Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical and Translational Oncology 5/2017

16.11.2016 | Research Article

A definition for aggressive disease in patients with HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer: an expert consensus of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM)

verfasst von: A. González, A. Lluch, E. Aba, J. Albanell, A. Antón, I. Álvarez, F. Ayala, A. Barnadas, L. Calvo, E. Ciruelos, J. Cortés, J. de la Haba, J. M. López-Vega, E. Martínez, M. Muñoz, I. Peláez, A. Redondo, Á. Rodríguez, C. A. Rodríguez, A. Ruíz, A. Llombart

Erschienen in: Clinical and Translational Oncology | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To converge on an expert opinion to define aggressive disease in patients with HER2-negative mBC using a modified Delphi methodology.

Methods

A panel of 21 breast cancer experts from the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology agreed upon a survey which comprised 47 questions that were grouped into three sections: relevance for defining aggressive disease, aggressive disease criteria and therapeutic goals. Answers were rated using a 9-point Likert scale of relevance or agreement.

Results

Among the 88 oncologists that were invited to participate, 81 answered the first round (92%), 70 answered the second round (80%), and 67 answered the third round (76%) of the survey. There was strong agreement regarding the fact that identifying patients with aggressive disease needs to be adequately addressed to help practitioners to decide the best treatment options for patients with HER2-negative mBC. The factors that were considered to be strongly relevant to classifying patients with aggressive HER2-negative mBC were a high tumor burden, a disease-free interval of less than 12–24 months after surgery, the presence of progressive disease during adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy and having a triple-negative phenotype. The main therapeutic goals were controlling symptoms, improving quality of life and increasing the time to progression and overall survival.

Conclusions

High tumor burden, time to recurrence after prior therapy and having a triple-negative phenotype were the prognostic factors for which the greatest consensus was found for identifying patients with aggressive HER2-negative mBC. Identifying patients with aggressive disease leads to different therapeutic approaches.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Baselga J, Cortes J, Kim SB, Im SA, Hegg R, Im YH, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:109–19.CrossRefPubMed Baselga J, Cortes J, Kim SB, Im SA, Hegg R, Im YH, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:109–19.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Verma S, Miles D, Gianni L, Krop IE, Welslau M, Baselga J, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1783–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Verma S, Miles D, Gianni L, Krop IE, Welslau M, Baselga J, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1783–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Leo A, Jerusalem G, Petruzelka L, Torres R, Bondarenko IN, Khasanov R, et al. Final overall survival: fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg in the randomized CONFIRM trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(1):djt337. doi:10.1093/jnci/djt337djt337.CrossRefPubMed Di Leo A, Jerusalem G, Petruzelka L, Torres R, Bondarenko IN, Khasanov R, et al. Final overall survival: fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg in the randomized CONFIRM trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(1):djt337. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djt337djt337.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Baselga J, Campone M, Piccart M, Burris HA 3rd, Rugo HS, Sahmoud T, et al. Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:520–9.CrossRefPubMed Baselga J, Campone M, Piccart M, Burris HA 3rd, Rugo HS, Sahmoud T, et al. Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:520–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Finn RS, Crown JP, Lang I, Boer K, Bondarenko IM, Kulyk SO, et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:25–35.CrossRefPubMed Finn RS, Crown JP, Lang I, Boer K, Bondarenko IM, Kulyk SO, et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:25–35.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner NC, Ro J, Andre F, Loi S, Verma S, Iwata H, et al. Palbociclib in hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:209–19.CrossRefPubMed Turner NC, Ro J, Andre F, Loi S, Verma S, Iwata H, et al. Palbociclib in hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:209–19.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Llombart-Cussac A, Pivot X, Biganzoli L, Cortes-Funes H, Pritchard KI, Pierga JY, et al. A prognostic factor index for overall survival in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: an analysis of the ATHENA trial. Breast. 2014;23:656–62.CrossRefPubMed Llombart-Cussac A, Pivot X, Biganzoli L, Cortes-Funes H, Pritchard KI, Pierga JY, et al. A prognostic factor index for overall survival in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: an analysis of the ATHENA trial. Breast. 2014;23:656–62.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Regierer AC, Wolters R, Ufen MP, Weigel A, Novopashenny I, Kohne CH, et al. An internally and externally validated prognostic score for metastatic breast cancer: analysis of 2269 patients. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:633–8.CrossRefPubMed Regierer AC, Wolters R, Ufen MP, Weigel A, Novopashenny I, Kohne CH, et al. An internally and externally validated prognostic score for metastatic breast cancer: analysis of 2269 patients. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:633–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Loblaw DA, Prestrud AA, Somerfield MR, Oliver TK, Brouwers MC, Nam RK, et al. American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guidelines: formal systematic review-based consensus methodology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3136–40.CrossRefPubMed Loblaw DA, Prestrud AA, Somerfield MR, Oliver TK, Brouwers MC, Nam RK, et al. American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guidelines: formal systematic review-based consensus methodology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3136–40.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber A, Bartscht T, Karstens JH, Schild SE, Rades D. Breast cancer patients with metastatic spinal cord compression. Number of extraspinal organs involved by metastases influences survival. Strahlenther Onkol. 2014;190:283–6.CrossRefPubMed Weber A, Bartscht T, Karstens JH, Schild SE, Rades D. Breast cancer patients with metastatic spinal cord compression. Number of extraspinal organs involved by metastases influences survival. Strahlenther Onkol. 2014;190:283–6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(15 Pt 1):4429–34.CrossRefPubMed Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(15 Pt 1):4429–34.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ismail-Khan R, Bui MM. A review of triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Control. 2010;17:173–6.PubMed Ismail-Khan R, Bui MM. A review of triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Control. 2010;17:173–6.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lobbezoo DJ, van Kampen RJ, Voogd AC, Dercksen MW, van den Berkmortel F, Smilde TJ, et al. Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer subtypes: the hormone receptor/HER2-positive subtype is associated with the most favorable outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;141:507–14.CrossRefPubMed Lobbezoo DJ, van Kampen RJ, Voogd AC, Dercksen MW, van den Berkmortel F, Smilde TJ, et al. Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer subtypes: the hormone receptor/HER2-positive subtype is associated with the most favorable outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;141:507–14.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Luporsi E, Andre F, Spyratos F, Martin PM, Jacquemier J, Penault-Llorca F, et al. Ki-67: level of evidence and methodological considerations for its role in the clinical management of breast cancer: analytical and critical review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132:895–915.CrossRefPubMed Luporsi E, Andre F, Spyratos F, Martin PM, Jacquemier J, Penault-Llorca F, et al. Ki-67: level of evidence and methodological considerations for its role in the clinical management of breast cancer: analytical and critical review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132:895–915.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dedic Plavetic N, Jakic-Razumovic J, Kulic A, Sirotkovic-Skerlev M, Baric M, Vrbanec D. Prognostic value of Ki-67 in breast carcinoma: tissue microarray method versus whole section analysis- potentials and pitfalls. Pathol Oncol Res. 2014;21:315–24. doi:10.1007/s12253-014-9823-5.CrossRefPubMed Dedic Plavetic N, Jakic-Razumovic J, Kulic A, Sirotkovic-Skerlev M, Baric M, Vrbanec D. Prognostic value of Ki-67 in breast carcinoma: tissue microarray method versus whole section analysis- potentials and pitfalls. Pathol Oncol Res. 2014;21:315–24. doi:10.​1007/​s12253-014-9823-5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat de Azambuja E, Cardoso F, de Castro G Jr., Colozza M, Mano MS, Durbecq V, et al. Ki-67 as prognostic marker in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies involving 12,155 patients. Br J Cancer. 2007;96:1504–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Azambuja E, Cardoso F, de Castro G Jr., Colozza M, Mano MS, Durbecq V, et al. Ki-67 as prognostic marker in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies involving 12,155 patients. Br J Cancer. 2007;96:1504–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Yin W, Yan T, Du Y, Shao Z, Lu J. The clinical significance of Ki-67 as a marker of prognostic value and chemosensitivity prediction in hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer: a meta-analysis of the published literature. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013;29:1453–61.CrossRefPubMed Liu Y, Yin W, Yan T, Du Y, Shao Z, Lu J. The clinical significance of Ki-67 as a marker of prognostic value and chemosensitivity prediction in hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer: a meta-analysis of the published literature. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013;29:1453–61.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A definition for aggressive disease in patients with HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer: an expert consensus of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM)
verfasst von
A. González
A. Lluch
E. Aba
J. Albanell
A. Antón
I. Álvarez
F. Ayala
A. Barnadas
L. Calvo
E. Ciruelos
J. Cortés
J. de la Haba
J. M. López-Vega
E. Martínez
M. Muñoz
I. Peláez
A. Redondo
Á. Rodríguez
C. A. Rodríguez
A. Ruíz
A. Llombart
Publikationsdatum
16.11.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Clinical and Translational Oncology / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1699-048X
Elektronische ISSN: 1699-3055
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-016-1571-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Clinical and Translational Oncology 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.