Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 8/2016

27.02.2016 | Topic Paper

A prospective risk-stratified follow-up programme for radically treated renal cell carcinoma patients: evaluation after eight years of clinical use

verfasst von: Christian Beisland, Gigja Guðbrandsdottir, Lars A. R. Reisæter, Leif Bostad, Karin M. Hjelle

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

In mid-2007, we introduced a new risk-stratified follow-up programme (FUP) for surgically treated localized renal cell carcinoma. After inclusion, the patients have been followed prospectively. In this study, we present the results in regard to stratification, completeness of the FUP and recurrences.

Methods

The FUP consists of three risk groups: low risk (LR), intermediate risk (IR) and high risk (HR), based on the risk stratification model introduced by Leibovich et al. (Cancer 97(7):1663–1671, 2003). In all risk groups, the patients are scheduled for ten follow-up visits (FUV) over 5 years, but seven, five and three FUVs, respectively, are outsourced to the patient’s general practitioner (GP). Chest X-ray and abdomen CT are the imaging modalities used in the FUP.

Results

Of 312 included patients, 195 (62.5 %) had a complete FUP. However, in 86 patients the scheduled FUP had to be reduced, leaving 86.3 % of the remaining patients with a complete FUP. By including GPs, the number of FUVs at the hospital was reduced by ~60 %. The 5-year probability for freedom of recurrence is 0.98, 0.84 and 0.52 for the LR, IR and HR groups, respectively. Of 31 recurrences, 20 patients (65 %) were diagnosed within the FUP. Eleven patients (35 %) were diagnosed due to symptoms, and five of these had recurrences in locations not covered by standard imaging. Patients diagnosed within the FUP showed a better prognosis for survival and could in greater part receive tumour-directed treatment.

Conclusions

After 8 years of clinical use, the outcome measures of the FUP seem to be within acceptable ranges.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Beisland C, Medby PC, Beisland HO (2004) Presumed radically treated renal cell carcinoma–recurrence of the disease and prognostic factors for subsequent survival. Scand J Urol Nephrol 38(4):299–305CrossRefPubMed Beisland C, Medby PC, Beisland HO (2004) Presumed radically treated renal cell carcinoma–recurrence of the disease and prognostic factors for subsequent survival. Scand J Urol Nephrol 38(4):299–305CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cancer Registry of Norway (2015) Cancer in Norway 2013—cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence. Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway Cancer Registry of Norway (2015) Cancer in Norway 2013—cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence. Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sand KE et al (2013) Incidentally detected renal cell carcinomas are highly associated with comorbidity and mortality unrelated to renal cell carcinoma. Scand J Urol 47(6):462–471CrossRefPubMed Sand KE et al (2013) Incidentally detected renal cell carcinomas are highly associated with comorbidity and mortality unrelated to renal cell carcinoma. Scand J Urol 47(6):462–471CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ljungberg B et al (1999) Follow-up guidelines for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma based on the occurrence of metastases after radical nephrectomy. BJU Int 84(4):405–411CrossRefPubMed Ljungberg B et al (1999) Follow-up guidelines for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma based on the occurrence of metastases after radical nephrectomy. BJU Int 84(4):405–411CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Stephenson AJ et al (2004) Guidelines for the surveillance of localized renal cell carcinoma based on the patterns of relapse after nephrectomy. J Urol 172(1):58–62CrossRefPubMed Stephenson AJ et al (2004) Guidelines for the surveillance of localized renal cell carcinoma based on the patterns of relapse after nephrectomy. J Urol 172(1):58–62CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandock DS, Seftel AD, Resnick MI (1995) A new protocol for the followup of renal cell carcinoma based on pathological stage. J Urol 154(1):28–31CrossRefPubMed Sandock DS, Seftel AD, Resnick MI (1995) A new protocol for the followup of renal cell carcinoma based on pathological stage. J Urol 154(1):28–31CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Levy DA et al (1998) Stage specific guidelines for surveillance after radical nephrectomy for local renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 159(4):1163–1167CrossRefPubMed Levy DA et al (1998) Stage specific guidelines for surveillance after radical nephrectomy for local renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 159(4):1163–1167CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Zisman A et al (2001) Improved prognostication of renal cell carcinoma using an integrated staging system. J Clin Oncol 19(6):1649–1657PubMed Zisman A et al (2001) Improved prognostication of renal cell carcinoma using an integrated staging system. J Clin Oncol 19(6):1649–1657PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Frank I et al (2002) An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score. J Urol 168(6):2395–2400CrossRefPubMed Frank I et al (2002) An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score. J Urol 168(6):2395–2400CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kattan MW et al (2001) A postoperative prognostic nomogram for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 166(1):63–67CrossRefPubMed Kattan MW et al (2001) A postoperative prognostic nomogram for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 166(1):63–67CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cindolo L et al (2008) Validation by calibration of the UCLA integrated staging system prognostic model for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy. Cancer 113(1):65–71CrossRefPubMed Cindolo L et al (2008) Validation by calibration of the UCLA integrated staging system prognostic model for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy. Cancer 113(1):65–71CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Patard JJ et al (2004) Multi-institutional validation of a symptom based classification for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 172(3):858–862CrossRefPubMed Patard JJ et al (2004) Multi-institutional validation of a symptom based classification for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 172(3):858–862CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cindolo L et al (2005) Comparison of predictive accuracy of four prognostic models for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy: a multicenter European study. Cancer 104(7):1362–1371CrossRefPubMed Cindolo L et al (2005) Comparison of predictive accuracy of four prognostic models for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy: a multicenter European study. Cancer 104(7):1362–1371CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Skolarikos A et al (2007) A review on follow-up strategies for renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy. Eur Urol 51(6):1490–1500 (discussion 1501) CrossRefPubMed Skolarikos A et al (2007) A review on follow-up strategies for renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy. Eur Urol 51(6):1490–1500 (discussion 1501) CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Uzzo RG, Novick AC (2001) Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol 166(1):6–18CrossRefPubMed Uzzo RG, Novick AC (2001) Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol 166(1):6–18CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Leibovich BC et al (2003) Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a stratification tool for prospective clinical trials. Cancer 97(7):1663–1671CrossRefPubMed Leibovich BC et al (2003) Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a stratification tool for prospective clinical trials. Cancer 97(7):1663–1671CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Beisland C et al (2015) Contemporary external validation of the Leibovich model for prediction of progression after radical surgery for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Scand J Urol 49(3):205–210CrossRefPubMed Beisland C et al (2015) Contemporary external validation of the Leibovich model for prediction of progression after radical surgery for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Scand J Urol 49(3):205–210CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pichler M et al (2011) External validation of the Leibovich prognosis score for nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma at a single European center applying routine pathology. J Urol 186(5):1773–1777CrossRefPubMed Pichler M et al (2011) External validation of the Leibovich prognosis score for nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma at a single European center applying routine pathology. J Urol 186(5):1773–1777CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Heng DY et al (2009) Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 27(34):5794–5799CrossRefPubMed Heng DY et al (2009) Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 27(34):5794–5799CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Feuerstein MA et al (2016) Patterns of surveillance imaging after nephrectomy in the Medicare population. BJU Int 117(2):280–286CrossRefPubMed Feuerstein MA et al (2016) Patterns of surveillance imaging after nephrectomy in the Medicare population. BJU Int 117(2):280–286CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Doornweerd BH et al (2014) Chest X-ray in the follow-up of renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 32(4):1015–1019PubMed Doornweerd BH et al (2014) Chest X-ray in the follow-up of renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 32(4):1015–1019PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lopez-Beltran A et al (2006) 2004 WHO classification of the renal tumors of the adults. Eur Urol 49(5):798–805CrossRefPubMed Lopez-Beltran A et al (2006) 2004 WHO classification of the renal tumors of the adults. Eur Urol 49(5):798–805CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Delahunt B et al (2007) Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 31(6):957–960CrossRefPubMed Delahunt B et al (2007) Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 31(6):957–960CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart SB et al (2014) Evaluation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Urological Association renal cell carcinoma surveillance guidelines. J Clin Oncol 32(36):4059–4065CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stewart SB et al (2014) Evaluation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Urological Association renal cell carcinoma surveillance guidelines. J Clin Oncol 32(36):4059–4065CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Zigeuner R et al (2010) External validation of the Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in a single European centre applying routine pathology. Eur Urol 57(1):102–109CrossRefPubMed Zigeuner R et al (2010) External validation of the Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in a single European centre applying routine pathology. Eur Urol 57(1):102–109CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hafez KS, Novick AC, Campbell SC (1997) Patterns of tumor recurrence and guidelines for followup after nephron sparing surgery for sporadic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 157(6):2067–2070CrossRefPubMed Hafez KS, Novick AC, Campbell SC (1997) Patterns of tumor recurrence and guidelines for followup after nephron sparing surgery for sporadic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 157(6):2067–2070CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat van Oostenbrugge TJ et al (2015) The blind spots in follow-up after nephrectomy or nephron-sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 33(6):881–887CrossRefPubMed van Oostenbrugge TJ et al (2015) The blind spots in follow-up after nephrectomy or nephron-sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 33(6):881–887CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A prospective risk-stratified follow-up programme for radically treated renal cell carcinoma patients: evaluation after eight years of clinical use
verfasst von
Christian Beisland
Gigja Guðbrandsdottir
Lars A. R. Reisæter
Leif Bostad
Karin M. Hjelle
Publikationsdatum
27.02.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1796-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

World Journal of Urology 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.