Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2017

01.08.2017 | Breast Oncology

A Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Form Accurately Transfers Supine MRI-Derived Tumor Localization Information to Guide Breast-Conserving Surgery

verfasst von: Richard J. Barth Jr., MD, Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy, PhD, Keith D. Paulsen, PhD, Timothy B. Rooney, MD, Wendy A. Wells, MD, Elizabeth Rizzo, MD, Christina V. Angeles, MD, Jonathan D. Marotti, MD, Rebecca A. Zuurbier, MD, Candice C. Black, DO

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 10/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Wire-localized excision of nonpalpable breast cancer is imprecise, resulting in positive margins 25–30% of the time.

Methods

Patients underwent preoperative supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A radiologist outlined the tumor edges on consecutive images, creating a three-dimensional (3D) view of its location. Using 3D printing, a bra-like plastic form (the Breast Cancer Locator [BCL]) was fabricated, with features that allowed a surgeon to (1) mark the edges of the tumor on the breast surface; (2) inject blue dye into the breast 1 cm from the tumor edges; and (3) place a wire in the tumor at the time of surgery.

Results

Nineteen patients with palpable cancers underwent partial mastectomy after placement of surgical cues using patient-specific BCLs. The cues were in place in <5 min and no adverse events occurred. The BCL accurately localized 18/19 cancers. In the 18 accurately localized cases, all 68 blue-dye injections were outside of the tumor edges. Median distance from the blue-dye center to the pathologic tumor edge was 1.4 cm, while distance from the blue dye to the tumor edge was <5 mm in 4% of injections, 0.5–2.0 cm in 72% of injections, and >2 cm in 24% of injections. Median distance from the tumor center to the BCL-localized wire and to the clip placed at the time of diagnosis was similar (0.49 vs. 0.73 cm) on specimen mammograms.

Conclusions

Information on breast cancer location and shape derived from a supine MRI can be transferred safely and accurately to patients in the operating room using a 3D-printed form.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Barth R, Gibson G, Carney P, Mott LA, Becher RD, Poplack SP, et al. Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less toxic therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:324–9.CrossRefPubMed Barth R, Gibson G, Carney P, Mott LA, Becher RD, Poplack SP, et al. Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less toxic therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:324–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong J, Kaelin C, Troyan S, Gadd MA, Gelman R, Lester SC, et al. Prospective study of wide excision alone for DCIS of the breast. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1031–6.CrossRefPubMed Wong J, Kaelin C, Troyan S, Gadd MA, Gelman R, Lester SC, et al. Prospective study of wide excision alone for DCIS of the breast. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1031–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lovrics P, Goldsmith C, Hodgson N, McCready D, Gohla G, Boylan C, et al. A multicentered, randomized controlled trial comparing radioguided seed localization to standard wire localization for nonpalpable, invasive and in situ breast carcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3407–14.CrossRefPubMed Lovrics P, Goldsmith C, Hodgson N, McCready D, Gohla G, Boylan C, et al. A multicentered, randomized controlled trial comparing radioguided seed localization to standard wire localization for nonpalpable, invasive and in situ breast carcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3407–14.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnabel F, Boolbol S, Gittleman M, Karni T, Tafra L, Feldman S, et al. A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margiin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1589–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schnabel F, Boolbol S, Gittleman M, Karni T, Tafra L, Feldman S, et al. A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margiin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1589–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chapgar A, Killelea B, Tsangaris T, Butler M, Stavris K, Li F, et al. A randomized controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:503–10.CrossRef Chapgar A, Killelea B, Tsangaris T, Butler M, Stavris K, Li F, et al. A randomized controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:503–10.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Heil J, Breitkruz K, Golatta M, Czink E, Dahlkamp J, Rom J, et al. Do reexcisions impair aesthetic outcome in breats conservation surgery? Exploratory analysis of a prospective study cohort. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:541–7.CrossRefPubMed Heil J, Breitkruz K, Golatta M, Czink E, Dahlkamp J, Rom J, et al. Do reexcisions impair aesthetic outcome in breats conservation surgery? Exploratory analysis of a prospective study cohort. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:541–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Abe S, Hill J, Han Y, Walsh K, Symanowski JT, Hadzikadic‐Gusic L, et al. Margin re-excision and local recurrence in invasive breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:443–8.CrossRefPubMed Abe S, Hill J, Han Y, Walsh K, Symanowski JT, Hadzikadic‐Gusic L, et al. Margin re-excision and local recurrence in invasive breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:443–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233:830–49.CrossRefPubMed Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233:830–49.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Manell J, Morris E, Dershaw D, Abramson AF, Brogi E, Liberman L, et al. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and MRI. Breast J. 2005;11:382–90.CrossRef Manell J, Morris E, Dershaw D, Abramson AF, Brogi E, Liberman L, et al. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and MRI. Breast J. 2005;11:382–90.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang E, Kinkel K, Esserman L, Lu Y, Weidner N, Hylton NM, et al. MRI in patients diagnosed with DCIS: value in the diagnosis of residual disease, occult invasion and multicentricity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:381–8.CrossRefPubMed Hwang E, Kinkel K, Esserman L, Lu Y, Weidner N, Hylton NM, et al. MRI in patients diagnosed with DCIS: value in the diagnosis of residual disease, occult invasion and multicentricity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:381–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kristoffersen Wiberg M, Aspelin P, Sylvan M, Bone B. Comparison of lesion size estimated by dynamic MR imaging, mammography and histopathology in breast neoplasms. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1207–12.PubMed Kristoffersen Wiberg M, Aspelin P, Sylvan M, Bone B. Comparison of lesion size estimated by dynamic MR imaging, mammography and histopathology in breast neoplasms. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1207–12.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Boetes C, Mus R, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology. 1995;197:743–7.CrossRefPubMed Boetes C, Mus R, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology. 1995;197:743–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis P, Staiger M, Harris K, Ganott MA, Klementaviciene J, McCarty KS, et al. Breast cancer measurements with MRI, ultrasonography and mammography. Breast Cancer Res. 1996;37:1–9.CrossRef Davis P, Staiger M, Harris K, Ganott MA, Klementaviciene J, McCarty KS, et al. Breast cancer measurements with MRI, ultrasonography and mammography. Breast Cancer Res. 1996;37:1–9.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, Olivier C, Drew P, Napp V, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:563–71.CrossRefPubMed Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, Olivier C, Drew P, Napp V, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:563–71.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakakibara M, Nagashima T, Sangai T, Nakamura R, Fujimoto H, Arai M, et al. Breast-conserving surgery using projection and reproduction techniques of surgical-position breast MRI in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:62–8.CrossRefPubMed Sakakibara M, Nagashima T, Sangai T, Nakamura R, Fujimoto H, Arai M, et al. Breast-conserving surgery using projection and reproduction techniques of surgical-position breast MRI in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:62–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakakibara M, Yokomizu J, Shima N, Kazama T, Nakamura R, Fujimoto R, et al. MRI guided quadrantectomy in patients with DCIS detected pre-operatively by mammographic calcifications. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219:295–302.CrossRefPubMed Sakakibara M, Yokomizu J, Shima N, Kazama T, Nakamura R, Fujimoto R, et al. MRI guided quadrantectomy in patients with DCIS detected pre-operatively by mammographic calcifications. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219:295–302.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pallone M, Poplack S, Avutu H, Paulsen KD, Barth RJ. Supine breast MRI and 3D optical scanning: a novel approach to improve tumor localization for breast conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:2203–08.CrossRefPubMed Pallone M, Poplack S, Avutu H, Paulsen KD, Barth RJ. Supine breast MRI and 3D optical scanning: a novel approach to improve tumor localization for breast conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:2203–08.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibson G, Lesnikoski B, Yoo J, Mott LA, Cady B, Barth RJ, et al. A comparison of ink directed and traditional whole cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:693–704.CrossRefPubMed Gibson G, Lesnikoski B, Yoo J, Mott LA, Cady B, Barth RJ, et al. A comparison of ink directed and traditional whole cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:693–704.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Krekel N, Haloua M, Lopes Cardozo A, de Wit RH, Bosch AM, de widt-Levert LM, et al. Intra-op US guidance for palpable breast cancer excision (COBALT trial): a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2103; 14: 448–54.CrossRef Krekel N, Haloua M, Lopes Cardozo A, de Wit RH, Bosch AM, de widt-Levert LM, et al. Intra-op US guidance for palpable breast cancer excision (COBALT trial): a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2103; 14: 448–54.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore M, Whitney L, Cerilli L, Imbrie JZ, Bunch M, Simpson VB, et al. Intra-operative US is associated with clear lumpectomy margins for palpable intraductal breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2001;233:761–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moore M, Whitney L, Cerilli L, Imbrie JZ, Bunch M, Simpson VB, et al. Intra-operative US is associated with clear lumpectomy margins for palpable intraductal breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2001;233:761–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
A Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Form Accurately Transfers Supine MRI-Derived Tumor Localization Information to Guide Breast-Conserving Surgery
verfasst von
Richard J. Barth Jr., MD
Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy, PhD
Keith D. Paulsen, PhD
Timothy B. Rooney, MD
Wendy A. Wells, MD
Elizabeth Rizzo, MD
Christina V. Angeles, MD
Jonathan D. Marotti, MD
Rebecca A. Zuurbier, MD
Candice C. Black, DO
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 10/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5979-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.