Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urology and Nephrology 11/2018

18.09.2018 | Urology - Original Paper

A negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging finding does not guarantee the absence of significant cancer among biopsy-proven prostate cancer patients: a real-life clinical experience

verfasst von: Jung Jun Kim, Seok-Soo Byun, Sang Eun Lee, Hak Jong Lee, Gheeyoung Choe, Sung Kyu Hong

Erschienen in: International Urology and Nephrology | Ausgabe 11/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

We analyzed the data of consecutive patients who had preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) to evaluate the actual performance of mpMRI among biopsy-proven prostate cancer (PCa) patients in predicting favorable pathology in the real-life clinical setting.

Methods

Among a total 730 biopsy-proven PCa patients underwent RP, the preoperative mpMRIs of 534 patients were positive, demonstrating one or more PI-RADs V2 grade ≥ 2 lesion(s). Other 196 mpMRIs were classified as negative, without any suspicious lesion. Pathology was classified to be unfavorable when showing Gleason score (GS) 4/5 or pT3/N1 features. Significant cancer was defined as non-organ-confined, GS 4/5, or cancer volume of ≥ 0.5 mL.

Results

Among a total 196 negative preoperative mpMRI patients, final RP pathology showed that 20 (10.2%) had pT3 disease and 2 (1.0%) had pN1 disease. Regarding the pathologic Gleason score, 117 (59.7%) had GS 3 + 4 and 44 (22.4%) had GS ≥ 4 + 3. The rate of a favorable PCa and an insignificant cancer was as low as 14.3% and 10.2%. Even among only the 101 D’Amico low-risk patients with negative MRI, the rates of a favorable pathology and an insignificant cancer were only 18.2% and 12.7%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value of mpMRI to predict a significant cancer were 74.3%, 45.5%, 95.5%, and 10.2%, respectively.

Conclusions

In the real-life clinical setting, mpMRI demonstrated limited performance in the prediction of favorable and insignificant prostate cancer as a negative mpMRI could not guarantee the absence of unfavorable pathology among PCa patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2015) Cancer statistics, 2015. CA 65(1):5–29PubMed Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2015) Cancer statistics, 2015. CA 65(1):5–29PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein JI, Partin AW, Sauvageot J, Walsh PC (1996) Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy: a multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol 20(3):286–292PubMed Epstein JI, Partin AW, Sauvageot J, Walsh PC (1996) Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy: a multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol 20(3):286–292PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Caster JM, Falchook AD, Hendrix LH, Chen RC (2015) Risk of pathologic upgrading or locally advanced disease in early prostate cancer patients based on biopsy Gleason score and PSA: a population-based study of modern patients. Int J Radiat Oncol* Biol* Phys 92(2):244–251 Caster JM, Falchook AD, Hendrix LH, Chen RC (2015) Risk of pathologic upgrading or locally advanced disease in early prostate cancer patients based on biopsy Gleason score and PSA: a population-based study of modern patients. Int J Radiat Oncol* Biol* Phys 92(2):244–251
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, Walz J, Kattan MW, Huland H, Graefen M (2007) A critical appraisal of logistic regression-based nomograms, artificial neural networks, classification and regression-tree models, look-up tables and risk-group stratification models for prostate cancer. BJU Int 99(4):794–800PubMed Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, Walz J, Kattan MW, Huland H, Graefen M (2007) A critical appraisal of logistic regression-based nomograms, artificial neural networks, classification and regression-tree models, look-up tables and risk-group stratification models for prostate cancer. BJU Int 99(4):794–800PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chun FK-H, Steuber T, Erbersdobler A, Currlin E, Walz J, Schlomm T, Haese A, Heinzer H, McCormack M, Huland H (2006) Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. Eur Urol 49(5):820–826PubMed Chun FK-H, Steuber T, Erbersdobler A, Currlin E, Walz J, Schlomm T, Haese A, Heinzer H, McCormack M, Huland H (2006) Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. Eur Urol 49(5):820–826PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan CH, Wei W, Johnson V, Kundra V (2012) Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(4):822PubMedPubMedCentral Tan CH, Wei W, Johnson V, Kundra V (2012) Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(4):822PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Riches S, Vanas N, Morgan V, Ashley S, Fisher C, Payne G, Parker C (2008) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer. Clin Radiol 63(7):774–782PubMed Riches S, Vanas N, Morgan V, Ashley S, Fisher C, Payne G, Parker C (2008) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer. Clin Radiol 63(7):774–782PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagarajan R, Margolis D, Raman S, Sarma MK, Sheng K, King CR, Verma G, Sayre J, Reiter RE, Thomas MA (2012) MR spectroscopic imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer with Gleason scores. J Magn Reson Imaging 36(3):697–703PubMed Nagarajan R, Margolis D, Raman S, Sarma MK, Sheng K, King CR, Verma G, Sayre J, Reiter RE, Thomas MA (2012) MR spectroscopic imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer with Gleason scores. J Magn Reson Imaging 36(3):697–703PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenkrantz AB, Sigmund EE, Johnson G, Babb JS, Mussi TC, Melamed J, Taneja SS, Lee VS, Jensen JH (2012) Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer. Radiology 264(1):126–135PubMed Rosenkrantz AB, Sigmund EE, Johnson G, Babb JS, Mussi TC, Melamed J, Taneja SS, Lee VS, Jensen JH (2012) Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer. Radiology 264(1):126–135PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitajima K, Takahashi S, Ueno Y, Miyake H, Fujisawa M, Kawakami F, Sugimura K (2013) Do apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained using high b-values with a 3-T MRI correlate better than a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy with true Gleason scores obtained from radical prostatectomy specimens for patients with prostate cancer? Eur J Radiol 82(8):1219–1226PubMed Kitajima K, Takahashi S, Ueno Y, Miyake H, Fujisawa M, Kawakami F, Sugimura K (2013) Do apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained using high b-values with a 3-T MRI correlate better than a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy with true Gleason scores obtained from radical prostatectomy specimens for patients with prostate cancer? Eur J Radiol 82(8):1219–1226PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bae H, Yoshida S, Matsuoka Y, Nakajima H, Ito E, Tanaka H, Oya M, Nakayama T, Takeshita H, Kijima T (2014) Apparent diffusion coefficient value as a biomarker reflecting morphological and biological features of prostate cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 46(3):555–561PubMed Bae H, Yoshida S, Matsuoka Y, Nakajima H, Ito E, Tanaka H, Oya M, Nakayama T, Takeshita H, Kijima T (2014) Apparent diffusion coefficient value as a biomarker reflecting morphological and biological features of prostate cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 46(3):555–561PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Itatani R, Namimoto T, Kajihara H, Katahira K, Kitani K, Hamada Y, Yamashita Y (2014) Triage of low-risk prostate cancer patients with PSA levels 10 ng/ml or less: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient value and transrectal ultrasound-guided target biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 202(5):1051–1057 Itatani R, Namimoto T, Kajihara H, Katahira K, Kitani K, Hamada Y, Yamashita Y (2014) Triage of low-risk prostate cancer patients with PSA levels 10 ng/ml or less: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient value and transrectal ultrasound-guided target biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 202(5):1051–1057
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Itatani R, Namimoto T, Yoshimura A, Katahira K, Noda S, Toyonari N, Kitani K, Hamada Y, Kitaoka M, Yamashita Y (2014) Clinical utility of the normalized apparent diffusion coefficient for preoperative evaluation of the aggressiveness of prostate cancer. Jpn J Radiol 32(12):685–691PubMed Itatani R, Namimoto T, Yoshimura A, Katahira K, Noda S, Toyonari N, Kitani K, Hamada Y, Kitaoka M, Yamashita Y (2014) Clinical utility of the normalized apparent diffusion coefficient for preoperative evaluation of the aggressiveness of prostate cancer. Jpn J Radiol 32(12):685–691PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lebovici A, Sfrangeu SA, Feier D, Caraiani C, Lucan C, Suciu M, Elec F, Iacob G, Buruian M (2014) Evaluation of the normal-to-diseased apparent diffusion coefficient ratio as an indicator of prostate cancer aggressiveness. BMC Med Imaging 14(1):1 Lebovici A, Sfrangeu SA, Feier D, Caraiani C, Lucan C, Suciu M, Elec F, Iacob G, Buruian M (2014) Evaluation of the normal-to-diseased apparent diffusion coefficient ratio as an indicator of prostate cancer aggressiveness. BMC Med Imaging 14(1):1
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nowak J, Malzahn U, Baur AD, Reichelt U, Franiel T, Hamm B, Durmus T (2014) The value of ADC, T2 signal intensity, and a combination of both parameters to assess Gleason score and primary Gleason grades in patients with known prostate cancer. Acta Radiol 57(1):107–114 Nowak J, Malzahn U, Baur AD, Reichelt U, Franiel T, Hamm B, Durmus T (2014) The value of ADC, T2 signal intensity, and a combination of both parameters to assess Gleason score and primary Gleason grades in patients with known prostate cancer. Acta Radiol 57(1):107–114
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamada T, Kanomata N, Sone T, Jo Y, Miyaji Y, Higashi H, Yamamoto A, Ito K (2014) High b value (2,000 s/mm2) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer at 3 T: comparison with 1,000 s/mm2 for tumor conspicuity and discrimination of aggressiveness. PLoS ONE 9(5):e96619PubMedPubMedCentral Tamada T, Kanomata N, Sone T, Jo Y, Miyaji Y, Higashi H, Yamamoto A, Ito K (2014) High b value (2,000 s/mm2) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer at 3 T: comparison with 1,000 s/mm2 for tumor conspicuity and discrimination of aggressiveness. PLoS ONE 9(5):e96619PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Roethke MC, Kuder TA, Kuru TH, Fenchel M, Hadaschik BA, Laun FB, Schlemmer H-P, Stieltjes B (2015) Evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging versus standard diffusion imaging for detection and grading of peripheral zone prostate cancer. Investig Radiol 50(8):483–489 Roethke MC, Kuder TA, Kuru TH, Fenchel M, Hadaschik BA, Laun FB, Schlemmer H-P, Stieltjes B (2015) Evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging versus standard diffusion imaging for detection and grading of peripheral zone prostate cancer. Investig Radiol 50(8):483–489
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Q, Li H, Yan X, Wu C-J, Liu X-S, Shi H-B, Zhang Y-D (2015) Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of pathologic Gleason grade of prostate cancer. In: Urologic oncology: seminars and original investigations, vol 8. Elsevier, New York, pp 337.e315–337.e324 Wang Q, Li H, Yan X, Wu C-J, Liu X-S, Shi H-B, Zhang Y-D (2015) Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of pathologic Gleason grade of prostate cancer. In: Urologic oncology: seminars and original investigations, vol 8. Elsevier, New York, pp 337.e315–337.e324
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang JH, Joon DL, Lee ST, Hiew C-Y, Esler S, Gong SJ, Wada M, Clouston D, O’Sullivan R, Goh YP (2014) Diffusion-weighted MRI, 11C-choline PET and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET for predicting the Gleason score in prostate carcinoma. Eur Radiol 24(3):715–722PubMed Chang JH, Joon DL, Lee ST, Hiew C-Y, Esler S, Gong SJ, Wada M, Clouston D, O’Sullivan R, Goh YP (2014) Diffusion-weighted MRI, 11C-choline PET and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET for predicting the Gleason score in prostate carcinoma. Eur Radiol 24(3):715–722PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim TH, Jeong JY, Lee SW, Kim CK, Park BK, Sung HH, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Lee HM (2015) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of insignificant prostate cancer in potential candidates for active surveillance. Eur Radiol 25(6):1786–1792PubMed Kim TH, Jeong JY, Lee SW, Kim CK, Park BK, Sung HH, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Lee HM (2015) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of insignificant prostate cancer in potential candidates for active surveillance. Eur Radiol 25(6):1786–1792PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, George AK, Rothwax J, Shakir N, Okoro C, Raskolnikov D, Parnes HL, Linehan WM (2015) Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion–guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA 313(4):390–397PubMedPubMedCentral Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, George AK, Rothwax J, Shakir N, Okoro C, Raskolnikov D, Parnes HL, Linehan WM (2015) Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion–guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA 313(4):390–397PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Somford D, Hamoen E, Fütterer J, Van Basten J, Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa C, Vreuls W, Van Oort I, Vergunst H, Kiemeney L, Barentsz J (2013) The predictive value of endorectal 3 T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. J Urol 190(5):1728–1734PubMed Somford D, Hamoen E, Fütterer J, Van Basten J, Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa C, Vreuls W, Van Oort I, Vergunst H, Kiemeney L, Barentsz J (2013) The predictive value of endorectal 3 T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. J Urol 190(5):1728–1734PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rastinehad AR, Turkbey B, Salami SS, Yaskiv O, George AK, Fakhoury M, Beecher K, Vira MA, Kavoussi LR, Siegel DN (2014) Improving detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 191(6):1749–1754PubMed Rastinehad AR, Turkbey B, Salami SS, Yaskiv O, George AK, Fakhoury M, Beecher K, Vira MA, Kavoussi LR, Siegel DN (2014) Improving detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 191(6):1749–1754PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sonn GA, Chang E, Natarajan S, Margolis DJ, Macairan M, Lieu P, Huang J, Dorey FJ, Reiter RE, Marks LS (2014) Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance–ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Eur Urol 65(4):809–815PubMed Sonn GA, Chang E, Natarajan S, Margolis DJ, Macairan M, Lieu P, Huang J, Dorey FJ, Reiter RE, Marks LS (2014) Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance–ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Eur Urol 65(4):809–815PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Le JD, Stephenson S, Brugger M, Lu DY, Lieu P, Sonn GA, Natarajan S, Dorey FJ, Huang J, Margolis DJ (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy for prediction of final prostate pathology. J Urol 192(5):1367–1373PubMedPubMedCentral Le JD, Stephenson S, Brugger M, Lu DY, Lieu P, Sonn GA, Natarajan S, Dorey FJ, Huang J, Margolis DJ (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy for prediction of final prostate pathology. J Urol 192(5):1367–1373PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang M, Song B, Lee I, Lee SE, Byun S-S, Hong SK (2016) Predictors of pathological upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients without hypointense lesions on an apparent diffusion coefficient map of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. World J Urol 34(11):1541–1546PubMed Kang M, Song B, Lee I, Lee SE, Byun S-S, Hong SK (2016) Predictors of pathological upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients without hypointense lesions on an apparent diffusion coefficient map of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. World J Urol 34(11):1541–1546PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Haider MA, Macura KJ, Margolis D, Schnall MD, Shtern F, Tempany CM (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging-reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69(1):16–40PubMed Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Haider MA, Macura KJ, Margolis D, Schnall MD, Shtern F, Tempany CM (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging-reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69(1):16–40PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1471–1474PubMed Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1471–1474PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL, Committee IG (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29(9):1228–1242PubMed Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL, Committee IG (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29(9):1228–1242PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeldres C, Suardi N, Walz J, Hutterer GC, Ahyai S, Lattouf J-B, Haese A, Graefen M, Erbersdobler A, Heinzer H (2008) Validation of the contemporary epstein criteria for insignificant prostate cancer in European men. Eur Urol 54(6):1306–1313PubMed Jeldres C, Suardi N, Walz J, Hutterer GC, Ahyai S, Lattouf J-B, Haese A, Graefen M, Erbersdobler A, Heinzer H (2008) Validation of the contemporary epstein criteria for insignificant prostate cancer in European men. Eur Urol 54(6):1306–1313PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Stamey TA, Freiha F, McNeal J, Redwine E, Whittemore A, Schmid H (1993) Localized prostate cancer. Cancer 71(S3):933–938PubMed Stamey TA, Freiha F, McNeal J, Redwine E, Whittemore A, Schmid H (1993) Localized prostate cancer. Cancer 71(S3):933–938PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA, Tomaszewski JE, Renshaw AA, Kaplan I, Beard CJ (1998) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280(11):969–974PubMed D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA, Tomaszewski JE, Renshaw AA, Kaplan I, Beard CJ (1998) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280(11):969–974PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Haffner J, Lemaitre L, Puech P, Haber GP, Leroy X, Jones JS, Villers A (2011) Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection. BJU Int 108(8b):E171–E178PubMed Haffner J, Lemaitre L, Puech P, Haber GP, Leroy X, Jones JS, Villers A (2011) Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection. BJU Int 108(8b):E171–E178PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Rastinehad AR, Baccala AA, Chung PH, Proano JM, Kruecker J, Xu S, Locklin JK, Turkbey B, Shih J, Bratslavsky G (2011) D’Amico risk stratification correlates with degree of suspicion of prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 185(3):815–820PubMedPubMedCentral Rastinehad AR, Baccala AA, Chung PH, Proano JM, Kruecker J, Xu S, Locklin JK, Turkbey B, Shih J, Bratslavsky G (2011) D’Amico risk stratification correlates with degree of suspicion of prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 185(3):815–820PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Itatani R, Namimoto T, Atsuji S, Katahira K, Morishita S, Kitani K, Hamada Y, Kitaoka M, Nakaura T, Yamashita Y (2014) Negative predictive value of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: outcome of 5-year follow-up in men with negative findings on initial MRI studies. Eur J Radiol 83(10):1740–1745PubMed Itatani R, Namimoto T, Atsuji S, Katahira K, Morishita S, Kitani K, Hamada Y, Kitaoka M, Nakaura T, Yamashita Y (2014) Negative predictive value of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: outcome of 5-year follow-up in men with negative findings on initial MRI studies. Eur J Radiol 83(10):1740–1745PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Pokorny MR, De Rooij M, Duncan E, Schröder FH, Parkinson R, Barentsz JO, Thompson LC (2014) Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 66(1):22–29PubMed Pokorny MR, De Rooij M, Duncan E, Schröder FH, Parkinson R, Barentsz JO, Thompson LC (2014) Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 66(1):22–29PubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Filson C, Margolis D, Huang J, Natarajan S, Lieu P, Dorey F, Marks L (2015) MP60-11 should a normal multiparametric MRI preclude prostate biopsy? J Urol 193(4):e742 Filson C, Margolis D, Huang J, Natarajan S, Lieu P, Dorey F, Marks L (2015) MP60-11 should a normal multiparametric MRI preclude prostate biopsy? J Urol 193(4):e742
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Wysock JS, Mendhiratta N, Zattoni F, Meng X, Bjurlin M, Huang WC, Lepor H, Rosenkrantz AB, Taneja SS (2016) Predictive value of negative 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate on 12-core biopsy results. BJU Int 118(4):515–520 Wysock JS, Mendhiratta N, Zattoni F, Meng X, Bjurlin M, Huang WC, Lepor H, Rosenkrantz AB, Taneja SS (2016) Predictive value of negative 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate on 12-core biopsy results. BJU Int 118(4):515–520
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenkrantz AB, Mendrinos S, Babb JS, Taneja SS (2012) Prostate cancer foci detected on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging are histologically distinct from those not detected. J Urol 187(6):2032–2038PubMed Rosenkrantz AB, Mendrinos S, Babb JS, Taneja SS (2012) Prostate cancer foci detected on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging are histologically distinct from those not detected. J Urol 187(6):2032–2038PubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Le JD, Tan N, Shkolyar E, Lu DY, Kwan L, Marks LS, Huang J, Margolis DJ, Raman SS, Reiter RE (2015) Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology. Eur Urol 67(3):569–576PubMed Le JD, Tan N, Shkolyar E, Lu DY, Kwan L, Marks LS, Huang J, Margolis DJ, Raman SS, Reiter RE (2015) Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology. Eur Urol 67(3):569–576PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang RS, Kim EH, Vetter JM, Fowler KJ, Shetty AS, Mintz AJ, Badhiwala NG, Grubb RL, Andriole GL (2016) Determination of the role of negative magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate in clinical practice: is biopsy is still necessary? Urology 102:190–197 Wang RS, Kim EH, Vetter JM, Fowler KJ, Shetty AS, Mintz AJ, Badhiwala NG, Grubb RL, Andriole GL (2016) Determination of the role of negative magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate in clinical practice: is biopsy is still necessary? Urology 102:190–197
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389(10071):815–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32401-1 CrossRefPubMed Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389(10071):815–822. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​s0140-6736(16)32401-1 CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim K, Lee JK, Choe G, Hong SK (2016) Intraprostatic locations of tumor foci of higher grade missed by diagnostic prostate biopsy among potential candidates for active surveillance. Sci Rep 6:36781PubMedPubMedCentral Kim K, Lee JK, Choe G, Hong SK (2016) Intraprostatic locations of tumor foci of higher grade missed by diagnostic prostate biopsy among potential candidates for active surveillance. Sci Rep 6:36781PubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Dinh KT, Mahal BA, Ziehr DR, Muralidhar V, Chen Y-W, Viswanathan VB, Nezolosky MD, Beard CJ, Choueiri TK, Martin NE (2015) Incidence and predictors of upgrading and up staging among 10,000 contemporary patients with low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 194(2):343–349PubMed Dinh KT, Mahal BA, Ziehr DR, Muralidhar V, Chen Y-W, Viswanathan VB, Nezolosky MD, Beard CJ, Choueiri TK, Martin NE (2015) Incidence and predictors of upgrading and up staging among 10,000 contemporary patients with low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 194(2):343–349PubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Branger N, Maubon T, Traumann M, Thomassin-Piana J, Brandone N, Taix S, Touzlian J, Brunelle S, Pignot G, Salem N (2016) Is negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging really able to exclude significant prostate cancer? The real-life experience. BJU Int 119:449–455 Branger N, Maubon T, Traumann M, Thomassin-Piana J, Brandone N, Taix S, Touzlian J, Brunelle S, Pignot G, Salem N (2016) Is negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging really able to exclude significant prostate cancer? The real-life experience. BJU Int 119:449–455
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang L, Yang B-X, Zhang H-T, Wang J-G, Wang H-L, Zhao X-J (2011) Prostate cancer: an emerging threat to the health of aging men in Asia. Asian J Androl 13(4):574–578PubMedPubMedCentral Zhang L, Yang B-X, Zhang H-T, Wang J-G, Wang H-L, Zhao X-J (2011) Prostate cancer: an emerging threat to the health of aging men in Asia. Asian J Androl 13(4):574–578PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
A negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging finding does not guarantee the absence of significant cancer among biopsy-proven prostate cancer patients: a real-life clinical experience
verfasst von
Jung Jun Kim
Seok-Soo Byun
Sang Eun Lee
Hak Jong Lee
Gheeyoung Choe
Sung Kyu Hong
Publikationsdatum
18.09.2018
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Urology and Nephrology / Ausgabe 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1986-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2018

International Urology and Nephrology 11/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.