Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 5/2018

03.03.2018 | Embryo Biology

A predictive model for high-quality blastocyst based on blastomere number, fragmentation, and symmetry

verfasst von: Cheng-he Yu, Ruo-peng Zhang, Juan Li, Zhou-Cun A

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to create a predictive model for high-quality blastocyst progression based on the traditional morphology parameters of embryos.

Methods

A total of 1564 embryos from 234 women underwent conventional in vitro fertilization and were involved in the present study. High-quality blastocysts were defined as having a grade of at least 3BB, and all embryos were divided based on the development of high-quality blastocysts (group HQ) or the failure to develop high-quality blastocysts (group NHQ). A retrospective analysis of day-3 embryo parameters, focused on blastomere number, fragmentation, the presence of a vacuole, symmetry, and the presence of multinucleated blastomeres was conducted.

Results

All parameters were related to high-quality blastocysts (p < 0001) in t tests, chi-square tests, or Fisher tests. The individual scores for all parameters were determined according to their distributions and corresponding rates of forming high-quality blastocysts. Parameters are indicated by s_bn (blastomere number), s_f (fragmentation), s_pv (presence of a vacuole), s_s (symmetry), and s_MNB (multinucleated blastomeres). Subsequently, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore their relationship. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, a predictive model was constructed, and a parameter Hc was created based on the s_bn, s_f, and s_s parameters and their corresponding odds ratios. The value of Hc in group HQ was significantly higher than that in group NHQ. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to test the effectiveness of the model. An area under the curve of 0.790, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.766–0.813, was calculated. A dataset was used to validate the predictive utility of the model. Moreover, another dataset was used to ensure that the model can be applied to predict the implantation of day-3 embryos.

Conclusions

A predictive model for high-quality blastocysts was created based on blastomere number, fragmentation, and symmetry. This model provides novel information on the selection of potential embryos.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Milewski R, Kuć P, Kuczyńska A, Stankiewicz B, Łukaszuk K, Kuczyński W. A predictive model for blastocyst formation based on morphokinetic parameters in time-lapse monitoring of embryo development. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(4):571–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Milewski R, Kuć P, Kuczyńska A, Stankiewicz B, Łukaszuk K, Kuczyński W. A predictive model for blastocyst formation based on morphokinetic parameters in time-lapse monitoring of embryo development. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(4):571–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Motato Y, LSM J d, Escriba MJ, Meseguer M. Morphokinetic analysis and embryonic prediction for blastocyst formation through an integrated time-lapse system. Fertil Steril. 2015;105(2):376–84.CrossRefPubMed Motato Y, LSM J d, Escriba MJ, Meseguer M. Morphokinetic analysis and embryonic prediction for blastocyst formation through an integrated time-lapse system. Fertil Steril. 2015;105(2):376–84.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Machtinger R, Racowsky C. Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence. Reprod BioMed Online. 2013;26(3):210–21.CrossRefPubMed Machtinger R, Racowsky C. Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence. Reprod BioMed Online. 2013;26(3):210–21.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Racowsky C, Vernon M, Mayer J, Ball GD, Behr B, Pomeroy KO, et al. Standardization of grading embryo morphology. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;94(3):1152–3. Racowsky C, Vernon M, Mayer J, Ball GD, Behr B, Pomeroy KO, et al. Standardization of grading embryo morphology. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;94(3):1152–3.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Adler A, Lee H, McCulloh DH, Ampeloquio E, Clarke-Williams M, Wertz BH, et al. Blastocyst culture selects for euploid embryos: comparison of blastomere and trophectoderm biopsies. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;28(4):485–91.CrossRefPubMed Adler A, Lee H, McCulloh DH, Ampeloquio E, Clarke-Williams M, Wertz BH, et al. Blastocyst culture selects for euploid embryos: comparison of blastomere and trophectoderm biopsies. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;28(4):485–91.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Surrey ES, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: maximizing success rates. In: Sauer MV, editor. Principles of oocyte and embryo donation. London: Springer; 2013. p. 129–39.CrossRef Surrey ES, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: maximizing success rates. In: Sauer MV, editor. Principles of oocyte and embryo donation. London: Springer; 2013. p. 129–39.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasikala N, Rajapriya A, Mahalakshmi S, Janani DM, Archana B, Parameaswari PJ. Blastocyst culture depends on quality of embryos on day 3, not quantity. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2015;20(4):224–30.CrossRef Sasikala N, Rajapriya A, Mahalakshmi S, Janani DM, Archana B, Parameaswari PJ. Blastocyst culture depends on quality of embryos on day 3, not quantity. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2015;20(4):224–30.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin H, Jiang H, He R, Wang C, Zhu J, Luan K. The effects of fertilization mode, embryo morphology at day 3, and female age on blastocyst formation and the clinical outcomes. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2015;(1):61, 1–7. Yin H, Jiang H, He R, Wang C, Zhu J, Luan K. The effects of fertilization mode, embryo morphology at day 3, and female age on blastocyst formation and the clinical outcomes. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2015;(1):61, 1–7.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Minasi MG. Current aspects of blastocyst culture, biopsy and vitrification. Curr Trends Clin Embriol. 2014;1(1):27–33. Minasi MG. Current aspects of blastocyst culture, biopsy and vitrification. Curr Trends Clin Embriol. 2014;1(1):27–33.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Thum MY, Wells V, Abdalla H. Patient selection criteria for blastocyst culture in IVF/ICSI treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27(9–10):555–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thum MY, Wells V, Abdalla H. Patient selection criteria for blastocyst culture in IVF/ICSI treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27(9–10):555–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Anckaert E, Smitz J, Schiettecatte J, Klein BM, Arce JC. The value of anti-mullerian hormone measurement in the long GnRH agonist protocol: association with ovarian response and gonadotrophin-dose adjustments. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(6):1829–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Anckaert E, Smitz J, Schiettecatte J, Klein BM, Arce JC. The value of anti-mullerian hormone measurement in the long GnRH agonist protocol: association with ovarian response and gonadotrophin-dose adjustments. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(6):1829–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang B, Ren X, Wu L, Zhu L, Xu B, Li Y, et al. Elevated progesterone levels on the day of oocyte maturation may affect top quality embryo IVF cycles. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0145895.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huang B, Ren X, Wu L, Zhu L, Xu B, Li Y, et al. Elevated progesterone levels on the day of oocyte maturation may affect top quality embryo IVF cycles. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0145895.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gallardo EF, Spiessens C, D’Hooghe T, Debrock S. Effect of embryo morphology and morphometrics on implantation of vitrified day 3 embryos after warming: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016;14(1):40.CrossRef Gallardo EF, Spiessens C, D’Hooghe T, Debrock S. Effect of embryo morphology and morphometrics on implantation of vitrified day 3 embryos after warming: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016;14(1):40.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Paternot G, Debrock S, D’Hooghe T, Spiessens C. Computer-assisted embryo selection: a benefit in the evaluation of embryo quality? Reprod BioMed Online. 2011;23(3):347–54.CrossRefPubMed Paternot G, Debrock S, D’Hooghe T, Spiessens C. Computer-assisted embryo selection: a benefit in the evaluation of embryo quality? Reprod BioMed Online. 2011;23(3):347–54.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. Towards reproductive certainty: infertility and genetics beyond. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, editors. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. Carnforth: Parthenon Press; 1999. p. 378–88. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. Towards reproductive certainty: infertility and genetics beyond. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, editors. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. Carnforth: Parthenon Press; 1999. p. 378–88.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Smuts MP, Miller M, Ramdas-Navale K, Aoki VW. Improved high-quality blastocyst formation rates result from in vitro embryo culture in the cook MINC incubator platform. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(4):Suppl 21.CrossRef Smuts MP, Miller M, Ramdas-Navale K, Aoki VW. Improved high-quality blastocyst formation rates result from in vitro embryo culture in the cook MINC incubator platform. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(4):Suppl 21.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cetinkaya M, Pirkevi C, Yelke H, Colakoglu YK, Atayurt Z, Kahraman S. Relative kinetic expressions defining cleavage synchronicity are better predictors of blastocyst formation and quality than absolute time points. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(1):27.CrossRefPubMed Cetinkaya M, Pirkevi C, Yelke H, Colakoglu YK, Atayurt Z, Kahraman S. Relative kinetic expressions defining cleavage synchronicity are better predictors of blastocyst formation and quality than absolute time points. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(1):27.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sang MK, Sang WL, Jeong HJ, San HY, Min WK, Jin HL, et al. Clinical outcomes of elective single morula embryo transfer versus elective single blastocyst embryo transfer in IVF-ET. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(5):423.CrossRef Sang MK, Sang WL, Jeong HJ, San HY, Min WK, Jin HL, et al. Clinical outcomes of elective single morula embryo transfer versus elective single blastocyst embryo transfer in IVF-ET. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(5):423.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Marhuenda-Egea FC, Martínez-Sabater E, Gonsálvez-Alvarez R, Lledó B, Ten J, Bernabeu R. A crucial step in assisted reproduction technology: human embryo selection using metabolomic evaluation. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(2):772.CrossRefPubMed Marhuenda-Egea FC, Martínez-Sabater E, Gonsálvez-Alvarez R, Lledó B, Ten J, Bernabeu R. A crucial step in assisted reproduction technology: human embryo selection using metabolomic evaluation. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(2):772.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Aziminekoo E, Mohseni Salehi MS, Kalantari V, Shahrokh Tehraninejad E, Haghollahi F, Hossein Rashidi B, et al. Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst stage transfer comparing to early cleavage stage embryo transfer. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31(11):880–4.CrossRefPubMed Aziminekoo E, Mohseni Salehi MS, Kalantari V, Shahrokh Tehraninejad E, Haghollahi F, Hossein Rashidi B, et al. Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst stage transfer comparing to early cleavage stage embryo transfer. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31(11):880–4.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mcclelland S, Melzer K, Mcculloh DH, Grifo JD. A comparison of pregnancy outcomes between day 3and day 5/6 fresh embryo transfers: does day of embryo transfer (ET) really make a difference? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(2):1–6. Mcclelland S, Melzer K, Mcculloh DH, Grifo JD. A comparison of pregnancy outcomes between day 3and day 5/6 fresh embryo transfers: does day of embryo transfer (ET) really make a difference? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(2):1–6.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Jaroudi S, Alfarawati S, Poli M, Wells D, Fragouli E. The effect of aneuploidy on embryo morphology and preimplantation development from the cleavage to the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(3):S164.CrossRef Jaroudi S, Alfarawati S, Poli M, Wells D, Fragouli E. The effect of aneuploidy on embryo morphology and preimplantation development from the cleavage to the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(3):S164.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bungum M, Bungum L, Humaidan P, Andersen CY. Day 3 versus day 5 embryo transfer: a prospective randomized study. Reprod BioMed Online. 2003;7(1):98–104.CrossRefPubMed Bungum M, Bungum L, Humaidan P, Andersen CY. Day 3 versus day 5 embryo transfer: a prospective randomized study. Reprod BioMed Online. 2003;7(1):98–104.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Martins WP, Nastri CO, Rienzi L, van der Poel SZ, Gracia C, Racowsky C. Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(5):583.CrossRefPubMed Martins WP, Nastri CO, Rienzi L, van der Poel SZ, Gracia C, Racowsky C. Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(5):583.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat De Vos A, Van Landuyt L, Santosribeiro S, Camus M, Van de Velde H, Tournaye H, et al. Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(11):2442.CrossRefPubMed De Vos A, Van Landuyt L, Santosribeiro S, Camus M, Van de Velde H, Tournaye H, et al. Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(11):2442.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernándezshaw S, Cercas R, Braña C, Villas C, Pons I. Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: impact of age on the results. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(2):177–84.CrossRef Fernándezshaw S, Cercas R, Braña C, Villas C, Pons I. Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: impact of age on the results. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(2):177–84.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Levi-Setti PE, Cirillo F, Smeraldi A, Morenghi E, Mulazzani GEG, Albani E. No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(11):1–9. Levi-Setti PE, Cirillo F, Smeraldi A, Morenghi E, Mulazzani GEG, Albani E. No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(11):1–9.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Phan V, Littman E, Harris D, La A. Correlation between aneuploidy and blastocyst quality. Asian Pac J Reprod. 2014;3(4):253–7.CrossRef Phan V, Littman E, Harris D, La A. Correlation between aneuploidy and blastocyst quality. Asian Pac J Reprod. 2014;3(4):253–7.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1155.CrossRefPubMed Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1155.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod BioMed Online. 2011;22(6):632–46.CrossRef Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod BioMed Online. 2011;22(6):632–46.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Racowsky C, Vernon MJ, Ball GD, Behr B, Pomeroy KO, Wininger D, et al. Standardization of grading embryo morphology. Fertil Steril. 2010;27(8):437–9. Racowsky C, Vernon MJ, Ball GD, Behr B, Pomeroy KO, Wininger D, et al. Standardization of grading embryo morphology. Fertil Steril. 2010;27(8):437–9.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Lan K, Huang F, Lin Y, Kung F, Hsieh C, Huang H, et al. The predictive value of using a combined Z-score and day 3 embryo morphology score in the assessment of embryo survival on day 5. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(6):1299.CrossRefPubMed Lan K, Huang F, Lin Y, Kung F, Hsieh C, Huang H, et al. The predictive value of using a combined Z-score and day 3 embryo morphology score in the assessment of embryo survival on day 5. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(6):1299.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A predictive model for high-quality blastocyst based on blastomere number, fragmentation, and symmetry
verfasst von
Cheng-he Yu
Ruo-peng Zhang
Juan Li
Zhou-Cun A
Publikationsdatum
03.03.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1132-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.