Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Primary Prevention 5/2021

12.07.2021 | Original Paper

A Cross-Sectional Comparison of US Adult Diabetes Screening Levels by Disability Status

verfasst von: Phoebe Tran, Lam Tran, Liem Tran

Erschienen in: Journal of Prevention | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Diabetes is a potentially life-threatening metabolic condition that disproportionately affects US adults with a disability. Diabetes screening is key to early disease detection and prompt treatment, but it is not known whether US adults with a disability receive similar levels of diabetes screening as individuals without a disability. We compared diabetes screening levels in US adults with a disability to those without one. Using national 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys, we determined the prevalence of diabetes screening by disability status in US adults who fall under the American Diabetes Association’s recommended screening guidelines: those younger than 45 years old with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 and those aged 45 years and older. We used logistic regression modelling to examine the impact of disability status on diabetes screening while adjusting for diabetes associated sociodemographic and clinical factors. In people with a disability, around 50% of those younger than 45 years old with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and 33% of those 45 years or older did not receive screening. In the under 45 years with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 screening group, individuals with a disability had a slightly higher but non-significant prevalence, but a lower adjusted odds of diabetes screening compared to those without a disability. People with a disability under age 45 had a slightly lower but again non-significant prevalence but a higher adjusted odds of diabetes screening than did those without a disability who were age 45 or older. Additional interventions are needed to improve diabetes screening levels among US adults with a disability at high risk of developing diabetes as screening is a critical initial step in the diabetes management process.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat American Diabetes Association. (2019b). 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2019. Diabetes Care, 42(Supplement 1), S13-S28. American Diabetes Association. (2019b). 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2019. Diabetes Care, 42(Supplement 1), S13-S28.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher, B., Gulanick, M., & Lamendola, C. (2002). Risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 16(2), 17–23.CrossRef Fletcher, B., Gulanick, M., & Lamendola, C. (2002). Risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 16(2), 17–23.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gordon, R. A. (1987). Social desirability bias: A demonstration and technique for its reduction. Teaching of Psychology, 14(1), 40–42.CrossRef Gordon, R. A. (1987). Social desirability bias: A demonstration and technique for its reduction. Teaching of Psychology, 14(1), 40–42.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Handelsman, Y., Bloomgarden, Z. T., Grunberger, G., Umpierrez, G., Zimmerman, R. S., Bailey, T. S., & Zangeneh, F. (2015). American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology–clinical practice guidelines for developing a diabetes mellitus comprehensive care plan–2015—executive summary. Endocrine Practice, 21(4), 413–437.CrossRef Handelsman, Y., Bloomgarden, Z. T., Grunberger, G., Umpierrez, G., Zimmerman, R. S., Bailey, T. S., & Zangeneh, F. (2015). American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology–clinical practice guidelines for developing a diabetes mellitus comprehensive care plan–2015—executive summary. Endocrine Practice, 21(4), 413–437.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kripke, C. (2017). Patients with disabilities: Avoiding unconscious bias when discussing goals of care. American Family Physician, 96(3), 192–195.PubMed Kripke, C. (2017). Patients with disabilities: Avoiding unconscious bias when discussing goals of care. American Family Physician, 96(3), 192–195.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Taggart, L., Truesdale-Kennedy, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Working with people with people with intellectual and developmental disabilities who have diabetes. Journal of Diabetes Nursing, 19(5), 190–194. Taggart, L., Truesdale-Kennedy, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Working with people with people with intellectual and developmental disabilities who have diabetes. Journal of Diabetes Nursing, 19(5), 190–194.
Metadaten
Titel
A Cross-Sectional Comparison of US Adult Diabetes Screening Levels by Disability Status
verfasst von
Phoebe Tran
Lam Tran
Liem Tran
Publikationsdatum
12.07.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Prevention / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 2731-5533
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-5541
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-021-00641-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

The Journal of Primary Prevention 5/2021 Zur Ausgabe