Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 3/2017

12.11.2016 | Original Article

A good death from the perspective of palliative cancer patients

verfasst von: Lisa Kastbom, Anna Milberg, Marit Karlsson

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Although previous research has indicated some recurrent themes and similarities between what patients from different cultures regard as a good death, the concept is complex and there is lack of studies from the Nordic countries. The aim of this study was to explore the perception of a good death in dying cancer patients in Sweden.

Methods

Interviews were conducted with 66 adult patients with cancer in the palliative phase who were recruited from home care and hospital care. Interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Results

Participants viewed death as a process. A good death was associated with living with the prospect of imminent death, preparing for death and dying comfortably, e.g., dying quickly, with independence, with minimised suffering and with social relations intact. Some were comforted by their belief that death is predetermined. Others felt uneasy as they considered death an end to existence. Past experiences of the death of others influenced participants’ views of a good death.

Conclusions

Healthcare staff caring for palliative patients should consider asking them to describe what they consider a good death in order to identify goals for care. Exploring patients’ personal experience of death and dying can help address their fears as death approaches.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC et al (2001) Preparing for the end of life: preferences of patients, families, physicians, and other care providers. J Pain Symptom Manag 22(3):727–737CrossRef Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC et al (2001) Preparing for the end of life: preferences of patients, families, physicians, and other care providers. J Pain Symptom Manag 22(3):727–737CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Payne SA, Langley-Evans A et al (1996) Perceptions of a “good” death: a comparative study of the views of hospice staff and patients. Palliat Med 10(4):307–312CrossRefPubMed Payne SA, Langley-Evans A et al (1996) Perceptions of a “good” death: a comparative study of the views of hospice staff and patients. Palliat Med 10(4):307–312CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Granada-Cameron C, Houldin A (2012) Concept analysis of good death in terminally ill patients. Am J Hosp Palliat Med 29(8):632–639CrossRef Granada-Cameron C, Houldin A (2012) Concept analysis of good death in terminally ill patients. Am J Hosp Palliat Med 29(8):632–639CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mak JM, Clinton M (1999) Promoting a good death: an agenda for outcomes research—a review of the literature. Nurs Ethics 6(2):97–106CrossRefPubMed Mak JM, Clinton M (1999) Promoting a good death: an agenda for outcomes research—a review of the literature. Nurs Ethics 6(2):97–106CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Patrick DL, Engelberg RA et al (2001) Evaluating the quality of dying and death. J Pain Symptom Manag 22(3):717–726CrossRef Patrick DL, Engelberg RA et al (2001) Evaluating the quality of dying and death. J Pain Symptom Manag 22(3):717–726CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC et al (2000) Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA 284(19):2476–2482CrossRefPubMed Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC et al (2000) Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA 284(19):2476–2482CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehl KA (2006) Moving toward peace: an analysis of the concept of a good death. Am J Hosp Palliat Med 23(4):277–286CrossRef Kehl KA (2006) Moving toward peace: an analysis of the concept of a good death. Am J Hosp Palliat Med 23(4):277–286CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Singer PA, Martin DK et al (1999) Quality end-of-life care: patients’ perspectives. JAMA 281(2):163–168CrossRefPubMed Singer PA, Martin DK et al (1999) Quality end-of-life care: patients’ perspectives. JAMA 281(2):163–168CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyashita M, Sanjo M, Morita T et al (2007) Good death in cancer care: a nationwide quantitative study. Ann Oncol 18:1090–1097CrossRefPubMed Miyashita M, Sanjo M, Morita T et al (2007) Good death in cancer care: a nationwide quantitative study. Ann Oncol 18:1090–1097CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirai K, Miyashita M et al (2006) Good death in Japanese cancer care: a qualitative study. J Pain Symptom Manag 31(2):140–147CrossRef Hirai K, Miyashita M et al (2006) Good death in Japanese cancer care: a qualitative study. J Pain Symptom Manag 31(2):140–147CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC et al (2000) In search of a good death: observations of patients, families and providers. Ann Intern Med 132(10):825–832CrossRefPubMed Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC et al (2000) In search of a good death: observations of patients, families and providers. Ann Intern Med 132(10):825–832CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldsteen M, Houtepen R et al (2006) What is a good death? Terminally ill patients dealing with normative expectations around death and dying. Patient Educ Couns 64:378–386CrossRefPubMed Goldsteen M, Houtepen R et al (2006) What is a good death? Terminally ill patients dealing with normative expectations around death and dying. Patient Educ Couns 64:378–386CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hughes T, Schumacher M et al (2008) Confronting death: perceptions of a good death in adults with lung cancer. Am J Hosp Palliat Med 25(1):39–44CrossRef Hughes T, Schumacher M et al (2008) Confronting death: perceptions of a good death in adults with lung cancer. Am J Hosp Palliat Med 25(1):39–44CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vig EK, Davenport NA, Pearlman RA (2002) Good deaths, bad deaths, and preferences for the end of life: a qualitative study of geriatric outpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:1541–1548CrossRefPubMed Vig EK, Davenport NA, Pearlman RA (2002) Good deaths, bad deaths, and preferences for the end of life: a qualitative study of geriatric outpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:1541–1548CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Vig EK, Pearlman RA (2004) Good and bad dying from the perspective of terminally ill men. Arch Intern Med 164(9):977–981CrossRefPubMed Vig EK, Pearlman RA (2004) Good and bad dying from the perspective of terminally ill men. Arch Intern Med 164(9):977–981CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Proulx K, Jacelon C (2004) Dying with dignity: the good patient versus the good death. Am J Hosp Palliat Med 21(2):116–120CrossRef Proulx K, Jacelon C (2004) Dying with dignity: the good patient versus the good death. Am J Hosp Palliat Med 21(2):116–120CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Van der Geest S (2004) Dying peacefully: considering good death and bad death in Kwahu-Tafo, Ghana. Social Science & Medicine 58:899–911CrossRef Van der Geest S (2004) Dying peacefully: considering good death and bad death in Kwahu-Tafo, Ghana. Social Science & Medicine 58:899–911CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Karlsson M, Milberg A, Strang P (2011) Dying cancer patients´ own opinions on euthanasia: an expression of autonomy? A qualitative study. Palliat Med 26(1):34–42CrossRefPubMed Karlsson M, Milberg A, Strang P (2011) Dying cancer patients´ own opinions on euthanasia: an expression of autonomy? A qualitative study. Palliat Med 26(1):34–42CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Karlsson M, Milberg A, Strang P (2012) Suffering and euthanasia: a qualitative study of dying patients´ perspectives. Support Care Cancer 20:1065–1071CrossRefPubMed Karlsson M, Milberg A, Strang P (2012) Suffering and euthanasia: a qualitative study of dying patients´ perspectives. Support Care Cancer 20:1065–1071CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kvale S (1996) InterViews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks Kvale S (1996) InterViews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Krippendorff K (2004) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks Krippendorff K (2004) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15(9):1277–1288CrossRefPubMed Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15(9):1277–1288CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Graneheim UH, Lundman B (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 24:105–112CrossRefPubMed Graneheim UH, Lundman B (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 24:105–112CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Malterud K (2001) Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 358:483–488CrossRefPubMed Malterud K (2001) Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 358:483–488CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kellehear A (2007) A social history of dying. Cambridge University Press Kellehear A (2007) A social history of dying. Cambridge University Press
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Parker SM, Clayton JM, Hancock K et al (2007) A systematic review of prognostic/end-of-life communication with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: patient/caregiver preferences for the content, style and timing of information. J Pain Symptom Manag 34(1):81–93CrossRef Parker SM, Clayton JM, Hancock K et al (2007) A systematic review of prognostic/end-of-life communication with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: patient/caregiver preferences for the content, style and timing of information. J Pain Symptom Manag 34(1):81–93CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Slort W, Blankenstein AH et al. (2011) Facilitators and barriers for GP-patient communication in palliative care: a qualitative study among GPs, patients and end-of-life consultants. Br J Gen Pract :167–172 Slort W, Blankenstein AH et al. (2011) Facilitators and barriers for GP-patient communication in palliative care: a qualitative study among GPs, patients and end-of-life consultants. Br J Gen Pract :167–172
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Benkel I, Wijk H, Molander U (2014) Challenging conversations with terminally ill patients and their loved ones: strategies to improve giving information in palliative care. SAGE Open Med Benkel I, Wijk H, Molander U (2014) Challenging conversations with terminally ill patients and their loved ones: strategies to improve giving information in palliative care. SAGE Open Med
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lundqvist G, Rasmussen BH, Axelsson B (2011) Information of imminent death or not: does it make a difference? J Clin Oncol 29:3927–3931CrossRef Lundqvist G, Rasmussen BH, Axelsson B (2011) Information of imminent death or not: does it make a difference? J Clin Oncol 29:3927–3931CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Johansen S, Holen JC, Kaasa S (2005) Attitudes towards, and wishes for, euthanasia in advanced cancer patients at a palliative medicine unit. Palliat Med 19:454–460CrossRefPubMed Johansen S, Holen JC, Kaasa S (2005) Attitudes towards, and wishes for, euthanasia in advanced cancer patients at a palliative medicine unit. Palliat Med 19:454–460CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Patton MQ Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res 34((5) Part II):1189–1208 Patton MQ Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res 34((5) Part II):1189–1208
Metadaten
Titel
A good death from the perspective of palliative cancer patients
verfasst von
Lisa Kastbom
Anna Milberg
Marit Karlsson
Publikationsdatum
12.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3483-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Supportive Care in Cancer 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.