The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00520-010-1048-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
To date, there is no coordinated strategy for end-of-life (EOL) cancer care research in Europe. The PRISMA (Reflecting the Positive Diversities of European Priorities for Research and Measurement in End-of-life Care) project is aiming to develop a programme integrating research and measurement in EOL care. This survey aimed to map and describe present EOL cancer care research in Europe and to identify priorities and barriers.
A questionnaire of 62 questions was developed and 201 researchers in 41 European countries were invited to complete it online in May 2009. An open invitation to participate was posted on the internet.
Invited contacts in 36 countries sent 127 replies; eight additional responses came through websites. A total of 127 responses were eligible for analysis. Respondents were 69 male and 58 female, mean age 49 (28–74) years; 85% of the scientific team leaders were physicians. Seventy-one of 127 research groups were located in a teaching hospital or cancer centre. Forty-five percent of the groups had only one to five members and 28% six to ten members. Sixty-three of 92 groups reported specific funding for EOL care research. Seventy-five percent of the groups had published papers in journals with impact factor ≤5 in the last 3 years; 8% had published in journals with impact factor >10. Forty-four out of 90 groups reported at least one completed Ph.D. in the last 3 years. The most frequently reported active research areas were pain, assessment and measurement tools, and last days of life and quality of death. Very similar areas—last days of life and quality of death, pain, fatigue and cachexia, and assessment and measurement tools—were ranked as the most important research priorities. The most important research barriers were lack of funding, lack of time, and insufficient knowledge/expertise.
Most research groups in EOL care are small. The few large groups (14%) had almost half of the reported publications, and more than half of the current Ph.D. students. There is a lack of a common strategy and coordination in EOL cancer care research and a great need for international collaboration.
ESM 1 (PDF 312 kb)520_2010_1048_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
World Health Organization/UICC (2003) Global action against cancer. World Health Organization/UICC, Geneva
The European Association for Palliative Care Research Network (EAPC RN). Available at: http://www.eapcnet.org/. Accessed 25 June 2010
Shipman C, Gysels M, White P, Worth A, Murray SA, Barclay S, Forrest S, Shepherd J, Dale J, Dewar S, Peters M, White S, Richardson A, Lorenz K, Koffman J, Higginson IJ (2008) Improving generalist end of life care: national consultation with practitioners, commissioners, academics, and service user groups. BMJ 337:848–851 CrossRef
Palliative Medicine (2006) Special issue on palliative care research methodology. Palliat Med 20:725–871 CrossRef
Kaasa S, De Conno F (2001) Palliative care research. Eur J Cancer 37:153–159 CrossRef
Patrick DL, Ferketich SL, Frame PS, Harris JJ, Hendricks CB, Levin B, Link MP, Lustig C, McLaughlin J, Ried LD, Turrisi AT 3 rd, Unutzer J, Vernon SW (2003) National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: symptom management in cancer: pain, depression, and fatigue, July 15–17, 2002. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1110–1117 PubMedCrossRef
OPCARE9. Available at: http://www.opcare9.eu/. Accessed 25 June 2010
European Palliative Research Collaborative. Available at: http://www.epcrc.org/. Accessed 25 June 2010
Defining best practice in palliative care in Europe. Available at: http://www.painandpalliativemedicine.eu/. Accessed 25 June 2010
National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) (2004) Supportive and palliative care research in the UK: report of the NCRI Strategic Planning Group on Supportive and Palliative Care. NCRI, London. pp. 1–64.
Hardy J, Dingle K, Beebe H, Yates P (2005) Creating a palliative research network in Queensland, Australia—is this the answer? Prog Palliat Care 13:277–281 CrossRef
SelectSurveyASP Advanced 8.1.10 software. Available at: http://www.classapps.com/. Accessed 25 June 2010
Web of Knowledge—Science—Thomson Reuters. Available at: http://wokinfo.com/. Accessed 25 June 2010
Kenna R, Berche B (2010) Critical mass and the dependency of research quality on group size. pp. 1–15. Available at: http://arxiv.org/
Binswanger J, Inauen R, Strasser F (2006) Barriers to Palliative Care (PC) research. Palliat Med 20: abstr # 467
European Palliative Care Research Centre. Available at: http://www.ntnu.edu/prc. Accessed 25 June 2010
Cicely Saunders Institute. Available at: http://www.cicelysaundersfoundation.org/cicely-saunders-institute. Accessed 25 June 2010
- A pan-European survey of research in end-of-life cancer care
Katrin Ruth Sigurdardottir
Dagny Faksvåg Haugen
Irene J. Higginson
Jan Henrik Rosland
on behalf of project PRISMA
Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie
e.Med Kampagnen-Visual, Mail Icon II