This was a prospective cross-over study. It took place in the medical/surgical ICU of St Michael’s hospital in Toronto, Canada, from March to October 2014. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 02067403).
Data acquisition/physiological measurements
At study inclusion, patients’ demographic and medical characteristics, arterial blood gas analysis, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III (APACHE III) score, and baseline ventilator settings were recorded.
A specific nasogastric tube (Eadi catheter) equipped with electrodes and an esophageal balloon (Neurovent, Toronto, ON, Canada) was inserted. The Eadi catheter was connected to a Servo-I ventilator (Maquet, Solna, Sweden). Its position was controlled on the ventilator screen according to the manufacturer’s instructions and previously published studies [
19]. The calibration procedure of esophageal pressure (Pes) consisted of an occlusion test (or Baydur maneuver) (two to five inspiratory efforts) [
20,
21].
A personal computer was connected to the ventilator. Flow, airway pressure (Paw), and Eadi waveforms were acquired from the ventilator using a dedicated software with a sampling frequency of 100 Hz (ServoTracker, Maquet, Solna, Sweden). Pes and Paw (measured between the Y piece of the ventilator circuit and the endotracheal tube) were recorded at 100 Hz by an analog/numeric data-acquisition system (MP150, Biopac Systems, Goleta, CA, USA) connected to a second personal computer. All the aforementioned waveforms were continuously recorded for 5 minutes after a stabilization period of 10 minutes and were secondarily synchronized for offline analysis. Briefly, we synchronized both files to get the 0 flow point of the same respiratory cycle perfectly matched.
Trigger delay (T
d) was defined as the time difference between the initial increase in Eadi (visually determined) and the beginning of the ventilator-delivered pressurization. Inspiratory time in excess (T
iex) was calculated as the time difference between the time when Eadi decreased to 70% of peak Eadi and the end of ventilator-delivered pressurization (Additional file
1).
Five types of major patient-ventilator asynchronies (autotriggering, ineffective effort, double triggering, delayed cycling and premature cycling) as defined by Thille et al. [
8] were determined by visual analysis from airway pressure, flow and Eadi curves over the 5 minutes recording period. Additionally, we computed during PSV
Nthe number of pseudo-autotriggerings defined as a significant pressurization delivered by the ventilator (>50% of PEEP level) not related to a patient’s effort [
22]. Example of pseudo-autotriggerings is represented in Additional file
2.
The global asynchrony index was computed as the sum of the five types of major asynchronies but not pseudo-autotriggerings. Severe asynchrony was defined as a global asynchrony index greater than 10% [
12,
23].
The neuroventilatory efficiency (NVE) expresses the ability to generate volume normalized to neural drive and was defined as the ratio of tidal volume (Vt) over peak of the Eadi (Eadimax).
A semi-automated research software, described in previous works [
24] was used for WOB and PTP measurements (SR program, non-commercially available, Barcelona, Spain).
WOB was determined from esophageal pressure measurement using the Campbell diagram as previously described [
25].
PTP was obtained by measuring the area under the esophageal pressure signal between the onset of the inspiratory effort and the end of inspiration, defined as the end of inspiratory flow signal. This area was referenced to the chest wall static recoil pressure-time curve relationship [
26].
For each step, respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume (Vt), minute ventilation, Td, Tiex, Eadimax, area under the curve of the Eadi (EadiAUC), NVE, WOB and PTP were measured for the 25 initial breathing cycles during the recording period and were averaged.
Study protocol
Once the specific nasogastric tube was correctly positioned, four different ventilator settings corresponding to five sequential steps were applied for 10 minutes, followed by a recording period of 5 minutes for all conditions.
At inclusion, patients were ventilated with PSV as set by the attending physician and respiratory therapists in charge of the patient in order to target a respiratory rate between 20 and 30/minute and with a PEEP setting ≥ 5 cmH2O (step 1).
Asynchronies were screened at the bedside using Paw, flow, and Eadi curves. The T
d and T
iex were estimated by freezing the screen and using cursors. During step 2, Eadi monitoring was used to sequentially optimize PS level, inspiratory trigger, and cycling settings to optimize patient-ventilator synchrony. In more detail, if ineffective efforts were observed, first the sensitivity of the inspiratory trigger was adapted to the lowest possible value without inducing auto-triggerings. Then, pressure support level was decreased as low as possible without inducing significant tachypnoea until ineffective efforts disappeared. Third, cycling-off criterion was gradually adjusted to decrease T
iex, based on Eadi signal visualization. If premature cyclings and/or double triggerings were present, insufflation time was gradually increased by decreasing the cycling-off criterion. During step 3a, Eadi signal was also used to adapt PEEP setting. Practically, if a prolonged T
d was observed, PEEP was increased by a step of 1 cm H
2O until T
d did not further decrease, up to a maximal value of 12 cmH
2O. After this titration process, the PEEP value was selected as the lowest PEEP corresponding to the lowest T
d. During step 4, the ventilator was switched to PSV
N. PSV
N consisted of using the advantage of the triggering and cycling function of the neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) mode but limiting the pressure to the same level than during PSV and using a high NAVA gain to create a square pressure wave. NAVA mode ventilation was thus set with the highest gain level (15 cmH
2O/μV) to provide very fast pressurization mimicking pressure support pressurization shape, to better match the initial inspiratory demand, which can be particularly high in the presence of respiratory distress [
27,
28]. The advantage of this mode would be to look very similar to clinicians used to pressure support ventilation but with an improved synchrony. The pressure limit was chosen to get the same level of assistance between step 3a and 4.
The level of PEEP during step 4 was the same as during step 3a. After termination of step 4, the same settings as step 3a were applied again to rule out a potential effect of time (Step 3b).
Statistical analysis
As no previously published data allowed quantifying a benefit, no sample size calculation could be performed in this physiological study. Nonparametric tests were used because of the small number of patients. Sequentially, for each parameter, the absence of difference between steps 3a and 3b were verified using Wilcoxon tests. The results of steps 3a and 3b were considered together and the average values of the two steps are presented as step 3. The measured parameters were compared across the different steps using nonparametric Friedman test. Wilcoxon tests were used to perform post hoc pairwise comparisons with correction for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate approach. Statistical significance was defined as p value <0.05. The statistical analysis was performed using Prism (GraphPad Software v5.0b, La Jolla, CA, USA).