Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Nephrology 1/2017

Open Access 01.12.2017 | Research article

A low initial serum sodium level is associated with an increased risk of overcorrection in patients with chronic profound hyponatremia: a retrospective cohort analysis

verfasst von: Sae Aratani, Masahiko Hara, Masahiko Nagahama, Fumika Taki, Miyuki Futatsuyama, Shuichi Tsuruoka, Yasuhiro Komatsu

Erschienen in: BMC Nephrology | Ausgabe 1/2017

Abstract

Background

Even with abundant evidence for osmotic demyelination in patients with hyponatremia, the risk factors for overcorrection have not been fully investigated. Therefore the purpose of this study is to clarify the risks for overcorrection during the treatment of chronic profound hyponatremia.

Methods

This is a single-center retrospective observational study. We enrolled 56 adult patients with a serum sodium (SNa) concentration of ≤125 mEq/L who were treated in an intensive care unit by nephrologists using a locally developed, fixed treatment algorithm between February 2012 and April 2014. The impact of patient parameters on the incidence of overcorrection was estimated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Overcorrection was defined as an increase of SNa by >10 mEq/L and >18 mEq/L during the first 24 and 48 h, respectively.

Results

The median age was 78 years, 48.2% were male, and 94.6% of the patients presented with symptoms associated with hyponatremia. The initial median SNa was 115 mEq/L (quartile, 111–119 mEq/L). A total of 11 (19.6%) patients met the criteria for overcorrection with 9 (16.0%) occurring at 24 h, 6 (10.7%) at 48 h, and 4 (7.1%) at both 24 and 48 h. However, none of these patients developed osmotic demyelination. Primary polydipsia, initial SNa, and early urine output were the significant risk factors for overcorrection on univariable analysis. Multivariable analysis revealed that the initial SNa had a statistically significant impact on the incidence of overcorrection with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.70–0.98; p = 0.037) for every 1 mEq/L increase. Additionaly, the increase in SNa during the first 4 h and early urine output were significantly higher in patients with overcorrection than in those without (p = 0.001 and 0.005, respectively).

Conclusions

An initial low level of SNa was associated with an increased risk of overcorrection in patients with profound hyponatremia. In this regard, the rapid increase in SNa during the first 4 h may play an important role.
Abkürzungen
ADH
Antidiuretic hormone
BUN
Blood urea nitrogen
CI
Confidence intervals
Cr
Creatinine
CSW
Cerebral salt wasting
D5W
5% dextrose in water
DDAVP
Desmopressin
ECW
Extracellular water
Glu
Glucose
HIV
Human immunodeficiency virus
i.v.
Intravenous injection
ICU
Intensive care unit
K
Potassium
Na
Sodium
ODS
Osmotic demyelination
OR
Odds ratios
Osm
Osmolality
p.o.
Per os
SIADH
Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone
TP
Total protein
UK
Urine potassium
UNa
Urine sodium

Background

Hyponatremia, defined as a serum sodium (SNa) concentration of <135 mEq/L, is a water balance disorder, with a relative excess of body water in relation to sodium [1]. Some reports have classified SNa ≤ 125 mEq/L as “profound” hyponatremia [2, 3]. Since profound hyponatremia is also associated with fatal complications such as brain herniation, appropriate treatments for hyponatremia have been discussed intensively worldwide [46]. For example, urgent therapy using hypertonic saline is justified in life-threatening conditions caused by hyponatremia complicated with seizures and coma [2, 7, 8]. In contrast, the problem of overcorrection makes the treatment of hyponatremia difficult because it can provoke osmotic demyelination (ODS), which is a dreaded neurologic complication associated with high mortality [9]. Therefore, the international guidelines recommend limiting the increase of SNa to within 10 mEq/L and 18 mEq/L during the first 24 and 48 h, respectively, from the initiation of treatment for hyponatremia [2, 7]. To achieve the ideal correction rate of hyponatremia, several strategies including administration of desmopressin acetate (DDAVP), 3% hypertonic saline in combination with DDAVP, and re-lowering the SNa with 5% dextrose in water (D5W) have been introduced [1013]. However, there is a paucity of literature on the risk factors for overcorrection [14], especially in “Chronic” profound hyponatremia, which carries a greater risk of neurologic complications from overcorrection, even though several risk factors for ODS have been identified, including SNa ≤ 105 mEq/L at presentation, overcorrection itself, malnutrition, hypokalemia, and liver disease [1522]. We hypothesized that the identification of risk factors for overcorrection can improve the safety and efficacy of the treatment of chronic hyponatremia.

Methods

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine the risks for overcorrection during the treatment of chronic profound hyponatremia to provide physicians with additional information on the safe and ideal treatment of hyponatremia.

Setting

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study, conducted by reviewing the medical records of a 520-bed teaching hospital (St. Luke’s International Hospital).

Study patients

Consecutive patients with chronic profound hyponatremia, who were attended to by nephrologists, and treated in an intensive care unit (ICU) between February 2012 and April 2014, were included. Chronic hyponatremia was defined as hyponatremia that was documented to exist >48 h. If the duration could not be identified, we considered it as chronic [2]. Among the 64 patients who were admitted to the ICU with Sna ≤ 125 mEq/L, we excluded 8 who were not treated for hyponatremia by nephrologists. This exclusion ensured that treatment and data gathering were uniform throughout the study. Finally, 56 consecutive patients with SNa ≤ 125 mEq/L were included in the present study. The number of patients was confirmed using the treatment list of our department, as well as the electrical patient records of the hospital.

Treatment protocol for Hyponatremia

All patients were treated using our standardized therapeutic protocol for hyponatremia (Fig. 1). This therapeutic protocol fundamentally complied with the international treatment recommendations on chronic profound hyponatremia [2, 8], although it did involve an exceptionally aggressive strategy to avoid under-treatment. The steps in this protocol are carried out in sequence, rather than simultaneously. First, all the patients were evaluated to identify the causes of hyponatremia. This evaluation involved (1) an interview about the history of the present illness, (2) vital signs, (3) physical examination, (4) laboratory data, and (5) echocardiography, if appropriate. Urine osmolality ≦100 mOsm/kg suggested that the hyponatremia was caused by primary polydipsia or poor sodium intake. Patientsand received cause-specific treatments, such as water restriction for primary polydipsia, discontinuation of a drug that caused hyponatremia, and amelioration of physiological stimulation of antidiuretic hormone (ADH). In addition, if patients had severe symptoms, such as seizures, coma, or cardiorespiratory distress, an intravenous (i.v.) bolus infusion of 3% hypertonic saline of weight-based (2 mL/kg) amount was initiated until the symptoms improved. When the patients were relieved from these severe symptoms, they were assessed to determine the extracellular water (ECW) status. Patients were considered to have hypovolemic hyponatremia if the following findings were present, along with the discretion of the attending physician: history of gastrointestinal loss, reduced oral intake, thiazide usage, reduced turgor, or prolonged capillary refill time on physical examination, urine Na ≦ 30 mEq/L, and collapsed IVC on echography. Hydration with 0.9% saline at 1 mL/kg/h i.v. was initiated for patients who were diagnosed with reduced ECW. The administration speed of 0.9% saline was increased to 2 mL/kg/h when the patient could not take food orally.
Subsequently, we evaluated the SNa and urine sodium (UNa), urine potassium (UK), and urine output every 2–4 h during the first 48 h. Note that our remarkable degree of monitoring was to ensure safer and uniform treatment throughout the study.
We defined the initial 4-h urine output as “early urine output.” We compared the SNa to the total amount of UNa and UK (UNa + UK) to predict the possibility of a subsequent spontaneous increase in the SNa. In case the SNa was ≤ UNa + UK, hyponatremia was assumed not to be corrected spontaneously due to the absence of electrolyte-free water in the urine, and 3% hypertonic saline at a continuous rate of 0.5–1.0 mL/kg/h or diuretics were administered if hyponatremia persisted in the subsequent 4 h. Thus, 3% hypertonic saline was administered to patients with reduced ECW, and diuretics such as loop diuretics or tolvaptan were administered to patients without reduced ECW. Administration of 3% hypertonic saline was continued at 0.5–1.0 mL/kg/h until the SNa improved. We used this relatively aggressive protocol to avoid under-treatment, based on evidence that even mild hyponatremia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in both hospitalized and ambulatory patients [23, 24].
On the contrary, if the SNa was > UNa + UK, SNa was expected to increase spontaneously by free water diuresis as the urine contained electrolyte free water. In such a situation, there was a subsequent possibility of overcorrection. We defined overcorrection as an increase of SNa by >10 mEq/L and >18 mEq/L during the first 24 and 48 h, respectively. Electrolyte-free water, D5W, or DDAVP was administered to prevent or manage the risk of overcorrection. DDAVP was administrated as an intranasal spray at a dose of 2.5–10 μg in patients with urine output >200 mL/h; urinary losses were replaced with D5W in patients with urine output ≤200 mL/h. If patients could consume free water orally, they were instructed to do so, instead of administering D5W infusion. We performed such interventions for patients who were likely to meet the criteria of overcorrection mentioned above as prophylactic interventions; those who met the criteria of overcorrection were administered these as therapeutic interventions.

Statistical analysis

We set the primary endpoint of the present study as overcorrection of SNa, which was defined as an increase in the SNa by >10 mEq/L and >18 mEq/L during the first 24 and 48 h, respectively [2, 7]. Categorical data were represented as percentages (%) and continuous data as medians (25–75 percentiles). The impact of patient parameters on the incidence of overcorrection was estimated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models, and represented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). In the multivariable model, the adjusted covariates included age, gender, presence of primary polydipsia, initial SNa, initial creatinine, and early urine output, and continuous infusion of 3% hypertonic saline; these constituted multivariable model 1. We selected these variables based on their clinical perspectives as only 11 primary events were identified in the present study. We also created a multivariable logistic regression model including 3 variables that demonstrated a P value of <0.05 in a univariable model; these constituted multivariable model 2. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. For the comparison of patient parameters and treatment strategies, we divided our patients into 2 groups: the no-overcorrection group (n = 45) and overcorrection group (n = 11). The chi-square test or Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for comparisons of categorical and continuous data between the groups, respectively. We conducted all statistical analyses using the R software package (version 3.3.01, R Development Core Team, https://​www.​r-project.​org/​).

Results

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study population. The median age was 78 years; 48.2% were male. Most patients (94.6%) were symptomatic and 3 (5.4%) had severe symptoms. Among the 3 patients with severe symptoms, only one received a bolus infusion of 3% hypertonic saline, because the other 2 patients’ symptoms had resolved by the time the nephrologists evaluated them. In contrast, 16 patients received 3% hypertonic saline at a continuous rate (Table 3). There were multiple causes for hyponatremia; 36 (64.3%) patients were diagnosed to have hypovolemic hyponatremia and 21 (37.5%) with hyponatremia secondary to poor solute intake (Table 1). Table 2 shows the patients’ laboratory data at presentation.The initial median SNa was 115 mEq/L (quartile, 111–119 mEq/L). Table 3 shows the treatments and outcomes after the nephrology consultation. Hydration with 0.9% saline for volume repletion was performed in 36 (64.3%) patients, maintenance fluid infusion with 0.9% saline was performed in 32 (57.1%) patients, and 3% hypertonic saline was administered in 17 (30.4%) patients. Loop diuretics (i.v.) were administered in 4 (7.1%) patients and tolvaptan per os (p.o.) in 4 (7.1%) patients. Prophylactic and therapeutic interventions for overcorrection included the use of D5W in 18 (32.1%) patients, free water intake in 2 (3.6%) patients, and DDAVP in 11 (19.6%) patients. The mean initial time of DDAVP administration was 8 h (range, 7–12 h) after the presentation. A total of 11 (19.6%) patients met the criteria for overcorrection: 9 (16.0%) patients in 24 h, 6 (10.7%) in 48 h, and 4 (7.1%) in both 24 and 48 h. Fortunately, none of the patients developed ODS during or after hyponatremia treatment in this study. Figure 2 shows the time course of SNa levels during the first 48 h after the treatment.
Table 1
Patient characteristics
Parameters
Missing
Total
(n = 56)
No-Overcorrection
(n = 45)
Overcorrection
(n = 11)
p-value
Age, years old
0
78 (60–83)
79 (63–84)
60 (48–82)
0.129
Male
0
27 (48.2)
22 (48.9)
5 (45.5)
0.838
Body weight, kg
0
52 (42–60)
50 (40–58)
56 (51–69)
0.049
Symptoms
 Severe symptoms
  Seizures
0
3 (5.4)
0 (0.0)
3 (27.3)
<0.001
  Coma
0
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
  Cardiorespiratory distress
0
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
 Other symptoms
  Vomit
0
13 (23.2)
9 (20.0)
4 (36.4)
0.249
  Nausea
0
9 (16.1)
7 (15.6)
2 (18.2)
0.832
  Loss of appetite
0
10 (17.9)
10 (22.2)
0 (0.0)
0.085
  Disorientation
0
34 (60.7)
28 (62.2)
6 (54.5)
0.640
  Impairment of gait or fall
0
10 (17.9)
9 (20.0)
1 (9.1)
0.397
  General fatigue
0
3 (5.4)
3 (6.7)
0 (0.0)
0.379
 Asymptomatic
0
3 (5.4)
2 (4.4)
1 (9.1)
0.540
Cause of hyponatremia
 Primary polydipsia
0
6 (10.7)
2 (4.4)
4 (36.4)
0.002
 Poor solute intake
0
21 (37.5)
17 (37.8)
4 (36.4)
0.931
 Hypovolemic hyponatremia
0
36 (64.3)
30 (66.7)
6 (54.5)
0.452
 SIADH
0
4 (7.1)
4 (8.9)
0 (0.0)
0.305
 Physiological stimulation of ADH
0
11 (19.6)
9 (20.0)
2 (18.2)
0.892
 CSW
0
2 (3.6)
2 (4.4)
0 (0.0)
0.476
 Drug intoxication
0
10 (17.9)
8 (17.8)
2 (18.2)
0.975
 Unidentified
0
1 (1.8)
1 (2.2)
0 (0.0)
0.618
Underlying disease
 Psychiatric disease
0
6 (10.7)
3 (6.7)
3 (27.3)
0.048
  Schizophrenia
0
1 (1.8)
0 (0.0)
1 (9.1)
0.041
  Anorexia nervosa
0
1 (1.8)
1 (2.2)
0 (0.0)
0.618
  Depression
0
3 (5.4)
2 (4.4)
1 (9.1)
0.540
  Development disorder
0
1 (1.8)
0 (0.0)
1 (9.1)
0.041
 Infectious disease
0
14 (25.0)
13 (28.9)
1 (9.1)
0.174
  Urinary tract infection
0
5 (8.9)
4 (8.9)
1(9.1)
0.983
  Pneumonia
0
3 (5.4)
3 (6.7)
0 (0.0)
0.379
  Thoracic empyema
0
1 (1.8)
1 (2.2)
0 (0.0)
0.618
  Meningitis
0
2 (3.6)
2 (4.4)
0 (0.0)
0.476
  Influenza
0
2 (3.6)
2 (4.4)
0 (0.0)
0.476
  Cellulitis
0
2 (3.6)
2 (4.4)
0 (0.0)
0.476
  HIV
0
1 (1.8)
1 (2.2)
0 (0.0)
0.618
 Malignant disease
0
6 (10.7)
5 (11.1)
1 (9.1)
0.846
  Stomach
0
1 (1.8)
1 (2.2)
0 (0.0)
0.618
  Pancreatic
0
2 (3.6)
2 (4.4)
0 (0.0)
0.476
  Renal
0
1 (1.8)
1 (2.2)
0 (0.0)
0.618
  Prostatic
 
2 (3.6)
1 (2.2)
1 (9.1)
0.271
 Alcohol abuse
0
4 (7.1)
3 (6.7)
1 (9.1)
0.780
 Unidentified
0
28 (50.0)
23 (51.1)
5 (45.5)
0.737
Medication on admission
 Thiazide
0
7 (12.5)
5 (11.1)
2 (18.2)
0.525
 Antipsychotic drug
0
2 (3.6)
2 (4.4)
0 (0.0)
0.476
 DDAVP
0
2 (3.6)
2 (4.4)
0 (0.0)
0.476
ADH antidiuretic hormone, CSW cerebral salt wasting, DDAVP desmopressin, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, and SIADH syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone
Categorical variables are shown as numbers (percentages) and continuous variables as medians (25–75 percentiles)
Table 2
Laboratory data at presentation
Parameters
Missing
Total
(n = 56)
No-Overcorrection
(n = 45)
Overcorrection
(n = 11)
p-value
Blood pressure, mmHg
 Systolic
0
130 (112–152)
127 (111–148)
142 (140–162)
0.034
 Diastolic
0
70 (62–83)
70 (60–82)
78 (72–89)
0.137
Laboratory data
 Blood analysis
  Serum Na, mEq/L
0
115 (111–119)
116 (111–119)
107 (104–113)
0.012
  Serum K, mEq/L
0
4.0 (3.4–4.5)
4.0 (3.7–4.7)
3.6 (3.3–4.1)
0.112
  Serum BUN, mg/dL
0
12.5 (9.7–18.2)
14.2 (10.1–22.9)
10.1 (7.7–10.8)
0.023
  Serum Cr, mg/dL
0
0.65
(0.44–0.94)
0.66
(0.46–1.12)
0.47
(0.42–0.73)
0.270
  Serum TP, mg/dL
6
6.4 (6.0–7.3)
6.4 (6.0–7.3)
7.3 (6.3–7.8)
0.260
  Serum Glu, mg/dL
8
123 (98–144)
124 (94–144)
120 (115–138)
0.741
 Urinary analysis
0
    
  Urine Na, mEq/L
0
41 (20–65)
41 (24–66)
33 (17–46)
0.343
  Urine K, mEq/L
0
28 (14–44)
33 (17–44)
13 (10–31)
0.058
  Urine Na + K, mEq/L
0
74 (49–114)
75 (52–115)
57 (28–97)
0.101
  Urine Osm, mOsm/kg H2O
1
332
(245–493)
336
(265–502)
217
(137–359)
0.029
BUN blood urea nitrogen, Cr creatinine, Glu glucose, K potassium, Na sodium, Osm osmolality, and TP total protein
Continuous variables as medians (25–75 percentiles)
Table 3
Treatments and outcomes
Parameters
Missing
Total
(n = 56)
No-overcorrection
(n = 45)
Overcorrection
(n = 11)
p-value
Treatment of hyponatremia
 Hydration (0.9% saline)
0
36 (64.3)
30 (66.7)
6 (54.5)
0.452
 Maintenance infusion (0.9% saline)
0
32 (57.1)
26 (57.8)
6 (54.5)
0.846
 3% hypertonic saline
     
  Bolus infusion
0
1 (1.8)
0 (0)
1 (9.1)
0.041
  Continuous infusion
0
16 (28.6)
15 (33.3)
1 (9.1)
0.111
 Diuretics
  Loop diuretic (i.v.)
0
4 (7.1)
4 (8.9)
0 (0.0)
0.305
  Tolvaptan (p.o.)
0
4 (7.1)
3 (6.7)
1 (9.1)
0.780
Intervention for overcorrection
 D5W
0
18 (32.1)
12 (26.7)
6 (54.5)
0.076
 Instructed to free water intake
0
2 (3.6)
1 (2.2)
1 (9.1)
0.271
 DDAVP
0
11 (19.6)
5 (11.1)
6 (54.5)
0.001
  Time from admission, hours
0
8 (7–12)
9 (8–9)
8 (7–13)
0.853
Outcomes
 Osmotic demyelination
0
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
NA
 Increase of serum Na, mEq/L
  At 4 h
5
2.0 (1.0–4.0)
2.0 (0.0–3.0)
6.5 (3.3–8.5)
0.001
  At 24 h
0
8 (6–10)
7 (5–9)
12 (11–15)
<0.001
  At 48 h
5
14 (12–17)
13 (11–15)
19 (17–23)
<0.001
 Early urine output, mL/h
0
205
(114–386)
183
(85–303)
436
(196–998)
0.005
 Urine output at 24 h, mL
0
2008
(1115–3101)
1640
(855–3005)
3725
(2229–4686)
0.001
 Urine output at 48 h, mL
0
1930
(1416–3006)
1875
(1315–2655)
2695
(1723–3750)
0.073
DDAVP desmopressin, D5W 5% dextrose in water, i.v. intravenous injection Na sodium, and p.o. per os
Categorical variables are shown as numbers (percentages) and continuous variables as medians (25–75 percentiles)
Regarding the risk of overcorrection, Table 4 shows that primary polydipsia, initial SNa at presentation, and early urine output were significant risk factors on the univariable analysis. In addition, multivariable model 1 and 2 revealed that only the initial SNa at presentation had a statistically significant impact on the incidence of overcorrection with an adjusted OR of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70–0.98; p = 0.037) for every 1 mEq/L increase in the multivariable model 1 after adjustment of all covariates listed in Table 3. Finally, we divided our study patients into the overcorrection and no-overcorrection groups, and compared the patient parameters, information on treatments and outcomes in Table 1, and the trend of SNa in Fig. 2 just for reference. It was noted that the increase in SNa during the first 4 h and early urine output were significantly higher for patients in the overcorrection group, as shown in Table 1 (p = 0.001 and 0.005, respectively).
Table 4
Impact of each variable on overcorrection
 
Univariable
Multivariable model 1
Multivariable model 2
Parameters
OR (95% CI)
p-value
adjusted OR (95% CI)
p-value
adjusted OR (95% CI)
p-value
Age
0.97 (0.93–1.01)
0.108
0.98 (0.92–1.05)
0.537
Male
0.87 (0.22–3.30)
0.838
0.63 (1.00–3.56)
0.603
Primary Polydipsia
12.3 (2.02–102.00)
0.009
2.41 (0.09–60.20)
0.576
3.25 (0.16–73.04)
0.432
Serum Na
0.83 (0.71–0.94)
0.006
0.84 (0.70–0.98)
0.036
0.86 (0.73–0.99)
0.041
Serum Cr
1.12 (0.51–2.04)
0.722
1.61 (0.72–4.01)
0.218
Early urine outputa
1.41 (1.13–1.87)
0.006
1.30 (0.94–1.94)
0.149
1.26 (0.93–1.79)
0.163
3% hypertonic continuous infusion
0.20 (0.01–1.19)
0.142
0.54 (0.02–5.50)
0.629
CI confidence interval Cr creatinine, Na sodium, and OR odds ratio
Multivariable model 1 included all 7 variables shown in the Table. Multivariable model 2 included 3 variables that showed statistical significance on univariable analysis
aOdds ratio per 100 mL increase
In addition, among the 56 patients, 6 (11%) from the “no-overcorrection” group died during hospitalization due to infectious disease (n = 4) or cancer (n = 2). Both of these conditions may have caused hyponatremia in these patients. Among the 50 patients who were discharged alive, 12 were lost to follow-up partly because they were referred to their family doctors or because they cancelled their outpatient visits unexpectedly. Among the 38 patients who were ultimately followed-up at our institution, there were no re-hospitalizations due to hyponatremia within a median follow-up of 822 (quartile, 199–1411) days.

Discussion

In this single-center retrospective observational study, we investigated the risk factors for overcorrection by enrolling 56 patients with chronic profound hyponatremia who underwent standardized therapeutic strategies including DDAVP administration at our institution. We found two clinically important observations. First, an initial low level of SNa was a statistically significant risk factor for overcorrection. Second, the rapid increase in the first 4 h of the treatment might be responsible for the overcorrection, as suggested by Fig. 2.

Incidence of overcorrection and ODS

The incidence of overcorrection varies depending on its definition and mode of correction [2, 7]. A retrospective study that involved 412 patients with SNa < 120 mEq/L, in which overcorrection was defined as an increase in the SNa by >10 mEq/L during the first 24 h, reported that 114 (27.9%) patients were overcorrected [19]. The study, however, did not discuss the treatment strategies for hyponatremia in detail. Another retrospective study that included 62 patients concluded that 7 (11.3%) patients exceeded the increase of SNa by >12 mEq/L and 6 (9.7%) patients by 18 mEq/L during the first 24 and 48 h, respectively [14]. The treatment included administration of 3% hypertonic saline, D5W, and DDAVP, which were used in patients in whom overcorrection was likely or had occurred. The incidence of overcorrection in our study was consistent with that observed in these previous studies. We identified that 9 (16.0%) patients had an increase in the SNa by >10 mEq/L and 6 (10.7%) by >18 mEq/L during the first 24 and 48 h, respectively.
The international guidelines define overcorrection with a safety margin. We speculated that no ODS occurred mainly because the increase in SNa was relatively limited in the present study; even in patients with overcorrection, SNa increased by 12 mEq/L (quartile, 11–15 mEq/L) and 19 mEq/L (quartile, 17–23 mEq/L) during the first 24 and 48 h, respectively (Table 3). Similarly, in a previous retrospective study in which four of 37 patients (11%) with overcorrection developed ODS [25], the increases in SNa were 21 ± 5 mEq/L and 28 ± 8 mEq/L during the first 24 and 48 h, respectively. Therefore, we believe that minimizing SNa increases is essential to prevent ODS, even when overcorrection does occur.

Risk of overcorrection

Risk factors for ODS included an initial SNa of <105 mEq/L and overcorrection. International guidelines recommend avoidance of overcorrection in the management of patients with hyponatremia; however, risk factors for overcorrection have not been fully investigated [2, 7]. In contrast, avoidance of overcorrection or ODS may lead to prolonged or inadequate management of patients with hyponatremia, leading to undercorrection in clinical practice. We need to develop an optimal treatment strategy to assure a safe correction rate of SNa to achieve an appropriate correction while avoiding overcorrection. With this point of view, we conducted this retrospective study to determine the risk factors for overcorrection and believe that our results will guide physicians in the management of these patients. Our study revealed that a low level of SNa at presentation was associated with overcorrection, with an adjusted OR of 1.19 for every 1 mEq/L decrease (0.84 for every 1 mEq/L increase). This meant that a 4 mEq/L lower SNa level doubled the risk of overcorrection. Although several previous retrospective studies have indicated that the SNa at presentation was lower in patients with overcorrection compared to those without, a direct association between the SNa levels and risk of overcorrection has not been evaluated previously [14]. Our results alert clinicians to be cautious of the incremental risk of overcorrection when patients present with low SNa levels.

Mechanism and intervention of overcorrection

Regarding the mechanism of overcorrection, it is noteworthy that a rapid increase in the SNa levels during the first 4 h of treatment might be responsible for the overcorrection, as suggested in Fig. 2. In our study, patients with overcorrection showed a rapid increase in the SNa levels soon after hospitalization, with greater early urine output, compared to those without overcorrection. This could happen when factors stimulating ADH secretion subside following hospitalization [26]. For example, resolution of hypovolemia by administration of 0.9% saline, discontinuation of thiazides, and amelioration of pain or stress would easily suppress the release of ADH [27, 28], leading to free water diuresis. Thus, we speculated that the hospitalization itself strongly contributed to the suppression of ADH secretion and the resultant rapid increase in SNa, especially when the SNa levels were very low. Hence, it is clinically important to manage the risk of overcorrection during the early period following presentation to avoid a rapid increase in the SNa levels; this should be considered even if a reactive approach, such as the one described in our standardized therapeutic protocol (Fig. 1), is followed. Sood L et al. recently proposed a unique approach to control the correction rate of hyponatremia by administering DDAVP as the initial treatment along with 3% saline. Their study enrolled 25 patients and showed that the approach was an effective and safe strategy to manage water diuresis [10]. In that study, the mean increase in SNa was 5.8 ± 2.8 mEq/L and 4.5 ± 2.2 mEq/L during the first and second 24 h, respectively. No patient experienced overcorrection. On the contrary, in our study, 54.5% of patients in the overcorrection group received DDAVP administration and the mean time from admission to DDAVP administration was 8 h (range, 7–13 h) (Table 2). Our results indicate that early detection and cautious monitoring of the rapid increase in SNa during the first 4 h of treatment are important in terms of clinical implications, although there is no consensus on the optimum monitoring frequency. For example, hourly monitoring or early administration of DDAVP during the first 4 h could be a reasonable and effective strategy to prevent overcorrection in high risk patients with an initial SNa of <110 mEq/L.

Study limitations

This study had some limitations. First, this was a single-center retrospective study with a small sample size of 56 patients. Some patients with chronic profound hyponatremia may have been admitted to the general ward and treated by general physicians, without the involvement of nephrologists. Second, the definition of overcorrection varies among studies [29]. Finally, we ourselves designed the algorithm used in hyponatremia treatment. The protocol basically complied with international guideline recommendations for the treatment of chronic profound hyponatremia, although we did employ an exceptionally aggressive strategy involving continuous administration of 3% hypertonic saline in some situations to avoid under-treatment [2, 8, 23, 24]. In addition, the purpose of this standardized algorithm was not to recommend our treatment protocol to other institutions, but to make our results comparable to other studies. The appropriateness of applying diagnostic algorithms to treat hyponatremia remains to be studied, and physiology-based treatment must always be kept in mind [30, 31]. Our data should be interpreted in the light of these limitations.

Conclusions

The present study identified that an initial low level of SNa was associated with an increased risk of overcorrection in patients with profound hyponatremia. The rapid increase in SNa during the first 4 h may play an important role in overcorrection. It is also important to note that no ODS occurred in the present study, and that minimizing SNa increases is important to prevent ODS, even when overcorrection does occur.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to the Japan Society of Clinical Research (http://​www.​japanscr.​org/) for their dedicated support.

Funding

The authors have no funding sources to declare.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
The study protocol complied with the Helsinki Declaration standards and was approved by the Ethical Committee of St. Luke’s International Hospital. The requirement for written informed consent was waived as this was a retrospective observational study.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Spasovski G, Vanholder R, Allolio B, Annane D, Ball S, Bichet D, et al. Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;170:G1–47.CrossRefPubMed Spasovski G, Vanholder R, Allolio B, Annane D, Ball S, Bichet D, et al. Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;170:G1–47.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoorn EJ, Lindemans J, Zietse R. Development of severe hyponatraemia in hospitalized patients: treatment-related risk factors and inadequate management. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:70–6.CrossRefPubMed Hoorn EJ, Lindemans J, Zietse R. Development of severe hyponatraemia in hospitalized patients: treatment-related risk factors and inadequate management. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:70–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagler EV, Vanmassenhove J, van der Veer SN, Nistor I, Van Biesen W, Webster AC, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of hyponatremia: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements. BMC Med. 2014;12:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nagler EV, Vanmassenhove J, van der Veer SN, Nistor I, Van Biesen W, Webster AC, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of hyponatremia: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements. BMC Med. 2014;12:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoorn EJ, Zietse R. Diagnosis and Treatment of Hyponatremia: Compilation of the Guidelines. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:1340–9.CrossRefPubMed Hoorn EJ, Zietse R. Diagnosis and Treatment of Hyponatremia: Compilation of the Guidelines. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:1340–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Verbalis JG, Goldsmith SR, Greenberg A, Korzelius C, Schrier RW, Sterns RH, et al. Diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hyponatremia: expert panel recommendations. Am J Med. 2013;126(10 Suppl 1):S1–42.CrossRefPubMed Verbalis JG, Goldsmith SR, Greenberg A, Korzelius C, Schrier RW, Sterns RH, et al. Diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hyponatremia: expert panel recommendations. Am J Med. 2013;126(10 Suppl 1):S1–42.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Arieff AI. Hyponatremia, convulsions, respiratory arrest, and permanent brain damage after elective surgery in healthy women. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1529–35.CrossRefPubMed Arieff AI. Hyponatremia, convulsions, respiratory arrest, and permanent brain damage after elective surgery in healthy women. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1529–35.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sterns RH, Riggs JE, Schochet SS Jr. Osmotic demyelination syndrome following correction of hyponatremia. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1535–42.CrossRefPubMed Sterns RH, Riggs JE, Schochet SS Jr. Osmotic demyelination syndrome following correction of hyponatremia. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1535–42.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sood L, Sterns RH, Hix JK, Silver SM, Chen L. Hypertonic saline and desmopressin: a simple strategy for safe correction of severe hyponatremia. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61:571–8.CrossRefPubMed Sood L, Sterns RH, Hix JK, Silver SM, Chen L. Hypertonic saline and desmopressin: a simple strategy for safe correction of severe hyponatremia. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61:571–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rafat C, Schortgen F, Gaudry S, Bertrand F, Miguel-Montanes R, Labbe V, et al. Use of desmopressin acetate in severe hyponatremia in the intensive care unit. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9:229–37.CrossRefPubMed Rafat C, Schortgen F, Gaudry S, Bertrand F, Miguel-Montanes R, Labbe V, et al. Use of desmopressin acetate in severe hyponatremia in the intensive care unit. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9:229–37.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Perianayagam A, Sterns RH, Silver SM, Grieff M, Mayo R, Hix J, Kouides R. DDAVP is effective in preventing and reversing inadvertent overcorrection of hyponatremia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:331–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Perianayagam A, Sterns RH, Silver SM, Grieff M, Mayo R, Hix J, Kouides R. DDAVP is effective in preventing and reversing inadvertent overcorrection of hyponatremia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:331–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gankam Kengne F, Soupart A, Pochet R, Brion JP, Decaux G. Re-induction of hyponatremia after rapid overcorrection of hyponatremia reduces mortality in rats. Kidney Int. 2009;76:614–21.CrossRefPubMed Gankam Kengne F, Soupart A, Pochet R, Brion JP, Decaux G. Re-induction of hyponatremia after rapid overcorrection of hyponatremia reduces mortality in rats. Kidney Int. 2009;76:614–21.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohmand HK, Issa D, Ahmad Z, Cappuccio JD, Kouides RW, Sterns RH. Hypertonic saline for hyponatremia: risk of inadvertent overcorrection. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2:1110–7.CrossRefPubMed Mohmand HK, Issa D, Ahmad Z, Cappuccio JD, Kouides RW, Sterns RH. Hypertonic saline for hyponatremia: risk of inadvertent overcorrection. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2:1110–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sterns RH. Severe symptomatic hyponatremia: treatment and outcome. A study of 64 cases. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:656–64.CrossRefPubMed Sterns RH. Severe symptomatic hyponatremia: treatment and outcome. A study of 64 cases. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:656–64.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunner JE, Redmond JM, Haggar AM, Kruger DF, Elias SB. Central pontine myelinolysis and pontine lesions after rapid correction of hyponatremia: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging study. Ann Neurol. 1990;27:61–6.CrossRefPubMed Brunner JE, Redmond JM, Haggar AM, Kruger DF, Elias SB. Central pontine myelinolysis and pontine lesions after rapid correction of hyponatremia: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging study. Ann Neurol. 1990;27:61–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sterns RH, Cappuccio JD, Silver SM, Cohen EP. Neurologic sequelae after treatment of severe hyponatremia: a multicenter perspective. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1994;4:1522–30.PubMed Sterns RH, Cappuccio JD, Silver SM, Cohen EP. Neurologic sequelae after treatment of severe hyponatremia: a multicenter perspective. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1994;4:1522–30.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sterns RH, Thomas DJ, Herndon RM. Brain dehydration and neurologic deterioration after rapid correction of hyponatremia. Kidney Int. 1989;35:69–75.CrossRefPubMed Sterns RH, Thomas DJ, Herndon RM. Brain dehydration and neurologic deterioration after rapid correction of hyponatremia. Kidney Int. 1989;35:69–75.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Geoghegan P, Harrison AM, Thongprayoon C, Kashyap R, Ahmed A, Dong Y, et al. Sodium correction practice and clinical outcomes in profound Hyponatremia. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90:1348–55.CrossRefPubMed Geoghegan P, Harrison AM, Thongprayoon C, Kashyap R, Ahmed A, Dong Y, et al. Sodium correction practice and clinical outcomes in profound Hyponatremia. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90:1348–55.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams RD, Victor M, Mancall EL. Central pontine myelinolysis: a hitherto undescribed disease occurring in alcoholic and malnourished patients. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1959;81:154–72.CrossRefPubMed Adams RD, Victor M, Mancall EL. Central pontine myelinolysis: a hitherto undescribed disease occurring in alcoholic and malnourished patients. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1959;81:154–72.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lohr JW. Osmotic demyelination syndrome following correction of hyponatremia: association with hypokalemia. Am J Med. 1994;96:408–13.CrossRefPubMed Lohr JW. Osmotic demyelination syndrome following correction of hyponatremia: association with hypokalemia. Am J Med. 1994;96:408–13.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee EM, Kang JK, Yun SC, Kim KH, Kim SJ, Hwang KS, et al. Risk factors for central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis following orthotopic liver transplantation. Eur Neurol. 2009;62:362–8.CrossRefPubMed Lee EM, Kang JK, Yun SC, Kim KH, Kim SJ, Hwang KS, et al. Risk factors for central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis following orthotopic liver transplantation. Eur Neurol. 2009;62:362–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gankam-Kengne F, Ayers C, Khera A, de Lemos J, Maalouf NM. Mild hyponatremia is associated with an increased risk of death in an ambulatory setting. Kidney Int. 2013;83:700–6.CrossRefPubMed Gankam-Kengne F, Ayers C, Khera A, de Lemos J, Maalouf NM. Mild hyponatremia is associated with an increased risk of death in an ambulatory setting. Kidney Int. 2013;83:700–6.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Holland-Bill L, Christiansen CF, Heide-Jorgensen U, Ulrichsen SP, Ring T, Jorgensen JO, Sorensen HT. Hyponatremia and mortality risk: a Danish cohort study of 279 508 acutely hospitalized patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173:71–81.CrossRefPubMed Holland-Bill L, Christiansen CF, Heide-Jorgensen U, Ulrichsen SP, Ring T, Jorgensen JO, Sorensen HT. Hyponatremia and mortality risk: a Danish cohort study of 279 508 acutely hospitalized patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173:71–81.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Vu T, Wong R, Hamblin PS, Zajac J, Grossmann M. Patients presenting with severe hypotonic hyponatremia: etiological factors, assessment, and outcomes. Hosp Pract (1995). 2009;37:128–36.CrossRef Vu T, Wong R, Hamblin PS, Zajac J, Grossmann M. Patients presenting with severe hypotonic hyponatremia: etiological factors, assessment, and outcomes. Hosp Pract (1995). 2009;37:128–36.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Agrawal V, Agarwal M, Joshi SR, Ghosh AK. Hyponatremia and hypernatremia: disorders of water balance. J Assoc Physicians India. 2008;56:956–64.PubMed Agrawal V, Agarwal M, Joshi SR, Ghosh AK. Hyponatremia and hypernatremia: disorders of water balance. J Assoc Physicians India. 2008;56:956–64.PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin SH, Chau T, Wu CC, Yang SS. Osmotic demyelination syndrome after correction of chronic hyponatremia with normal saline. Am J Med Sci. 2002;323:259–62.CrossRefPubMed Lin SH, Chau T, Wu CC, Yang SS. Osmotic demyelination syndrome after correction of chronic hyponatremia with normal saline. Am J Med Sci. 2002;323:259–62.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Mozes B, Pines A, Werner D, Olchovsky D, Lieberman P, Frankl O. Thiazide-induced hyponatremia: an unusual neurologic course. South Med J. 1986;79:629–31.CrossRefPubMed Mozes B, Pines A, Werner D, Olchovsky D, Lieberman P, Frankl O. Thiazide-induced hyponatremia: an unusual neurologic course. South Med J. 1986;79:629–31.CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoorn EJ, Halperin ML, Zietse R. Diagnostic approach to a patient with hyponatraemia: traditional versus physiology-based options. QJM. 2005;98:529–40.CrossRefPubMed Hoorn EJ, Halperin ML, Zietse R. Diagnostic approach to a patient with hyponatraemia: traditional versus physiology-based options. QJM. 2005;98:529–40.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Fenske W, Maier SK, Blechschmidt A, Allolio B, Stork S. Utility and limitations of the traditional diagnostic approach to hyponatremia: a diagnostic study. Am J Med. 2010;123:652–7.CrossRefPubMed Fenske W, Maier SK, Blechschmidt A, Allolio B, Stork S. Utility and limitations of the traditional diagnostic approach to hyponatremia: a diagnostic study. Am J Med. 2010;123:652–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A low initial serum sodium level is associated with an increased risk of overcorrection in patients with chronic profound hyponatremia: a retrospective cohort analysis
verfasst von
Sae Aratani
Masahiko Hara
Masahiko Nagahama
Fumika Taki
Miyuki Futatsuyama
Shuichi Tsuruoka
Yasuhiro Komatsu
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2017
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Nephrology / Ausgabe 1/2017
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2369
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0732-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

BMC Nephrology 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.