The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
KV and SV designed this study. KV gathered the data: she contacted the Balint groups, observed the Balint group meetings, audio-recorded them, and made notes about observations and impressions during and after the meetings. KV did the initial coding of the transcripts. KV, SV, VD, RI, RM and JD formed the research group: they repeatedly discussed the coding, as well as the theoretical concepts that ultimately guided the analysis. KV drafted the manuscript, which was extensively commented upon and rewritten by SV. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
GPs’ subjectivity is an intrinsic instrument in their daily work. By offering GPs a platform to present and discuss difficult interactions with patients, Balint group work be might provide them an opportunity to explore and articulate aspects of their subjectivity. In order to get a more profound understanding of what participation in a Balint group can offer, we focused on the process of change that can be observed during Balint group meetings. To that end, this study scrutinized two Balint group case discussions on a micro-level.
Two cases were selected from a larger data set of 68 audio-taped case discussions in four Balint groups. In order to shed light on the type of change that characterizes the presenter’s narrative, we used Lacan’s theoretical distinction between imaginary and symbolic modes of relating to the other.
In both case discussions, the GPs presenting the case initially appeared to be stuck in a fixed image of a situation, referred to as ‘imaginary relating to the other.’ Through a range of interactions with the group, the presenters were encouraged to explore different subject positions, which allowed them to broaden their initial image of the situation and to discover other issues at stake. This was referred to as a more symbolic way of relating to the other.
This study throws light on the type of change Balint group participation allows for and on the way this might be achieved. We conclude that Balint group work is potentially beneficial to the participating GPs as well as to the relationship with their patients.
Balint M: The doctor, his patient and the illness. 1964, London: Pitman Medical Publishing Co Ltd, 2
Horder J: The first Balint group. Brit J Gen Pract. 2001, 51: 1038-1039.
Oppenheim Gluckman H: Lire Michael Balint. Un clinicien pragmatique. 2006, Paris: CampagnePremière
Rabinowitz S, Kushnir T, Ribak J: Developing psychosocial mindedness and sensitivity to mental-health issues among primary-care nurses using the Balint group method. Isr J Psychiatr Relat Sci. 1994, 31: 280-286.
Lustig M: Balint groups - an Australian perspective. Aust Fam Physician. 2006, 35: 639-641. PubMed
Arnaud G, Vanheule S: The division of the subject and the organization: a Lacanian approach to subjectivity at work. J Organ Change Manag. 2007, 20: 359-369. 10.1108/09534810710740182. CrossRef
Lacan J: The mirror stage as formative of the I function as revealed in the psychoanalytic experience. Écrits. Edited by: Fink B. 1949, New York and London: WW Norton, 75-81.
Vanheule S, Verhaeghe P: Identity through a psychoanalytic looking glass. Theor Psychol. 2009, 19: 319-411. CrossRef
Chiesa L: Subjectivity and Otherness: a philosophical reading of Lacan. 2007, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Vanheule S, Lievrouw A, Verhaeghe P: Burnout and intersubjectivity: a psychoanalytical study from a Lacanian perspective. Hum Relat. 2003, 56: 321-338. 10.1177/0018726703056003614. CrossRef
Verhaeghe P: Causation and destitution of a pre-ontological non-entity: on the Lacanian subject. Key concepts of Lacanian psychoanalysis. Edited by: Nobus D. 1998, London: Rebus Press, 164-189.
Fink B: The Lacanian subject: between language and jouissance. 1995, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
Lacan J: The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book II: The ego in Freud’s theory and technique of psychoanalysis. 1988, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1954-1955]
Lacan J: On a question prior to any possible treatment of psychosis. Écrits. Edited by: Fink B. 2006, New York and London: WW Norton, 445-488. 
Georgaca E: Lacanian psychoanalysis and the subject of social constructionist psychology. analyzing subjectivity in talk. Int J Crit Psychol. 2005, 14: 74-94.
Avdi E, Georgaca E: Narrative and discursive approaches to the analysis of subjectivity in psychotherapy. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2009, 3: 654-670. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00196.x. CrossRef
Georgaca E: Exploring signs and voices in the therapeutic space. Theor Psychol. 2003, 13: 541-560. 10.1177/09593543030134005. CrossRef
Lipsitt DR: Michael Balint's group approach: the Boston Balint group. Group. 1999, 23: 187-201. 10.1023/A:1023028121072. CrossRef
Elder A, Samuel O: While I’m here doctor. 1987, London: Tavistock
Lacan J: The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis. Écrits. Edited by: Fink B. 1956, New York and London: WW Norton, 197-268.
- A Lacanian view on Balint group meetings: a qualitative analysis of two case presentations
Kaatje Van Roy
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Allgemeinmedizin
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet
Mail Icon II