Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2020

26.05.2020 | 2020 SAGES Oral

A randomized controlled trial comparing right and left lateral decubitus starting position on outcomes in colonoscopy

verfasst von: Alison Greene, Mark Borgoankar, Kathy Hodgkinson, Chantae Garland, Lisa Bacque, David Pace

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 8/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Patient positioning in colonoscopy has been proposed as a simple and inexpensive technique to increase luminal distention and improve navigation through the large bowel. We sought to determine if the right lateral (RL) starting position compared to the standard left lateral (LL) starting position could improve outcomes in colonoscopy.

Methods

We conducted a randomized controlled trial of 185 patients who were undergoing an elective colonoscopy. Patients were randomized to either a right lateral decubitus starting position or a left lateral decubitus starting position and the primary outcome measure was cecal intubation time. Secondary outcome measures included cecal intubation rate, patient discomfort, and sedation dosage. All colonoscopists who had successfully completed a colonoscopy skills improvement course were included in the trial. A sample size was calculated prior to the start of the study and outcomes were analyzed using univariate and multiple regression analyses.

Results

A total of 94 patients were randomized to RL starting position and 91 patients were randomized to LL starting position. No difference was found in time to cecal intubation comparing the RL starting position (542.6 s, SD 360.7 s) to LL starting position (497.85 s, SD 288.3 s) (p = 0.354). Variables associated with prolonged cecal intubation time included female gender, General Surgery specialty, less than 5 years of endoscopist experience, a high patient discomfort score, amount of water used, and number of position changes required to reach the cecum. There was no difference in any of the secondary outcome measures aside from the amount of midazolam used, with more midazolam used for patients starting in the right lateral decubitus position.

Conclusion

This study failed to show an association between cecal intubation time and patient position comparing right and left lateral starting position.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Facciorusso A, Triantafyllou K, Murad MH, Prokop LJ, Tziatzios G, Muscatiello N, Singh S (2018) Compared abilities of endoscopic techniques to increase colon adenoma detection rates: a network meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 17(12):2439–2454CrossRef Facciorusso A, Triantafyllou K, Murad MH, Prokop LJ, Tziatzios G, Muscatiello N, Singh S (2018) Compared abilities of endoscopic techniques to increase colon adenoma detection rates: a network meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 17(12):2439–2454CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat East JE, Suzuki N, Arebi N, Bassett P, Saunders BP (2007) Position changes improve visibility during colonoscope withdrawal: a randomized, blinded, crossover trial{A figure is presented}. Gastrointest Endosc 65:263–269CrossRef East JE, Suzuki N, Arebi N, Bassett P, Saunders BP (2007) Position changes improve visibility during colonoscope withdrawal: a randomized, blinded, crossover trial{A figure is presented}. Gastrointest Endosc 65:263–269CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Vergis N, McGrath AK, Stoddart CH, Hoare JM (2015) Right or left in COLonoscopy (ROLCOL)? A randomized controlled trial of right-versus left-sided starting position in colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 110:1576–1581CrossRef Vergis N, McGrath AK, Stoddart CH, Hoare JM (2015) Right or left in COLonoscopy (ROLCOL)? A randomized controlled trial of right-versus left-sided starting position in colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 110:1576–1581CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao S et al (2019) Impact of the supine position versus left horizontal position on colonoscopy insertion: a 2-center, randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 89:1193–1201.e1CrossRef Zhao S et al (2019) Impact of the supine position versus left horizontal position on colonoscopy insertion: a 2-center, randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 89:1193–1201.e1CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Vergis N, Scarborough AJ, Morris JA, Hoare JM (2018) Prone or left for colonoscopy? A randomized controlled trial of prone versus left-sided starting position for colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 52:82–86CrossRef Vergis N, Scarborough AJ, Morris JA, Hoare JM (2018) Prone or left for colonoscopy? A randomized controlled trial of prone versus left-sided starting position for colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 52:82–86CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Uddin FS et al (2013) Prone positioning of obese patients for colonoscopy results in shortened cecal intubation times: a randomized trial. Dig Dis Sci 58:782–787CrossRef Uddin FS et al (2013) Prone positioning of obese patients for colonoscopy results in shortened cecal intubation times: a randomized trial. Dig Dis Sci 58:782–787CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG et al (2010) CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. BMJ 340:c869CrossRef Altman DG et al (2010) CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. BMJ 340:c869CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Saunders BP, Fukumoto M, Halligan S et al (1996) Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women? Gastrointest Endosc 43:124–126CrossRef Saunders BP, Fukumoto M, Halligan S et al (1996) Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women? Gastrointest Endosc 43:124–126CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Zuber-Jeger I, Endlicher E, Gelbman CM (2008) Factors affecting cecal and ileal intubation time in colonoscopy. Med Klin (Munich) 103(7):477–481CrossRef Zuber-Jeger I, Endlicher E, Gelbman CM (2008) Factors affecting cecal and ileal intubation time in colonoscopy. Med Klin (Munich) 103(7):477–481CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah SG, Saunders BP, Brooker JC, Williams CB (2000) Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers. Gastrointest Endosc 52:1–8CrossRef Shah SG, Saunders BP, Brooker JC, Williams CB (2000) Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers. Gastrointest Endosc 52:1–8CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee S et al (2014) Colonoscopy procedural skills and training for new beginners. World J Gastroentrol 20:16984–16995CrossRef Lee S et al (2014) Colonoscopy procedural skills and training for new beginners. World J Gastroentrol 20:16984–16995CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A randomized controlled trial comparing right and left lateral decubitus starting position on outcomes in colonoscopy
verfasst von
Alison Greene
Mark Borgoankar
Kathy Hodgkinson
Chantae Garland
Lisa Bacque
David Pace
Publikationsdatum
26.05.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 8/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07661-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.