a 1.5 % financial penalty. Research indicates that physicians believe this reporting does not lead to high quality care; however, little research has examined what PQRS actually measures, which is reflective of the physicians and patient disease populations being assessed.

OBJECTIVES

(1) Identify the proportion of measures that apply to different medical specialties, types of quality measurement, and National Quality Strategy (NQS) priorities. (2) Identify how different specialties are required to measure quality and NQS priorities. (3) Compare the 2011 and 2015 measures.

DESIGN AND MAIN MEASURES

This was a categorical qualitative analysis of 2011 and 2015 PQRS measures. One hundred and ninety-eight and 254 individual measures, respectively, were analyzed by three domains: medical specialty measured, type of measure, and NQS priority category.

KEY RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2015, the type of measures changed significantly, with fewer processes (85.4 % vs. 66.5 %, p < 0.001) and more outcomes (12.6 % vs. 29.1 %, p < 0.001). The measures showed no significant specialty or NQS category differences. For subcategories within each specialty in 2015, differences in measure type were statistically significant: surgery had the highest percentage of outcomes (61.1 %) compared to 21.7 % of internal medicine and 5.9 % of obstetrics/gynecology. For NQS categories, internal medicine had the highest percentage of effective clinical care measures (68.5 %), compared to 22.2 % in surgery. Surgery had the highest percentage of patient safety (31.9 %) and communication and care coordination measures (27.8 %) compared with internal medicine (5.4 % and 6.5 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that PQRS measures include many medical specialties and significantly more outcomes in recent years, particularly for surgery. PQRS still lacks sufficient measures for half of NQS priorities and sufficient outcomes to assess internal medicine and obstetrics/gynecology. CMS must continue to improve PQRS measures to better assess and encourage high-quality care for all Americans.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Halladay JR, Sloane PD, Lefebvre A, Warburton SW, Wolf M. Should your practice participate in a quality-reporting program? Fam Pract Manag. 2011;18(1):9–14.PubMed Halladay JR, Sloane PD, Lefebvre A, Warburton SW, Wolf M. Should your practice participate in a quality-reporting program? Fam Pract Manag. 2011;18(1):9–14.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sloane PD, Wroth T, Halladay J, Bray P, Spragens L, Stearns S, Sheryl Z. How eight primary care practices initiated and maintained quality monitoring and reporting. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24(4):360–9.CrossRefPubMed Sloane PD, Wroth T, Halladay J, Bray P, Spragens L, Stearns S, Sheryl Z. How eight primary care practices initiated and maintained quality monitoring and reporting. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24(4):360–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer GS, Nelson EC, Pryor DB, James B, Swensen SJ, Kaplan GS, Weissberg JI, Bisognano M, Yates GR, Hunt GC. More quality measures versus measuring what matters: a call for balance and parsimony. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(11):964–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Meyer GS, Nelson EC, Pryor DB, James B, Swensen SJ, Kaplan GS, Weissberg JI, Bisognano M, Yates GR, Hunt GC. More quality measures versus measuring what matters: a call for balance and parsimony. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(11):964–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kessell E, Pegany V, Keolanui B, Fulton BD, Scheffler RM, Shortell SM. Review of medicare, medicaid, and commercial quality of care measures: considerations for assessing Accountable Care Organizations. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015;40(4):761–96.CrossRefPubMed Kessell E, Pegany V, Keolanui B, Fulton BD, Scheffler RM, Shortell SM. Review of medicare, medicaid, and commercial quality of care measures: considerations for assessing Accountable Care Organizations. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015;40(4):761–96.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Berman B, Pracilio VP, Crawford A, Behm WR, Jacoby R, Nash DB, Goldfarb NI. Implementing the physician quality reporting system in an academic multispecialty group practice: lessons learned and policy implications. Am J Med Qual. 2013;28(6):464–71.CrossRefPubMed Berman B, Pracilio VP, Crawford A, Behm WR, Jacoby R, Nash DB, Goldfarb NI. Implementing the physician quality reporting system in an academic multispecialty group practice: lessons learned and policy implications. Am J Med Qual. 2013;28(6):464–71.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Panzer RJ, Gitomer RS, Greene WH, Webster PR, Landry KR, Riccobono CA. Increasing demands for quality measurement. JAMA. 2013;310(18):1971–80.CrossRefPubMed Panzer RJ, Gitomer RS, Greene WH, Webster PR, Landry KR, Riccobono CA. Increasing demands for quality measurement. JAMA. 2013;310(18):1971–80.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Federman AD, Keyhani S. Physicians’ participation in the Physicians’ Quality Reporting Initiative and their perceptions of its impact on quality of care. Health Policy. 2011;102(2–3):229–34.CrossRefPubMed Federman AD, Keyhani S. Physicians’ participation in the Physicians’ Quality Reporting Initiative and their perceptions of its impact on quality of care. Health Policy. 2011;102(2–3):229–34.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966; 44 (3): Suppl:166–206. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966; 44 (3): Suppl:166–206.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chassin MR, Loeb JM, Schmaltz SP, Wachter RM. Accountability measures—using measurement to promote quality improvement. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(7):683–8.CrossRefPubMed Chassin MR, Loeb JM, Schmaltz SP, Wachter RM. Accountability measures—using measurement to promote quality improvement. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(7):683–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the twenty-first century. Washington: National Academies Press; 2001. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the twenty-first century. Washington: National Academies Press; 2001.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Berenson RA, Provonost PJ, Krumholz HM. Achieving the potential of health care performance measures. Princeton (NJ): Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2013. Berenson RA, Provonost PJ, Krumholz HM. Achieving the potential of health care performance measures. Princeton (NJ): Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2013.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Casalino LP, Alexander GC, Jin L, Konetzka RT. General internists’ views on pay-for-performance and public reporting of quality scores: a national survey. Health Aff. 2007;26:492–9.CrossRef Casalino LP, Alexander GC, Jin L, Konetzka RT. General internists’ views on pay-for-performance and public reporting of quality scores: a national survey. Health Aff. 2007;26:492–9.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Chien AT, Wroblewski K, Damberg C, Williams TR, Yanagihara D, Yakunina Y, Casalino LP. Do physician organizations located in lower socioeconomic status areas score lower on pay-for-performance measures? J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(5):548–54.CrossRefPubMed Chien AT, Wroblewski K, Damberg C, Williams TR, Yanagihara D, Yakunina Y, Casalino LP. Do physician organizations located in lower socioeconomic status areas score lower on pay-for-performance measures? J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(5):548–54.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldberg AL, Jacob A. Creating better doctors or merely finding better patients?. Family Medicine and Medical Science Research. 2013; 2(2). Goldberg AL, Jacob A. Creating better doctors or merely finding better patients?. Family Medicine and Medical Science Research. 2013; 2(2).
22.
Metadaten
Titel
A Cross-Sectional Assessment of the Quality of Physician Quality Reporting System Measures
verfasst von
Brittney A. Frankel, BA
Tara F. Bishop, MD, MPH
Publikationsdatum
19.05.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3693-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.