Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2018

23.03.2018 | Colorectal Cancer

A National-Level Validation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Subclassification of Stage IIA and B Anal Squamous Cell Cancer

verfasst von: Paolo Goffredo, MD, Mattia Garancini, MD, Timothy J. Robinson, MD, Jessica Frakes, MD, Hisakazu Hoshi, MD, Imran Hassan, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) updated the staging system of anal squamous cell cancer (ASCC) by subdividing stage II into A (T2N0M0) and B (T3N0M0) based on a secondary analysis of the RTOG 98-11 trial. We aimed to validate this new subclassification utilizing two nationally representative databases.

Materials

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) [2004–2014] and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database [1988–2013] were queried to identify patients with stage II ASCC.

Results

A total of 6651 and 2579 stage IIA (2–5 cm) and 1777 and 641 stage IIB (> 5 cm) patients were identified in the NCDB and SEER databases, respectively. Compared with stage IIB patients, stage IIA patients within the NCDB were more often females with fewer comorbidities. No significant differences were observed between age, race, receipt of chemotherapy and radiation, and mean radiation dose. Demographic, clinical, and pathologic characteristics were comparable between patients in both datasets. The 5-year OS was 72% and 69% for stage IIA versus 57% and 50% for stage IIB in the NCDB and SEER databases, respectively (p < 0.001). After adjustment for available demographic and clinical confounders, stage IIB was significantly associated with worse survival in both cohorts (hazard ratio 1.58 and 2.01, both p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study validates the new AJCC subclassification of stage II anal cancer into A and B based on size (2–5 cm vs. > 5 cm) in the general ASCC population. AJCC stage IIB patients represent a higher risk category that should be targeted with more aggressive/novel therapies.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson RA, Levine AM, Bernstein L, Smith DD, Lai LL. Changing Patterns of Anal Canal Carcinoma in the United States. Journal of clinical oncology. 2013;31(12):1569-1575.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nelson RA, Levine AM, Bernstein L, Smith DD, Lai LL. Changing Patterns of Anal Canal Carcinoma in the United States. Journal of clinical oncology. 2013;31(12):1569-1575.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Cancer Stat Facts: Anal Cancer. 2017. Accessed 31 Jul 2017. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Cancer Stat Facts: Anal Cancer. 2017. Accessed 31 Jul 2017.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Glynne-Jones R, Nilsson PJ, Aschele C, et al. Anal cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Radiother Oncol. 2014;111(3):330–39.CrossRefPubMed Glynne-Jones R, Nilsson PJ, Aschele C, et al. Anal cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Radiother Oncol. 2014;111(3):330–39.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Greene FL, Sobin LH. The staging of cancer: a retrospective and prospective appraisal. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(3):180–90.CrossRefPubMed Greene FL, Sobin LH. The staging of cancer: a retrospective and prospective appraisal. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(3):180–90.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat AJCC. American Joint Committee on Cancer Manual for Staging of Cancers. 3rd ed. AJCC; 1988. AJCC. American Joint Committee on Cancer Manual for Staging of Cancers. 3rd ed. AJCC; 1988.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Amin MB ES, Greene F, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2017.CrossRef Amin MB ES, Greene F, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2017.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ajani JA, Winter KA, Gunderson LL, et al. Prognostic factors derived from a prospective database dictate clinical biology of anal cancer: the intergroup trial (RTOG 98-11). Cancer. 2010;116(17):4007–13.CrossRefPubMed Ajani JA, Winter KA, Gunderson LL, et al. Prognostic factors derived from a prospective database dictate clinical biology of anal cancer: the intergroup trial (RTOG 98-11). Cancer. 2010;116(17):4007–13.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat National Cancer Data Base. 2014. Accessed May 2014. National Cancer Data Base. 2014. Accessed May 2014.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugarathnam K, Sobin L, Parkin DM, Whelan S. International classification of disease for oncology. 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugarathnam K, Sobin L, Parkin DM, Whelan S. International classification of disease for oncology. 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat National Cancer Institute. Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER registries. 2017. Accessed 1 Nov 2017. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER registries. 2017. Accessed 1 Nov 2017.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gunderson LL, Winter KA, Ajani JA, et al. Long-term update of US GI intergroup RTOG 98-11 phase III trial for anal carcinoma: survival, relapse, and colostomy failure with concurrent chemoradiation involving fluorouracil/mitomycin versus fluorouracil/cisplatin. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(35):4344–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gunderson LL, Winter KA, Ajani JA, et al. Long-term update of US GI intergroup RTOG 98-11 phase III trial for anal carcinoma: survival, relapse, and colostomy failure with concurrent chemoradiation involving fluorouracil/mitomycin versus fluorouracil/cisplatin. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(35):4344–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gunderson LL, Moughan J, Ajani JA, et al. Anal carcinoma: impact of TN category of disease on survival, disease relapse, and colostomy failure in US Gastrointestinal Intergroup RTOG 98-11 phase 3 trial. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;87(4):638–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gunderson LL, Moughan J, Ajani JA, et al. Anal carcinoma: impact of TN category of disease on survival, disease relapse, and colostomy failure in US Gastrointestinal Intergroup RTOG 98-11 phase 3 trial. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;87(4):638–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Geltzeiler CB, Nabavizadeh N, Kim J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy with a radiation boost for anal cancer decreases the risk for salvage abdominoperineal resection: analysis from the national cancer data base. Ann surg oncol. 2014;21(11):3616–20.CrossRefPubMed Geltzeiler CB, Nabavizadeh N, Kim J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy with a radiation boost for anal cancer decreases the risk for salvage abdominoperineal resection: analysis from the national cancer data base. Ann surg oncol. 2014;21(11):3616–20.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Glynne-Jones R, Lim F. Anal cancer: an examination of radiotherapy strategies. Int j Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79(5):1290–301.CrossRefPubMed Glynne-Jones R, Lim F. Anal cancer: an examination of radiotherapy strategies. Int j Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79(5):1290–301.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Harlan LC, Hankey BF. The surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results program database as a resource for conducting descriptive epidemiologic and clinical studies. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(12):2232–33.CrossRefPubMed Harlan LC, Hankey BF. The surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results program database as a resource for conducting descriptive epidemiologic and clinical studies. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(12):2232–33.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Winchester DP, Stewart AK, Phillips JL, Ward EE. The national cancer data base: past, present, and future. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(1):4–7.CrossRefPubMed Winchester DP, Stewart AK, Phillips JL, Ward EE. The national cancer data base: past, present, and future. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(1):4–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A National-Level Validation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Subclassification of Stage IIA and B Anal Squamous Cell Cancer
verfasst von
Paolo Goffredo, MD
Mattia Garancini, MD
Timothy J. Robinson, MD
Jessica Frakes, MD
Hisakazu Hoshi, MD
Imran Hassan, MD
Publikationsdatum
23.03.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6449-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.