Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics 7/2021

15.04.2021 | Original Paper

“A decade with micro-tubular decompression”: Peri-operative complications and surgical outcomes in single and multilevel lumbar canal stenosis

verfasst von: Jwalant Patel, Vishal Kundnani, Suraj Kuriya

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 7/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

We present ten years experience with micro-tubular decompression (MTD) performed for single and multilevel lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) assessing the peri-operative complications and mid-term surgical outcome. The aims of this study were to review the incidence of peri-operative complications and classification of complications and define risk factors to prevent it while negotiating the learning curve.

Methods

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data over a period of ten years involving 625 patients who underwent single/multilevel lumbar MTD. Peri-operative clinical-radiological parameters, post-operative complications, clinical outcome (VAS and ODI), and satisfactory outcomes in the form of Wang and Bohlmann’s criteria were evaluated. The peri-operative complications were divided into five broad categories based on their time of occurrence, severity, and system affected. The comparison between the patients with and without complications was done to evaluate the causative risk factors.

Results

The overall incidence of the peri-operative complication was 12.96% over ten years with higher rate (29.8%) during the initial three years of practice and lower rate (8.78%) in the last seven years. The most common peri-operative complications were urinary tract infections (UTI). The risk factors for complications with MTD revealed in statistical analysis were presence of one or more comorbidities, L4–L5 single-level stenosis, bilateral stenosis with ipsilateral and bilateral decompression done through unilateral approach, and multilevel MTD done through single incision for multilevel LCS. More than 95% patients operated with MTD showed excellent to good outcome as per the Wang and Bohlmann’s criteria at the final follow-up.

Conclusion

This study represents 12.96% overall incidence of peri-operative complications with higher rate (29.8%) during the initial three years of practice and lower rate (8.78%) in the last seven years with MTD for single/multilevel LCS with. MTD is an effective procedure with substantial clinical benefits in the form of excellent to good clinico-radiological outcomes at two year follow-up. However, there is a learning curve associated with the adoption of the technique. The described classification for peri-operative complications is helpful to record, to evaluate, and to understand the aetiology and risk factors based on its duration of occurrence in the peri-operative period.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Foley KT, Smith MM (1997) Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg 3:301–307 Foley KT, Smith MM (1997) Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg 3:301–307
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Poletti CE (1995) Central lumbar stenosis caused by ligamentum flavum: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral ligamentectomy: preliminary report of two cases. Neurosurgery 37:343–347CrossRef Poletti CE (1995) Central lumbar stenosis caused by ligamentum flavum: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral ligamentectomy: preliminary report of two cases. Neurosurgery 37:343–347CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Righesso O, Falavigna A, Avanzi O (2007) Comparison of open discectomy with microendoscopic discectomy in lumbar disc herniations: results of randomized controlled trial. Neurosurgery 61:545–549CrossRef Righesso O, Falavigna A, Avanzi O (2007) Comparison of open discectomy with microendoscopic discectomy in lumbar disc herniations: results of randomized controlled trial. Neurosurgery 61:545–549CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikuta K, Arima J, Tanaka T et al (2005) Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine 2:624–633CrossRef Ikuta K, Arima J, Tanaka T et al (2005) Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine 2:624–633CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pao JL, Chen WC, Chen PQ (2009) Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 18:672–678CrossRef Pao JL, Chen WC, Chen PQ (2009) Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 18:672–678CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mannion R, Guilfoyle M, Efendy J et al (2012) Minimally invasive lumbar decompression long-term outcome, morbidity and the learning curve from the first 50 cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 25:47–51CrossRef Mannion R, Guilfoyle M, Efendy J et al (2012) Minimally invasive lumbar decompression long-term outcome, morbidity and the learning curve from the first 50 cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 25:47–51CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel N, Bagan B, Vadera S et al (2007) Obesity and spine surgery: relation to perioperative complications. J Neurosurg Spine 6:291–297CrossRef Patel N, Bagan B, Vadera S et al (2007) Obesity and spine surgery: relation to perioperative complications. J Neurosurg Spine 6:291–297CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lebude B, Yadla S, Albert T et al (2010) Defining “complications” in spine surgery. Neurosurgery and Orthopedic Spine Surgeons’ Survey. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:492–500CrossRef Lebude B, Yadla S, Albert T et al (2010) Defining “complications” in spine surgery. Neurosurgery and Orthopedic Spine Surgeons’ Survey. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:492–500CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ibanez FA, Hem S, Ajler P et al (2011) A new classification of complications in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 75:709–715CrossRef Ibanez FA, Hem S, Ajler P et al (2011) A new classification of complications in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 75:709–715CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Perez-Cruet MJ, Fessler RG, Perin NI (2002) Review: complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery. Neurosurgery 51(2 Suppl):26–36 Perez-Cruet MJ, Fessler RG, Perin NI (2002) Review: complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery. Neurosurgery 51(2 Suppl):26–36
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratliff JK, Lebude B, Albert T et al (2009) Complications in spinal surgery: comparative survey of spine surgeons and patients who underwent spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 10:578–584CrossRef Ratliff JK, Lebude B, Albert T et al (2009) Complications in spinal surgery: comparative survey of spine surgeons and patients who underwent spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 10:578–584CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Imagama S, Kawakami N, Tsuji T et al (2011) Perioperative complications and adverse events after lumbar spinal surgery: evaluation of 1012 operations at a single center. J Orthop Sci 16:510–515CrossRef Imagama S, Kawakami N, Tsuji T et al (2011) Perioperative complications and adverse events after lumbar spinal surgery: evaluation of 1012 operations at a single center. J Orthop Sci 16:510–515CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dekutoski MB, Norvell DC, Dettori JR et al (2010) Surgeons’ perceptions and reported complications in spine surgery. Spine 35(Suppl):S9–S21CrossRef Dekutoski MB, Norvell DC, Dettori JR et al (2010) Surgeons’ perceptions and reported complications in spine surgery. Spine 35(Suppl):S9–S21CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Guiot BH, Khoo LT, Fessler RG (2002) A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine. Spine 27:432–438CrossRef Guiot BH, Khoo LT, Fessler RG (2002) A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine. Spine 27:432–438CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahman M, Summers LE, Richter B et al (2008) Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the “classic” open approach. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 51:100–105CrossRef Rahman M, Summers LE, Richter B et al (2008) Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the “classic” open approach. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 51:100–105CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikuta K, Arima J, Tanaka T et al (2005) Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2:624–633CrossRef Ikuta K, Arima J, Tanaka T et al (2005) Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2:624–633CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilby MJ, Seeley H, Laing RJ (2006) Laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a safe and effective treatment. Br J Neurosurg 20:391–395CrossRef Wilby MJ, Seeley H, Laing RJ (2006) Laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a safe and effective treatment. Br J Neurosurg 20:391–395CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD et al (2008) SPORT Investigators. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 358:794–810CrossRef Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD et al (2008) SPORT Investigators. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 358:794–810CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bresnahan L, Ogden AT, Natarajan RN et al (2009) A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques. Spine 34:17–23CrossRef Bresnahan L, Ogden AT, Natarajan RN et al (2009) A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques. Spine 34:17–23CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Khoo L, Fessler RG (2002) Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery 51(5 suppl):S146–S154PubMed Khoo L, Fessler RG (2002) Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery 51(5 suppl):S146–S154PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Palmer S, Turner R, Palmer R (2002) Bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis involving a unilateral approach with microscope and tubular retractor system. J Neurosurg 97(Suppl 2):213–217PubMed Palmer S, Turner R, Palmer R (2002) Bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis involving a unilateral approach with microscope and tubular retractor system. J Neurosurg 97(Suppl 2):213–217PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Palmer S, Turner R, Palmer R (2002) Bilateral decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis associated with spondylolisthesis: unilateral approach and use of a microscope and tubular retractor system. Neurosurg Focus 13:E4PubMed Palmer S, Turner R, Palmer R (2002) Bilateral decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis associated with spondylolisthesis: unilateral approach and use of a microscope and tubular retractor system. Neurosurg Focus 13:E4PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Benz RJ, Garfin SR (2001) Current techniques of decompression of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 384:75–81CrossRef Benz RJ, Garfin SR (2001) Current techniques of decompression of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 384:75–81CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar JR 2nd et al (2003) Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A:2089–2092CrossRef Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar JR 2nd et al (2003) Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A:2089–2092CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ragab AA, Fye MA, Bohlman HH (2003) Surgery of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis in 118 patients 70 years of age or older. Spine 28:348–353PubMed Ragab AA, Fye MA, Bohlman HH (2003) Surgery of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis in 118 patients 70 years of age or older. Spine 28:348–353PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
“A decade with micro-tubular decompression”: Peri-operative complications and surgical outcomes in single and multilevel lumbar canal stenosis
verfasst von
Jwalant Patel
Vishal Kundnani
Suraj Kuriya
Publikationsdatum
15.04.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05032-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2021

International Orthopaedics 7/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.