Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Urolithiasis 6/2016

29.03.2016 | Original Paper

A new optical coupling control technique and application in SWL

verfasst von: Jian Lin Lv

Erschienen in: Urolithiasis | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the results of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) between patients treated with optical coupling control (OCC) and those treated with “blind” coupling during SWL to treat renal stones. Enrolled in the study were patients with urinary stones who underwent SWL between January 2014 and February 2015. The lithotripter used in the study was an electromagnetic Dornier Compact Delta II UIMS. The closed envelope method was used to randomize the enroled patients to OCC (Group A) or “Blind” coupling group (Group B). The stone-free rates (SFRs) were determined using KUB film with or without ultrasonography after 3 months. Treatment failure was defined as radiologically confirmed persistence of the stone with no fragmentation after second SWL sessions. Complications during the intraoperative or post-operative periods were recorded. A total of 336 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria for the study, of which 169 patients were treated in the Group A and 167 in the Group B. There was no significant difference in patient and stone characteristics between the two groups (Table 1). The locations of treated stones are shown in Table 2. The treatment results were stratified by stone location in Table 3, significant differences existed in all treatment results between the two groups (P < 0.05). The overall stone-free rates after 3 months were 78.2 % for kidney stones and 81.7 % for ureteral stones in patients from Group A. The corresponding SFRs for patients in Group B were 62.8 and 67.9 % for stones in the kidneys and ureters, respectively. There were statistical differences in these results between the two groups (P < 0.05). The lithotripter with OCC had excellent shock wave transmission properties with the least possible loss of energy; it can lead to the optimization of SWL treatment outcome and reduce the incidence of SW-induced adverse effects. We are confident that the OCC used in this study should be a standard feature in future lithotripters.
Table 1
Patients’ and stones’ characteristics
 
Group A
Group B
P value
Number of patients
169
167
 
Patients’ gender (M/F)
97/72
109/58
0.138
Stone location (left/right)
86/83
89/78
0.659
Patients’ age (years)
36.3 ± 7.1
34.2 ± 6.8
0.521
Size of stones
 Kidney (cm)
1.4 ± 0.6
1.3 ± 0.7
0.452
 Ureter (cm)
1.1 ± 0.5
1.1 ± 0.4
0.354
 Average size (cm)
1.2 ± 0.8
1.2 ± 0.7
0.372
Table 2
The distribution of location of stones treated
 
Group A
%
Group B
%
Upper calyx
21
12.4
25
15.0
Middle calyx
28
16.6
23
13.8
Lower calyx
7
4.1
5
3.0
Renal pelvis
31
18.3
33
19.8
Upper ureter
28
16.6
31
18.6
Middle ureter
6
3.6
4
2.4
Lower ureter
48
28.4
46
27.5
Overall
169
100.0
167
100.0
Table 3
The treatment results were stratified by stone location
 
Group A
Group B
%Stone-free
%Re-treatment
%Ancillary procedure
%Stone-free
%Re-treatment
%Ancillary procedure
Kidney
 Upper calyx
76.2
33.3
14.3
60.0
48.0
12.0
 Middle calyx
75.0
35.7
7.1
56.5
56.5
13.0
 Lower calyx
71.4
42.9
28.6
60.0
60.0
40.0
 Renal pelvis
83.9
29.0
9.7
69.7
45.5
12.1
 Overall
78.2
33.3
11.5
62.8
50. 0
14.0
Ureter
 Upper ureter
82.1
28.6
10.7
74.2
32.3
16.1
 Middle ureter
66.7
66.7
33.3
50.
75.0
50.0
 Lower ureter
83.3
25.0
10.4
65.0
41.3
13.0
 Overall
81.7
29.3
12.2
67.9
39.5
16.0
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jain A, Shah TK (2007) Effect of air bubbles in the coupling medium on efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Eur Urol 51:1680–1687CrossRefPubMed Jain A, Shah TK (2007) Effect of air bubbles in the coupling medium on efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Eur Urol 51:1680–1687CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bohris C, Roosen A, Dickmann M et al (2012) Monitoring the coupling of the lithotripter therapy head with skin during routine shock wave lithotripsy with a surveillance camera. J Urol 187(1):157–163CrossRefPubMed Bohris C, Roosen A, Dickmann M et al (2012) Monitoring the coupling of the lithotripter therapy head with skin during routine shock wave lithotripsy with a surveillance camera. J Urol 187(1):157–163CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tailly GG, Tailly-Cusse MM (2014) Optical coupling control: an important step toward better shock wave lithotripsy. J Endourol 28:1368–1373CrossRefPubMed Tailly GG, Tailly-Cusse MM (2014) Optical coupling control: an important step toward better shock wave lithotripsy. J Endourol 28:1368–1373CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaussy C, Tailly GG, Forssmann B et al (2013) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in a nutshell. In: Chaussy C, Tailly G eds. Booklet presented to European Association of Urology. Chaussy C, Tailly GG, Forssmann B et al (2013) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in a nutshell. In: Chaussy C, Tailly G eds. Booklet presented to European Association of Urology.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tailly GG (2013) Optical coupling control in SWL: first clinical experience. Poster MP07–13 presented at World Congress of Endourology; October 22–26, New Orleans Tailly GG (2013) Optical coupling control in SWL: first clinical experience. Poster MP07–13 presented at World Congress of Endourology; October 22–26, New Orleans
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lingeman JE, McAteer JA, Gnessin E, Evan AP (2009) Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique. Nature Rev Urol 6:660–670CrossRef Lingeman JE, McAteer JA, Gnessin E, Evan AP (2009) Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique. Nature Rev Urol 6:660–670CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergsdorf T, Chaussy C, Thueroff S (2010) Coupling gel viscosity: a relevant factor for efficient shock wave coupling in SWL. J Urol 183(suppl):e704CrossRef Bergsdorf T, Chaussy C, Thueroff S (2010) Coupling gel viscosity: a relevant factor for efficient shock wave coupling in SWL. J Urol 183(suppl):e704CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pishchalnikov YA, Neucks JS, VonDerHaar RJ et al (2006) Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy. J Urol 176:2706–2710CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pishchalnikov YA, Neucks JS, VonDerHaar RJ et al (2006) Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy. J Urol 176:2706–2710CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergsdorf T, Chaussy C, Thueroff S (2008) Energy coupling in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy—the impact of coupling quality on disintegration efficacy. J Endourol 22:A161 Bergsdorf T, Chaussy C, Thueroff S (2008) Energy coupling in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy—the impact of coupling quality on disintegration efficacy. J Endourol 22:A161
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergsdorf T, Chaussy C, Thueroff S (2009) The significance of accurate shock wave coupling in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Endourol 23:1042 Bergsdorf T, Chaussy C, Thueroff S (2009) The significance of accurate shock wave coupling in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Endourol 23:1042
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bohris C (2010) Quality of coupling in ESWL significantly affects the disintegration capacity—how to achieve good coupling with ultra-sound gel. In: Chaussy C, Haupt G, Jocham D, Köhrmann KU (eds) Therapeutic energy applications in urology II: standards and recent developments. Thieme; Stuttgart, Germany, pp 61–64 Bohris C (2010) Quality of coupling in ESWL significantly affects the disintegration capacity—how to achieve good coupling with ultra-sound gel. In: Chaussy C, Haupt G, Jocham D, Köhrmann KU (eds) Therapeutic energy applications in urology II: standards and recent developments. Thieme; Stuttgart, Germany, pp 61–64
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaussy CG, Fuchs GJ (1989) Current state and future developments of noninvasive treatment of human urinary stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 141(3 Pt 2):782–789PubMed Chaussy CG, Fuchs GJ (1989) Current state and future developments of noninvasive treatment of human urinary stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 141(3 Pt 2):782–789PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Clayman RV, McClennan BL, Garvin TJ et al (1989) Lithostar: an electromagnetic acoustic shock wave unit for extracorporeal lithotripsy. In: Lingeman JE (ed) Shock wave lithotripsy 2: urinary and biliary lithotripsy. Springer, Berlin, New York, NY, pp 403–409CrossRef Clayman RV, McClennan BL, Garvin TJ et al (1989) Lithostar: an electromagnetic acoustic shock wave unit for extracorporeal lithotripsy. In: Lingeman JE (ed) Shock wave lithotripsy 2: urinary and biliary lithotripsy. Springer, Berlin, New York, NY, pp 403–409CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat McClain PD, Lange JN, Assimos DG (2013) Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy: a comprehensive review. Rev Urol 15(2):49–60PubMedPubMedCentral McClain PD, Lange JN, Assimos DG (2013) Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy: a comprehensive review. Rev Urol 15(2):49–60PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Neucks JS, Pishchalnikov YA, Zancanaro AJ et al (2008) Improved acoustic coupling for shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res 36:61–66CrossRefPubMed Neucks JS, Pishchalnikov YA, Zancanaro AJ et al (2008) Improved acoustic coupling for shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res 36:61–66CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Li G, Williams JC Jr, Pishchalnikov YA, McAteer JA (2012) Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance. BJU Int 110:871–877CrossRef Li G, Williams JC Jr, Pishchalnikov YA, McAteer JA (2012) Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance. BJU Int 110:871–877CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bohris C, Jensen H, Bayer T et al (2006) A new integrated ultrasound system for shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol 20:863CrossRefPubMed Bohris C, Jensen H, Bayer T et al (2006) A new integrated ultrasound system for shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol 20:863CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Neucks JS, Pishchalnikov YA, Zancanaro AJ et al (2008) Improved acoustic coupling for shock wave lithotripsy. Res Urol 36(1):61CrossRef Neucks JS, Pishchalnikov YA, Zancanaro AJ et al (2008) Improved acoustic coupling for shock wave lithotripsy. Res Urol 36(1):61CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A new optical coupling control technique and application in SWL
verfasst von
Jian Lin Lv
Publikationsdatum
29.03.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Urolithiasis / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Elektronische ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-016-0874-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Urolithiasis 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.