Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 4/2017

Open Access 01.09.2017 | Original Article

A phase I, randomized, single-dose study evaluating the pharmacokinetic equivalence of biosimilar ABP 215 and bevacizumab in healthy adult men

verfasst von: Richard Markus, Vincent Chow, Zhiying Pan, Vladimir Hanes

Erschienen in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of the proposed biosimilar ABP 215 with bevacizumab in healthy males.

Methods

In this randomized, single-blind, single-dose, three-arm, parallel-group study, healthy subjects were randomized to receive ABP 215 (n = 68), bevacizumab (US) (n = 67), or bevacizumab (EU) (n = 67) 3 mg/kg intravenously. Primary endpoints were area under the serum concentration–time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) and the maximum observed concentration (C max). Secondary endpoints included safety and immunogenicity.

Results

AUCinf and C max were similar across the three groups. Geometric means ratio (GMR) for C max and AUCinf, respectively, was 0.98 and 0.99 for ABP 215 versus bevacizumab (US); 1.03 and 0.96 for ABP 215 versus bevacizumab (EU); and 1.05 and 0.97 for bevacizumab (US) versus bevacizumab (EU). The 90% confidence intervals for the GMRs of AUCinf and C max were within the prespecified standard PK bioequivalence criteria of 0.80 to 1.25. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 47.1, 32.8, and 61.2% in the ABP 215, bevacizumab (US) and bevacizumab (EU) groups, respectively. When analyzed by investigational site, the incidence and severity of AEs were comparable in the ABP 215 and bevacizumab groups. There were no AEs leading to study discontinuation. No binding or neutralizing anti-drug anti-bodies was detected.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the PK similarity of ABP 215 to both bevacizumab (US) and bevacizumab (EU), and of bevacizumab (US) to bevacizumab (EU). Safety and tolerability were comparable between treatments and no subject developed binding or neutralizing anti-drug anti-bodies.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Neufeld G, Cohen T, Gengrinovitch S, Poltorak Z (1999) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors. FASEB J 13:9–22PubMed Neufeld G, Cohen T, Gengrinovitch S, Poltorak Z (1999) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors. FASEB J 13:9–22PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi S (2011) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptors and their inhibitors for antiangiogenic tumor therapy. Biol Pharm Bull 34:1785–1788CrossRefPubMed Takahashi S (2011) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptors and their inhibitors for antiangiogenic tumor therapy. Biol Pharm Bull 34:1785–1788CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Avastin (bevacizumab). Summary of Product Characteristics, Roche Pharma AG, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany (2012) Avastin (bevacizumab). Summary of Product Characteristics, Roche Pharma AG, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany (2012)
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu J, Hutterer K, Martinez T et al (2015) Analytical similarity assessment of a biosimilar to bevacizumab RP. Presented at WCBP Symposium, Washington, DC, 27–29 Jan 2015 Liu J, Hutterer K, Martinez T et al (2015) Analytical similarity assessment of a biosimilar to bevacizumab RP. Presented at WCBP Symposium, Washington, DC, 27–29 Jan 2015
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Markus R, Kaur P, Chow V et al (2015) Results of functional testing and pharmacokinetics equivalence evaluation comparing ABP 215 to bevacizumab. Presented at the ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, San Francisco, CA, 15–17 Jan 2015 Markus R, Kaur P, Chow V et al (2015) Results of functional testing and pharmacokinetics equivalence evaluation comparing ABP 215 to bevacizumab. Presented at the ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, San Francisco, CA, 15–17 Jan 2015
Metadaten
Titel
A phase I, randomized, single-dose study evaluating the pharmacokinetic equivalence of biosimilar ABP 215 and bevacizumab in healthy adult men
verfasst von
Richard Markus
Vincent Chow
Zhiying Pan
Vladimir Hanes
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3416-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.