Patient enrollment and characteristics
The trial (
ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02822326) was designed to assess the safety and feasibility of infusing 1928zT2 T cells in patients with relapsed or refractory B-ALL and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Guangdong General Hospital. Here, we reported the first three enrolled ALL patients with extramedullary involvement (Table
1).
Table 1The characteristics of enrolled ALL patients with extramedullary involvement
No.1 | 34 | F | Breast | 0.5 | CR on day 46 | Grade 2 | No | CR |
No.2 | 16 | M | BM, kidney | 5.0 | CR on day 10 | Grade 2 | Yes | CR |
No.3 | 20 | M | CNS, pancreas, pleuroperitoneum, pelvic fascia, and LNs | 10 | CR on day 18 | Grade 3 | No | CR |
Patient 1 was a 34-year-old female diagnosed as B-ALL (CD19+, BCR/ABL-) in April, 2015 (Fig.
3a). Although she had no response to chemotherapy regimen of VDLCP at first, the patient achieved CR after Hyper CVAD A therapy. She received four cycles of chemotherapy and underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) from her 10/10 HLA allele-matched sister in November, 2015. However, 9 months later, she had a relapse in extramedullary tissues including her left breast and multiple lymph nodes identified by Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) (Fig.
3b). The extramedullary leukemia in breast was confirmed histologically (Fig.
3c), and leukemia blast cells were detected as positive for TdT, CD19, CD20, CD79a, CD34, CD99, CD10, PAX5, and Ki67 (15%), and negative for CD3 and Cyclin D1. B-mode ultrasound was used to monitor the tumor mass in the left breast, and about 2.8 × 1.6 cm size of an inhomogeneous hypo-echoic mass was identified (Fig.
3d). No evidence of relapse in BM and CNS was observed with persisted complete donor chimerism or negative minimal residual disease.
Patient 2 was a 15-year-old male also diagnosed as B-ALL (CD19+, BCR/ABL-) in October, 2014 (Fig.
4a). He underwent allo-HSCT from his 10/10 HLA allele-matched sibling in June, 2015, and unfortunately had a relapse in CNS 6 months later. Then, he achieved a second CR after intrathecal chemotherapy (IT), irradiation, and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). However, the leukemia recurred again 10 months later with BM and extramedullary involvement. The BM smear showed typical leukemic blasts account for 15% (Fig.
4b). The PET/CT revealed that an abnormal intense high metabolic region beneath the kidney capsule, indicating the extramedullary relapse in kidney (Fig.
4c). Although he received chemotherapy regimen of VDLCP, he had no response at all.
Patient 3 was a 20-year-old male with a third recurrence of ALL with CNS-3 status [
14] and extramedullary involvement. He received a diagnosis of ALL (CD19
+, BCR/ABL-) in 2000 when he was 3 years old (Fig.
5a). During the following 13 years, he had received more than 20 courses of intensive systemic chemotherapy (SC) and IT and remained being in CR. However, he had a relapse in BM and CNS in 2013. Then, he underwent allo-HSCT from a 10/10 HLA allele-matched unrelated female donor in 2014 and the second CR was achieved. Despite he received IT for more than six courses, the patient suffered from second recurrence with CNS-ALL. He had a good response to IT and irradiation and achieved CR for a third time. However, the cancer recurred again 10 months later with CNS and extramedullary involvement in June, 2017. The bone marrow examination still showed signs of complete remission. The whole-body PET/CT showed that extensive extramedullary relapse involving almost the entire pleura, peritoneum, pelvic fascia, pancreas, and multiple lymph nodes (Fig.
5b). A biopsy was performed on right-sided supraclavicular node mass, and characteristic megakaryocytes, erythroblasts and myeloid cells were observed microscopically. The markers were identified as CD3−, CD20−, CD19+, TdT+++, CD10+++, CD34−, and Ki67+ (90%), revealing the leukemic involvement (Fig.
5c). A palpable mass below xiphoid was identified by B-mode ultrasound, and inhomogeneous hypo-echoic mass about 3.0 × 1.9 cm in diameter was seen (Fig.
5d). In addition, aberrant blast cells were detected histologically (Fig.
5e) and examined CD19
+CD10
+ phenotype (Fig.
5f) in the CSF obtained by lumbar puncture. X/Y fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) showed that XY-type recipient cells accounted for 50% of the cerebrospinal cells, further indicating a relapse in the CSF (Fig.
5g).
Clinical protocols
Patients underwent an apheresis to obtain sufficient PBMCs for producing 1928zT2 T cells. The manufacture of 1928zT2 was completed in about 14 days. The cells were released for infusion after safety check. All patients received a lymphodepletion conditioning regimen which contained with fludarabine 25 mg/m
2, cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m
2, and/or plus other drugs. After 1-day rest, they received a split-dose infusion of 1928zT2 T cells (a total of 5 × 10
4–1 × 10
6 cells/kg and 10% on day 1, 30% on day 2, and 60% on day 3). No post-infusion cytokines such as IL-2 were administered. These patients were evaluated for responses and toxic effects. The expansion and persistence of circulating 1928zT2 T cells were also monitored. Adverse events such as CRS after 1928zT2 T cell infusion were graded according to National Institutes of Health criteria (Common terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4) [
8], and clinical responses were evaluated and defined as complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD) according with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. MRD negative was defined as the absence of leukemia cells in BM determined by flow cytometry, and the absence of fusion gene in BM determined by qPCR.
Flow cytometry of CD19-CAR T cells detection
The percentages of transduced GFP-positive T cells, CD19 on leukemia cells, T cell phenotypes of the patient were determined by flow cytometry. The antibodies for CD3 (APC), CD4 (Percp-cy5.5), CD8 (PE), CD19 (APC), CD20 (PE), and CD22 (Percp-cy5.5) were used. The flow cytometry was performed with a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo software.
Killing assays
The target cells K562, K562-CD19, and NALM6 were tagged both GFP and luciferase (GL), specifically incubated with GFP T, 1928z T or 1928zT2 T cells at the indicated ratios in triplicate wells in U-bottomed 96-well plates. Viability of target cells was monitored 18 h later by adding 100 dl/well substrate D-luciferin firefly (Life Sciences) resolved at 150 μg/ml. Background luminescence was negligible (< 1% than the signal from the wells with only target cells). The viability percentage was calculated as experimental signal/maximal signal × 100%, and killing percentage was equal to 100 − viability percentage.
Xenograft models and in vivo assessment
To develop the mouse subcutaneous tumor xenograft model of human extramedullary ALL leukemia [
15], NSI mice of ages 6 to 10 weeks were used. All procedures were performed under approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Ethics Committee. NALM6-GL (2 × 10
5 cells in 200 μl PBS) was injected subcutaneously, and 2 × 10
6 lentiviral transduced human T cells in 200 μl PBS were adoptively transferred to these mice systemically by tail vein injection 2 days later. In vivo whole body imaging of luciferase-labeled cells was performed by cooled CCD camera system (IVIS 100 Series Imaging System, Xenogen, Alameda, CA). D-Luciferin firefly, potassium salt (75 mg/kg) was injected, and the mice were imaged. Quantification of total and average emissions was performed using the Living Image software (Xenogen). The mice were killed at day 34, and their subcutaneous tumor masses were extracted and weighted.
Cytokine measurements and luminex technology
IL-6 levels in plasma were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA kit, eBioscience, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The immune-related cytokines were analyzed using Luminex MAGPIX system (Luminex Corp., Austin, TX) according to the manufacturers’ specifications. Samples were detected in triplicate relative to standards supplied by the manufacturer and analyzed for significant differences between different groups.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software version 19.0 (Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Student’s t test (two-tailed) or one-way analysis of variance was used, and data were presented as means ± SEM. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant.