nach oben

International Orthopaedics

Erschienen in:

09.03.2018 | Original Paper

A novel method of using elastic bionic fixation device for distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury

verfasst von: Lin Wang, Yingze Zhang, Zhaohui Song, Hengrui Chang, Ye Tian, Fei Zhang

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 9/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To describe and evaluate the novel method of using elastic bionic fixation device in treating the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis (DTS) injury.

Methods

From June 2013 to January 2014, 17 subjects with ankle fractures combined with DTS separation were treated by the elastic bionic fixation device. The syndesmotic parameters, healing, functional scores, and possible complications were recorded.

Results

All patients had a mean follow-up of 23.35 ± 4.39 months (range, 15–28 months). Syndesmotic parameters returned to normal after surgery and remained normal throughout the follow-up period. X-ray examinations at 12 months follow-up showed no cable breakage of the elastic bionic fixation device or instrument invalidation compared to that of immediate post-operative X-ray films. Besides, no signs of articular degeneration and arthritis were observed. Furthermore, change in bone density near the fibular fixing button or tibial screw nut was also not detected. Primary wound healing was observed in 16 patients, while the remaining one showed redness and swelling of lateral ankle incision and got wound healing after seven to ten days of antibiotic therapy and local radio frequency physiotherapy. All obtained excellent and good outcomes according to the AOFAS score at 12 months after surgery.

Conclusions

The use of elastic bionic fixation device appears to be a promising option in treating DTS injury because it can provide stable and reliable elastic fixation, good functional recovery, and relatively fewer complications.

Grass R, Herzmann K, Biewener A, Zwipp H (2000) Injuries of the inferior tibiofibular syndesmosis. Unfallchirurg 103(7):520–532CrossRefPubMed

Hopkinson WJ, Pierre PS, Ryan JB, Wheeler JH (1990) Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. Foot Ankle 10(6):325–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079001000607 CrossRefPubMed

Cedell C (1975) Ankle lesions. Acta Orthop Scand 46(3):425–445PubMed

Teramoto A, Kura H, Uchiyama E, Suzuki D, Yamashita T (2008) Three-dimensional analysis of ankle instability after tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries: a biomechanical experimental study. Am J Sports Med 36(2):348–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546507308235 CrossRefPubMed

Boden SD, Labropoulos PA, McCowin P, Lestini WF, Hurwitz SR (1989) Mechanical considerations for the syndesmosis screw. A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am Vol) 71(10):1548–1555CrossRef

Close JR (1956) Some applications of the functional anatomy of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg (Am Vol) 38(4):761–781CrossRef

Rasmussen O, Tovborg-Jensen I, Boe S (1982) Distal tibiofibular ligaments: analysis of function. Acta Orthop Scand 53(4):681–686CrossRefPubMed

Bauer AS, Bluman EM, Wilson MG, Chiodo CP (2009) Injuries of the distal lower extremity syndesmosis. Current Orthopaedic Practice 20(2):111–116CrossRef

Schepers T (2012) Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair. Int Orthop 36(6):1199–1206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1500-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Bell DP, Wong MK (2006) Syndesmotic screw fixation in Weber C ankle injuries—should the screw be removed before weight bearing? Injury 37(9):891–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.02.003 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Heim D, Heim U, Regazzoni P (1993) Malleolar fractures with ankle joint instability—experience with the positioning screw. Unfallchirurgie 19(5):307–312CrossRefPubMed

12.

Karapinar H, Kalenderer O, Karapinar L, Altay T, Manisali M, Gunal I (2007) Effects of three- or four-cortex syndesmotic fixation in ankle fractures. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 97(6):457–459CrossRefPubMed

13.

Bava E, Charlton T, Thordarson D (2010) Ankle fracture syndesmosis fixation and management: the current practice of orthopedic surgeons. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 39(5):242–246

14.

van den Bekerom MP, Hogervorst M, Bolhuis HW, van Dijk CN (2008) Operative aspects of the syndesmotic screw: review of current concepts. Injury 39(4):491–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.11.425 CrossRefPubMed

15.

van den Bekerom MP, Lamme B, Hogervorst M, Bolhuis HW (2007) Which ankle fractures require syndesmotic stabilization? J Foot Ankle Surg 46(6):456–463. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2007.08.009 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Thornes B, Shannon F, Guiney AM, Hession P, Masterson E (2005) Suture-button syndesmosis fixation: accelerated rehabilitation and improved outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 431:207–212CrossRef

17.

Degroot H, Al-Omari AA, El Ghazaly SA (2011) Outcomes of suture button repair of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 32(3):250–256. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2011.0250 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Amendola A, Williams G, Foster D (2006) Evidence-based approach to treatment of acute traumatic syndesmosis (high ankle) sprains. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 14(4):232–236. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jsa.0000212329.32969.b8 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Lin CF, Gross ML, Weinhold P (2006) Ankle syndesmosis injuries: anatomy, biomechanics, mechanism of injury, and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and intervention. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36(6):372–384. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2006.2195 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Dittmer H, Dettmann E (1999) Treatment of the rupture of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis with “Engelbrecht’s syndesmosis hook”. Unfallchirurg 102(10):770–775CrossRefPubMed

21.

Xian H, Miao J, Zhou Q, Lian K, Zhai W, Liu Q (2018) Novel elastic syndesmosis hook plate fixation versus routine screw fixation for syndesmosis injury. J Foot Ankle Surg 57(1):65–68. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.08.007 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Wang L, Wang B, Xu G, Song Z, Cui H, Zhang Y (2016) Biomechanical comparison of bionic, screw and Endobutton fixation in the treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries. Int Orthop 40(2):307–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2920-6 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Ministry of Health C (2004) Guideline for clinical use of antimicrobial agents

24.

Jordan TH, Talarico RH, Schuberth JM (2011) The radiographic fate of the syndesmosis after trans-syndesmotic screw removal in displaced ankle fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg 50(4):407–412. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2011.03.014 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Beumer A, Valstar ER, Garling EH, van Leeuwen WJ, Sikma W, Niesing R, Ranstam J, Swierstra BA (2003) External rotation stress imaging in syndesmotic injuries of the ankle: comparison of lateral radiography and radiostereometry in a cadaveric model. Acta Orthop Scand 74(2):201–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470310013969 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Weening B, Bhandari M (2005) Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 19(2):102–108CrossRefPubMed

27.

Beumer A, Valstar ER, Garling EH, Niesing R, Ginai AZ, Ranstam J, Swierstra BA (2006) Effects of ligament sectioning on the kinematics of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a radiostereometric study of 10 cadaveric specimens based on presumed trauma mechanisms with suggestions for treatment. Acta Orthop 77(3):531–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670610012557 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Pankovich AM (1976) Maisonneuve fracture of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg (Am Vol) 58(3):337–342CrossRef

29.

Chissell HR, Jones J (1995) The influence of a diastasis screw on the outcome of Weber type-C ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(3):435–438CrossRefPubMed

30.

Cottom JM, Hyer CF, Philbin TM, Berlet GC (2008) Treatment of syndesmotic disruptions with the Arthrex Tightrope: a report of 25 cases. Foot Ankle Int 29(8):773–780. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2008.0773 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Yasui Y, Takao M, Miyamoto W, Innami K, Matsushita T (2011) Anatomical reconstruction of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament for chronic disruption of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(4):691–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1311-1 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Mosier-LaClair S, Pike H, Pomeroy G (2002) Syndesmosis injuries: acute, chronic, new techniques for failed management. Foot Ankle Clin 7(3):551–565 ix CrossRefPubMed

33.

Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Perren S (1991) Manual of internal fixation: techniques recommended by the AO-ASIF group. Springer Science & Business Media

34.

Moore JA Jr, Shank JR, Morgan SJ, Smith WR (2006) Syndesmosis fixation: a comparison of three and four cortices of screw fixation without hardware removal. Foot Ankle Int 27(8):567–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070602700801 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Soin SP, Knight TA, Dinah AF, Mears SC, Swierstra BA, Belkoff SM (2009) Suture-button versus screw fixation in a syndesmosis rupture model: a biomechanical comparison. Foot Ankle Int 30(4):346–352. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2009.0346 CrossRefPubMed

36.

Teramoto A, Suzuki D, Kamiya T, Chikenji T, Watanabe K, Yamashita T (2011) Comparison of different fixation methods of the suture-button implant for tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries. Am J Sports Med 39(10):2226–2232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511413455 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Klitzman R, Zhao H, Zhang LQ, Strohmeyer G, Vora A (2010) Suture-button versus screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a biomechanical analysis. Foot Ankle Int 31(1):69–75. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2010.0069 CrossRefPubMed

38.

Ahmad J, Raikin SM, Pour AE, Haytmanek C (2009) Bioabsorbable screw fixation of the syndesmosis in unstable ankle injuries. Foot Ankle Int 30(2):99–105. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2009.0099 CrossRefPubMed

39.

Egol KA, Pahk B, Walsh M, Tejwani NC, Davidovitch RI, Koval KJ (2010) Outcome after unstable ankle fracture: effect of syndesmotic stabilization. J Orthop Trauma 24(1):7–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181b1542c CrossRefPubMed

Titel: A novel method of using elastic bionic fixation device for distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury
verfasst von: Lin Wang
Yingze Zhang
Zhaohui Song
Hengrui Chang
Ye Tian
Fei Zhang
Publikationsdatum: 09.03.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3869-z

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

23.04.2024 | Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

A novel method of using elastic bionic fixation device for distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2018

Incidence and patterns of meniscal tears accompanying the anterior cruciate ligament injury: possible local and generalized risk factors

Functional outcomes after the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure for distal radio-ulnar post-traumatic instability: a case-control comparison of three different operative methods of stabilization of the ulnar stump

Risk factor analysis for re-collapse of cemented vertebrae after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP)

Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for diagnosing periprosthetic hip infection: the importance of diagnostic criteria

A novel in vivo porcine model of intervertebral disc degeneration induced by cryoinjury

Re-admissions treble the risk of late mortality after primary total hip arthroplasty

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie