Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
A 70-year-old man underwent cardiac surgery including left atrial appendage closure. A pigtail catheter was inserted into the pericardial sac because of delayed tamponade. Removal of the catheter was planned for 2 days after drain insertion. However, the resistance was high and pulsatile. The patient was transferred to the catheterization laboratory and a guide wire was inserted through the catheter, revealing the catheter route around the left atrial appendage. The wire was exchanged for a stiff wire to uncurl the catheter as much as possible, then the catheter was removed. The left atrial appendage does not usually represent an obstacle to catheter removal because it is soft and shrinkable. However, once the left atrial appendage becomes closed off, it can become hard, unshrinkable and an obstacle that might be caught by the drainage catheter.
Boersma LV, Schmidt B, Betts TR, Sievert H, Tamburino C, Teiger E, et al. Implant success and safety of left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN device: peri-procedural outcomes from the EWOLUTION registry. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2465–74. CrossRef
Boersma LV, Ince H, Kische S, Pokushalov E, Schmitz T, Shmidt B, et al. Efficacy and safety of left atrial appendage closure with WATCHMAN in patients with or without contraindication to oral anticoagulation: 1-year follow-up outcome data of the EWOLUTION trial. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:1302–8. CrossRef
Di Biase L, Santangeli P, Anselmino M, Mohanty P, Salvetti I, Gili S, et al. Does the left atrial appendage morphology correlate with the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation? Results from a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:531–8. CrossRef
- A drainage catheter tangled around a closed left atrial appendage
- Springer Singapore
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Print ISSN: 1863-6705
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-6713
Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie
Mail Icon II