Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody has proven to be effective in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients positive for programmed cell death-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1). However, there are currently no prospective studies evaluating PD-L1 expression for small biopsy samples.
Methods
To prospectively investigate the reliability of small samples for NSCLC, we included patients who underwent diagnostic biopsy by flexible bronchoscopy, computed tomography (CT) and ultra-sonography (US) guided core-needle to determine the PD-L1 expression status. In pathologically confirmed NSCLC, PD-L1 expression was evaluated using companion diagnostic PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. We evaluated: 1) tumor cell count and sample size, 2) tumor proportion score (TPS): <1, 1–49%, 50%≦, and 3) the concordance rate of TPS by biopsy and surgical samples.
Results
Of the 153 cases of PD-L1 expression, 110 were assessed using endobronchial ultrasonography guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB) (thin bronchoscopy 84 cases; normal bronchoscopy 26 cases), 23 were endobronchial ultrasonography guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), and 20 cases of CT or US-guided core-needle biopsy. Tumor cell count and sample size were significantly larger for normal bronchoscopy than thin bronchoscopy or EBUS-TBNA samples. Moreover, tumor cell counts for each subsequent biopsy decreased. In all cases, TPS distribution (undiagnosed, <1%, 1–49, 50%≦) was 2.6, 34.6, 31.4, 31.4%, respectively. TPS positive cases using thin bronchoscope was 55.9%, normal bronchoscope was 73.1% and EBUS-TBNA was 78.3%. In early stage adenocarcinoma, TPS was lower compared with advanced stages. Conversely, in squamous cell carcinoma, the rates of TPS were similar regardless of stage. The concordance rate of TPS by biopsy and surgical materials was 86.7%.
Conclusion
Utilizing smaller samples for evaluation, the frequency of TPS was comparable to past clinical trials using larger samples. The differences in TPS were influenced by diagnostic tools, cancer histologic types and staging. The concordance of TPS between EBUS-TBB samples and surgical materials was high.
Trial registration
This study was performed at the Department of Respiratory Medicine at St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital, with ethics approval (#3590) and registered as a clinical trial (UMIN000027030).
The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors has changed chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other malignancies. In recent years, many immune checkpoint inhibitors were developed and approved after promising results in clinical trials. In Japan, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab are approved for the treatment of advanced NSCLC [1‐5].
Pembrolizumab is a humanized anti–programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody that inhibits PD-1 from binding to programmed cell death-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1). In a phase I clinical trial (KEYNOTE-001), pembrolizumab showed antitumor efficacy for patients with advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 positive expression [1]. This trial concluded that pembrolizumab was more effective in tumor cells with more than 50% PD-L1 expression.
Anzeige
A phase III clinical trial (KEYNOTE-024) enrolled 305 previously untreated patients who were diagnosed with advanced NSCLC, with more than 50% PD-L1 expression. This study revealed that pembrolizumab was more effective in progression-free survival, overall survival, and a higher response rate than platinum-based chemotherapy [4].
From these study results, approval of 22C3 assay was granted by the U.S. food and drug administration as a companion diagnostic to predict the clinical response to pembrolizumab treatment [6‐9].
In Japan, small biopsy samples collected by bronchoscopic examination are often used for diagnosing lung cancer [10‐13]. However, since surgically resected specimens and core-needle biopsy samples were used to estimate drug potency in past clinical trials, there is little known regarding the reliability of small biopsy samples [14, 15]. In addition, although some studies evaluated the reliability of small biopsy samples, most of these studies were retrospective in nature, or were assessed by different antibodies [13‐15].
Methods
Aim and study design
The aim of this study is to prospectively investigate the reliability of small samples for NSCLC cases to determine the status of PD-L1 expression. In pathologically confirmed NSCLC, PD-L1 expression was evaluated using companion diagnostic PD-L1 immunohistochemistry at our institution. We evaluated: 1) tumor cell count and sample size, 2) tumor proportion score (TPS): <1, 1–49%, 50%≦ and 3) the concordance rate of TPS by biopsy and surgical samples.
Anzeige
Patient selection
We prospectively enrolled patients who underwent diagnostic biopsy procedures from March 2017 to August 2018. In this study, patients were examined through Japan’s health insurance, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Included patients were suspected of lung cell carcinoma by computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography - computed tomography (PET-CT) imaging. Diagnostic biopsy samples were obtained by flexible bronchoscopy and core-needle biopsy, at initial examination.
Diagnostic procedures
We selected the most appropriate diagnostic method for each case by taking into consideration patient safety and diagnostic rates. For bronchoscopic examinations, endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) (Endoscopic Ultrasound Center; EU-ME2, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was routinely used in combination with endobronchial ultrasonography guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB) and endobronchial ultrasonography guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) with flexible bronchoscope. EBUS-TBB was undertaken using a thin bronchoscope (BF-P260F, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) or normal bronchoscope (BF-1 T260, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). For EBUS-TBB, imaging of the peripheral pulmonary lesions was confirmed using a miniature ultrasound probe (UM-S20-17S, 20 MHz center frequency, radial type, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and samples were obtained by a guide sheath kit (K-201, 203 guide-sheath kit, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). After confirmation of the ultrasound probe within the target lesion, brushing and biopsy forceps were performed alternately, for a minimum of 5 times. EBUS-TBNA was undertaken using a flexible fiberscope (BF-UC260F, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and performed 2 to 3 times with a 22-gauge needle (Single Use Aspiration Needle; NA-201SX-4022, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). CT-guided core needle biopsy was performed 2 to 3 times with a semi-automatic aspiration device (Temno Evolution, Care Fusion Japan, Tokyo, Japan). The needle size was 20 gauge, and the length of the needle was 11 or 15 cm. US-guided core needle biopsy was usually performed at least 3 times.
Pathological diagnosis
Pathological diagnosis was conducted by pathologist using hematoxylin-eosin (HE) stained slides. After the diagnosis of NSCLC, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry staining of each biopsy sample was conducted and assessed by at least two pathologists.
The samples, which were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded, were sliced at a thickness of 4 μm. The sections were processed for 20 min at 97 °C for deparaffinized and inactivating enzymes. Sequentially, the samples were stained for PD-L1 with an anti-human PD-L1 antibody. PD-L1 expression was evaluated in our institution using companion diagnostic PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) (PD-L1 IHC 22C3, pharmDx, Dako/Agilent, Santa Clara, United States) with autostainer Link 48, detecting driver mutation in parallel. Following the standard recommendation of previous publications, PD-L1 protein expression was determined by TPS, which is the percentage of viable tumor cells showing partial or complete membrane staining. PD-L1 expression was classified into three levels: no TPS (<1%), low TPS (1–49%), and high TPS (50%≦). Figure 1 shows typical cases for each TPS level. Using HE and PD-L1 stained slides, we manually assessed the number of tumor cells, the sample size (diameter), the crush rate with a cut-off value of <5, 5–50%, 50%<, and the TPS for each biopsy sample using the slide that contained the most tumor cells.
Fig. 1
The typical cases for each TPS level: < 1, 1–49%, 50%≦. a The TPS was under 1%; no TPS. b The TPS was 20%; low TPS. c The TPS was 80%; high TPS. The TPS level was evaluated by pathologists who completed training courses in TPS estimation
TPS: tumor proportion score
×
Comparison of small biopsy samples and surgical specimens
In patients assessed as early stage NCSLC by diagnostic procedures, small biopsy and resected specimens were compared from the standpoint of TPS after surgical operation. We evaluated the concordance rate for TPS, which was under the 20% threshold to differentiate between small biopsy and surgical specimen.
Statistical analysis
JMP pro 13 (SAS Institute Japan, Tokyo, Japan) was used for statistical analysis. We analyzed the differences of tumor cell counts and sample sizes in each method non-parametrically using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
A total of 153 patients were eligible for this study. Patients’ characteristics are shown in Table 1. The biopsy methods performed for each case were: 110 for EBUS-TBB; 84 for thin bronchoscope, 26 for normal bronchoscope; 23 for EBUS-TBNA, and 20 cases were core-needle biopsy. For pathological subtypes, 59.5% were adenocarcinoma, 35.9% were squamous cell carcinoma, and 4.6% were others. Smoking histories were observed for 86.3% of patients.
Table 2 shows the number of tumor cells, crush artifact or necrotic changes, and sample sizes of each specimen and for each method. Ninety-three percent of cases contained enough tumor cells (over 100 tumor cells) for TPS evaluation. Normal size bronchoscope biopsy method was able to obtain more tumor cells than thin bronchoscope. In small samples that were obtained by thin bronchoscopy, 35.7% of cases showed a crush artifact rate of more than 50%. In this study, the sample sizes for normal bronchoscope and core-needle were significantly larger compared with other methods (Table 3).
Table 2
Tumor cell counts, crush artifact or necrotic changes, and sample size for each method
Figure 2a shows the percentage of TPS for all pathological cases. The ratio of high TPS was 31.4%, low TPS was 31.4% and no TPS was 34.6%. While squamous cell carcinoma represented 72.7% of TPS positive cases, adenocarcinoma was comprised of 57.2%. For each method, TPS positive cases using thin bronchoscope was 55.9%, normal bronchoscope was 73.1%, and EBUS-TBNA was 78.3% (Fig. 2b).
Fig. 2
a The total percentage of TPS for each pathological case. b The total percentage of TPS for each biopsy method. Red indicates high TPS (50%≦), yellow indicates low TPS (1–49%), and blue indicates no TPS (<1%). Gray indicates undiagnosed cases. Ad: adenocarcinoma, Sq: squamous cell carcinoma. TBNA: transbronchial needle aspiration
×
Table 4 shows TPS expression by cancer stage. In adenocarcinoma, early stage cases (stageI and II), showed 16.1% high TPS compared to advanced stage cases (stage III and IV), with 34.5%. In early stage cases, 48.4% showed no TPS. In squamous cell carcinoma, the rates of TPS were similar regardless of stage.
Table 4
The difference of TPS by staging
TPS
high
low
no
undiagnosed
Adenocarcinoma
StageI, II
5
11
15
0
(%)
16.1
35.5
48.4
0
StageIII, IV
20
15
21
2
(%)
34.5
25.9
36.2
3.5
Squamous cell carcinoma
StageI, II
6
6
4
1
(%)
35.3
35.3
23.5
5.9
StageIII, IV
12
14
7
1
(%)
35.3
41.2
20.6
2.9
Tumor cell counts in biopsy samples for each method are shown in Fig. 3. We were able to obtain over 100 tumor cells in nearly every case, which is necessary for evaluating PD-L1 expression. These results showed that earlier samples obtained more tumor cells. However, after the first biopsy, the number of tumor cells for subsequent biopsies decreased. In 11 cases, there were less than 100 tumor cells per sample.
Fig. 3
The subsequent median number of tumor cell counts with 95% confidential interval for each biopsy method. a Comparison of tumor cells using thin bronchoscopy (BF-P260F), (b) normal bronchoscopy (BF-1 T260), (c) EBUS-TBNA, and (d) CT or US-guided core-needle biopsy. EBUS-TBNA: endobronchial ultrasonography - transbronchial needle aspiration. CT: computed-tomography. US: ultra-sonography
×
Table 5 shows a comparison of PD-L1 expression between smaller biopsy samples and surgical specimens in 30 cases. Smaller biopsies were taken by thin bronchoscope. The concordance rate was 86.7%, which was under the 20% threshold to differentiate TPS between small biopsy and resected samples. Additional file 1 shows all raw data of this study.
Table 5
The comparison of PD-L1 expression between small biopsy samples and surgical specimens
Case
Sex
Smoking
Location
Pathology (dominant %)
Size of lesion (mm)
SUV max
BF
Tumor cell count for BF
TPS in BF (%)
TPS in operation (%)
1
F
never
Ling
Ad (papi 85)
24 × 20
4.0
P260F
700
0
10
2
M
former
RL
Ad (acinar 70)
17 × 13
4.0
P260F
160
0
0
3
M
former
Ling
Ad (enteric)
18 × 18
5.6
P260F
600
0
10
4
M
current
LL
Pleomorphic
40 × 28
8.1
P260F
500
50
100
5
M
current
RL
Sq
40 × 35
13.4
P260F
400
20
30
6
F
never
LU
Ad (lepidic 90)
17 × 16
4.1
P260F
140
70
70
7
F
former
LU
Ad (papi 70)
25 × 22
4.6
P260F
1200
0
10
8
M
former
RU
Ad (lepi/aci 60/30)
27 × 25
20.4
P260F
800
0
0
9
F
never
LU
Ad (solid/lepi 60/30)
25 × 18
9.4
P260F
70
50
0
10
F
never
LL
Ad (lepi/aci/papi 50/20/20)
25 × 25
3.9
P260F
280
0
0
11
M
former
LL
Ad (papi 60)
18 × 16
6.3
P260F
220
50
30
12
F
former
RU
Ad (papi/lepi 90/10)
15 × 12
3.1
P260F
170
0
0
13
M
former
LL
Ad (solid 100)
43 × 40
11
P260F
160
90
100
14
F
never
LU
Ad (aci/lepi/papi/micropapi 40/20/20/20)
18 × 17
2.2
P260F
120
40
10
15
M
former
RU
Ad (papi/lepi/solid 30/10/10)
27 × 24
2.9
P260F
340
20
10
16
M
former
LU
Ad (solid//papi/aci 50/30/20)
26 × 12
3.2
P260F
220
0
0
17
M
former
RU
Ad (aci/lepi/papi 65/30/5)
36 × 20
5.3
P260F
530
30
30
18
M
former
RL
Mucinous
64 × 29
9.3
P260F
450
0
0
19
M
former
LU
Squamous
20 × 15
8
P260F
450
30
10
20
F
former
RU
Squamous
12 × 8
14.2
P260F
1000
0
0
21
M
never
RU
Ad (papi/aci/lepi/micropapi 60/20/10/10)
33 × 20
3.4
P260F
100
0
10
22
M
former
RU
Ad (papi/lepi 60/40)
35 × 25
6
P260F
100
30
0
23
F
former
RM
Ad (papi/lepi/aci 60/20/20)
23 × 18
3.8
P260F
700
0
10
24
M
former
RU
Ad (micropapi/aci/papi/lepi 50/20/20/10)
13 × 13
3.1
P260F
600
10
20
25
M
former
LU
Mucinous
25 × 23
1.7
P260F
200
10
0
26
M
former
RM
Large
30 × 25
4.8
P260F
200
70
90
27
M
former
RU
Mucinous
70 × 35
8.2
P260F
300
0
0
28
M
former
RU
Squamous
45 × 20
7
P260F
350
0
0
29
F
former
RU
Ad (solid/papi 80/20)
45 × 38
14.1
P260F
1000
20
0
30
F
former
LU
Squamous
50 × 30
4.8
P260F
50
0
10
Aci acinar, Papi papillary, lepi lepidic, micropapi micropapillary, SUV standardized uptake value, RU right upper lobe, RM right middle lobe, RL right lower lobe, LU left upper segment, Ling left lingular segment, LL left lower lobe
Anzeige
Discussion
This is the first report, to our knowledge, to prospectively investigate TPS for small biopsy samples in clinical practice. Bronchoscopic examinations are widely conducted as an initial diagnostic procedure. Hence, the assessment of reliability for small samples is important in the decision-making process for induction of immuno-checkpoint inhibitor as a first line treatment [1, 4, 5, 13‐15].
For each case in this study, the ratio of TPS (<1, 1–49%, 50%≦) was approximately equal to past studies [5]. In a previous report outlining TPS assessment guidelines, samples should contain at least 100 tumor cells for TPS assessment [16]. Although there were differences in the sample sizes for each method, we were able to obtain at least 100 tumor cells for our small samples. In particular, this study revealed the differences in specimen size between thin bronchoscopy, normal bronchoscopy and other methods. Moreover, our approach revealed that tumor cells from subsequent biopsies decreased which might be due to localized bleeding from repeated biopsies. Therefore, the first and second biopsy samples are considered important for the evaluation of TPS. When there were less than 100 tumor cells per sample, we collected subsequent samples and combined these on one slide for TPS evaluation.
For each pathological subtype, the ratio of TPS positive cases was higher in squamous cell carcinoma as previously reported [17]. These cases were more likely located in the central airway and therefore, normal bronchoscopy could easily reach the target lesion and collect an appropriate specimen size.
For adenocarcinoma cases, there were some differences observed for TPS between early and advanced cancer stages. It has been suggested that PD-L1 expression increases as the stage of cancer advances. On the other hand, in squamous cell carcinoma, there were no significant differences seen for TPS between early and advanced stage cases. Differences in the pathological diagnosis and cancer staging might influence PD-L1 expression [17‐19].
Anzeige
The samples that were obtained by thin bronchoscope tended to collect less tumor cells and show low TPS. This was mainly due to early stage adenocarcinoma, located at the pulmonary peripheral areas, which tended to show low TPS [20]. Another explanation might be that the crush artifact rates were relatively higher for thin bronchoscope samples as previously reported [13]. However, for the comparison of bronchoscopic specimens, which were obtained by thin bronchoscopy or surgically resected, the TPS concordance was relatively high which contrasts with previous retrospective reports [14, 15].
There were some limitations observed in this study. First, this study was performed at a single institution; therefore, these results should be compared against larger multi-center studies. Second, there were less cases for normal bronchoscope, EBUS-TBNA, and core-needle in compared to the number of cases using thin bronchoscope. However, we believe this study emulates real-world circumstances since there are more instances to perform thin bronchoscope. Third, this study included eight post chemotherapy patients (re-biopsy) and seven recurrences after surgery. It could be suggested that these treatments may have influenced PD-L1 expression as previous papers have reported [21]. Forth, this study focused on TPS data only; however, we plan to further evaluate the response of other immune checkpoint inhibitors in future studies.
Conclusion
Small biopsy samples obtained by bronchoscopy were deemed appropriate to evaluate TPS, and the frequency of TPS was comparable to past clinical trials using larger samples for evaluation. Differences in TPS were observed according to diagnostic tools, cancer histologic types and staging. The TPS concordance rate between EBUS-TBB samples and surgical materials was high.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Naoki Shimada, Hironao Kusakari and Chie Okawa from St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Department of Pathological Diagnosis for preparing specimen slides for all cases. The authors also thank Mr. Jason Tonge from St. Marianna University School of Medicine for the linguistic review of this manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was performed at the Department of Respiratory Medicine at St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital, with ethics approval (human research and ethics committee approval reference number 3590) and registered as a clinical trial UMIN000027030. In this study, written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors have no financial or commercial associations that would be considered a conflict of interest in relation to this study.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
