Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2017

06.07.2017 | Colorectal Cancer

A Multicenter Phase 2 Study on the Feasibility and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Without Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

verfasst von: Suguru Hasegawa, MD, PhD, FACS, Saori Goto, MD, Takuya Matsumoto, MD, PhD, Koya Hida, MD, PhD, Kenji Kawada, MD, PhD, Ryo Matsusue, MD, PhD, Takashi Yamaguchi, MD, PhD, Ryuta Nishitai, MD, PhD, Dai Manaka, MD, PhD, Shigeru Kato, MD, PhD, Yoshio Kadokawa, MD, PhD, Satoshi Yamanokuchi, MD, PhD, Junichiro Kawamura, MD, PhD, Masazumi Zaima, MD, PhD, Takahisa Kyogoku, MD, PhD, Akiyoshi Kanazawa, MD, PhD, FACS, Yukiko Mori, MD, PhD, Masashi Kanai, MD, PhD, Shigemi Matsumoto, MD, PhD, Yoshiharu Sakai, MD, PhD, FACS

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 12/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

This prospective multicenter phase 2 study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) without radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

Methods

Patients with LARC (cStage II and III) were included in the study. Those with cT4b tumor were excluded. Six cycles of modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) plus either bevacizumab or cetuximab, depending on KRAS status, were administered before surgery. The primary end point of the study was the R0 resection rate. The secondary end points were adverse effect, rate of NAC completion, postoperative complications, and pathologic complete response (pCR) rate.

Results

The study enrolled 60 patients from eight institutions. For the study, mFOLFOX6 was administered with cetuximab to 40 patients who had wild-type KRAS and with bevacizumab to 20 patients who had KRAS mutations. The completion rate for NAC was 88.4%. Sphincter-preserving surgery was performed for 43 patients and abdominoperineal resection for 17 patients. The median operation time was 335 min, and the median blood loss was 40 g. The R0 resection rate was 98.3%, and the pCR rate was 16.7%. The overall postoperative complication rate (≥grade 2) was 21.7%. The complications included anastomotic leakage (11.6%), surgical-site infection (6.7%), and urinary dysfunction (3.3%). The patients with wild-type KRAS did not differ significantly from those with KRAS mutations in terms of response rate, postoperative complication rate, and pCR rate.

Conclusion

The findings show that NAC is a feasible and promising treatment option for LARC (This study is registered with UMIN-CTR, UMIN000005654).
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet London Engl. 1986;1:1479–82.CrossRef Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet London Engl. 1986;1:1479–82.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong RK, Tandan V, De Silva S, Figueredo A. Preoperative radiotherapy and curative surgery for the management of localized rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2007;2:CD002102. Wong RK, Tandan V, De Silva S, Figueredo A. Preoperative radiotherapy and curative surgery for the management of localized rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2007;2:CD002102.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat De Caluwe L, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Ceelen WP. Preoperative chemoradiation versus radiation alone for stage II and III resectable rectal cancer. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2013;2:CD006041. De Caluwe L, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Ceelen WP. Preoperative chemoradiation versus radiation alone for stage II and III resectable rectal cancer. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2013;2:CD006041.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Peeters KC, van de Velde CJ, Leer JW, et al. Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients: a Dutch colorectal cancer group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6199–06.CrossRefPubMed Peeters KC, van de Velde CJ, Leer JW, et al. Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients: a Dutch colorectal cancer group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6199–06.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Parc Y, Zutshi M, Zalinski S, Ruppert R, Furst A, Fazio VW. Preoperative radiotherapy is associated with worse functional results after coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:2004–14.CrossRefPubMed Parc Y, Zutshi M, Zalinski S, Ruppert R, Furst A, Fazio VW. Preoperative radiotherapy is associated with worse functional results after coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:2004–14.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Birgisson H, Pahlman L, Gunnarsson U, Glimelius B. Occurrence of second cancers in patients treated with radiotherapy for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6126–31.CrossRefPubMed Birgisson H, Pahlman L, Gunnarsson U, Glimelius B. Occurrence of second cancers in patients treated with radiotherapy for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6126–31.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A, et al. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:663–71.CrossRefPubMed Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A, et al. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:663–71.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Jalil O, Claydon L, Arulampalam T. Review of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in locally advanced rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2015;46:219–36.CrossRefPubMed Jalil O, Claydon L, Arulampalam T. Review of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in locally advanced rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2015;46:219–36.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsumoto T, Hasegawa S, Zaima M, Inoue N, Sakai Y. Outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation for rectal cancer. Dig Surg. 2015;32:275–83.CrossRefPubMed Matsumoto T, Hasegawa S, Zaima M, Inoue N, Sakai Y. Outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation for rectal cancer. Dig Surg. 2015;32:275–83.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Folprecht G, Gruenberger T, Bechstein WO, et al. Tumour response and secondary resectability of colorectal liver metastases following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cetuximab: the CELIM randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:38–47.CrossRefPubMed Folprecht G, Gruenberger T, Bechstein WO, et al. Tumour response and secondary resectability of colorectal liver metastases following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cetuximab: the CELIM randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:38–47.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Giantonio BJ, Catalano PJ, Meropol NJ, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3200. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1539–44.CrossRefPubMed Giantonio BJ, Catalano PJ, Meropol NJ, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3200. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1539–44.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Saltz LB, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2013–9.CrossRefPubMed Saltz LB, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2013–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurwitz H, Saini S. Bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: safety profile and management of adverse events. Semin Oncol. 2006;33(5 Suppl 10):S26–S34.CrossRefPubMed Hurwitz H, Saini S. Bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: safety profile and management of adverse events. Semin Oncol. 2006;33(5 Suppl 10):S26–S34.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimizu T, Satoh T, Tamura K, et al. Oxaliplatin/fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4 and modified FOLFOX6) in patients with refractory or advanced colorectal cancer: post-approval Japanese population experience. Int J Clin Oncol. 2007;12:218–23.CrossRefPubMed Shimizu T, Satoh T, Tamura K, et al. Oxaliplatin/fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4 and modified FOLFOX6) in patients with refractory or advanced colorectal cancer: post-approval Japanese population experience. Int J Clin Oncol. 2007;12:218–23.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Institute NC. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. 2009. Institute NC. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. 2009.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rectum JSfCotCa. Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma. 2009; McGraw-Hill, New York. Rectum JSfCotCa. Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma. 2009; McGraw-Hill, New York.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:303–12.CrossRefPubMed Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:303–12.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Green SJ, Dahlberg S. Planned versus attained design in phase II clinical trials. Stat Med. 1992;11:853–62.CrossRefPubMed Green SJ, Dahlberg S. Planned versus attained design in phase II clinical trials. Stat Med. 1992;11:853–62.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, van Krieken JH, Quirke P. Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:9257–64.CrossRefPubMed Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, van Krieken JH, Quirke P. Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:9257–64.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes. The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015;314:1346–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes. The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015;314:1346–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Aschele C, Cionini L, Lonardi S, et al. Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic results of the STAR-01 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2773–80.CrossRefPubMed Aschele C, Cionini L, Lonardi S, et al. Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic results of the STAR-01 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2773–80.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S, et al. Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1638–44.CrossRefPubMed Gerard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S, et al. Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1638–44.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Rödel C, Liersch T, Becker H, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:679–87.CrossRefPubMed Rödel C, Liersch T, Becker H, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:679–87.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodel C, Martus P, Papadoupolos T, et al. Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8688–96.CrossRefPubMed Rodel C, Martus P, Papadoupolos T, et al. Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8688–96.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Schrag D, Weiser MR, Goodman KA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy without routine use of radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a pilot trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:513–8.CrossRefPubMed Schrag D, Weiser MR, Goodman KA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy without routine use of radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a pilot trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:513–8.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:637–45.CrossRefPubMed Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:637–45.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:210–8.CrossRefPubMed van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:210–8.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T, et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1065–75.CrossRefPubMed Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T, et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1065–75.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2015;20:207–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2015;20:207–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujita S, Mizusawa J, Kanemitsu Y, et al. A randomized trial comparing mesorectal excision with or without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II, III lower rectal cancer: primary end-point analysis of Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG0212. J Clin Oncol. 2016. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002212. Fujita S, Mizusawa J, Kanemitsu Y, et al. A randomized trial comparing mesorectal excision with or without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II, III lower rectal cancer: primary end-point analysis of Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG0212. J Clin Oncol. 2016. doi: 10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000002212​.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Sukhni E, Milot L, Fruitman M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2212–23.CrossRefPubMed Al-Sukhni E, Milot L, Fruitman M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2212–23.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasegawa S, Takahashi R, Hida K, Kawada K, Sakai Y. Revisiting the treatment strategy for rectal cancer through the pattern of local recurrence. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42:1674–9.CrossRefPubMed Hasegawa S, Takahashi R, Hida K, Kawada K, Sakai Y. Revisiting the treatment strategy for rectal cancer through the pattern of local recurrence. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42:1674–9.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ogawa S, Hida J, Ike H, et al. Selection of lymph node-positive cases based on perirectal and lateral pelvic lymph nodes using magnetic resonance imaging: study of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1187–94.CrossRefPubMed Ogawa S, Hida J, Ike H, et al. Selection of lymph node-positive cases based on perirectal and lateral pelvic lymph nodes using magnetic resonance imaging: study of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1187–94.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A Multicenter Phase 2 Study on the Feasibility and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Without Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
verfasst von
Suguru Hasegawa, MD, PhD, FACS
Saori Goto, MD
Takuya Matsumoto, MD, PhD
Koya Hida, MD, PhD
Kenji Kawada, MD, PhD
Ryo Matsusue, MD, PhD
Takashi Yamaguchi, MD, PhD
Ryuta Nishitai, MD, PhD
Dai Manaka, MD, PhD
Shigeru Kato, MD, PhD
Yoshio Kadokawa, MD, PhD
Satoshi Yamanokuchi, MD, PhD
Junichiro Kawamura, MD, PhD
Masazumi Zaima, MD, PhD
Takahisa Kyogoku, MD, PhD
Akiyoshi Kanazawa, MD, PhD, FACS
Yukiko Mori, MD, PhD
Masashi Kanai, MD, PhD
Shigemi Matsumoto, MD, PhD
Yoshiharu Sakai, MD, PhD, FACS
Publikationsdatum
06.07.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 12/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5967-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.