Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2018

17.05.2018 | Breast Oncology

A National Study of the Use of Asymptomatic Systemic Imaging for Surveillance Following Breast Cancer Treatment (AFT-01)

verfasst von: Jessica R. Schumacher, PhD, Heather B. Neuman, MD, MS, George J. Chang, MD, MS, Benjamin D. Kozower, MD, MPH, Stephen B. Edge, MD, Menggang Yu, PhD, David J. Vanness, PhD, Yajuan Si, PhD, Elizabeth A. Jacobs, MD, MAPP, Amanda B. Francescatti, MS, Patricia A. Spears, BS, Jeffrey Havlena, MS, Taiwo Adesoye, MD, MPH, Daniel McKellar, MD, David Winchester, MD, Elizabeth S. Burnside, MD, MPH, MS, Caprice C. Greenberg, MD, MPH, the Alliance ACS-CRP CCDR Breast Cancer Surveillance Working Group

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 9/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Although not guideline recommended, studies suggest 50% of locoregional breast cancer patients undergo systemic imaging during follow-up, prompting its inclusion as a Choosing Wisely measure of potential overuse. Most studies rely on administrative data that cannot delineate scan intent (prompted by signs/symptoms vs. asymptomatic surveillance). This is a critical gap as intent is the only way to distinguish overuse from appropriate care.

Objective

Our aim was to assess surveillance systemic imaging post-breast cancer treatment in a national sample accounting for scan intent.

Methods

A stage-stratified random sample of 10 women with stage II–III breast cancer in 2006–2007 was selected from each of 1217 Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities, for a total of 10,838 patients. Registrars abstracted scan type (computed tomography [CT], non-breast magnetic resonance imaging, bone scan, positron emission tomography/CT) and intent (cancer-related vs. not, asymptomatic surveillance vs. not) from medical records for 5 years post-diagnosis. Data were merged with each patient’s corresponding National Cancer Database record, containing sociodemographic and tumor/treatment information.

Results

Of 10,838 women, 30% had one or more, and 12% had two or more, systemic surveillance scans during a 4-year follow-up period. Patients were more likely to receive surveillance imaging in the first follow-up year (lower proportions during subsequent years) and if they had estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-negative tumors.

Conclusions

Locoregional breast cancer patients undergo asymptomatic systemic imaging during follow-up despite guidelines recommending against it, but at lower rates than previously reported. Providers appear to use factors that confer increased recurrence risk to tailor decisions about systemic surveillance imaging, perhaps reflecting limitations of data on which current guidelines are based.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02171078.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Howlander N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2011. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2014. Howlander N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2011. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2014.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(4):220–41.CrossRefPubMed Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(4):220–41.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(1):10–29.CrossRefPubMed Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(1):10–29.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Khatcheressian JL, Hurley P, Bantug E, et al. Breast cancer follow-up and management after primary treatment: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(7):961–65.CrossRefPubMed Khatcheressian JL, Hurley P, Bantug E, et al. Breast cancer follow-up and management after primary treatment: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(7):961–65.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Khatcheressian JL, Wolff AC, Smith TJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(31):5091–97.CrossRefPubMed Khatcheressian JL, Wolff AC, Smith TJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(31):5091–97.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Grunfeld E, Hodgson DC, Del Giudice ME, et al. Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for breast cancer survivors. J Oncol Pract. 2010;6(4):174–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grunfeld E, Hodgson DC, Del Giudice ME, et al. Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for breast cancer survivors. J Oncol Pract. 2010;6(4):174–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Panageas KS, Sima CS, Liberman L, et al. Use of high technology imaging for surveillance of early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;131(2):663–70.CrossRefPubMed Panageas KS, Sima CS, Liberman L, et al. Use of high technology imaging for surveillance of early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;131(2):663–70.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn EE, Hays RD, Kahn KL, et al. Use of imaging and biomarker tests for posttreatment care of early-stage breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2013;119(24):4316–24.CrossRefPubMed Hahn EE, Hays RD, Kahn KL, et al. Use of imaging and biomarker tests for posttreatment care of early-stage breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2013;119(24):4316–24.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Geurts SM, de Vegt F, Siesling S, et al. Pattern of follow-up care and early relapse detection in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136(3):859-868.CrossRefPubMed Geurts SM, de Vegt F, Siesling S, et al. Pattern of follow-up care and early relapse detection in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136(3):859-868.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(14):1715–24.CrossRefPubMed Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(14):1715–24.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, et al. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(3):683–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, et al. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(3):683–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams RT, Stewart AK, Winchester DP. Monitoring the delivery of cancer care: Commission on Cancer and National Cancer Data Base. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2012;21(3):377–88. Williams RT, Stewart AK, Winchester DP. Monitoring the delivery of cancer care: Commission on Cancer and National Cancer Data Base. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2012;21(3):377–88.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Winchester DP, Stewart AK, Bura C, et al. The National Cancer Data Base: A clinical surveillance and quality improvement tool. J Surg Oncol. 2004;85(1):1–3.CrossRefPubMed Winchester DP, Stewart AK, Bura C, et al. The National Cancer Data Base: A clinical surveillance and quality improvement tool. J Surg Oncol. 2004;85(1):1–3.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Commission on Cancer. Facility Oncology Registry Data Standards. Chicago, IL: Commission on Cancer; 2013. Commission on Cancer. Facility Oncology Registry Data Standards. Chicago, IL: Commission on Cancer; 2013.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat In H, Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, et al. Cancer recurrence: an important but missing variable in national cancer registries. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(5):1520–29.CrossRefPubMed In H, Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, et al. Cancer recurrence: an important but missing variable in national cancer registries. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(5):1520–29.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cossetti RJ, Tyldesley SK, Speers CH, et al. Comparison of breast cancer recurrence and outcome patterns between patients treated from 1986 to 1992 and from 2004 to 2008. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(1):65–73.CrossRefPubMed Cossetti RJ, Tyldesley SK, Speers CH, et al. Comparison of breast cancer recurrence and outcome patterns between patients treated from 1986 to 1992 and from 2004 to 2008. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(1):65–73.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams R. Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata J. 2012;12(2):308–31. Williams R. Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata J. 2012;12(2):308–31.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn EE, Tang T, Lee JS, et al. Use of posttreatment imaging and biomarkers in survivors of early-stage breast cancer: inappropriate surveillance or necessary care? Cancer. 2016;122(6):908–16.CrossRefPubMed Hahn EE, Tang T, Lee JS, et al. Use of posttreatment imaging and biomarkers in survivors of early-stage breast cancer: inappropriate surveillance or necessary care? Cancer. 2016;122(6):908–16.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat 21. Colleoni M, Sun Z, Price KN, et al. Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer during 24 years of follow-up: results from the international breast cancer study group trials I to V. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(9):927–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral 21. Colleoni M, Sun Z, Price KN, et al. Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer during 24 years of follow-up: results from the international breast cancer study group trials I to V. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(9):927–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Institute of Medicine—Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. Institute of Medicine—Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Palli D, Russo A, Saieva C, et al. Intensive vs clinical follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer: 10-year update of a randomized trial. JAMA. 1999;281(17):1586–86.CrossRefPubMed Palli D, Russo A, Saieva C, et al. Intensive vs clinical follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer: 10-year update of a randomized trial. JAMA. 1999;281(17):1586–86.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghezzi P, Magnanini S, Rinaldini M, et al. Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality-of-life in breast-cancer patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1994;271(20):1587–92.CrossRef Ghezzi P, Magnanini S, Rinaldini M, et al. Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality-of-life in breast-cancer patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1994;271(20):1587–92.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Delturco MR, Palli D, Cariddi A, et al. Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast-cancer—a randomized trial. JAMA. 1994;271(20):1593–97.CrossRef Delturco MR, Palli D, Cariddi A, et al. Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast-cancer—a randomized trial. JAMA. 1994;271(20):1593–97.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat 26. Liberati A. The GIVIO trial on the impact of follow-up care on survival and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 1995;6:41–46.CrossRefPubMed 26. Liberati A. The GIVIO trial on the impact of follow-up care on survival and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 1995;6:41–46.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, et al. Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(1):CD001768. Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, et al. Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(1):CD001768.
Metadaten
Titel
A National Study of the Use of Asymptomatic Systemic Imaging for Surveillance Following Breast Cancer Treatment (AFT-01)
verfasst von
Jessica R. Schumacher, PhD
Heather B. Neuman, MD, MS
George J. Chang, MD, MS
Benjamin D. Kozower, MD, MPH
Stephen B. Edge, MD
Menggang Yu, PhD
David J. Vanness, PhD
Yajuan Si, PhD
Elizabeth A. Jacobs, MD, MAPP
Amanda B. Francescatti, MS
Patricia A. Spears, BS
Jeffrey Havlena, MS
Taiwo Adesoye, MD, MPH
Daniel McKellar, MD
David Winchester, MD
Elizabeth S. Burnside, MD, MPH, MS
Caprice C. Greenberg, MD, MPH
the Alliance ACS-CRP CCDR Breast Cancer Surveillance Working Group
Publikationsdatum
17.05.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 9/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6496-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.