Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Gastroenterology 1/2020

Open Access 01.12.2020 | Research article

A population-based cohort study of mortality of intensive care unit patients with liver cirrhosis

verfasst von: Yu-Feng Huang, Chao-Shun Lin, Yih-Giun Cherng, Chun-Chieh Yeh, Ray-Jade Chen, Ta-Liang Chen, Chien-Chang Liao

Erschienen in: BMC Gastroenterology | Ausgabe 1/2020

Abstract

Background

The impact of liver cirrhosis on the outcomes of admission to intensive care unit (ICU) is not completely understood. Our purpose is to identify risk factors for mortality in ICU patients with liver cirrhosis.

Methods

Using reimbursement claims from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database from in 2006–2012, 1,250,300 patients were identified as having ICU stays of more than 1 day, and 37,197 of these had liver cirrhosis. With propensity score-matching for socioeconomic status, pre-existing medical conditions, and cirrhosis-related morbidities, 37,197 ICU patients without liver cirrhosis were selected for comparison. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of cirrhosis associated with 30-day, ICU, and one-year mortality were calculated.

Results

Compared with control, cirrhotic patients had higher 30-day mortality (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.53 to 1.68), particularly those with jaundice (aOR 2.23, 95% CI 2.03 to 2.45), ascites (aOR 2.32, 95% CI 2.19 to 2.46) or hepatic coma (aOR 2.21, 95% CI 2.07 to 2.36). Among ICU patients, liver cirrhosis was also associated with ICU mortality (aOR 144, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.51) and one-year mortality (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.46). Associations between cirrhosis of liver and increased 30-day mortality were significant in both sexes and every age group.

Conclusions

Liver cirrhosis was associated with 30-day mortality in ICU patients. Jaundice, ascites, hepatic coma, more than 4 admissions due to cirrhosis, and more than 30 days of hospital stay due to cirrhosis were exacerbated factors in cirrhotic ICU patients.

Background

Cirrhosis of the liver results in various complications and mortality worldwide, but especially in developed regions [1]. It is the fourth most common cause of death in Europe and leads to more than a million deaths around the globe annually [2, 3]. The main etiologies of liver cirrhosis in most areas are infection with hepatitis B or C virus and alcohol abuse [1]. A French screening program estimated prevalence at 0.3%, and European studies found annual incidences of 15.3–132.6 per 100,000 people [3].
In the United States, annual medical expenditures related to intensive care unit (ICU) admissions are US $3 billion, with mean charges of US $116,200 per admission [4]. Patients in late-stage liver cirrhosis are likely to be admitted to ICUs for critical conditions such as sepsis and renal or respiratory failure [4, 5]. Though some studies reported improving outcomes in patients with cirrhosis admitted to ICUs [6], the prognosis remains poor, with mortality rates as high as 45% or even higher [7, 8].
It is important to identify the risk factors of cirrhosis of the liver and associated adverse outcomes of patients admitted to ICU. Several prognostic scoring systems have been proposed for risk assessment [912], such as the Child-Pugh score [13], the Model for End-stage Liver Disease [14], the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [15], and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [16]. Most previous reports only analyzed risk factors that predict outcomes when stratifying cirrhotic patients admitted to ICU, but did not assess the influence of cirrhosis itself on mortality in ICU or one-year survival after discharge.
We conducted a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database to investigate ICU mortality in patients with and without liver cirrhosis. We also evaluated the impacts of different comorbidities and cirrhosis-related clinical indictors on ICU mortality and on one-year survival in further stratified analyses.

Methods

Data sources

We conducted this study using reimbursement claims data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Program. This program merged former insurance systems in March 1995 and covers more than 99% of Taiwan’s 23 million residents. The National Health Research Institutes established a National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) to record all beneficiaries’ inpatient and outpatient medical services. This information includes basic patient demographics, physician’s primary and secondary disease diagnoses, treatment procedures, prescribed medications and medical expenditures for all health care services. The validity of this database has been favorably evaluated, and research articles based on it have been accepted in prominent scientific journals worldwide [1720].

Ethics

This study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. To protect personal privacy, the electronic database was decoded with patient identifications scrambled for further academic access for research. According to Taiwan National Health Research Institutes regulations, informed consent is not required because patient identifications were decoded and scrambled [1820]. Ethical approval for this study (TMU-JIRB-201504008) was provided by the Institutional Review Board of Taipei Medical University.

Study design

Among 23 million beneficiaries, 1,250,300 patients were admitted to ICU between 2006 and 2012 (Additional file 1: Figure S1). We identified 79,528 patients aged ≥20 years who had histories of liver cirrhosis from the National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients with liver cirrhosis were defined as having at least two visits for medical care with physician’s primary diagnosis of liver cirrhosis within the 24 months before ICU admission. To select appropriate comparison groups, we matched each ICU patient with cirrhosis with one randomly selected ICU patients without liver cirrhosis by the analysis with a propensity score-matched pair procedure (case-control ratio = 1:1). These matched factors included age, sex, low income, stay in medical center or not, diabetes, hypertension, mental disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, fracture, pneumonia, stroke, asthma, traumatic brain injury, congestive heart failure, immune thrombocytopenia, renal dialysis, hyperlipidemia, epilepsy, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease and systemic lupus erythematosus, causes of admission to ICU according to physician’s primary diagnosis (digestive disease, cancer, respiratory disease, circulatory disease, infectious disease, injury and poisoning, symptom-defined conditions, genitourinary disease, endocrine disease, musculoskeletal disease, neurological disease, skin disease, mental disorder, tumors, blood diseases, congenital anomalies, disease of perinatal period, complications of pregnancy, ICU complications (such as septicemia, pneumonia, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, stroke, acute myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism). After matching selection, there were 37,197 patients with cirrhosis of liver in the exposure group and 37,197 people without liver cirrhosis in non-exposure group. We investigated the impact of liver cirrhosis on 30-day mortality, ICU mortality, and one-year mortality among ICU patients in this study.

Measures and definitions

Income status was identified by defining low-income patients as those who qualified for waived medical copayment, as this status is verified by the National Health Insurance Bureau. Whether patients stayed in medical center ICUs or those in other hospitals was also recorded. We used the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) to define coexisting medical conditions and ICU complications. Details codes of ICD-9-CM for these diseases were listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. Cirrhosis of liver before ICU stay was defined as the major exposure. Coexisting medical conditions determined from medical claims within the 24-month period before ICU stay included diabetes, hypertension, mental disorders, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, fracture, pneumonia, stroke, asthma, traumatic brain injury, congestive heart failure, immune thrombocytopenia, hyperlipidemia, epilepsy, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Renal dialysis was defined by administration code (D8, D9). Seven major complications during the ICU stay were analyzed (and those having severe cases of these diseases before ICU were excluded) including septicemia, pneumonia, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, stroke, acute myocardial infarction, and pulmonary embolism. Length of hospital stay and ICU medical expenditure were analyzed as secondary outcomes.
Causes of admission to ICU (according to physician’s primary diagnosis at admission) were also identified and described with disease codes including digestive disease, cancer, respiratory disease, circulatory disease, infectious disease, injury and poisoning, symptom-defined conditions, genitourinary disease, endocrine disease, musculoskeletal disease, neurological disease, skin disease, mental disorder, tumor, blood disease, congenital anomalies, disease of perinatal period, and pregnancy complications.

Statistical analysis

To reduce confounding bias, we used a propensity score-matched pair combined with frequency matching procedure to balance the covariates between ICU patients with and without liver cirrhosis. We developed a non-parsimonious multivariable logistic regression model to estimate a propensity score for pre-ICU cirrhosis of the liver. We matched cirrhotic patients to patients without liver cirrhosis, using a greedy matching algorithm (without replacement) with a caliper width of 0.2 SDs of the log odds of the estimated propensity score. Clinical significance guided initial choices of covariates in this multivariable logistic regression model: age, sex, low income, ICU stay in medical center or not, diabetes, hypertension, mental disorders, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, fracture, pneumonia, stroke, asthma, traumatic brain injury, congestive heart failure, immune thrombocytopenia, renal dialysis, hyperlipidemia, epilepsy, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, septicemia, pneumonia, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, stroke, acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, digestive disease, cancer, respiratory disease, circulatory disease, infectious disease, injury and poisoning, symptom-defined conditions, genitourinary disease, endocrine disease, musculoskeletal disease, neurological disease, skin disease, mental disorder, tumor, blood disease, congenital anomalies, disease of perinatal period, and complications of pregnancy. A structured iterative approach was used to refine this model to achieve covariate balance within matched pairs. We used chi-square tests to measure covariate balance, and p < 0.05 was suggested to represent meaningful covariate imbalance. We matched patients with and without cirrhosis using a greedy-matching algorithm with a caliper width of 0.2 SD of the log odds of the estimated propensity score. This method could remove 98% of bias from measured covariates.
Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for 30-day mortality, ICU mortality, and one-year mortality for patients with and without cirrhosis were analyzed with multiple logistic regression models by controlling for age, sex, low income, stay in medical center or not, coexisting medical conditions, ICU complications and admission causes. To confirm associations between liver cirrhosis and ICU mortality, we also performed stratification analysis by age, sex, low income, stay in medical center or not, coexisting medical conditions, ICU complications and causes of ICU admission. The impacts of liver-related indicators and medical care on 30-day mortality in ICU patients with cirrhosis were also measured by calculating adjusted ORs and 95% CIs in the multivariate logistic regression models. SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) statistical software was used for data analyses; two-sided p < 0.05 indicated significant differences.

Results

The Additional file 1: Figure S1 shows the flow chart for selecting ICU patients with and without liver cirrhosis. Table 1 shows the distributions of age, sex, low income, stay in medical center or not, coexisting medical conditions (diabetes, hypertension, mental disorders, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, fracture, pneumonia, stroke, asthma, traumatic brain injury, congestive heart failure, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, renal dialysis, hyperlipidemia, epilepsy, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, systemic lupus erythematosus), ICU complications (septicemia, pneumonia, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, stroke, acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism), causes of admission to ICU (digestive disease, cancer, respiratory disease, circulatory disease, infectious disease, injury and poisoning, symptom-defined conditions, genitourinary disease, endocrine disease, musculoskeletal disease, neurological disease, skin disease, mental disorders, tumor, blood disease, congenital anomalies, disease of perinatal period, pregnancy complications) as well as surgery and endotracheal intubation balanced between surgical patients with and without cirrhosis of liver using the matching procedure by propensity score.
Table 1
Characteristics of ICU patients with and without liver cirrhosis
Pre-hospital and in-hospital characteristics
No liver cirrhosis
(N = 37197)
Liver cirrhosis
(N = 37197)
Age, years
n
(%)
n
(%)
 20–29
304
(0.8)
304
(0.8)
 30–39
2261
(6.1)
2261
(6.1)
 40–49
6022
(16.2)
6022
(16.2)
 50–59
8939
(24.0)
8939
(24.0)
 60–69
7832
(21.1)
7832
(21.1)
 70–79
7841
(21.1)
7841
(21.1)
  ≥ 80
3998
(10.8)
3998
(10.8)
Sex
 Female
10,274
(27.6)
10,274
(27.6)
 Male
26,923
(72.4)
26,923
(72.4)
 Low income
1192
(3.2)
1192
(3.2)
 ICU in medical center
11,331
(30.5)
11,331
(30.5)
Coexisting medical conditions
 Hypertension
8949
(24.1)
8949
(24.1)
 Diabetes
8360
(22.5)
8360
(22.5)
 Mental disorder
6725
(18.1)
6725
(18.1)
 Peptic ulcer disease
6206
(16.7)
6206
(16.7)
 Anemia
4507
(12.1)
4507
(12.1)
 COPD
3561
(9.6)
3561
(9.6)
 Fracture
2495
(6.7)
2495
(6.7)
 Asthma
1250
(3.4)
1250
(3.4)
 Atherosclerosis
1197
(3.2)
1197
(3.2)
 Traumatic brain injury
1063
(2.9)
1063
(2.9)
 Congestive heart failure
832
(2.2)
832
(2.2)
 Renal dialysis
806
(2.2)
806
(2.2)
 Thrombocytopenia
719
(1.9)
719
(1.9)
Reasons for ICU admission
 Digestive disease
10,198
(27.4)
10,198
(27.4)
 Cancer
6726
(18.1)
6726
(18.1)
 Respiratory disease
4524
(12.2)
4524
(12.2)
 Circulatory disease
4385
(11.8)
4385
(11.8)
 Infectious disease
3518
(9.5)
3518
(9.5)
 Injury and poisoning
2918
(7.8)
2918
(7.8)
 Symptom-defined conditions
862
(2.3)
862
(2.3)
 Genitourinary disease
762
(2.0)
762
(2.1)
 Endocrine disease
605
(1.6)
605
(1.6)
 Musculoskeletal disease
598
(1.6)
598
(1.6)
 Mental disorder
278
(0.8)
278
(0.8)
 Neurological disease
304
(0.8)
304
(0.8)
 Skin diseases
291
(0.8)
291
(0.8)
 Tumor
254
(0.7)
254
(0.7)
 Blood disease
76
(0.2)
76
(0.2)
 Congenital anomalies
40
(0.1)
40
(0.1)
 Disease of perinatal period
33
(0.1)
33
(0.1)
 Pregnancy complications
7
(0.02)
7
(0.02)
 Receiving surgery
15,297
(41.1)
15,297
(41.1)
 Endotracheal intubation
13,076
(35.1)
13,076
(35.1)
Complications in ICU
 Septicemia
7338
(19.7)
7338
(19.7)
 Pneumonia
2970
(8.0)
2970
(8.0)
 Acute renal failure
1708
(4.6)
1708
(4.6)
 Urinary tract infection
1681
(4.5)
1681
(4.5)
 Stroke
1438
(3.9)
1438
(3.9)
 Acute myocardial infarction
403
(1.1)
403
(1.1)
 Pulmonary embolism
22
(0.1)
22
(0.1)
COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ICU intensive care unit
In Table 2, patients with cirrhosis showed higher ICU medical expenditure than patients without (12,008 ± 9890 vs. 11,366 ± 8742 USD, p < 0.0001). Cirrhosis was associated with a significant increase in 30-day mortality (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.53 to 1.68), ICU mortality (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.51), and one-year mortality (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.46) in ICU patients.
Table 2
Intensive care unit mortality in patients with and without liver cirrhosis
Outcomes of ICU
No LC, %
LC, %
OR
(95% CI)a
30-day mortality
10.9
15.9
1.60
(1.53 to 1.68)
ICU mortality
12.9
17.2
1.44
(1.38 to 1.51)
One-year mortality
17.3
22.1
1.40
(1.35 to 1.46)
Medical expenditure, USDb
11,366 ± 8742
12,008 ± 9890
p < 0.0001
Length of hospital stay, daysb
8.6 ± 29.6
8.3 ± 29.2
p = 0.2174
CI confidence interval, ICU intensive care unit, OR odds ratio
aAdjusted all.covariates listed in Table 1
bMean ± SD
Compared with ICU patients without cirrhosis (Table 3), cirrhotic ICU patients had increased 30-day mortality when they also had liver cancer (aOR 1.85, 95% CI 1.74 to 1.97), hepatitis B or C virus infection (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.03), alcohol dependence syndrome (aOR 1.82, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.04), jaundice (aOR 2.23, 95% CI 2.03 to 2.45), ascites (aOR 2.32, 95% CI 2.19 to 2.46), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (aOR 1.90, 95% CI 1.78 to 2.03), hepatic coma (aOR 2.21, 95% CI 2.07 to 2.36), more than 4 admissions due to LC (aOR 2.52, 95% CI 2.20 to 2.89), more than 30 days of hospital stay due to LC (aOR 2.97, 95% CI 2.66 to 3.31), and albumin supplement (aOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.83 to 2.04). The aORs of alcohol-related cirrhosis and previous hospitalization associated with 30-day mortality were 1.75 (95% CI 1.66 to 1.85) and 1.52 (95% CI 1.46 to 1.58), respectively.
Table 3
Stratified analysis and effects of cirrhosis-related clinical indicators on 30-day mortality of ICU patients
 
n
30-day mortality
Deaths
Mortality, %
OR
(95% CI)a
Pre-ICU characteristics within 2 years
 No LC
37,197
4046
10.9
1.00
(reference)
 LC without liver cancer
25,758
3705
14.4
1.48
(1.41 to 1.56)
 LC with liver cancer
11,439
2190
19.2
1.85
(1.74 to 1.97)
 LC with no HBV and HCV
22,258
3366
15.1
1.55
(1.47 to 1.63)
 LC with HBV or HCV
13,573
2288
16.9
1.67
(1.58 to 1.77)
 LC with HBV and HCV
1366
241
17.6
1.75
(1.50 to 2.03)
 LC without ADS
34,496
5450
15.8
1.59
(1.52 to 1.66)
 LC with ADS
2701
445
16.5
1.82
(1.62 to 2.04)
 LC without jaundice
33,978
5171
15.2
1.54
(1.47 to 1.62)
 LC with jaundice
3219
724
22.5
2.23
(2.03 to 2.45)
 LC without ascites
26,352
3332
12.6
1.30
(1.23 to 1.37)
 LC with ascites
10,845
2563
23.6
2.32
(2.19 to 2.46)
 LC without GI hemorrhage
27,652
4114
14.9
1.50
(1.43 to 1.58)
 LC with GI hemorrhage
9545
1781
18.7
1.90
(1.78 to 2.03)
 LC without hepatic coma
29,252
4102
14.0
1.43
(1.37 to 1.37)
 LC with hepatic coma
7945
1793
22.6
2.21
(2.07 to 2.36)
 LC with 0 admission
25,677
3378
13.2
1.33
(1.26 to 1.40)
 LC with 1 admission
6600
1411
21.4
2.16
(2.01 to 2.32)
 LC with 2 admissions
2449
521
21.3
2.14
(1.92 to 2.38)
 LC with 3 admissions
1059
248
23.4
2.37
(2.03 to 2.76)
 LC with ≥4 admissions
1412
337
23.9
2.52
(2.20 to 2.89)
 LC with 0 days of hospital stay
25,677
3378
13.2
1.33
(1.26 to 1.40)
 LC with 1–9 days of hospital stay
5144
996
19.4
1.92
(1.77 to 2.08)
 LC with 10–19 days of hospital stay
3022
664
22.0
2.23
(2.02 to 2.45)
 LC with 20–29 days of hospital stay
1312
305
23.3
2.30
(2.00 to 2.65)
 LC with ≥30 days of hospital stay
2042
552
27.0
2.97
(2.66 to 3.31)
 LC without albumin supplement
23,279
3140
13.5
1.40
(1.33 to 1.47)
 LC with albumin supplement
13,918
2755
19.8
1.93
(1.83 to 2.04)
 LC without alcohol-related illness
24,894
3581
14.4
1.25
(1.20 to 1.31)
 LC with alcohol-related illness
12,303
2314
18.8
1.75
(1.66 to 1.85)
 LC without hospitalizations
7214
756
10.5
0.91
(0.84 to 0.98)
 LC with hospitalizations
29,983
5139
17.1
1.52
(1.46 to 1.58)
Reasons for ICU admission
 Digestive disease, no LC
10,198
550
5.4
1.00
(reference)
 Digestive disease, LC
10,198
1511
14.8
3.23
(2.91 to 3.58)
 Cancer, no LC
6726
1031
15.3
1.00
(reference)
 Cancer, LC
6726
1154
17.2
1.15
(1.05 to 1.27)
 Respiratory disease, no LC
4524
837
18.5
1.00
(reference)
 Respiratory disease, LC
4524
986
21.8
1.24
(1.12 to 1.38)
 Circulatory disease, no LC
4385
384
8.8
1.00
(reference)
 Circulatory disease, LC
4385
530
12.1
1.47
(1.28 to 1.70)
 Infectious disease, no LC
3518
807
22.9
1.00
(reference)
 Infectious disease, LC
3518
983
27.9
1.32
(1.19 to 1.48)
 Injury and poisoning, no LC
2918
192
6.6
1.00
(reference)
 Injury and poisoning, LC
2918
345
11.8
1.95
(1.61 to 2.35)
 Symptom-defined conditions, no LC
862
123
14.3
1.00
(reference)
 Symptom-defined conditions, LC
862
194
22.5
1.86
(1.43 to 2.42)
 Genitourinary disease, no LC
762
38
5.0
1.00
(reference)
 Genitourinary disease, LC
762
59
7.7
1.74
(1.10 to 2.75)
 Endocrine disease, no LC
605
24
4.0
1.00
(reference)
 Endocrine disease, LC
605
31
5.1
1.36
(0.76 to 2.43)
 Musculoskeletal disease, no LC
598
17
2.8
1.00
(reference)
 Musculoskeletal disease, LC
598
42
7.0
3.49
(1.79 to 6.82)
 Mental disorder, no LC
278
0
0.0
1.00
(reference)
 Mental disorder, LC
278
0
0.0
 Neurological disease, no LC
304
11
3.6
1.00
(reference)
 Neurological disease, LC
304
25
8.2
2.94
(1.30 to 6.65)
 Skin disease, no LC
291
7
2.4
1.00
(reference)
 Skin disease, LC
291
8
2.8
1.23
(0.35 to 4.39)
 Tumor, no LC
254
2
0.8
1.00
(reference)
 Tumor, LC
254
5
2.0
3.33
(0.51 to 21.8)
 Blood disease, no LC
76
5
6.6
1.00
(reference)
 Blood disease, LC
76
3
4.0
0.38
(0.05 to 2.84)
 Congenital anomalies, no LC
40
1
2.5
1.00
(reference)
 Congenital anomalies, LC
40
0
0.0
 Disease of perinatal period, no LC
33
1
3.0
1.00
(reference)
 Disease of perinatal period, LC
33
0
0.0
 Complications of pregnancy, no LC
7
0
0.0
1.00
(reference)
 Complications of pregnancy, LC
7
1
14.3
 0 CCI score, no LC
10,476
1066
10.2
1.00
(reference)
 0 CCI score, LC
1165
101
8.7
0.97
(0.77 to 1.23)
 1 CCI score, no LC
8899
731
8.2
1.00
(reference)
 1 CCI score, LC
6656
818
12.3
1.38
(1.21 to 1.58)
 2 CCI score, no LC
6573
592
9.0
1.00
(reference)
 2 CCI score, LC
5116
592
11.6
1.49
(1.31 to 1.70)
 3 CCI score, no LC
3897
355
9.1
1.00
(reference)
 3 CCI score, LC
5478
760
13.9
1.45
(1.25 to 1.69)
 4 CCI score, no LC
1823
209
11.5
1.00
(reference)
 4 CCI score, LC
7085
1325
18.7
1.40
(1.17 to 1.67)
  ≥ 5 CCI score, no LC
5529
1093
19.8
1.00
(reference)
  ≥ 5 CCI score, LC
11,697
2299
19.7
1.08
(0.99 to 1.18)
ADS alcohol dependence syndrome, CI confidence interval, GI gastrointestinal, HBV hepatitis B virus, HCV hepatitis C virus, ICU intensive care unit, LC liver cirrhosis, OR odds ratio
aAdjusted all covariates listed in Table 1
The association between liver cirrhosis and ICU mortality was significant in relation to the following causes of ICU admission: digestive disease (aOR 3.23, 95% CI 2.91 to 3.58), cancer (aOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.27), respiratory disease (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.38), circulatory disease (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.70), infectious disease (aOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.48), injury and poisoning (aOR 1.95, 95% CI 1.61 to 2.35), symptom-defined conditions (aOR 1.86, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.42), genitourinary disease (aOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.75), musculoskeletal disease (aOR 3.49, 95% CI 1.79 to 6.82), and neurological disease (aOR 2.94, 95% CI 1.30 to 6.65). The 30-day mortality was also associated with LC in ICU patients with 2 scores (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.70), 3 scores (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.69), and 4 scores (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.67) of Charlson Comorbidity Index.
Stratified analysis and effects of cirrhosis-related clinical indicators on ICU mortality and one-year mortality of ICU patients were showed in Additional file 1: Tables S2 and S3. The actual survival starting at the day of ICU admission in patients with and without liver cirrhosis was showed in Additional file 1: Table S4.

Discussion

In this large-scale, nationwide, population-based propensity score-matched study, patients with cirrhosis of the liver admitted to ICU showed significantly higher ICU mortality as well as increased medical expenditure compared with non-cirrhotic controls. The stratified analyses showed higher ICU mortality among patients with increasing numbers of co-morbidities. Associated with even higher ICU mortality were cirrhosis-related clinical conditions, liver cancer, alcohol dependence syndrome, jaundice, ascites, gastrointestinal hemorrhage and hepatic coma. Regarding long-term outcomes after ICU discharge, higher one-year mortality was noted in liver cirrhosis patients with older age, male gender, ICU in medical center, anemia, renal dialysis, congestive heart failure, and complications in ICU such as septicemia and pneumonia.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report investigating the influence of liver cirrhosis on 30-day mortality, ICU mortality, and one-year mortality in ICU patients using a nationwide database. Previous studies were mostly conducted from a single center [10, 12, 2124], which may represent a certain type of patient group and medical practice. Although these studies evaluated risk factors among patients with liver cirrhosis admitted to ICU, they did not note various cirrhosis-related clinical characteristics nor assess the impact of cirrhosis per se, adjusting all covariates with the control group to the ICU mortality [7, 1012, 25, 26]. In our subgroup analyses, the odds ratios of ICU mortality in cirrhotic patients’ ICU admissions with primary diagnoses such as cancer, respiratory disease and infectious disease were lower than other causes of ICU admission. This might be attributed to cancer, pneumonia, COPD and sepsis having more impact on ICU mortality than cirrhosis after adjustment [2729].
Regarding the effects of cirrhosis-related clinical indicators on ICU mortality, cirrhotic patients with liver cancer, alcohol dependence syndrome, jaundice, ascites, gastrointestinal hemorrhage and hepatic coma had higher ICU mortality than those without cirrhosis. Of these cirrhosis-related clinical indicators, jaundice, ascites and hepatic coma were consistent with the Child-Pugh score risk factors of the most commonly used prognosis predicting model in cirrhotic patients [13]. The development of ascites, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, encephalopathy and jaundice mark the decompensated stage of liver cirrhosis that results in poorer prognoses [30, 31]. These complications might contribute to the increased ICU mortality found in patients of liver cirrhosis with more hospitalization. Liver cancer, especially hepatocellular carcinoma, is one of the leading causes of death in Taiwan [32], so it is reasonable that cirrhotic patients with liver cancer would have higher ICU mortality than those without it.
Regarding increased ICU mortality and medical expenditures, there are some possible explanations why patients with liver cirrhosis had worse outcomes. First, patients with liver cirrhosis are presumed to have impaired immune function and are thus more susceptible to severe infection, leading to higher mortality [33, 34]. A previous study demonstrated that infection increased mortality in patients with cirrhosis of liver fourfold, with 30% of patients dying within a month of infection and another 30% dying within a year [35]. This was consistent with our finding that septicemia and pneumonia in patients with cirrhosis were associated with higher ICU mortality. Second, portal hypertension and subsequent esophageal variceal bleeding and ascites play major roles as complications of cirrhosis and are associated with 1-year mortality of nearly 20% [1, 5, 36]. Third, as cirrhosis progresses, the development of renal vasoconstriction leads to hepatorenal syndrome. Renal failure is an indicator of end-stage liver disease and increases mortality risk by seven times, with half of patients dying within a month [37]. In our study, acute renal failure was also significantly associated with ICU mortality. To reduce ICU mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis, health care teams should optimize management of these specific issues according to updated guidelines.
Concerning long-term outcomes, variables such as serum albumin or bilirubin levels, ascites, encephalopathy, and prothrombin time for the Child-Pugh score are the most common independent predictors of mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis [5]. In our national cohort, ICU mortality among patients with liver cirrhosis increased with numbers of cirrhosis-related clinical conditions. These findings were compatible with previous studies demonstrating high mortality in cirrhotic patients with renal failure and gastrointestinal hemorrhage [37, 38]. However, our study focused on impacts on long-term mortality after ICU discharge, which was not investigated before. Considering specific management of these factors for ICU patients with cirrhosis of the liver is warranted to reduce mortality.
The present study has strengths of large sample sizes and adjustment for potential confounding factors by propensity score-matching method in a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort. It also has some limitations encountered in research based on secondary data. First, detailed information on laboratory data, physical examinations, and hemodynamic parameters was not available from reimbursement claim data. For example, the international normalized ratio of prothrombin time, bilirubin and creatinine level in blood would help to predict outcomes among cirrhosis patients [13, 14]. Second, severity of liver cirrhosis noted by Child-Pugh score, Model For End-Stage Liver Disease score or other criteria was not found in reimbursement data for risk stratification of ICU mortality. Third, though the accuracy of major diagnosis codes from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database has been accepted by scientific journals [1720], the validity of liver cirrhosis, comorbidity and complication codes employed in this study might still be questioned. To reduce the possibility of misdiagnosis or miscoding, we applied inclusive criteria of at least two visits for medical services with physician’s primary diagnosis of liver cirrhosis. In addition, an important factor influencing ICU outcome is Do Not Resuscitate orders. However, we have no data regarding the Do Not Resuscitate order in this study because of the limitations of Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database. Finally, we could not exclude the possibility that some patients with hepatitis without cirrhosis were included in cirrhotic group in this study because the diagnosis error by physicians may occur in the clinical settings.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this nationwide population-based study showed that patients with liver cirrhosis admitted to ICU have higher ICU and one-year mortality after discharge in patterns that closely correlate with medical conditions and specific scenarios. These findings can help health care providers develop specific protocols to improve prognosis and long-term survival rates for ICU patients with liver cirrhosis.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12876-020-1163-1.

Acknowledgements

This study is based in part on data obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database provided by the Bureau of National Health Insurance of the Taiwan Department of Health and managed by the National Health Research Institutes. The interpretation and conclusions contained herein do not represent those of the Bureau of National Health Insurance, the Taiwan Department of Health, or the National Health Research Institutes.
This study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. To protect personal privacy, the electronic database was decoded with patient identifications scrambled for further academic access for research. According to Taiwan National Health Research Institutes regulations, informed consent is not required because patient identifications were decoded and scrambled. Ethical approval for this study (TMU-JIRB-201504008) was provided by the Institutional Review Board of Taipei Medical University.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsochatzis EA, Bosch J, Burroughs AK. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet. 2014;383:1749–61.CrossRef Tsochatzis EA, Bosch J, Burroughs AK. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet. 2014;383:1749–61.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095–128.CrossRef Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095–128.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Blachier M, Leleu H, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Valla DC, Roudot-Thoraval F. The burden of liver disease in Europe: a review of available epidemiological data. J Hepatol. 2013;58:593–608.CrossRef Blachier M, Leleu H, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Valla DC, Roudot-Thoraval F. The burden of liver disease in Europe: a review of available epidemiological data. J Hepatol. 2013;58:593–608.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Olson JC, Wendon JA, Kramer DJ, et al. Intensive care of the patient with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2011;54:1864–72.CrossRef Olson JC, Wendon JA, Kramer DJ, et al. Intensive care of the patient with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2011;54:1864–72.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol. 2006;44:217–31.CrossRef D’Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol. 2006;44:217–31.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Galbois A, Trompette ML, Das V, et al. Improvement in the prognosis of cirrhotic patients admitted to an intensive care unit: a retrospective study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24:897–904.CrossRef Galbois A, Trompette ML, Das V, et al. Improvement in the prognosis of cirrhotic patients admitted to an intensive care unit: a retrospective study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24:897–904.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomson SJ, Moran C, Cowan ML, et al. Outcomes of critically ill patients with cirrhosis admitted to intensive care: an important perspective from the non-transplant setting. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:233–43.CrossRef Thomson SJ, Moran C, Cowan ML, et al. Outcomes of critically ill patients with cirrhosis admitted to intensive care: an important perspective from the non-transplant setting. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:233–43.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cholongitas E, Senzolo M, Patch D, Shaw S, Hui C, Burroughs AK. Review article: scoring systems for assessing prognosis in critically ill adult cirrhotics. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:453–64.CrossRef Cholongitas E, Senzolo M, Patch D, Shaw S, Hui C, Burroughs AK. Review article: scoring systems for assessing prognosis in critically ill adult cirrhotics. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:453–64.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Das V, Boelle PY, Galbois A, et al. Cirrhotic patients in the medical intensive care unit: early prognosis and long-term survival. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:2108–16.CrossRef Das V, Boelle PY, Galbois A, et al. Cirrhotic patients in the medical intensive care unit: early prognosis and long-term survival. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:2108–16.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Levesque E, Hoti E, Azoulay D, et al. Prospective evaluation of the prognostic scores for cirrhotic patients admitted to an intensive care unit. J Hepatol. 2012;56:95–102.CrossRef Levesque E, Hoti E, Azoulay D, et al. Prospective evaluation of the prognostic scores for cirrhotic patients admitted to an intensive care unit. J Hepatol. 2012;56:95–102.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Theocharidou E, Pieri G, Mohammad AO, et al. The Royal Free Hospital score: a calibrated prognostic model for patients with cirrhosis admitted to intensive care unit. Comparison with current models and CLIF-SOFA score. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:554–62.CrossRef Theocharidou E, Pieri G, Mohammad AO, et al. The Royal Free Hospital score: a calibrated prognostic model for patients with cirrhosis admitted to intensive care unit. Comparison with current models and CLIF-SOFA score. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:554–62.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Emerson P, McPeake J, O’Neill A, et al. The utility of scoring systems in critically ill cirrhotic patients admitted to a general intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2014;29:1131.CrossRef Emerson P, McPeake J, O’Neill A, et al. The utility of scoring systems in critically ill cirrhotic patients admitted to a general intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2014;29:1131.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg. 1973;60:646–9.CrossRef Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg. 1973;60:646–9.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, Peine CJ, Rank J, ter Borg PC. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology. 2000;31:864–71.CrossRef Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, Peine CJ, Rank J, ter Borg PC. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology. 2000;31:864–71.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818–29.CrossRef Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818–29.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. SOFA (Sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure: working group on Sepsis-related problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:707–10.CrossRef Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. SOFA (Sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure: working group on Sepsis-related problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:707–10.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng CL, Kao YH, Lin SJ, Lee CH, Lai ML. Validation of the National Health Insurance Research Database with ischemic stroke cases in Taiwan. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20:236–42.CrossRef Cheng CL, Kao YH, Lin SJ, Lee CH, Lai ML. Validation of the National Health Insurance Research Database with ischemic stroke cases in Taiwan. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20:236–42.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin CS, Lin SY, Chang CC, Wang HH, Liao CC, Chen TL. Postoperative adverse outcomes after non-hepatic surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1784–90.CrossRef Lin CS, Lin SY, Chang CC, Wang HH, Liao CC, Chen TL. Postoperative adverse outcomes after non-hepatic surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1784–90.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeh CC, Liao CC, Chang YC, et al. Adverse outcomes after noncardiac surgery in patients with diabetes: a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3216–21.CrossRef Yeh CC, Liao CC, Chang YC, et al. Adverse outcomes after noncardiac surgery in patients with diabetes: a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3216–21.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin JA, Liao CC, Lee YJ, Wu CH, Huang WQ, Chen TL. Adverse outcomes after major surgery in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a nationwide population-based study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:1646–51.CrossRef Lin JA, Liao CC, Lee YJ, Wu CH, Huang WQ, Chen TL. Adverse outcomes after major surgery in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a nationwide population-based study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:1646–51.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wehler M, Kokoska J, Reulbach U, Hahn EG, Strauss R. Short-term prognosis in critically ill patients with cirrhosis assessed by prognostic scoring systems. Hepatology. 2001;34:255–61.CrossRef Wehler M, Kokoska J, Reulbach U, Hahn EG, Strauss R. Short-term prognosis in critically ill patients with cirrhosis assessed by prognostic scoring systems. Hepatology. 2001;34:255–61.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gildea TR, Cook WC, Nelson DR, et al. Predictors of long-term mortality in patients with cirrhosis of the liver admitted to a medical ICU. Chest. 2004;126:1598–603.CrossRef Gildea TR, Cook WC, Nelson DR, et al. Predictors of long-term mortality in patients with cirrhosis of the liver admitted to a medical ICU. Chest. 2004;126:1598–603.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cholongitas E, Calvaruso V, Senzolo M, et al. RIFLE classification as predictive factor of mortality in patients with cirrhosis admitted to intensive care unit. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:1639–47.CrossRef Cholongitas E, Calvaruso V, Senzolo M, et al. RIFLE classification as predictive factor of mortality in patients with cirrhosis admitted to intensive care unit. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:1639–47.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Juneja D, Gopal PB, Kapoor D, Raya R, Sathyanarayanan M, Malhotra P. Outcome of patients with liver cirrhosis admitted to a specialty liver intensive care unit in India. J Crit Care. 2009;24:387–93.CrossRef Juneja D, Gopal PB, Kapoor D, Raya R, Sathyanarayanan M, Malhotra P. Outcome of patients with liver cirrhosis admitted to a specialty liver intensive care unit in India. J Crit Care. 2009;24:387–93.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Freire P, Romaozinho JM, Amaro P, Ferreira M, Sofia C. Prognostic scores in cirrhotic patients admitted to a gastroenterology intensive care unit. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011;103:177–83.CrossRef Freire P, Romaozinho JM, Amaro P, Ferreira M, Sofia C. Prognostic scores in cirrhotic patients admitted to a gastroenterology intensive care unit. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011;103:177–83.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bahirwani R, Ghabril M, Forde KA, et al. Factors that predict short-term intensive care unit mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:1194–200.CrossRef Bahirwani R, Ghabril M, Forde KA, et al. Factors that predict short-term intensive care unit mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:1194–200.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Dombrovskiy VY, Martin AA, Sunderram J, Paz HL. Rapid increase in hospitalization and mortality rates for severe sepsis in the United States: a trend analysis from 1993 to 2003. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1244–50.CrossRef Dombrovskiy VY, Martin AA, Sunderram J, Paz HL. Rapid increase in hospitalization and mortality rates for severe sepsis in the United States: a trend analysis from 1993 to 2003. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1244–50.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Blot S, Koulenti D, Dimopoulos G, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and mortality for ventilator-associated pneumonia in middle-aged, old and very old critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:601–9.CrossRef Blot S, Koulenti D, Dimopoulos G, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and mortality for ventilator-associated pneumonia in middle-aged, old and very old critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:601–9.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ai-Ping C, Lee KH, Lim TK. In-hospital and 5-year mortality of patients treated in the ICU for acute exacerbation of COPD: a retrospective study. Chest. 2005;128:518–24.CrossRef Ai-Ping C, Lee KH, Lim TK. In-hospital and 5-year mortality of patients treated in the ICU for acute exacerbation of COPD: a retrospective study. Chest. 2005;128:518–24.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat De Franchis R. Evolving consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno IV consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2005;43:167–76.CrossRef De Franchis R. Evolving consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno IV consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2005;43:167–76.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Amico G, Morabito A, Pagliaro L, Marubini E. Survival and prognostic indicators in compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci. 1986;31:468–75.CrossRef D’Amico G, Morabito A, Pagliaro L, Marubini E. Survival and prognostic indicators in compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci. 1986;31:468–75.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Kee KM, Lu SN. Hospital- and community-based screenings for hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan. Oncology. 2011;81:36–40.CrossRef Kee KM, Lu SN. Hospital- and community-based screenings for hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan. Oncology. 2011;81:36–40.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Christou L, Pappas G, Falagas ME. Bacterial infection-related morbidity and mortality in cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1510–7.CrossRef Christou L, Pappas G, Falagas ME. Bacterial infection-related morbidity and mortality in cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1510–7.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Thulstrup AM, Sørensen HT, Schønheyder HC, Møller JK, Tage-Jensen U. Population-based study of the risk and short-term prognosis for bacteremia in patients with liver cirrhosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31:1357–61.CrossRef Thulstrup AM, Sørensen HT, Schønheyder HC, Møller JK, Tage-Jensen U. Population-based study of the risk and short-term prognosis for bacteremia in patients with liver cirrhosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31:1357–61.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Arvaniti V, D’Amico G, Fede G, et al. Infections in patients with cirrhosis increase mortality four-fold and should be used in determining prognosis. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1246–56.CrossRef Arvaniti V, D’Amico G, Fede G, et al. Infections in patients with cirrhosis increase mortality four-fold and should be used in determining prognosis. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1246–56.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Runyon BA. Management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis: an update. Hepatology. 2009;49:2087–107.CrossRef Runyon BA. Management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis: an update. Hepatology. 2009;49:2087–107.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Fede G, D’Amico G, Arvaniti V, et al. Renal failure and cirrhosis: a systematic review of mortality and prognosis. J Hepatol. 2012;56:810–8.CrossRef Fede G, D’Amico G, Arvaniti V, et al. Renal failure and cirrhosis: a systematic review of mortality and prognosis. J Hepatol. 2012;56:810–8.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Nidegger D, Ragot S, Berthelemy P, et al. Cirrhosis and bleeding: the need for very early management. J Hepatol. 2003;39:509–14.CrossRef Nidegger D, Ragot S, Berthelemy P, et al. Cirrhosis and bleeding: the need for very early management. J Hepatol. 2003;39:509–14.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A population-based cohort study of mortality of intensive care unit patients with liver cirrhosis
verfasst von
Yu-Feng Huang
Chao-Shun Lin
Yih-Giun Cherng
Chun-Chieh Yeh
Ray-Jade Chen
Ta-Liang Chen
Chien-Chang Liao
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2020
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Gastroenterology / Ausgabe 1/2020
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-230X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-1163-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

BMC Gastroenterology 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.