Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 4/2017

18.03.2017 | Original Article

A Prospective Study of Distal Microscopic Spread in Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Pinned and Unpinned Specimen

verfasst von: Aravind S. Kapali, K. Chandramohan, A. V. Jayasudha

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The most important margin in determining the prognosis of rectal cancer is circumferential resection margin (CRM). But, the type of surgery is determined by distal rectal margin (DRM), whether sphincter saving procedure is possible or patient needs an abdominoperineal resection. There are no standardized uniform guidelines for measurement of DRM. The purpose of this study is to assess the distal microscopic spread beyond gross margin after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) in rectal cancers, the factors influencing the distal microscopic spread, the shrinkage of the distal margin in pinned and unpinned fresh and fixed specimen, and to find out the best method of measurement of distal rectal margin. A prospective analytical study was conducted from May 2013 through February 2015 in 47 cases of carcinoma rectum (both AR and APR) who had received neoadjuvant CCRT. Fresh specimen was collected within 30 min of specimen retrieval and a longitudinal cut was made in the distal margin of all specimens. One side of the specimen was pinned onto a cork board and the other side was left unpinned. Measurements were made from the distal end of clinical gross tumor. DRM was determined in both pinned and unpinned sides in fresh and fixed specimen. Of the 47 patients, 2 patients (4.2%) had small focus of tumor beyond gross margins, 1 at 6 mm and another at 3.5 mm on the unpinned side. The average margin for fresh and fixed pinned specimens was 3.67 and 3.47 cm, respectively, with percentage shrinkage of 5.4% for the pinned specimens. The average margin for fresh and fixed unpinned specimens was 3.32 and 2.84 cm, respectively, with percentage shrinkage of 14.4% for the unpinned specimens. Six patients (12.7%) had complete pathological response. Correlation of distal margin was better in pinned specimen. A correction factor of 15% for shrinkage needs to be taken into account while assessing unpinned specimen. Only in 4.2% of patients, there was distal submucosal spread beyond gross margin. Long-term follow up is required for assessing adequacy of DRM post neoadjuvant CCRT.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott N, Jackson P, Al-Jaberi T, Dixon MF, Quirke P, Finan PJ (1995) Total mesorectal excision and local recurrence: a study of tumour spread in the mesorectum distal to rectal cancer. Br J Surg 82:1031–1033CrossRefPubMed Scott N, Jackson P, Al-Jaberi T, Dixon MF, Quirke P, Finan PJ (1995) Total mesorectal excision and local recurrence: a study of tumour spread in the mesorectum distal to rectal cancer. Br J Surg 82:1031–1033CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Fujimoto K, Uchida T (1997) Okuno lymph node metastases detected in the mesorectum distal to carcinoma of the rectum by the clearing method: justification of total mesorectal excision. J Am Coll Surg 184:584–588PubMed Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Fujimoto K, Uchida T (1997) Okuno lymph node metastases detected in the mesorectum distal to carcinoma of the rectum by the clearing method: justification of total mesorectal excision. J Am Coll Surg 184:584–588PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Reynolds JV, Joyce WP, Dolan J, Sheahan K, Hyland JM (1996) Pathological evidence in support of total mesorectal excision in the management of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83:1112–1115CrossRefPubMed Reynolds JV, Joyce WP, Dolan J, Sheahan K, Hyland JM (1996) Pathological evidence in support of total mesorectal excision in the management of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83:1112–1115CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P (2008) What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 26:303CrossRefPubMed Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P (2008) What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 26:303CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986a) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2:996CrossRefPubMed Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986a) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2:996CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gosens MJ, Klaassen RA, Tan-Go I et al (2007) Circumferential margin involvement is the crucial prognostic factor after multimodality treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 13:6617CrossRefPubMed Gosens MJ, Klaassen RA, Tan-Go I et al (2007) Circumferential margin involvement is the crucial prognostic factor after multimodality treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 13:6617CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nash GM, Weiss A, Dasgupta R, Gonen M, Guillem JG, Wong WD (2010) Close distal margin and rectal cancer recurrence after sphincter-preserving rectal resection. Dis Colon rectum 53:1365–1373 Nash GM, Weiss A, Dasgupta R, Gonen M, Guillem JG, Wong WD (2010) Close distal margin and rectal cancer recurrence after sphincter-preserving rectal resection. Dis Colon rectum 53:1365–1373
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiran RP, Lian I, Lavery IC (2011) Does a subcentimeter distal resection margin adversely influence oncologic outcomes in patients with rectal cancer undergoing restorative proctectomy? Dis Colon rectum 54:157–163 Kiran RP, Lian I, Lavery IC (2011) Does a subcentimeter distal resection margin adversely influence oncologic outcomes in patients with rectal cancer undergoing restorative proctectomy? Dis Colon rectum 54:157–163
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986b) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2(8514):996–999CrossRefPubMed Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986b) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2(8514):996–999CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJH, van der Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken JHJM (2002) Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 20(7):1729–1734CrossRefPubMed Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJH, van der Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken JHJM (2002) Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 20(7):1729–1734CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldstein NS, Soman A, Sacksner J (1999) Disparate surgical margin lengths of colorectal resection specimens between in vivo and in vitro measurements: the effects of surgical resection and formalin fixation on organ shrinkage. Am J Clin Pathol 111(3):349–351CrossRefPubMed Goldstein NS, Soman A, Sacksner J (1999) Disparate surgical margin lengths of colorectal resection specimens between in vivo and in vitro measurements: the effects of surgical resection and formalin fixation on organ shrinkage. Am J Clin Pathol 111(3):349–351CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bujko K, Rutkowski A, Chang GJ, Michalski W, Chmielik E, Kusnierz J (2012) Is the 1-cm rule of distal bowel resection margin in rectal cancer based on clinical evidence? A systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 19(3):801–808. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-2035-2 CrossRefPubMed Bujko K, Rutkowski A, Chang GJ, Michalski W, Chmielik E, Kusnierz J (2012) Is the 1-cm rule of distal bowel resection margin in rectal cancer based on clinical evidence? A systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 19(3):801–808. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-011-2035-2 CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomes RM, Bhandare M, Desouza A, Bal M, Saklani AP (2015) Role of intraoperative frozen section for assessing distal resection margin after anterior resection. Int J Color Dis 30(8):1081–1089CrossRef Gomes RM, Bhandare M, Desouza A, Bal M, Saklani AP (2015) Role of intraoperative frozen section for assessing distal resection margin after anterior resection. Int J Color Dis 30(8):1081–1089CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutkowski A, Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Chmielik E, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Wojnar A (2008) Polish colorectal study group distal bowel surgical margin shorter than 1 cm after preoperative radiation for rectal cancer: is it safe? Ann Surg Oncol 15:3124–3131. doi:10.1245/s10434-008-0125-6 CrossRefPubMed Rutkowski A, Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Chmielik E, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Wojnar A (2008) Polish colorectal study group distal bowel surgical margin shorter than 1 cm after preoperative radiation for rectal cancer: is it safe? Ann Surg Oncol 15:3124–3131. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-008-0125-6 CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Andreola S, Leo E, Belli F et al (2001) Adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum surgically treated with a <10-mm distal clearance: preliminary results in 35 N0 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 8:611–615CrossRefPubMed Andreola S, Leo E, Belli F et al (2001) Adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum surgically treated with a <10-mm distal clearance: preliminary results in 35 N0 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 8:611–615CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hermanek P, Junginger T (2005) The circumferential resection margin in rectal carcinoma surgery. Tech Coloproctol 9:193–199CrossRefPubMed Hermanek P, Junginger T (2005) The circumferential resection margin in rectal carcinoma surgery. Tech Coloproctol 9:193–199CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, Scott N, Finan PJ, Johnston D et al (1994) Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 344:707–711CrossRefPubMed Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, Scott N, Finan PJ, Johnston D et al (1994) Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 344:707–711CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Søreide O (2004) Norwegian rectal cancer group. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon rectum 47:48–58 Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Søreide O (2004) Norwegian rectal cancer group. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon rectum 47:48–58
23.
Zurück zum Zitat de Haas-Kock DF, Baeten CG, Jager JJ, Langendijk JA, Schouten LJ, Volovics A et al (1996) Prognostic significance of radial margins of clearance in rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 83:781–785CrossRefPubMed de Haas-Kock DF, Baeten CG, Jager JJ, Langendijk JA, Schouten LJ, Volovics A et al (1996) Prognostic significance of radial margins of clearance in rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 83:781–785CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee YC, Kim H, Lee KY, Sohn SK et al (2007) Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:462–469CrossRefPubMed Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee YC, Kim H, Lee KY, Sohn SK et al (2007) Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:462–469CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Zorcolo L, Rosman AS, Restivo A, Pisano M, Nigri GR, Fancellu A, Melis M (2012) Complete pathologic response after combined modality treatment for rectal cancer and long-term survival: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19(9):2822–2832CrossRefPubMed Zorcolo L, Rosman AS, Restivo A, Pisano M, Nigri GR, Fancellu A, Melis M (2012) Complete pathologic response after combined modality treatment for rectal cancer and long-term survival: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19(9):2822–2832CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A Prospective Study of Distal Microscopic Spread in Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Pinned and Unpinned Specimen
verfasst von
Aravind S. Kapali
K. Chandramohan
A. V. Jayasudha
Publikationsdatum
18.03.2017
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0975-7651
Elektronische ISSN: 0976-6952
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-017-0637-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.