MicroRNA (miRNA)-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may compromise miRNA binding affinity and modify mRNA expression levels of the target genes, thus leading to cancer susceptibility. However, few studies have investigated roles of miRNA-related SNPs in the etiology of cervical carcinoma.
Methods
In this case–control study of 1,584 cervical cancer cases and 1,394 cancer-free female controls, we investigated associations between two miR-218-related SNPs involved in the LAMB3-miR-218 pathway and the risk of cervical carcinoma in Eastern Chinese women.
Results
We found that the pri-miR-218 rs11134527 variant GG genotype was significantly associated with a decreased risk of cervical carcinoma compared with AA/AG genotypes (adjusted OR=0.77, 95% CI=0.63-0.95, P=0.015). However, this association was not observed for the miR-218 binding site SNP (rs2566) on LAMB3. Using the multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis, we observed some evidence of interactions of these two SNPs with other risk factors, especially age at primiparity and menopausal status, in the risk of cervical carcinoma.
Conclusions
The pri-miR-218 rs11134527 SNP was significantly associated with the risk of cervical carcinoma in Eastern Chinese women. Larger, independent studies are warranted to validate our findings.
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2407-13-19) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
Conception and design: QW, XW. In-person survey and data collection: XJC, XC, KDY, ZMS, MHS. Genotyping and Provision of study materials: TYS, MLZ, MYW, JH, XYZ. Data analysis and interpretation: TYS, QW. Manuscript writing: TYS, QW, XW. Final approval of manuscript: TYS, XJC, MLZ, MYW, JH, KDY, ZMS, MHS, XYZ, XC, XW, QW. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Abkürzungen
miRNA
microRNA
nt
Nucleotide
UTR
Untranslated region
pri-miRNA
Primary miRNA
pre-miRNA
Precursor miRNA
SNP
Single nucleotide polymorphism
SCC
Squamous cell carcinoma
HPV
Human papillomavirus
LAMB3
Laminin 5 β3
FUSCC
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
FIGO
International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics
LN
Lymph node
LVSI
Lympho-vascular space invasion
ER
Estrogen receptor
PR
Progesterone receptor
MAF
Minor allele frequency
MDR
Multifactor dimensionality reduction
CVC
Cross-validation consistency
OR
Odds ratio
CI
Confidence interval
BMI
Body mass index
FPRP
False-positive report probability
HWE
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
MFE
Minimum free energy
Background
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are single-stranded 21–23 nucleotide (nt) long endogenous noncoding RNAs that regulate the mRNA expression of numerous target genes [1]. Disregulation of these target genes could alter biological processes as a result of either degradation of target mRNAs or repression of their translation by miRNA binding to their 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs) [2]. Accumulated data have shown that the deregulation of miRNAs is involved in cell differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis and carcinogenesis [3]. MiRNAs include primary (pri-), precursor (pre-) and mature miRNA, in which single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of these miRNAs or in their binding sites on their target genes may compromise miRNA binding affinity and change mRNA expression levels of the target genes, thus leading to cancer susceptibility [4, 5]. Several recent studies have indicated that miRNA-related SNPs, especially those located at miRNA binding sites or miRNAs themselves, can remarkably alter the biogenesis and/or function of the corresponding miRNAs and thus the risk of human cancers [4, 6].
Cervical carcinoma is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths in women worldwide, accounting for 9% (529,800) of the new cancer cases and 8% (275,100) of the cancer deaths among women in 2008 [7]. More than 85% of these cases and deaths occur in developing countries, including China [7]. Invasive cervical cancer can be divided into two major histological types of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma, and SCC accounts for about 85% of the cases [8, 9]. A large body of research in molecular epidemiology supports the hypothesis that persistent infection with oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV), especially high-risk HPV types, is the primary cause of cervical carcinoma, deemed as a necessary cause for the disease [7, 10].
Anzeige
Recent studies have found that the expression levels of miR-218 were associated with infection of high-risk HPV involved in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer [11]. Specifically, in high-risk HPV16-positive cell lines, the upregulation of E6 oncoprotein could reduce the miR-218 expression; in contrast, the RNA interference of E6 oncogene increased the miR-218 expression [12]. Moreover, the Laminin 5 β3 (LAMB3) gene has been found to be one of transcriptional targets of miR-218[12]. LAMB3 was expressed in many epithelial tissues and was involved in tumor microenvironment by increasing carcinoma cell migration [13]. Others reported that LAMB3 might upregulate the expression levels of the HPV16 E6 oncoprotein though miR-218[12]. Therefore, the LAMB3-miR-218 pathway may be involved in the process of high-risk HPV infection and thus contribute to cervical carcinogenesis. However, its intrinsic mechanisms are still unclear. It is likely that miRNAs and related genetic variations may have effects on cancer development [6]. To date, only two reported studies have investigated the associations between three miRNA-related SNPs and the risk of cervical carcinoma [6, 14], two of which (i.e., pri-miR-218 rs11134527 and LAMB3 rs2566) are found to be associated with altered risk of cervical cancer in a Chinese Han population [6]. To further test the hypothesis that miRNA-related SNPs involved in the LAMB3-miR-218 pathway contribute to cervical cancer risk, we performed a case–control study with a much larger sample size to validate the reported associations with cervical cancer risk in Eastern Chinese women.
Methods
Study subjects
The study population consisted of 1,584 cervical carcinoma patients, who had been operated between February 2008 and March 2011 in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC). The tumors were histopathologically confirmed independently as primary cervical carcinoma by two gynecologic pathologists as routine diagnosis at FUSCC. An additional 1,394 cancer-free female controls were enrolled from women who had come to the Outpatient Department of Breast Surgery at FUSCC for breast cancer screening and agreed to participate in this study. These female controls, with the selection criteria including no individual history of cancer, were genetically unrelated and frequency matched to the cases on age (± 5 years) and residential areas in Eastern China.
During an in-person survey, all potential subjects were interviewed to identify their willingness to participate in this study. As a result, a response rate for the cases and controls was of approximate 95% and 95%, respectively. Because the vast majority of Chinese women are non-smokers and non-drinkers, our study populations were restricted to women who did not smoke cigarettes or drink alcohol. For the cases, detailed clinico-pathologic information was extracted from the patients′ electronic database of FUSCC, including tumor histology [15], FIGO stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2009), tumor size (i.e., the size of the primary tumor was the largest tumor diameter), pelvic lymph node (LN) metastasis, lympho-vascular space invasion (LVSI), depth of cervical stromal invasion and the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR). Each participant provided a one-time 10 ml of venous blood sample (after the diagnosis and before the initiation of treatment for the cases), and samples were kept frozen till DNA extraction for genotyping. All samples were obtained from tissue bank of FUSCC. The research was approved by the Institutional Review Board of FUSCC, and a written informed consent was obtained from all recruited individuals. Each clinical investigation was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki consent.
SNP selection and genotyping
The SNPs were selected from the NCBI dbSNP database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP) and the International HapMap Project database (http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) based on four criteria: 1) located at the pri-miR-218 gene region or 3′-UTR of the LAMB3 gene, 2) minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 5% in Chinese Han populations, 3) with low linkage disequilibrium by using an r2 threshold of < 0.8 for each other, and 4) predicted as potentially functional SNPs by SNP function prediction (FuncPred) software from National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (http://snpinfo.niehs.nih.gov/snpfunc.htm). As a result, only two reported SNPs (i.e., pri-miR-218 rs11134527 and LAMB3 rs2566) were selected, because pri-miR-218 rs11134527 was predicted to be functional and LAMB3 rs2566 was the only one SNP residing in the miR-218 binding site. Genomic DNA was obtained from the whole blood, and the Taqman assay was performed for genotyping, as described previously [16, 17]. Four negative controls (without DNA template), duplicated positive controls and eight repeat samples were included in each 384-fomate for the quality control. As a result, the mean genotyping rate was 99.3%, and the discrepancy rate in all positive controls (i.e., duplicated samples, overlapping samples from previous studies and samples randomly selected to be sequenced) was less than 0.1%.
To further explore high-order gene-environment interactions that were individually involved in cervical cancer risk, we performed the MDR analysis, as described previously [17, 18]. This approach was used to find the main factor and the combination of multiple factors (in this case, SNPs and environmental risk factors) that were significantly associated with cancer risk. As a result, the model that minimized the prediction error and maximized the cross-validation consistency (CVC) was chosen. To reduce the probability of bias, we used different random seeds to repeat the complete analysis for 10 times, and permutated the status of cases and controls in the data set then repeated the test 1000 times under the null hypothesis of no association. This analysis was performed by using the MDR V2.0 beta 8.2 program (http://www.multifactordimensionalityreduction.org/).
Statistical analysis
The differences in selected variables between cervical carcinoma cases and female controls were evaluated by the Pearson's χ2-test. The associations of genotypes with the risk of cervical carcinoma were estimated by computing odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from both univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, with or without adjustment for age, age at primiparity, menopausal status and body mass index (BMI) [19]. The associations of SNP genotypes with cervical carcinoma risk were also stratified by demographic and clinico-pathologic variables. We also performed homogeneity test and logistic regression analysis to estimate and compare the risks between the strata and interactions between two factors, respectively. For all significant genetic effects observed in our study, we calculated the false-positive report probability (FPRP) with prior probabilities of 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 and 0.25 to test for false-positive associations [20]. A FPRP value < 0.2 was considered a noteworthy and indicated a remained robust association for a given prior probability. Statistical power was estimated to detect an OR of 1.50/0.67 (for a risk/protective effect), with an α level equal to the observed P value [20]. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS software (version 9.1; SAS Institute, Cary, NC), unless stated otherwise. All P values were two-sided with a significance level of P < 0.05.
Results
Among all studied subjects, 19 cases and three controls failed to be genotyped after repeated assays. Thus, the final analysis included 1,565 cases and 1,391 controls. As showed in Additional file 1: Table S1, there were no significant differences in the distributions of age between the cases and the controls with similar mean ages of 45.8 (± 9.8) and 46.1 (± 8.9) years, respectively (P=0.226). The cases were more likely to be premenopausal (72.5% vs. 60.5%), thinner (BMI < 25 kg/m2, 78.2% vs. 65.9%) and younger at primiparity (≤ 24 yr, 63.2% vs. 51.0%) than the controls. Because the differences in age at primiparity, menopausal status and BMI were significant between cases and controls (all P<0.001), these variables were further adjusted for any residual confounding effect in later multivariate logistic regression analyses.
The genotype frequencies of the pri-miR-218 rs11134527 and LAMB3 rs2566 SNPs as well as their associations with the risk of cervical carcinoma are summarized in Table 1. All observed genotype distributions in the 1,391 controls agreed with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE, P=0.083 and 0.094 for rs11134527 and rs2566, respectively). In the recessive genetic model, the pri-miR-218 rs11134527 variant GG genotype was significantly associated with a decreased risk of cervical carcinoma compared with the AA and AA/AG genotypes (adjusted OR=0.79 and 0.77, 95% CI=0.63-0.99 and 0.63-0.95, P=0.039 and 0.015, respectively). However, this association was not observed for the LAMB3 rs2566 SNP.
Table 1
Logistic regression analysis of associations between genotypes of theLAMB3-miR-218pathway and cervical cancer risk
Variants Genotypes
Cases
Controls
P*
Crude OR
P
Adjusted OR
P**
(N=1565)
(N=1391)
(95% CI)
(95%CI)
pri-miR-218rs11134527
AA
588 (37.6)
512 (36.8)
0.085
1.00
1.00
AG
752 (48.1)
638 (45.9)
1.03 (0.88-1.20)
0.748
1.03 (0.87-1.22)
0.705
GG
225 (14.4)
241 (17.3)
0.81 (0.65-1.01)
0.061
0.79 (0.63-0.99)
0.039
AG/GG
977 (62.4)
879 (63.2)
0.668a
0.97 (0.83-1.12)
0.668
0.96 (0.82-1.13)
0.648
Additive model
0.93 (0.84-1.03)
0.148
0.92 (0.82-1.02)
0.111
Recessive model
0.028b
0.80 (0.66-0.98)
0.028
0.77 (0.63-0.95)
0.015
LAMB3rs2566
CC
667 (42.6)
570 (41.0)
0.431
1.00
1.00
CT
709 (45.3)
663 (47.7)
0.91 (0.78-1.07)
0.252
0.89 (0.76-1.05)
0.165
TT
189 (12.1)
158 (11.4)
1.02 (0.81-1.30)
0.857
0.94 (0.73-1.21)
0.642
CT/TT
898 (57.4)
821 (59.0)
0.366a
0.94 (0.81-1.08)
0.367
0.90 (0.77-1.05)
0.186
Additive model
0.98 (0.88-1.09)
0.707
0.94 (0.84-1.06)
0.325
Recessive model
0.545b
1.07 (0.86-1.34)
0.546
1.00 (0.79-1.27)
1.000
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
* χ2 test for genotype distributions between cases and controls;
** Adjusted for age, age at primiparity, menopausal status, BMI in logistic regression models;
a for dominant genetic models;
b for recessive genetic models.
The results were in bold, if P < 0.05.
In stratification analyses, as showed in Table 2, under a recessive genetic model, a decreased cervical carcinoma risk associated with the pri-miR-218 rs11134527 GG genotype was more evident in women who were younger at primiparity (≤ 24 yr, adjusted OR=0.73, 95% CI=0.56-0.96, P=0.022) or premenopausal (adjusted OR=0.73, 95% CI=0.57-0.94, P=0.013), which was also observed for subgroups of SCC, FIGO stage I, stage II, positive pelvic LN, positive LVSI, deep cervical stromal invasion (> 1/2) and negative expression of ER and PR (P=0.008, 0.008, 0.028, 0.002, 0.008, 0.022, 0.011 and 0.014, respectively). However, homogeneity tests suggested that there was no difference in risk estimates between the strata (Table 2), and no statistical evidence for interactions between the genotypes and these variables on the risk of cervical carcinoma (Additional file 1: Table S2).
Table 2
Stratification analysis for associations between genotypes of theLAMB3-miR-218pathway and cervical cancer risk in the recessive genetic model
Variables
rs11134527
Adjusted OR* (95% CI)
P*
P**
rs2566
Adjusted OR* (95% CI)
P*
P**
(cases/controls)
(cases/controls)
AA/AG
GG
CC/CT
TT
Age, years
≤46 (Mean)
747/623
136/131
0.84 (0.64-1.11)
0.215
0.364
774/669
109/85
1.02 (0.74-1.40)
0.919
0.740
>46 (Mean)
593/527
89/110
0.77 (0.56-1.06)
0.111
602/564
80/73
1.00 (0.69-1.45)
0.995
Age at primiparity, years
≤24 (Mean)
797/568
136/131
0.73 (0.56-0.96)
0.022
0.452
822/625
111/74
1.12 (0.82-1.54)
0.482
0.460
>24 (Mean)
468/566
76/106
0.86 (0.62-1.20)
0.386
481/591
63/81
0.91 (0.63-1.32)
0.621
Menopausal status
Premenopausal
962/685
164/155
0.73 (0.57-0.94)
0.013
0.425
986/743
140/97
1.00 (0.75-1.34)
0.981
0.635
Postmenopausal
366/463
61/86
0.90 (0.62-1.32)
0.600
381/488
46/61
1.09 (0.70-1.70)
0.696
BMI, kg/m2
< 25
1026/759
175/157
0.79 (0.62-1.00)
0.054
0.715
1061/810
140/106
1.00 (0.75-1.32)
0.973
0.739
≥ 25
288/390
47/84
0.74 (0.50-1.12)
0.152
295/422
40/52
1.02 (0.64-1.63)
0.939
Histology
CINIII
129/1150
32/241
1.06 (0.68-1.66)
0.789
0.169
137/1233
24/158
1.32 (0.80-2.16)
0.274
0.409
SCC
1068/1150
170/241
0.74 (0.59-0.92)
0.008
1096/1233
142/158
0.95 (0.73-1.22)
0.673
Non-squamous
138/1150
23/241
0.75 (0.46-1.22)
0.240
138/1233
23/158
1.18 (0.71-1.96)
0.526
FIGO stage
I
633/1150
97/241
0.70 (0.53-0.91)
0.008
0.796
645/1233
85/158
0.94 (0.70-1.27)
0.689
0.341
II
464/1150
75/241
0.72 (0.54-0.97)
0.028
478/1233
61/158
0.96 (0.69-1.35)
0.830
III~IV
43/1150
5/241
0.43 (0.15-1.28)
0.129
39/1233
9/158
1.97 (0.83-4.71)
0.126
Tumor size, cm
< 4
801/1150
139/241
0.78 (0.61-0.99)
0.043
0.695
840/1233
100/158
0.88 (0.66-1.16)
0.365
0.100
≥ 4
428/1150
69/241
0.71 (0.53-0.97)
0.031
426/1233
71/158
1.25 (0.91-1.72)
0.176
Pelvic LN
Negative
965/1150
174/241
0.83 (0.66-1.04)
0.098
0.095
1002/1233
137/158
1.00 (0.77-1.29)
0.970
0.819
Positive
309/1150
39/241
0.55 (0.37-0.80)
0.002
308/1233
40/158
0.96 (0.64-1.42)
0.828
LVSI
Negative
750/1150
132/241
0.80 (0.63-1.02)
0.073
0.305
783/1233
99/158
0.93 (0.70-1.24)
0.632
0.379
Positive
390/1150
56/241
0.64 (0.46-0.89)
0.008
387/1233
59/158
1.06 (0.75-1.50)
0.755
Depth of cervical stromal invasion
≤ 1/2
584/1150
99/241
0.75 (0.57-0.98)
0.037
0.898
598/1233
85/158
1.08 (0.81-1.45)
0.602
0.709
> 1/2
670/1150
111/241
0.74 (0.57-0.96)
0.022
690/1233
91/158
0.94 (0.70-1.26)
0.660
ER expression
Negative
647/1150
102/241
0.71 (0.55-0.92)
0.011
0.146
671/1233
78/158
0.85 (0.62-1.15)
0.289
0.365
Positive
50/1150
13/241
1.01 (0.51-1.98)
0.982
54/1233
9/158
1.35 (0.65-2.81)
0.428
PR expression
Negative
677/1150
110/241
0.73 (0.56-0.94)
0.014
0.407
703/1233
84/158
0.87 (0.65-1.18)
0.370
0.836
Positive
20/1150
5/241
0.94 (0.32-2.80)
0.911
22/1233
3/158
1.13 (0.33-3.84)
0.851
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; LN, lymph node; LVSI, lympho-vascular space invasion; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor.
* Logistic regression models with adjustment for age, age at primiparity, menopausal status and BMI;
** Homogeneity test.
The results were in bold, if P < 0.05.
We calculated the FPRP values for all the observed significant associations. When the assumption of prior probability was 0.1, the association with the pri-miR-218 rs11134527 (GG vs. AA/AG) was still noteworthy in subgroups of premenopausal, SCC, FIGO stage I and positive pelvic LN (FPRP=0.189, 0.111, 0.163 and 0.153, respectively) (Additional file 1: Table S3).
To further explore whether the pri-miR-218 rs11134527 variant could alter the local second structure of the pri-miR-218 mRNA, we performed the RNAfold online tool that is an online RNA secondary structure prediction software based on the minimum free energy (MFE) and found that the MFE changed from −182.5 kcal/mol to −126.0 kcal/mol when the nucleotide at the pri-miR-218 rs11134527 locus changed from A to G (Figure 1).
×
Moreover, using the MDR analysis and including these two SNPs and three risk factors, we found that age at primiparity was the best one-factor model with the highest CVC (100%) and the lowest prediction error (43.2%) among all five discrete factors. Intriguingly, the five-factor model had a maximum CVC (100%) and a minimum prediction error (38.6%), which showed a better prediction than one factor (Table 3).
Table 3
MDR analysis for the cervical cancer risk prediction with and withoutLAMB3-miR-218pathway genotypes
Number of risk factors
Best interaction models by MDR analysis
Cross- validation
Average prediction error
Pfor permutation test
1
age at primiparity
100/100
43.2%
<.0001
2
age at primiparity, BMI
100/100
40.4%
<.0001
3
age at primiparity, menopausal status, BMI
100/100
39.2%
<.0001
4
age at primiparity, menopausal status, BMI, rs2566
83/100
39.2%
<.0001
5
age at primiparity, menopausal status, BMI, rs11134527, rs2566
100/100
38.6%
<.0001
MDR, multifactor dimensionality reduction.
The multi-locus model with maximum cross-validation consistency and minimum prediction error rate is indicated in bold.
Anzeige
Discussion
In this relatively large hospital-based case–control study of 1,584 cervical cancer cases and 1,394 cancer-free female controls, we validated two previously reported significant miRNA-related SNPs involved in the LAMB3-miR-218 pathway for the risk of cervical carcinoma in Chinese populations [6]. We found that the pri-miR-218 rs11134527 variant GG genotype was significantly associated with a decreased risk of cervical carcinoma compared with the AA and AA/AG genotypes, and our sample size had a statistical power of 94.9% to detect such an association. Further RNAfold prediction analysis showed a MFE changed from −182.5 kcal/mol to −126.0 kcal/mol, when the nucleotide at the pri-miR-218 rs11134527 locus changed from A to G, indicating that this variant may act as a functional SNP, which affects the miRNA binding process and contributes to cervical cancer susceptibility. However, for the other SNP (i.e., LAMB3 rs2566), our data did not have statistical evidence to support its association with cervical cancer risk. Our sample size had 100% statistical power to detect an OR of 1.57 that was reported by Zhou et al. [6]. The inconsistency for the LAMB3 rs2566 SNP between Zhou’s study and ours may be caused by differences in selection of subjects, different catchments of the hospitals and residential regions as well as different sample sizes.
Recent studies have demonstrated that miRNAs may function as tumor suppressors and/or oncogenes in human cancers [21, 22], because elevated or decreased expression of miRNAs has been found in various tumor types, which may alter the regulation of mRNA expression. It is of note that miRNAs regulate gene expression by the sequence-specific binding to the target mRNA, and these binding processes may be affected by SNPs located in the miRNA complementary site [23]. Therefore, it is important to understand the functional and evolutionary significance of related genetic variations in determining expression of miRNAs and mRNAs that interact with each other as well as with environmental risk factors in the related biological processes [23, 24].
It is well known that genetic variants may modify cancer risk associated with environmental factors. Although there were no two-factor interactions between genotypes and environmental factors, using the MDR analysis [18], we further explored high-order multiple-factor interactions in associations with cervical cancer risk and found that age at primiparity was the strongest risk predictor among all the risk factors considered. Meanwhile, the interaction between the variant genotypes and other risk factors appeared to modify the risk of cervical carcinoma, with the five-factor model being the best model.
MiR-218, is encoded by an intron of the SLIT2 tumor suppressor gene [25], is known to be associated with the development and progression of several cancers [21, 22]. The decreased level of the miR-218 expression has been observed in cancers of the breast, ovary, lung and stomach [22, 26, 27], and its low expression level was also correlated with tumor stage, LN metastasis and poor prognosis in gastric cancer [27]. Recently, Martinez et al. reported a decreased expression level of miR-218 (> 2 fold) in HPV-16 or 18 positive cervical cancer cell lines (i.e., SiHa, CaSki and HeLa) as well as in cervical tumor tissues [12]. They also demonstrated miR-218 as a specific cellular target of high-risk HPV types [12], suggesting that the down-regulation of miR-218 is likely linked to the process of HPV-associated tumorgenesis. Based on the Microcosm Targets tool software (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/enright-srv/microcosm/), the mature miR-218 was found to have an effect on the mRNA expression regulation through more than 900 target genes, including LAMB3[12], RICTOR[28], ROBO1[27] and BIRC5[29], that may play important roles in cervical carcinogenesis. These genes were reported to participate in a number of cancer signaling pathways, such as the Wnt/β-catenin, ERK/MAPK and Notch pathways [30]. Laminin-5 has been found as a sensitive marker of early invasion of cervical lesions [31]. LAMB3 that expressed in many epithelial tissues could induce carcinogenesis by increasing carcinoma cell migration and disturbing tumor microenvironment [13]. Moreover, LAMB3 increased expression levels of the HPV16 E6 oncoprotein in cervical cancer cells and this process might be mediated by miR-218[12], which indicates a possible mechanism of the LAMB3-miR-218 pathway involved in the development of cervical carcinoma.
Anzeige
It is known that the mRNA secondary structure is critical for mRNA-miRNA interactions and gene functions [32]. To investigate whether the pri-miR-218 rs11134527 SNP could alter the local second structure of the pri-miR-218 mRNA, we performed the RNAfold prediction analysis and found an obviously changed mRNA structure from rs11134527 allele A to G. These findings further suggest that germline genetic variations of pri-miR-218, such as rs11134527, may lead to an alteration of miR-218 expression and affect the miRNA binding process and thus are associated with cervical cancer susceptibility.
Several limitations of our study need to be addressed. Firstly, this hospital-based case–control study may have selection bias and information bias, which may be minimized by frequency-matching cases and controls as well as the adjustment for potential confounding factors in the final analyses. Secondly, only two miR-218-related SNPs involved in the LAMB3-miR-218 pathway (i.e., one in pri-miR-218 and the other in miR-218 binding site) were investigated in this study. Cancer is a complex and multifactorial disease, and any single SNP may not be sufficient for the prediction of the overall risk [33]. Future studies should include more genes and more SNPs, especially functional ones, associated with cervical cancer risk. Finally, we did not have enough information on other risk factors, especially HPV infection. This was because the hospital did not perform HPV and related subtype detection for the diagnosis of all cervical cancer cases, let alone for the female controls. A recent meta-analysis found that high-risk HPV16, 18 and 45 types accounted for a greater or equal proportion of HPV infections in cervical cancer, but not other high-risk HPV types, such as HPV33, 51 and 58 [34]. Therefore, HPV types could be confounders in estimating the risk associated with genetic factors.
Conclusions
In summary, in the current case–control study of 1,584 cases and 1,394 controls, we found that the pri-miR-218 rs11134527 SNP was associated with the risk of cervical carcinoma in Eastern Chinese women. Our findings suggest some possible interactions between genetic variations involved in the LAMB3-miR-218 pathway and other risk factors for cervical carcinoma. However, well-designed prospective studies with larger sample sizes are required to validate our findings.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the funds from “China’s Thousand Talents Program” Recruitment at Fudan University and by the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology, China (Grant No.12DZ2260100). We would like to thank Yu-Hu Xin and Hong-Yu Gu from FUSCC for the technical support.
Anzeige
Open Access
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
Conception and design: QW, XW. In-person survey and data collection: XJC, XC, KDY, ZMS, MHS. Genotyping and Provision of study materials: TYS, MLZ, MYW, JH, XYZ. Data analysis and interpretation: TYS, QW. Manuscript writing: TYS, QW, XW. Final approval of manuscript: TYS, XJC, MLZ, MYW, JH, KDY, ZMS, MHS, XYZ, XC, XW, QW. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.