Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2012

01.08.2012 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A Paradigm Shift to Check the Increasing Trend of Cesarean Delivery is the Need of Hour: But How?

verfasst von: Sudarsan Saha, Soma Saha, Rupkamal Das, Mayoukh Chakraborty, Himadri Sekhar Bala, Priyankar Naskar

Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Ausgabe 4/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To check the progressive increasing trend of caesarean delivery in a tertiary facility care centre.

Aims

The purpose of this study is to implement a paradigm shift in caesarean delivery by introducing a new classification system and a check list based management protocol.

Methods

The study was conducted from 1st January, 2007 to 31st December, 2008 at CNMC G&O Department. All deliveries in the year 2007 were compared retrospectively and all deliveries in the year 2008 under prospective study with implementation of a new strategic protocol. Comparative audit and analysis of deliveries in retrospective and prospective year reveals significant changes in the caesarean delivery rate.

Results

In retrospective group all women in labour were allowed for spontaneous delivery and in prospective group all women were subjected to intervention protocol and caesarean delivery done in both the groups in need for risk of fetal and maternal salvage. Incidence of caesarean delivery (CD) in retrospective group was 29 % while in the prospective group it was 18.4 %. Marked decrease in CD was observed for augmentation, induction and trial of labour (TOL) for delivery in prospective group. The result was compared with Robson’s studies following similar type of classification system.

Conclusion

Marked improvement was noticed in this new paradigm and more multicentric trial is needed to check the increasing trend of CD.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Robson MS. Can we reduce the caesarean section rate? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;15:179–94.CrossRef Robson MS. Can we reduce the caesarean section rate? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;15:179–94.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wax GR, Cartin A, Pinette MG, et al. Patient choice caesarean and evidenced base review. Obstet Gynaecol Surv. 2004;59:601–16.CrossRef Wax GR, Cartin A, Pinette MG, et al. Patient choice caesarean and evidenced base review. Obstet Gynaecol Surv. 2004;59:601–16.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Grisaru S, Samueloff A. Primary non-medically indicated caesarean section (section on request) evidence based on modern vogus? Clin Perinatol. 2004;31:409–30.PubMedCrossRef Grisaru S, Samueloff A. Primary non-medically indicated caesarean section (section on request) evidence based on modern vogus? Clin Perinatol. 2004;31:409–30.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hegar R, Daltveit AK, Hofoss D, et al. Complications in caesarean delivery rates and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:428–34.CrossRef Hegar R, Daltveit AK, Hofoss D, et al. Complications in caesarean delivery rates and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:428–34.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahale AR, Ghodke UP, Bhingare PE, et al. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2008;58:507–10. Mahale AR, Ghodke UP, Bhingare PE, et al. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2008;58:507–10.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Pai M, Sundaram P, Radhakrishnan KK, et al. High rate of caesarean section in an affluent section of Chennai: is it cause for concern? Nat Med J India. 1999;12:156–8. Pai M, Sundaram P, Radhakrishnan KK, et al. High rate of caesarean section in an affluent section of Chennai: is it cause for concern? Nat Med J India. 1999;12:156–8.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kambo I, Bedi M, Dhilon BS, et al. A critical appraisal of caesarean section rates at teaching hospitals in India. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002;79:151–8.CrossRef Kambo I, Bedi M, Dhilon BS, et al. A critical appraisal of caesarean section rates at teaching hospitals in India. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002;79:151–8.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sreevidya S, Sathiyasekaran BW. High caesarean rate in Madras (India). A population based cross sectional study. BJOG. 2003;110:106–11.PubMedCrossRef Sreevidya S, Sathiyasekaran BW. High caesarean rate in Madras (India). A population based cross sectional study. BJOG. 2003;110:106–11.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Guise GM, Hasima J, Osterweil P. Evidence base vaginal birth after caesarean section. Best Pract Ras Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;19:117–30.CrossRef Guise GM, Hasima J, Osterweil P. Evidence base vaginal birth after caesarean section. Best Pract Ras Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;19:117–30.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pathania K, Premi HK, Gupta J, et al. Delivery following previous CS (a retrospective study). Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;50:63–7. Pathania K, Premi HK, Gupta J, et al. Delivery following previous CS (a retrospective study). Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;50:63–7.
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hele RW, Haser WB. Elective prophylactic caesarean delivery ACOG. Clin Rev. 2005;10:1–50. Hele RW, Haser WB. Elective prophylactic caesarean delivery ACOG. Clin Rev. 2005;10:1–50.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat National Maternity Hospital, Annual clinical report. Dublin National Maternity Hospital. 2005; 96–7. National Maternity Hospital, Annual clinical report. Dublin National Maternity Hospital. 2005; 96–7.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah DS, Mehata AV, Gondalia R. Twice a caesarean always a caesarean? J Obstet Gynecol India. 1996;46:770–4. Shah DS, Mehata AV, Gondalia R. Twice a caesarean always a caesarean? J Obstet Gynecol India. 1996;46:770–4.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Russillo B, Sewitch MJ, Cardinal L, et al. Comparing rate of trial of labour attempts, VBAC success and fetal and maternal complications in family physicians and obstetrician. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;30:123–8.PubMed Russillo B, Sewitch MJ, Cardinal L, et al. Comparing rate of trial of labour attempts, VBAC success and fetal and maternal complications in family physicians and obstetrician. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;30:123–8.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A Paradigm Shift to Check the Increasing Trend of Cesarean Delivery is the Need of Hour: But How?
verfasst von
Sudarsan Saha
Soma Saha
Rupkamal Das
Mayoukh Chakraborty
Himadri Sekhar Bala
Priyankar Naskar
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Ausgabe 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Elektronische ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-012-0288-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2012

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.