Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2020

14.11.2019 | Dynamic Manuscript

A novel technique of endoscopic submucosal dissection for circumferential ileocecal valve adenomas with terminal ileum involvement: the “doughnut resection” (with videos)

verfasst von: Krishna C. Gurram, Erin Ly, Xiaocen Zhang, Rani Modayil, Kanak Das, Daryl Ramai, Sagarika Nithyanand, Shriya Bhumi, Sivaram Neppala, Harika Boinpally, Stavros Stavropoulos

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Ileocecal valve (ICV) lesions are difficult to resect endoscopically and patients are often referred for laparoscopic colectomy. ICV involvement has been shown to be related to technical failure and tumor recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and represents a challenge for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Few publications have focused specifically on endoscopic management of ICV lesions.

Methods

We developed a novel ESD technique, the “doughnut resection,” for circumferential ICV adenomas with terminal ileum involvement. Two circumferential mucosal incisions are performed, one in the ileum and the other in the cecum, followed by submucosal dissection of the disk of tissue between the two incisions around a guiding stent placed across the valve that helps guide the dissection as it crosses the valve orifice. The lesion is removed en bloc in the shape of a “doughnut” with two concentric assessable lateral margins. The underwater ESD technique and a gastroscope were used to facilitate the resection.

Results

Seven patients received the doughnut resection. The median patient age was 67 years. All patients had prior biopsy and three had prior endoscopic resection (1–6 times). The median specimen diameter was 4.5 cm (range 3–8). All resections were en bloc and R0. There was no perforation, delayed bleeding, or other clinically significant adverse events. After a median follow-up of 21 months (range 12–32), there was no tumor recurrence.

Conclusion

The “doughnut resection” is a feasible, safe, and effective method to remove circumferential ICV lesions endoscopically even for patients with multiple prior tumor manipulations.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Pokala N, Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Brady K, Senagore AJ (2007) Outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for polyps not suitable for endoscopic resection. Surg Endosc 21(3):400–403CrossRef Pokala N, Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Brady K, Senagore AJ (2007) Outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for polyps not suitable for endoscopic resection. Surg Endosc 21(3):400–403CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayanna M, Burgess NG, Singh R, Hourigan LF, Brown GJ, Zanati SA et al (2016) Cost analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection vs surgery for large laterally spreading colorectal lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 14(2):271–278.e2CrossRef Jayanna M, Burgess NG, Singh R, Hourigan LF, Brown GJ, Zanati SA et al (2016) Cost analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection vs surgery for large laterally spreading colorectal lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 14(2):271–278.e2CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF, Brown G, Tam W et al (2011) Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 140(7):1909–1918CrossRef Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF, Brown G, Tam W et al (2011) Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 140(7):1909–1918CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchner AM, Guarner-Argente C, Ginsberg GG (2012) Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center. Gastrointest Endosc 76(2):255–263CrossRef Buchner AM, Guarner-Argente C, Ginsberg GG (2012) Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center. Gastrointest Endosc 76(2):255–263CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishii N, Itoh T, Horiki N, Matsuda M, Setoyama T, Suzuki S et al (2010) Endoscopic submucosal dissection with a combination of small-caliber-tip transparent hood and flex knife for large superficial colorectal neoplasias including ileocecal lesions. Surg Endosc 24(8):1941–1947CrossRef Ishii N, Itoh T, Horiki N, Matsuda M, Setoyama T, Suzuki S et al (2010) Endoscopic submucosal dissection with a combination of small-caliber-tip transparent hood and flex knife for large superficial colorectal neoplasias including ileocecal lesions. Surg Endosc 24(8):1941–1947CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishii N, Setoyama T, Matsuda M, Suzuki S, Uemura M, Iizuka Y et al (2010) Superficial tumors involving terminal ileum treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Clin J Gastroenterol 3(5):226–229CrossRef Ishii N, Setoyama T, Matsuda M, Suzuki S, Uemura M, Iizuka Y et al (2010) Superficial tumors involving terminal ileum treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Clin J Gastroenterol 3(5):226–229CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nanda KS, Tutticci N, Burgess NG, Sonson R, Williams SJ, Bourke MJ (2015) Endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading lesions involving the ileocecal valve: technique, risk factors for failure, and outcomes. Endoscopy 47(08):710–718CrossRef Nanda KS, Tutticci N, Burgess NG, Sonson R, Williams SJ, Bourke MJ (2015) Endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading lesions involving the ileocecal valve: technique, risk factors for failure, and outcomes. Endoscopy 47(08):710–718CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Conio M, Blanchi S, Filiberti R, Ruggeri C, Fisher D (2010) Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection of large polyps involving the ileocecal valve. Endoscopy 42(08):677–680CrossRef Conio M, Blanchi S, Filiberti R, Ruggeri C, Fisher D (2010) Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection of large polyps involving the ileocecal valve. Endoscopy 42(08):677–680CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshizaki T, Toyonaga T, Tanaka S, Ohara Y, Kawara F, Baba S et al (2016) Feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions involving the ileocecal valve. Endoscopy 48(07):639–645CrossRef Yoshizaki T, Toyonaga T, Tanaka S, Ohara Y, Kawara F, Baba S et al (2016) Feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions involving the ileocecal valve. Endoscopy 48(07):639–645CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kishimoto G, Saito Y, Takisawa H, Suzuki H, Sakamoto T, Nakajima T et al (2012) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for large laterally spreading tumors involving the ileocecal valve and terminal ileum. World J Gastroenterol 18(3):291CrossRef Kishimoto G, Saito Y, Takisawa H, Suzuki H, Sakamoto T, Nakajima T et al (2012) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for large laterally spreading tumors involving the ileocecal valve and terminal ileum. World J Gastroenterol 18(3):291CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484CrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tolliver KA, Rex DK (2008) Colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 37(1):229–251CrossRef Tolliver KA, Rex DK (2008) Colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 37(1):229–251CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hori K, Uraoka T, Harada K, Higashi R, Kawahara Y, Okada H et al (2014) Predictive factors for technically difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colorectum. Endoscopy 46(10):862–870CrossRef Hori K, Uraoka T, Harada K, Higashi R, Kawahara Y, Okada H et al (2014) Predictive factors for technically difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colorectum. Endoscopy 46(10):862–870CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta S, Miskovic D, Bhandari P, Dolwani S, McKaig B, Pullan R et al (2011) The ‘SMSA’scoring system for determining the complexity of a polyp. Gut 60(Suppl 1):A129CrossRef Gupta S, Miskovic D, Bhandari P, Dolwani S, McKaig B, Pullan R et al (2011) The ‘SMSA’scoring system for determining the complexity of a polyp. Gut 60(Suppl 1):A129CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Thirumurthi S, Raju GS (2016) How to deal with large colorectal polyps: snare, endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection; resect or refer? Curr Opin Gastroenterol 32(1):26–31CrossRef Thirumurthi S, Raju GS (2016) How to deal with large colorectal polyps: snare, endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection; resect or refer? Curr Opin Gastroenterol 32(1):26–31CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HG, Thosani N, Banerjee S, Chen A, Friedland S (2015) Effect of prior biopsy sampling, tattoo placement, and snare sampling on endoscopic resection of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 81(1):204–213CrossRef Kim HG, Thosani N, Banerjee S, Chen A, Friedland S (2015) Effect of prior biopsy sampling, tattoo placement, and snare sampling on endoscopic resection of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 81(1):204–213CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S et al (2015) JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc 27(4):417–434CrossRef Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S et al (2015) JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc 27(4):417–434CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsumoto A, Tanaka S, Oba S, Kanao H, Oka S, Yoshihara M et al (2010) Outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors accompanied by fibrosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 45(11):1329–1337CrossRef Matsumoto A, Tanaka S, Oba S, Kanao H, Oka S, Yoshihara M et al (2010) Outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors accompanied by fibrosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 45(11):1329–1337CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayashi T, Kudo SE, Miyachi H, Sakurai T, Ishigaki T, Yagawa Y et al (2017) Management and risk factor of stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 86(2):358–369CrossRef Hayashi T, Kudo SE, Miyachi H, Sakurai T, Ishigaki T, Yagawa Y et al (2017) Management and risk factor of stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 86(2):358–369CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kantsevoy SV (2017) Stenosis after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: when to expect, how to manage? Gastrointest Endosc 86(2):370–371CrossRef Kantsevoy SV (2017) Stenosis after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: when to expect, how to manage? Gastrointest Endosc 86(2):370–371CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Honda M, Hori Y, Nakada A, Uji M, Nishizawa Y, Yamamoto K et al (2011) Use of adipose tissue-derived stromal cells for prevention of esophageal stricture after circumferential EMR in a canine model. Gastrointest Endosc 73(4):777–784CrossRef Honda M, Hori Y, Nakada A, Uji M, Nishizawa Y, Yamamoto K et al (2011) Use of adipose tissue-derived stromal cells for prevention of esophageal stricture after circumferential EMR in a canine model. Gastrointest Endosc 73(4):777–784CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Perrod G, Pidial L, Camilleri S, Bellucci A, Casanova A, Viel T et al (2017) ADSC-sheet transplantation to prevent stricture after extended esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection. J Vis Exp 120:e55018 Perrod G, Pidial L, Camilleri S, Bellucci A, Casanova A, Viel T et al (2017) ADSC-sheet transplantation to prevent stricture after extended esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection. J Vis Exp 120:e55018
Metadaten
Titel
A novel technique of endoscopic submucosal dissection for circumferential ileocecal valve adenomas with terminal ileum involvement: the “doughnut resection” (with videos)
verfasst von
Krishna C. Gurram
Erin Ly
Xiaocen Zhang
Rani Modayil
Kanak Das
Daryl Ramai
Sagarika Nithyanand
Shriya Bhumi
Sivaram Neppala
Harika Boinpally
Stavros Stavropoulos
Publikationsdatum
14.11.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07202-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.