Description of interviewees
Table
1 provides a demographic description of interview participants. Interviewees represented a range of physician specialties, had been practicing medicine for between 6 and 28 years, and were slightly over 50% male. All except one participant reported being moderately or very comfortable with the EHR. Our analysis did not identify differences in the themes described below by specialty, years of practice or comfort with the EHR.
Table 1Participant demographics
Infectious Disease | Female | 13 | Very |
Hospitalist | Male | 8 | Very |
General Surgery | Female | 6 | Moderately |
Hospitalist | Male | 9 | Moderately |
Emergency Medicine | Female | 6 | Moderately |
Gastroenterology | Male | 26 | Moderately |
Neurology | Female | 26 | Moderately |
Pulmonology | Male | 28 | Very |
Dermatology | Male | 8 | Moderately |
We found that physicians noted specific benefits to using an EHR. For example, one physician noted the ease of using the EHR while conducting rounds, “As it relates to patient care, it makes it much easier. I was actually on the floor rounding when you called initially. It makes it easier. Certainly we can pull up any data any time that we need it. We have those little computers on the walls and stuff. It’s not like we have to go back to the main nursing desk to get the information.” Another noted that communication with patients and outside the health system can happen significantly faster, “It probably gets there faster. In the old days, I used to dictate a letter. In the 1990s I had a Dictaphone. I would see a patient, I’d dictate a letter, and then it would be transcribed. Then I had to sign it, and it was sent out. That might take a week.” Finally, another noted the increase in efficiency of communication among colleagues, “I think it gets a—the information a little bit more at your fingertips and embeds it in a place you’re already looking for the information, anyhow. I think it’s truncated the notes, so we’re not getting as verbose in the notes. I think that’s been one benefit where some of the communication between partners to be able to flag those kinds of things.”
In addition, we identified four major themes related to managing change from EHR implementation: impact of changes to the EHR, dealing with changes, factors that facilitate adaptation, and impact on patient care. Below we describe subthemes identified in each of these major themes with example quotations.
Theme 1. Impact of changes
We also examined how use of an EHR impacts physicians and ways in which that requires physicians to adapt their practice. Some felt the impact was minor while others reported a more substantial impact. For example, one physician told us,” Then the other thing that’s very frustrating people, once you get in a groove, let’s say you know what you’re doing, it’s working for you, and then there’s these major up changes that they just change everything from what the screen looks like and so forth… Not that it’s never gonna change, it will, but just to make it so crippling to you, is just—people complain about it.” Another acknowledged that changes cause an initial disruption but they could quickly adjust, “I would say upgrades in the electronic health record are more impactful. Because those happen pretty often, and sometimes they’re subtle. But, they’re enough to slow you down for a couple days. Even changes in color and changes in where the buttons are will—it’s surprisingly disruptive. You get right back up to where you were, as long as it’s the same system that started out with. So, it’s not like it’s a long-term disruption, but those are the things that I think are more day-to-day disrupting.”
Theme 2. Dealing with changes
Theme 3. Factors that facilitate adaptation
Within the theme of factors that facilitate adaptation, physicians discussed maintaining a positive mindset toward change, seeing benefits of the EHR, tailored training and physician voice in modifications, and learning from colleagues as facilitating adaptation to the EHR. Table
2 below provides example quotes and potential improvement strategies associated with each factor.
Table 2Specialty, Sex, Years at AMC and Self-reported Comfort with EHR
Positive Mindset toward Change | “Understanding how to do your job is part of being a doctor, and part of being a good doctor.” | • Cultivate specialty-specific physician champions |
“The last big change that I remember was when they changed all the templates, the font, and everything looked different. It didn’t really impact it too much. Maybe the first two patients that I did in clinic. It only really affects me in clinic because that’s where I’m doing all my major notes.” |
Recognizing Benefits of the EHR | “I mean despite all the stuff I just said, nobody is gonna recommend that we go back to paper. I think everybody understands the value of it, and this is the direction. It is a good thing. I can see all the things.” | • Highlight benefits of EHR and upgrades in all communication efforts • Provide explanation for why changes are made |
“Yeah, it’s better. It’s not paper charts. Again, I remember paper charts. Everybody complains about, oh, EHR takes so long. No. Paper charts take forever’” |
“… we often didn’t do it [chart temperatures], because it was just too burdensome to do on a daily basis. So, we’d just do it occasionally when we’re trying to figure it out. But, now we have this extra information available to us at all times. I’m not sure if I know if that’s helpful to patients or not. It seems helpful.” |
“I think from an efficiency standpoint, I can see, definitely, gains there.” |
“Prior to that, we were using—to my knowledge, at least—three different, coexisting systems. … it was highly inefficient.” |
“I mean to put that into perspective of what it was like in the 1990s, every service had their own chart. I had a chart from a patient I saw in gastroenterology, and the patient was also seeing a cardiologist and a rheumatologist. They had their charts. There was no unified chart.” |
Tailored training and physician voice in modifications | “At least in the Department of Emergency Medicine, we’ve managed to get several people onto different committees.” | • Provide general as well as specialty-specific training • Incorporate stakeholder input into training development |
“If it was actually specific for my specific inpatient job, like let’s just talk about consultants, and we had some say in it.” |
“I think that they feel like if it’s somebody from our division, they have our best interests in mind. Not to say that somebody outside the division couldn’t do that training, but I think it would have to be—it would likely need to be connected with somebody in the division, so it feels like it’s more personalized.” |
“I think it works well for us because it’s someone that we know that inherently knows our workflow. Sell that idea and efficiency to our group.” |
“It has all these stock phrases that make life so much simpler… They made ‘em, and then I stole them.” |
Learning from Colleagues | “It’s usually things like at a division meeting someone will say, I can’t figure out how to do this, and someone else would say, oh, you just have to do this and this and this.” | • Create electronic mechanisms that facilitate sharing of stock phrases • Allow time for colleagues to share challenges and solutions |
“I just had some other colleagues show me tips or tricks, and you can use the share function to steal tools other people have made.” |
“I think you need some initial basic instruction, but you learn more on the job from your colleagues.” |
Theme 4. Impact on patient care
Physicians discussed ways in which the availability of the EHR influenced patient encounters. Some physicians described ways in which the EHR made inpatient care more efficient. For example, one told us, “And back when I used paper charts, for better or worse, you really only had the talking to the patient, trying to get their information, maybe talking to one of their physicians and then reading through the chart, which even my huge, huge chart was a limited amount of work.” Physicians also felt the EHR made patient care safer, as one stated, “I think it has probably improved safety of patients, because we have—we actually know more, you’re not guessing. You’re not taking people’s words for it. You actually have the person’s records from five years ago, for example. You actually know what happened.”
Several physicians noted that while the EHR made information more readily accessible, this information also introduced new challenges. One physician described balancing the volume of information available electronically with gathering information from the patient in this way, “But, I mean, it’s not uncommon to think that you have an entire picture of what’s been going on, when you’ve look at the chart in-depth, and actually then get up and go and see the patient, find out that that’s not at all what’s going on.”
Some physicians, however, felt that using an EHR resulted in decreased patient contact. For example, one physician told us, “You can get such a good history from a chart, the patient was just in the hospital, and so you know day-to-day what happened, and you’re writing up this whole timeline, and you know everything that happened. Your actual evaluation of the patient might be a little shorter. You might just sort of say, okay, so, I understand from your chart that this, this, this, happened. Is that true? And they say, sure. And then you ask them a few more questions. As opposed to really talking to them for a long period of time.” Another told us, “Well, you just can’t see as many patients. You can’t get as many in… You’re documenting in the computer. You’re doctoring the computer.”
To manage the impact on patient care, physicians utilized different approached depending on the situation. When patients became frustrated at being asked to repeat information they felt should be in the EHR, one physician would tell patients “…there’s something to be gained from you telling me, because one, I can figure out whether or not that’s—you understand what’s going on, to some extent, and maybe you went somewhere else and I don’t know about that.” In response to the need to face the computer while asking the patient question, one physician stated, “I make jokes. I say, “How is the back of my head looking?” What am I supposed to do? I apologize. Sometimes I’ll move the patient. Instead of having them—I say hey, why don’t—especially if it’s somebody who I don’t know, or if it’s gonna be a lengthy conversation, I’ll say why don’t you sit over here, and I’ll move a chair so it’s to the side of me, so that I can periodically look at the computer and look at them.”