Background
Sleep problems in pregnancy are common, with most pregnant women reporting declining sleep quality and increased night waking especially in the third trimester [
1‐
6]. Studies have found that 82-98% of women in late pregnancy report waking at night [
2,
3,
6], and 64% - 86% report problems with sleep quality during pregnancy [
4]. Insomnia and increased wakefulness after sleep onset can result from a large number of potential causes including gastro-oesophageal reflux, discomfort, frequent micturition, and dyspnoea [
1,
2,
5]. Poor sleep quality and lowered sleep duration have been associated with a higher incidence of preterm birth [
7] and glucose intolerance and gestational diabetes in pregnancy [
8,
9]. Furthermore, a number of studies have shown an increased frequency of snoring and sleep disordered breathing as pregnancy progresses which may contribute to the increased incidence of glucose intolerance [
9] and pregnancy induced hypertension [
10].
This study aimed to assess sleep practices and sleep quality in women in the last trimester of pregnancy, and to document self-reported changes that occurred between the pre-pregnancy period and the last trimester of pregnancy.
Methods
In September 2011, survey questionnaires were posted to 650 pregnant women randomly selected from all women (n=1597) who were between 27 and 38 weeks gestation on the booking list at National Women’s Health (NWH), a large maternity unit in Auckland, New Zealand. The questionnaire contained questions relating to their sleep experience both before becoming pregnant and in the last week. Questions included maternal demographics, perceived sleep quality, sleep difficulties, night waking, snoring, daytime tiredness, and daytime napping. Questions relating to sleep quality were based on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a 9-question self-rated test intended to measure sleep disturbances and quality of sleep [
11]. Sleep disordered breathing questions were based on the Berlin Sleep Questionnaire (BSQ), a 10-item screening test designed to predict sleep apnea and sleep disordered breathing [
12]. Participants also completed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) to assess daytime sleepiness [
13]. The ESS asks people to rate, on a 4-point scale (0 – 3), their usual chances of dozing off or falling asleep in eight different situations or activities that most people engage in as part of their daily lives. The total ESS score is the sum of 8 item-scores and can range between 0 and 24. The higher the score, the higher the person’s level of daytime sleepiness. We did not use questions from the PSQI and BSQ relating to blood pressure and areas already covered in the ESS. Additional questions were also posed in order to expand understanding of the respondents’ experience specific to pregnancy. Additionally, the questionnaire asked the mother to report on her height, pre-pregnancy weight, ethnicity, smoking status at the time of the survey, parity and due date.
Statistical analysis was carried out using SAS (Version 9.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Chi-squared analysis was used for categorical variables and t-tests were performed for continuous variables. The study complied with the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the NZ Ministry of Health’s Northern Regional X Ethics Committee; reference number NTX/11/EXP/172.
Discussion
Sleep problems in late pregnancy are common. In this study we have provided an in-depth survey of sleep practices and symptoms in the third trimester of pregnancy and compared this with pre-pregnancy sleep in the same women.
Compared with pre-pregnancy, and consistent with other studies [
2,
3,
6,
9,
15], we have shown a reduction in maternal sleep quality in the third trimester compared with before pregnancy. Much of the reduction in quality appears to be the result of night waking, which was almost universal in this group of mothers, particularly in the latter part of the third trimester, for reasons of nocturia, discomfort, pain and general restlessness.
Sleep duration decreased in the third trimester compared with before pregnancy, dropping from a mean of 8.1 hours to 7.5 hours a night. This contrasts with Hedman et al. [
6] whose Finnish respondents reported a sleep duration of 7.8 hours both before pregnancy and in the third trimester. Facco et al. in Chicago analysed self-administered questionnaires from women in early pregnancy and again in the third trimester and showed that mean sleep duration dropped from 7.4 hours early in pregnancy to 7 hours in late pregnancy [
9]. In a small Taiwanese study using actigraphy to measure sleep duration in nulliparous women the mean duration of total night time sleep in the third trimester was 6.4 (± 1.0) hours [
16].
Those who reported snoring often or every night in the last week comprised 28%, slightly higher than others have shown using self-reported data (10% - 25%) [
1,
2,
6]; however, Izci et al. used partner reports to determine the presence and frequency of snoring, and found that 35% to 39% were frequent snorers [
17,
18]. That group also investigated the pathophysiology of snoring and showed that in the third trimester of pregnancy the upper airways are significantly narrower than in non-pregnant women [
18], and that the difference was only in the seated position but not when the subjects were supine [
19]. This possibly acts as a protective mechanism against the effects of supine position on upper airways in late pregnancy.
Daytime fatigue also increased significantly over the course of the pregnancy with 33% of third-trimester women having an ESS total score >10. Consistent with this finding, Pien et al. from the University of Pennsylvania showed that in the month of delivery 45% of pregnant women scored >10 [
4] while in a Scottish study 23% of third trimester women scored >10 [
17]. In an Australian study, 11% of non-pregnant adults without evidence of a chronic sleep disorder scored >10 [
14]. Whether variations in sleep duration and daytime fatigue relate to local lifestyle factors in different parts of the world is unknown.
Apart from the mechanical and physical effects of increased size and weight in late pregnancy, especially as these affect general fatigue and sleep disordered breathing, sleep in pregnancy may also be influenced by hormonal changes. While these changes were not measured in this survey, they are undoubtedly important. The hormones oestrogen, which decreases REM sleep, and progesterone, which increases non-REM sleep, ventilation and respiratory alkalosis, both increase markedly in pregnancy. In addition, a lowered cortisol-melatonin ratio in late pregnancy can result in poor quality of sleep [
20]. It is important to consider however, that at this time in a woman’s life it may not only be hormonal or physiological factors that are at play. For instance, although sleep duration decreased overall, 31% of the women reported increased sleep duration, perhaps due to stopping work, changing childcare demands, other lifestyle factors, or the perceived need to sleep more because of increased fatigue.
While pregnant women and their obstetric carers may regard pregnancy sleep disorders as normal and to be endured, there is evidence that disrupted sleep and changing sleep practices may influence adverse pregnancy outcomes, and several reviews have commented on this [
5,
7,
21]. An increased risk of preterm delivery [
7,
22] and postpartum depression [
7] have been linked with sleep deprivation, while sleep disordered breathing is associated with gestational diabetes [
8,
9,
21], low birth weight, preterm and small for gestational age infants, caesarean section and preeclampsia [
23]. In addition, short sleep duration and severely disrupted sleep are also more likely to be associated with unplanned caesarean deliveries after controlling for infant birth weight [
24]. Increased daytime napping and fewer toilet visits at night have been implicated as risk factors for stillbirth [
25]. Whilst Stacey et al. reported that daytime sleepiness per se was not related to the incidence of stillbirth [
25], increased daytime napping has been associated with sleep disordered breathing, at least in the non-pregnant population [
26], and it is not uncommon for patients to underestimate their levels of daytime sleepiness. The current study does not include polysomnography or measures of fetal outcomes, so we are unable to comment on any potential associations between excessive daytime sleepiness, sleep disordered breathing and fetal health. Interventions to improve sleep and possible adverse pregnancy outcomes may thus be important and further studies are warranted to investigate this area.
The main limitation of this study was the retrospective nature of the questions leading to the possibility of recall bias, particularly for the questions relating to sleep prior to pregnancy. Preferably, the same survey administered to the women both before pregnancy and in the third trimester might have provided a more accurate picture of increased prevalence of sleep related behaviours of pregnancy. However, this would have increased the complexity of the study. Ideally, a polysomnogram would confirm the accuracy of maternal report.
In addition, there is no validated questionnaire for sleep disorders in pregnancy, and although we used questions from other validated tools such as the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Berlin Sleep Questionnaire, and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale questionnaires, the relative contributions of common symptoms of pregnancy and true sleep disordered breathing are unclear. In fact, the Berlin questionnaire has been shown to poorly predict sleep disordered breathing in pregnant women [
27]. Tiredness and reduced daytime functioning are frequently experienced by pregnant women [
18,
28], and this potentially compounds the problem of assessing the true prevalence of sleep problems in pregnancy. The validity of retrospective reporting of sleep questions prior to pregnancy has also not been established, although one study in a non-pregnant population has shown a high correlation between baseline ESS and a retrospective re-test 5 months later [
29].
Another limitation may be that only 27% of our respondents were in the overweight or obese BMI categories, compared with 48% who were overweight or obese in the 2010 NWH annual report [
30]; therefore, the incidence of sleep disordered breathing in our study may be lower than in the NWH population. Thus our results for snoring are likely conservative. Unfortunately we did not have access to information regarding gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, or gestational diabetes in the participants and so cannot comment on these conditions in relation to the sleep findings. Notwithstanding these limitations, this study has provided a clearer understanding of the problems, difficulties, and sleep practices experienced by third trimester pregnant women.
Acknowledgements
We express thanks to the mothers who participated in this survey and to Cure Kids for funding the study. We also acknowledge valuable input from the members of the Maternal Sleep in Pregnancy Study Group: EA Mitchell (Principal Investigator, Department of Paediatrics, University of Auckland), P Stone (Deputy Principal Investigator, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Auckland), R Doughty (Department of Medicine, University of Auckland), L McCowan (Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Auckland), J Thompson (Department of Paediatrics, University of Auckland), L Hutchison (Department of Paediatrics, University of Auckland), A Stewart (School of Population Health, University of Auckland), K Ellyett (Department of Respiratory Physiology, Auckland District Health Board), AG Veale (New Zealand Respiratory and Sleep Institute), S Jones (Department of Respiratory Medicine, Counties Manukau District Health Board), J McIntyre (Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Auckland; New Zealand Respiratory and Sleep Institute), R Cronin (Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Auckland).
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
BLH developed the questionnaire, carried out the data collection and data entry, performed basic statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. LMEM and PRS participated in the planning of the study and contributed to the manuscript. AWS and JMDT contributed to the statistical analysis. EAM conceived of the study, participated in its design and oversaw the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.